Verbal fluency tests together with mini mental state examination may be useful in differentiating between dementia and mild cognitive impairment stages according to Alzheimer's disease clinical criteria

Year 2022, Volume: 47 Issue: 4, 1403 - 1411, 28.12.2022

Didem Öz Yağmur Özbek İşbitiren İlayda Kıyı Görsev Yener

https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.1179620

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Short screening tests are frequently used in clinical practice for dementia screening and diagnosis. The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) is one of the most frequently used. MMSE is known to have high sensitivity for dementia. However, MMSE is often not sufficient in the differentiation of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), which is considered a transitional stage between healthy aging and dementia, and in the differential diagnosis of dementia of Alzheimer's Disease type (ADD) and MCI. Verbal fluency tests (semantic and phonemic), which can be applied in a time-limited medical settings, can be used as an alternative to MMSE or when used with MMSE higher diagnostic accuracy can be obtained for the early stages of AD and MCI. The aim of this study is to present the sensitivity, specificity and cut-off points of MMSE, semantic and phonemic fluency tests determined by ROC curve analysis.
Materials and Methods: Age-education-sex matched 72 healthy individuals, 72 MCI and 72 AD dementia individuals were included in the study. MMSE, semantic and phonemic fluency tests were applied to all participants. Sensitivity and specificity values and cut-off scores of MMSE, semantic and phonemic fluency tests in distinguishing healthy, MCI and ADD individuals were obtained by ROC curve analysis.
Results: ROC analyses show that all three tests can significantly discriminate between healthy, ADD and MCI individuals. It was seen that the discrimination power of the MMSE was higher than the verbal fluency tests when the areas under the ROC curve were compared. The specificity of semantic fluency was found to be higher than MMSE and phonemic fluency in distinguishing individuals with ADD and MCI.
Conclusion: The findings of the study show that MMSE is stronger than semantic and phonemic fluency in distinguishing healthy individuals, but its specificity is lower than semantic fluency in distinguishing MCI and AD dementia. In order to increase the diagnostic accuracy, it may be effective to add verbal fluency tests, especially semantic fluency test, which can be applied in a short time, to clinical practice.

Keywords

Mini Mental, verbal fluency, dementia, diagnostic accuracy, MCI, Alzheimer’s disease

Alzheimer hastalığı klinik ölçütlerine göre demans ve hafif kognitif bozukluk ayrımında sözel akıcılık testlerinin mini mental durum testi ile birlikte kullanılması yararlı olabilir

Abstract

Amaç: Demans tarama ve tanısı için klinik pratikte sıklıkla kısa tarama testleri kullanılmaktadır. Mini Mental Durum Testi (MMDT) en sık kullanılan testlerin başında gelmektedir. MMDT’nin demans için duyarlı olduğu bilinmektedir. Ancak, sağlıklı yaşlanma ile demans arasında bir geçiş evresi olarak kabul edilen Hafif Kognitif Bozukluk (HKB)’un ayırt edilmesinde ve Alzheimer Hastalığı tipi demans (AHD) ile HKB’nin ayırıcı tanısında MMDT çoğu zaman yeterli olmamaktadır. Kısa sürede uygulanabilen sözel akıcılık testleri (semantik ve fonemik) MMDT’ye alternatif ya da MMDT ile kullanıldığında HKB ve AH’nin erken evreleri için tanısal doğruluğu daha yüksek bir tarama testi elde edilebilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı MMDT, semantik ve fonemik akıcılık testlerinin ROC eğrisi analizleri ile belirlenen duyarlılık, özgüllük ve kesme puanı değerlerinin sunulmasıdır.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya yaş-eğitim-cinsiyet açısından uyumlu 72 sağlıklı birey, 72 HKB ve 72 AHD’li birey dahil edilmiştir. Tüm katılımcılara MMDT, semantik ve fonemik akıcılık testleri uygulanmıştır. ROC eğrisi analizleri ile MMDT, semantik ve fonemik akıcılık testlerinin sağlıklı, HKB ve AHD’li bireyleri ayırt etmedeki duyarlılık ve özgüllük değerleri ile kesme puanları elde edilmiştir.
Bulgular: ROC analizleri her üç testin de sağlıklı, AHD ve HKB’li bireyleri istatistiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde ayırt edebildiğini göstermektedir. ROC eğrisi altında kalan alanlar karşılaştırıldığında MMDT’nin ayırt etme gücünün sözel akıcılık testlerinden yüksek olduğu görülmüştür. AHD ve HKB’li bireylerin ayrımında semantik akıcılığın özgüllüğü MMDT ve fonemik akıcılıktan yüksek bulunmuştur.
Sonuç: Çalışmanın bulguları MMDT’nin sağlıklı bireyleri ayırt etmede semantik ve fonemik akıcılıktan daha güçlü olduğunu, ancak HKB ve AH ayrımında özgüllüğünün semantik akıcılıktan düşük olduğunu göstermektedir. Tanı doğruluğunun artırılması için kısa zamanda uygulanabilen sözel akıcılık testlerinin, özellikle semantik akıcılık testinin klinik pratiğe eklenmesi yararlı olabilir.

Keywords

Mini-Mental, sözel akıcılık, demans, tanı doğruluğu, HKB, Alzheimer hastalığı

References

• Ackermann H, Mathiak K, Riecker A. The contribution of the cerebellum to speech production and speech perception: clinical and functional imaging data. The cerebellum. 2007 Sep;6(3):202-13.
• Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, Dubois B, Feldman HH, Fox NC, Gamst A, Holtzman DM, Jagust WJ, Petersen RC, Snyder PJ. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging‐Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's & dementia. 2011 May;7(3):270-9.
• Arevalo-Rodriguez I, Smailagic N, Roque-Figuls M, Ciapponi A, Sanchez-Perez E, Giannakou A, Pedraza OL, Cosp XB, Cullum S. Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the early detection of dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2021(7).
• Breton A, Casey D, Arnaoutoglou NA. Cognitive tests for the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), the prodromal stage of dementia: Meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. International journal of geriatric psychiatry. 2019 Feb;34(2):233-42.
• Catani M, Mesulam M. The arcuate fasciculus and the disconnection theme in language and aphasia: history and current state. cortex. 2008 Sep 1;44(8):953-61.
• Chang YL, Chen TF, Tseng WY. White matter pathways underlying Chinese semantic and phonological fluency in mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia. 2020 Dec 1;149:107671.
• DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988 Sep 1:837-45.
• Galimberti D, Scarpini E. Progress in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of neurology. 2012 Feb;259(2):201-11.
• Gauthier S, Touchon J. Subclassification of mild cognitive impairment in research and clinical practice. InAlzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Annual 2004 2004 Mar 1 (pp. 70-79). CRC Press.
• Grogan A, Green DW, Ali N, Crinion JT, Price CJ. Structural correlates of semantic and phonemic fluency ability in first and second languages. Cerebral cortex. 2009 Nov 1;19(11):2690-8.
• Güngen C, Ertan T, Eker E, Yaşar R, Engin F. Standardize mini mental test’in Türk toplumunda hafif demans tan› s› nda geçerlik ve güvenilirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2002;13(4):273-81.
• Gustavson DE, Elman JA, Panizzon MS, Franz CE, Zuber J, Sanderson-Cimino M, Reynolds CA, Jacobson KC, Xian H, Jak AJ, Toomey R. Association of baseline semantic fluency and progression to mild cognitive impairment in middle-aged men. Neurology. 2020 Aug 25;95(8):e973-83.
• Henry JD, Crawford JR. A meta-analytic review of verbal fluency performance in patients with traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology. 2004 Oct;18(4):621.
• İlkmen YS, Büyükişcan ES. Verbal Fluency Tests: Normative Data Stratified by Age and Education in an Istanbul Sample. Turkish Journal of Neurology/Turk Noroloji Dergisi. 2022 Jun 1;28(2).
• Jack Jr CR, Bennett DA, Blennow K, Carrillo MC, Dunn B, Haeberlein SB, Holtzman DM, Jagust W, Jessen F, Karlawish J, Liu E. NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's & Dementia. 2018 Apr 1;14(4):535-62.
• Kavé G, Knafo-Noam A. Lifespan development of phonemic and semantic fluency: Universal increase, differential decrease. Journal of clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 2015 Aug 9;37(7):751-63.
• Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, Ames D, Ballard C, Banerjee S, Brayne C, Burns A, Cohen-Mansfield J, Cooper C, Costafreda SG. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. The Lancet. 2020 Aug 8;396(10248):413-46.
• McDonnell M, Dill L, Panos S, Amano S, Brown W, Giurgius S, Small G, Miller K. Verbal fluency as a screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. International Psychogeriatrics. 2020 Sep;32(9):1055-62.
• McDowd J, Hoffman L, Rozek E, Lyons KE, Pahwa R, Burns J, Kemper S. Understanding verbal fluency in healthy aging, Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychology. 2011 Mar;25(2):210.
• McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack Jr CR, Kawas CH, Klunk WE, Koroshetz WJ, Manly JJ, Mayeux R, Mohs RC. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's & dementia. 2011 May 1;7(3):263-9.
• Mitchell AJ. The clinical significance of subjective memory complaints in the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a meta‐analysis. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry: A journal of the psychiatry of late life and allied sciences. 2008 Nov;23(11):1191-202.
• Patterson C. World Alzheimer report 2018.
• Peraita H, Chacón J, Díaz-Mardomingo C, Martínez-Arias R. Profiles of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in the elderly. The Spanish journal of psychology. 2015;18.
• Robinson G, Shallice T, Bozzali M, Cipolotti L. The differing roles of the frontal cortex in fluency tests. Brain. 2012 Jul 1;135(7):2202-14.
• Rodríguez-Aranda C, Johnsen SH, Eldevik P, Sparr S, Wikran GC, Herder M, Vangberg TR. Neuroanatomical correlates of verbal fluency in early Alzheimer’s disease and normal aging. Brain and language. 2016 Apr 1;155:24-35.
• Shao Z, Janse E, Visser K, Meyer AS. What do verbal fluency tasks measure? Predictors of verbal fluency performance in older adults. Frontiers in psychology. 2014 Jul 22;5:772.
• Tahami Monfared AA, Byrnes MJ, White LA, Zhang Q. Alzheimer’s Disease: Epidemiology and Clinical Progression. Neurology and Therapy. 2022 Mar 14:1-7.
• Tumac AY, Canbeyli DD. Normal Deneklerde Frontal Hasarlara Duyarli Bazi Testlerde Performansa Yaş ve Eğitimin Etkisi (Doctoral dissertation, Master Thesis). Istanbul University, Istanbul).
• Weller J, Budson A. Current understanding of Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis and treatment. F1000Research. 2018;7.
• Whiteside DM, Kealey T, Semla M, Luu H, Rice L, Basso MR, Roper B. Verbal fluency: language or executive function measure. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult. 2016 Jan 2;23(1):29-34.