Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Incidence of complications in anesthesia applications during magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients

Year 2022, Volume: 47 Issue: 4, 1455 - 1462, 28.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.1125733

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate complications during sedation of pediatric patients undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to determine precautions to take to minimize complications while providing a safer environment for patients and healthcare workers.
Materials and Methods: The files of consecutive patients taken for 6 months in the MRI unit of our hospital were reviewed retrospectively, and a total of 122 pediatric patients were included. Primary parameter in the study is set as peroperative and postoperative complication incidence. Interventions to treat, demographic data, ASA scores, accompanying diseases, agents and their doses for sedation, sedation and recovery time are the secondary parameters and their correlation to complication incidence is assessed.
Results: Using the data of 122 patients, complication rate is found as 6.6% (8/122). During sedation, desaturation in 6, bradycardia and desaturation in 1 and airway obstruction in 1 of the patients was observed. Desaturation was seen in 2, bradycardia was seen in 1 of the patients during recovery. Use of ketamine didn’t decrease the dose of midazolam or propofol used for maintenance but decreased the dose of propofol used for induction.
Conclusion: Complications may occur despite the presence of an experienced anesthesia team. It is important to anticipate such complications and intervene in a timely manner.

References

  • Reference1 Maddirala S, and Theagrajan A. Non-operating room anaesthesia in children. Indian J Anaesth. 2019;63(9):754-762.
  • Reference2 Sethi D, Gupta M, Subramanian S. A randomized trial evaluating low doses of propofol infusion after intravenous ketamine for ambulatory pediatric magnetic resonance imaging. Saudi J Anaesth. 2014;8(4):510-6.
  • Reference3 Tith S, Lalwani K, Fu R. Complications of three deep sedation methods for magnetic resonance imaging. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012;28(2):178-84.
  • Reference4 Weissend EE, Litman RS. Paediatric anaesthesia outside the operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2001;14(4):437-40.
  • Reference5 Practice advisory on anesthetic care for magnetic resonance imaging: an updated report by the american society of anesthesiologists task force on anesthetic care for magnetic resonance imaging. Anesthesiology. 2015;122(3):495-520.
  • Reference6 Serafini G, Ongaro L, Mori A, Rossi C, Cavallora F, Tagliaferri et al. Anesthesia for MRI in the paediatric patient. Minerva Anestesiol. 2005;71(6):361-6.
  • Reference7 Missant C,Van de Velde M. Morbidity and mortality related to anaesthesia outside the operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2004;17(4):323-7.
  • Reference8 Couloures KG, Beach M, Cravero JP, Monroe KK, Hertzog JH. Impact of provider specialty on pediatric procedural sedation complication rates. Pediatrics. 2011;127(5):e1154-60.
  • Reference9 Melloni C. Morbidity and mortality related to anesthesia outside the operating room. Minerva Anestesiol. 2005;71(6):325-34.
  • Reference10 Biber JL, Allareddy V, Allareddy V, Gallagher SM, Couloures KG, Speicher DG et al. Prevalence and Predictors of Adverse Events during Procedural Sedation Anesthesia-Outside the Operating Room for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and Colonoscopy in Children: Age Is an Independent Predictor of Outcomes. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16(8):e251-9.
  • Reference11 Cravero JP, Blike GT, Beach M, Gallagher SM, Hertzog JH, Havidich JE et al. Incidence and nature of adverse events during pediatric sedation/anesthesia for procedures outside the operating room: report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. Pediatrics. 2006;118(3):1087-96.
  • Reference12 Gozal D, Drenger B, Levin PD, Kadari A, Gozal Y. A pediatric sedation/anesthesia program with dedicated care by anesthesiologists and nurses for procedures outside the operating room. J Pediatr. 2004;145(1):47-52.
  • Reference13 Van De Velde M, Kuypers M, Teunkens A, Devroe S. Risk and safety of anesthesia outside the operating room. Minerva Anestesiol. 2009;75(5):345-8.
  • Reference14 Usher AG, Kearney RA, Tsui BCH. Propofol total intravenous anesthesia for MRI in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005;15(1):23-8.
  • Reference15 Demir G, Cukurova Z, Eren G, Tekdos Y, Hergunsel O. The effect of "multiphase sedation" in the course of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging on children, parents and anesthesiologists. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2012;62(4):511-9.

Pediatrik hastalarda manyetik rezonans görüntüleme sırasında anestezi uygulamalarında görülen komplikasyonların insidansı

Year 2022, Volume: 47 Issue: 4, 1455 - 1462, 28.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.1125733

Abstract

Amaç: Çalışmamızda, Manyetik Rezonans Görüntüleme (MRG) Ünitesi’nde anestezi altında görüntüleme yapılan pediatrik hastalarda, uygulanan sedasyona bağlı gelişen komplikasyonları inceleyip; bu komplikasyonları daha aza indirmek için gereken önlemleri tespit ederek, hasta ve sağlık personeline daha güvenli bir ortam sağlanması amaçlanmıştır.
Gereç ve Yöntem: MRG Ünitesi’nde 6 ay boyunca alınan hastaların dosyaları retrospektif olarak incelenip, toplam 122 pediatrik hasta çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Çalışmadaki birincil parametre, peroperatif ve postoperatif komplikasyon insidansı olarak belirlenmiştir. Bu komplikasyonlara olan müdahale yöntemleri, demografik verileri, ASA skorları, eşlik eden hastalıkları, kullanılan anestezik ajanlar ve dozları, sedasyon ve derlenme süreleri ikincil parametreler olarak incelenmiş; komplikasyon insidansı ile korelasyonları değerlendirilmiştir.
Bulgular: Toplam 122 hastaya ait veriler çalışmaya dahil edilmiş; komplikasyon oranı %6.6 (8/122) olarak tespit edilmiştir. Sedasyon süresince; 6 hastada desaturasyon, 1 hastada bradikardi ve desaturasyon, 1 hastada havayolu obstrüksiyonu saptanmıştır. Derlenme sırasında, 2 hastada desaturasyon, 1 hastada bradikardi gelişmiştir. Ketamin kullanılan hastalardaki diğer anestezik ajanların dozlarında herhangi bir azalma olup olmadığı incelendiğinde midazolam dozunun ve idamede kullanılan propofol dozunun azalmadığı; ancak, indüksiyonda kullanılan propofol dozunun anlamlı şekilde azaldığı görülmüştür.
Sonuç: MRG için anestezi sırasında, deneyimli bir anestezi ekibinin varlığına rağmen komplikasyonlar oluşabilir. Bu tür komplikasyonların öngörülmesi ve zamanında müdahale edilebilmesi için hazırlıklı olmak önemlidir.

References

  • Reference1 Maddirala S, and Theagrajan A. Non-operating room anaesthesia in children. Indian J Anaesth. 2019;63(9):754-762.
  • Reference2 Sethi D, Gupta M, Subramanian S. A randomized trial evaluating low doses of propofol infusion after intravenous ketamine for ambulatory pediatric magnetic resonance imaging. Saudi J Anaesth. 2014;8(4):510-6.
  • Reference3 Tith S, Lalwani K, Fu R. Complications of three deep sedation methods for magnetic resonance imaging. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012;28(2):178-84.
  • Reference4 Weissend EE, Litman RS. Paediatric anaesthesia outside the operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2001;14(4):437-40.
  • Reference5 Practice advisory on anesthetic care for magnetic resonance imaging: an updated report by the american society of anesthesiologists task force on anesthetic care for magnetic resonance imaging. Anesthesiology. 2015;122(3):495-520.
  • Reference6 Serafini G, Ongaro L, Mori A, Rossi C, Cavallora F, Tagliaferri et al. Anesthesia for MRI in the paediatric patient. Minerva Anestesiol. 2005;71(6):361-6.
  • Reference7 Missant C,Van de Velde M. Morbidity and mortality related to anaesthesia outside the operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2004;17(4):323-7.
  • Reference8 Couloures KG, Beach M, Cravero JP, Monroe KK, Hertzog JH. Impact of provider specialty on pediatric procedural sedation complication rates. Pediatrics. 2011;127(5):e1154-60.
  • Reference9 Melloni C. Morbidity and mortality related to anesthesia outside the operating room. Minerva Anestesiol. 2005;71(6):325-34.
  • Reference10 Biber JL, Allareddy V, Allareddy V, Gallagher SM, Couloures KG, Speicher DG et al. Prevalence and Predictors of Adverse Events during Procedural Sedation Anesthesia-Outside the Operating Room for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and Colonoscopy in Children: Age Is an Independent Predictor of Outcomes. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16(8):e251-9.
  • Reference11 Cravero JP, Blike GT, Beach M, Gallagher SM, Hertzog JH, Havidich JE et al. Incidence and nature of adverse events during pediatric sedation/anesthesia for procedures outside the operating room: report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. Pediatrics. 2006;118(3):1087-96.
  • Reference12 Gozal D, Drenger B, Levin PD, Kadari A, Gozal Y. A pediatric sedation/anesthesia program with dedicated care by anesthesiologists and nurses for procedures outside the operating room. J Pediatr. 2004;145(1):47-52.
  • Reference13 Van De Velde M, Kuypers M, Teunkens A, Devroe S. Risk and safety of anesthesia outside the operating room. Minerva Anestesiol. 2009;75(5):345-8.
  • Reference14 Usher AG, Kearney RA, Tsui BCH. Propofol total intravenous anesthesia for MRI in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005;15(1):23-8.
  • Reference15 Demir G, Cukurova Z, Eren G, Tekdos Y, Hergunsel O. The effect of "multiphase sedation" in the course of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging on children, parents and anesthesiologists. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2012;62(4):511-9.
There are 15 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Clinical Sciences
Journal Section Research
Authors

Özge Özen 0000-0003-3714-5142

Filiz Üzümcügil 0000-0001-9161-3248

Aysun Ankay Yılbaş 0000-0001-6196-3191

Başak Akça 0000-0003-4069-2462

Heves Karagöz 0000-0002-6020-0464

Publication Date December 28, 2022
Acceptance Date August 26, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 47 Issue: 4

Cite

MLA Özen, Özge et al. “Incidence of Complications in Anesthesia Applications During Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pediatric Patients”. Cukurova Medical Journal, vol. 47, no. 4, 2022, pp. 1455-62, doi:10.17826/cumj.1125733.