Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing venous port catheter implantation

Year 2017, Volume: 42 Issue: 3, 604 - 605, 30.09.2017

Sevgi Kesici Verda Tuna Selma Özkan Ercüment Cengiz Aygen Türkmen

https://doi.org/10.17826/cutf.324602

Cited By: 3

Abstract

Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing venous port catheter implantation 

Keywords

venous port catheter

Venöz port kateter implantasyonu uygulanan hastaların retrospektif analizi

Abstract

Venöz port kateter implantasyonu uygulanan hastaların retrospektif analizi

Keywords

venöz port kateter

References

• 1. Kıral N, Saraç G, Yüksel T, Salepçi B, Çağlayan B. Nadir görülen port kateter komplikasyonu. Tüberküloz ve Toraks Dergisi. 2010;58:177-80.
• 2. Samancı T, Mandel NM, Bozkurt AK, Kutlu F, Uras C. 115 kanser hastasında port komplikasyonlarının değerlendirilmesi. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi. 2004;35:71-7.
• 3. John TC, Jeffrey PL, Todd MM, Livingston S, Joseph AK. A prospective randomized trial demonstrating valved implantable ports have fewer complications and lower overall cost than nonvalved implantable ports. Am J Surg. 2004;188:722-7.
• 4. Kock HJ, Pietsch M, Krause U, Wilke H, Eigler FW. Implantable vascular access systems: experience in 1500 patients with totally implanted central venous port systems. World J Surg. 1998;22:12-6.
• 5. Arch P. Port navigation: let the journey begin. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2007;11:485-8.
• 6. Polderman KH, Girbes AJ. Central venous catheter use part:1 mechanical complications. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:1-17.
• 7. Gullo SM. Implanted ports. technologic advances and nursing care issues, Nurs Clin North Am. 1993;28:859-71.
• 8. Ahmad I, Ray CE Jr. Complications of central venous access devices. In: Central Venous Access (Ed CE Ray Jr.):151-65. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001.