Factors affecting adaptation of patients with intestinal stoma: a relational study

Year 2020, Volume: 45 Issue: 2, 428 - 438, 30.06.2020

Yasemin Akıl Seçil Taylan

https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.640154

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between descriptive, disease and surgical characteristics of patients with intestinal stoma.
Materials and Methods: This descriptive-relational study was conducted with 128 patients with intestinal stoma who applied to the stomatotherapy unit of Balcalı Hospital, Çukurova University. The research data were collected with Questionnaire for Individuals with Bowel Stoma, Adaptation Scale for Individuals with Ostomy and Inventory of Coping Ways.
Results: The Ostomy Adapted Scale for Individuals (ADSS) of the patients with stomata scored 58.61 ± 14.12, 23.98 ± 8.43, 15.84 ± 3.44, 12.53 ± 4.73, 6.25 ± 2.077 from total, acceptance, anxiety / anxiety, social adjustment, and anger subscales. Stepwise Multiple Linear Regression was found to be associated with the status of having ileostomy, being a woman, being older, being single, returning to work after stoma, using emotional coping ways to cope with problems, and inability to perform self-stoma care.
Conclusion: Stomata compliance scores of patients with stoma were found to be low and they needed methods to support stomata adaptation.

Keywords

Colostomy, ileostomy, adaptation to the stoma

Bağırsak stomalı hastaların stomaya uyumlarını etkileyen faktörler: ilişkisel çalışma

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışma, bağırsak stoması olan hastaların stomalarına uyumlarının tanımlayıcı, hastalık ve cerrahi özellikleriyle olan ilişkisini değerlendirmek amacıyla yapılmıştır.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Çukurova Üniversitesi Balcalı Hastanesi Stomaterapi ünitesine başvuran bağırsak stoması olan 128 hasta ile yürütülen çalışma tanımlayıcı-ilişkisel tiptedir. Araştırma verileri Bağırsak Stoması Olan Bireylere Yönelik Soru Formu, Ostomili Bireylere Yönelik Uyum Ölçeği ve Başa Çıkma Yolları Envanteri ile toplanmıştır.
Bulgular: Stomalı hastaların Ostomili Bireylere Yönelik Uyum Ölçeği (OBYUÖ) toplam, kabul etme, kaygı/endişe, sosyal uyum, öfke alt boyutlarından sırasıyla 58.61±14.12, 23.98 ±8.43, 15.84±3.44, 12.53±4.73, 6.25±2,077 puan almışlardır. Stepwise Multıble Doğrusal Regresyonda ileostomisi olma, kadın olma, ileri yaşta olma, bekar olma, stoma sonrası çalışma yaşamına dönme, sorunları ile baş etmede duygusal baş etme yollarını kullanma ve kendi stoma bakımını yapamamama durumu ile yetersiz-kötü stoma uyum sürecinin ilişkili olduğu belirlendi.
Sonuç: Stomalı hastaların stomaya uyum puanlarının düşük ve stomaya uyum sağlama destekleyici yöntemlere gereksinimleri olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. 

Keywords

Kolostomi, ileostomi, stomaya uyum, stomaya uyum.

References

• 1. Burch J. Exploring the conditions leading to stoma-forming surgery. Br J Nurs 2005;14:94-98.
• 2.Thorpe G, Arthur A, McArthur M. Adjusting to bodily change following stoma formation: a phenomenological study. Disabil Rehabil 2016;38:1791-1802.
• 3. Thorpe G, McArthur M, Richardson B. Bodily change following faecal stoma formation: qualitative interpretive synthesis. J Adv Nurs 2009;65:1778-1789.
• 4. Karadağ A., Menteş B.B., Üner A., et al. Impact of Stomatherapy on Quality of Life in Patients with Permanent Colostomies or IleostomiesInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease 2003;18, :234-238
• 5. Karadağ A., Z. GB, Korkut H., et al. Ostomili Bireylere Yönelik Uyum Ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye Uyarlanması Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi 2011;27206-211.
• 6. Bazalinski D, Salacinska I, Wiech P, et al. Life satisfaction and self-efficacy in patients with stoma. . Prog Health Sci 2014; 4:22-30.
• 7. Engel J, Kerr J, Schlesinger-Raab A, et al. Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: a four-year prospective study. Ann Surg 2003;238:203-213.
• 8. Nasvall P, Dahlstrand U, Lowenmark T, et al. Quality of life in patients with a permanent stoma after rectal cancer surgery. Qual Life Res 2017;26:55-64.
• 9. Notter J, Chalmers F. Living with a colostomy: a pilot study. . Gastrointestinal Nursing 2012; 10.
• 10. Persson E, Hellstrom AL. Experiences of Swedish men and women 6 to 12 weeks after ostomy surgery. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2002;29:103-108.
• 11. Tao H, Songwathana P, Isaramalai SA, et al. Taking good care of myself: a qualitative study on self-care behavior among Chinese persons with a permanent colostomy. Nurs Health Sci 2014;16:483-489.
• 12. Goldberg M, Aukett LK, Carmel J, et al. Management of the patient with a fecal ostomy: best practice guideline for clinicians. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2010;37:596-598.
• 13. Taylor C, Morgan L. Quality of life following reversal of temporary stoma after rectal cancer treatment. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2011;15:59-66. 14. Simmons KL. A view from here: psychological issues in colostomy care. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2014;41:55-59. 15. Karaveli S, Özbayır T, Karacabay K. Kolorektal kanser ameliyatı geçiren hastaların ameliyat öncesi ve ameliyat sonrası dönemde yaşadıkları deneyimlerin incelenmesi. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2014;17:90-96. 16. Beaver K, Latif S, Williamson S, et al. An exploratory study of the follow-up care needs of patients treated for colorectal cancer. J Clin Nurs 2010;19:3291-3300. 17. Brown H, Randle J. Living with a stoma: a review of the literature. J Clin Nurs 2005;14:74-81.
• 18. de la Quintana Jimenez P, Pastor Juan C, Prados Herrero I, et al. A prospective, longitudinal, multicenter, cohort quality-of-life evaluation of an intensive follow-up program for patients with a stoma. Ostomy Wound Manage 2010;56:44-52.
• 19. Karabulut HK, Dinc L, Karadag A. Effects of planned group interactions on the social adaptation of individuals with an intestinal stoma: a quantitative study. J Clin Nurs 2014;23:2800-2813.
• 20. Simmons KL, Smith JA, Maekawa A. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Ostomy Adjustment Inventory-23. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2009;36:69-76.
• 21. Folkman S, Lazarus RS. An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. J Health Soc Behav 1980;21:219-239.
• 22. Şahin NH, Durak A. Stresle başa çıkma tarzları envanteri: Üniversite öğrencileri için uyarlaması. . Türk psikoloji dergisi ; 1995;10 58–73.
• 23. Simmons KL, Smith JA, Bobb KA, et al. Adjustment to colostomy: stoma acceptance, stoma care self-efficacy and interpersonal relationships. J Adv Nurs 2007;60:627-635.
• 24. Bekkers MJ, van Knippenberg FC, van den Borne HW, et al. Psychosocial adaptation to stoma surgery: a review. J Behav Med 1995;18:1-31.
• 25. Brydolf M, Berndtsson I, Lindholm E, et al. Evaluation of a Swedish version of the Ostomy Adjustment Scale. Scand J Caring Sci 1994;8:179-183.
• 26. Piwonka MA, Merino JM. A multidimensional modeling of predictors influencing the adjustment to a colostomy. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 1999;26:298-305.
• 27. Hamashima C. Long-term quality of life of postoperative rectal cancer patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002;17:571-576.
• 28. Ito N, Ishiguro M, Uno M, et al. Prospective longitudinal evaluation of quality of life in patients with permanent colostomy after curative resection for rectal cancer: a preliminary study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2012;39:172-177.
• 29. Cheng F, Meng AF, Yang LF, et al. The correlation between ostomy knowledge and self-care ability with psychosocial adjustment in Chinese patients with a permanent colostomy: a descriptive study. Ostomy Wound Manage 2013;59:35-38.
• 30. Fan R. Which care? Whose responsibility? And why family? A Confucian account of long-term care for the elderly. J Med Philos 2007;32:495-517.
• 31. Richbourg L, Thorpe JM, Rapp CG. Difficulties experienced by the ostomate after hospital discharge. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2007;34:70-79.
• 32. Koçhan K, Erdem E, Babacan G, et al. İnflamatuar barsak hastalıklarında aktivite tayininde endoskopik aktivite indeksleri ile laboratuar parametreleri arasındaki ilişki. . Akad Gastroenterol Derg 2014;13:101–106.
• 33. Beaver K, Williamson S, Chalmers K. Telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: views and experiences of patients and specialist breast care nurses. J Clin Nurs 2010;19:2916-2924.
• 34. Persson E, Berndtsson I, Carlsson E, et al. Stoma-related complications and stoma size - a 2-year follow up. Colorectal Dis 2010;12:971-976.
• 35. Bakalim O. Self-Confident Approach in Coping with Stress and Social Appearance Anxiety of Turkish University Students: The Mediating Role of Body Appreciation International Journal of Higher Education 2016;5:134-143.
• 36. Weinstein ND. Unrealistic optimism about future life events. J Pers Soc Psychol 1980 806–820.
• 37. Çam O, Gümüş AB. Meme kanserli kadınlar için duygusal destek odaklı hemşirelik girişimleri. CÜ Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 2006;10 52-60.
• 38. Deckard K, Dunn J, Lussier G, et al. Relationship and Social-emotional Adjustment in Different Family Context. Social Development 2002;11:571-588.
• 39. Bakker DA, Fitch MI, Gray R, et al. Patient-health care provider communication during chemotherapy treatment: the perspectives of women with breast cancer. Patient Educ Couns 2001;43:61-71.
• 40. Pittman J, Bakas T, Ellett M, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the ostomy complication severity index. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2014;41:147-157.