Research Article

Effect of the premarital sexual health/reproductive health training on knowledge level and marital adjustment of the newly married women

Volume: 45 Number: 3 September 30, 2020
EN TR

Effect of the premarital sexual health/reproductive health training on knowledge level and marital adjustment of the newly married women

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted in order to determine the effect of the premarital Sexual Health/Reproductive Health Training on the knowledge level, marital adjustment and sexual satisfaction of the newly married woman.
Materials and Methods: This study was an experimental study based on the design of pretest-posttest with control group. The study was performed with 149 women.
Results: In the pretest measurements of the study, total score of The Assessment Form on Sexual Knowledge Level of the experimental group was 65.19 ± 9.88 and total score of The Assessment Form on Sexual Knowledge Level of the control group was 63.33 ± 11.51, and it is observed that total scores were similar between the groups. It was determined that the posttest total score was significantly higher in the experimental group (74.08 ± 11.98) compared to the control group (62.33 ± 12.57). It was determined that Marital Adjustment Scale, Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction and The Marital Beliefs and Attitudes Scale; Health Belief Model total scores of the women in the experimental and the control groups did not show a statistically significant difference.
Conclusion: The training was effective in increasing the knowledge levels of the women on sexual matters but it did not affect their marital adjustment and sexual satisfaction in a four-month period. 

Keywords

Marital adjustment , Premarital training , Sexual satisfaction , Sexual health , Reproductive health

References

  1. REFERENCES 1. Budak S. Psychology Dictionary. 3th ed. Ankara, TR: Science and Art Publications; 2005.
  2. 2. Vural BK, Temel AB. Belıefs and attıtudes towards marrıage: Analysıs of valıdıty and relıabılıty of health belıef model ınstrument for turkısh socıety. Journal of Ege University Nursing Faculty. 2007;23(2):31-50.
  3. 3. Kahraman Z. The effect of a marriage and family life education program to marital adjustment and family system for married women [PhD Thesis]. Istanbul, Marmara Üniversitesi, 2011.
  4. 4. Kayma Güneş D. To determinate the correlation between family relationship and problem solving abilities of the couples? who are at the process of divorce [PhD Thesis]. Ankara, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, 2007. 5. Gülsün M, Ak M, Bozkurt A. Marriage and sexuality from a psychiatric point of view. Current Approaches In Psychıatry. 2009;1(1): 68-79.
  5. 6. Cohen O, Finzi-Dottan R. Reasons for divorce and mental health following the breakup. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2012;53(8): 581-601. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2012.719413
  6. 7. Abalı S. Considering the sexual life as a cause of divorce by women [PhD Thesis]. Istanbul, Marmara Üniversitesi, 2006.
  7. 8. Brezsnyak M, Whisman M. Sexual desire and relationship functioning: The effects of marital satisfaction and power. Journal Of Sex&Marital Therapy. 2004; 30(3):199-217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230490262393.
  8. 9. Erbek E, Beştepe E, Akar H, Alpkan L, Eradamlar N. The association between sexuality and dyadic adjustment: A comparative study in three groups of couples. The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences. 2005;18(2): 72-81.
  9. 10. Şen B. A group of fiance couples' who applied to get marry, the evaluations, idea and knowledge that are releated to the marriage and 'pre-marital couple education [PhD Thesis]. Ankara, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, 2009.
  10. 11. Öztürk CŞ, Arkar H. The relationships between marital adjustment and sexual satisfaction in married couples. Literatür Sempozyum. 2014;1(3):16-24.
MLA
Kaplan, Özlem, and Tülay Bülbül. “Effect of the Premarital Sexual Health Reproductive Health Training on Knowledge Level and Marital Adjustment of the Newly Married Women”. Cukurova Medical Journal, vol. 45, no. 3, Sept. 2020, pp. 899-0, doi:10.17826/cumj.677397.