Self Adeziv Rezin Simanlar

Abstract

Sabit protetik restorasyonlar diş hekimliğinde en çok tercih edilen restorasyonlardır. Sabit pro- tetik restorasyonların kullanımındaki artışa bağlı olarak, restorasyon ve dişi yapıştırmak amacıyla kullanılan simanlar da önem kazanmaktadır. Klinisyenlerin tercihi, mekanik özellikleri iyi olan, kul- lanımı kolay, biyouyumlu ve farklı renk seçenekleri olan simanlardan yanadır. Bu amaçla self adeziv rezin simanlar geliştirilmiştir. Self adeziv rezin simanlar, geleneksel simanların uygulama kolaylığı ile kompozit rezin simanların iyi mekanik özellikleri ve estetik üstünlüklerini birleştirmeyi amaç- layan, klinik uygulama basamaklarını azaltan ve böylelikle de teknik hassasiyet kaynaklı hataları en aza indiren simanlardır. Bu derleme, self adeziv rezin simanların kullanımı, klinik prosedürleri, özellikleri ve gelişimlerini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Adezyon, self adeziv rezin, siman ABSTRACT Fixed prosthetic restorations are most preferable restorations in dentistry. Because of that, cements used for bonding fixed restoration become popular in recent years. Clinicians prefer cements with good mechanical properties, that are easy to use, that are biocompatible, and with different color options. For this purpose, self-adhesive resin cements have been developed. Self-adhesive resin cements are cements that aim to combine the ease of application of tradi- tional cements with the good mechanical properties and esthetic advantages of composite resin cements, reducing the clinical application steps and thus minimizing technical sensitivity-related errors. This review aims to evaluate the use, clinical procedures, characteristics, and development of self-adhesive resin cements. Keywords: Adhesion, self adhesive resin, cement

Keywords

• Adhesion
• self adhesive resin
• cement

References

1. 1. Lad PP, Kamath M, Tarale K, Kusugal PB. Practical clinical considera- tions of luting cements: a review. J Int Oral Health. 2014;6(1):116-120.
2. 2. Manso AP, Silva NR, Bonfante EA, Pegoraro TA, Dias RA, Carvalho RM. Cements and adhesives for all-ceramic restorations. Dent Clin North Am. 2011;55(2):311-332. [CrossRef]
3. 3. Simon JF, Darnell LA. Considerations for proper selection of dental cements. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2012;33(1):28-30, 32, 34-25; quiz 36, 38.
4. 4. Burgess JO, Ghuman T, Cakir D. Self-adhesive resin cements. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2010;22(6):412-419. [CrossRef]
5. 5. Sunico-Segarra M, Segarra A. Resin Cements: Factors Affecting Clinical Performance, In Sunico-Segarra M, Segarra A, eds, A Practi- cal Clinical Guide to Resin Cements. Springer. 2015:2-22.
6. 6. Köroğlu AE, Kurtoğlu O, Geleneksel C, Hakkında Bir Derleme ADS. Çalışması. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hekim Fak Derg. 2012;2012:205-216.
7. 7. Weiser F, Behr M. Self-adhesive resin cements: A clinical review. J Prosthodont. 2015;24(2):100-108. [CrossRef]
8. 8. De Angelis F, Minnoni A, Vitalone LM, et al. Bond strength evaluation of three self-adhesive luting systems used for cementing composite and porcelain. Oper Dent. 2011;36(6):626-634. [CrossRef]

9. 9. Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Ende A, et al. Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive composites to dentin and enamel. Dent Mater. 2013;29(2):221-230. [CrossRef] 10. Tjan AH, Li T. Seating and retention of complete crowns with a new adhesive resin cement. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67(4):478-483. [CrossRef]
10. 11. Manso AP, Carvalho RM. Dental cements for luting and bonding res- torations: self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Clin North Am. 2017;61(4):821-834. [CrossRef]
11. 12. Gerth HU, Dammaschke T, Züchner H, Schäfer E. Chemical analysis and bonding reaction of RelyX Unicem and Bifix composites--a com- parative study. Dent Mater. 2006;22(10):934-941. [CrossRef]
12. 13. Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Self-adhe- sive resin cements: a literature review. J Adhes Dent. 2008;10(4): 251-258.
13. 14. Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJ. Self-adhesive resin cements- chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38(4):295-314. [CrossRef]
14. 15. Burke FJ, Crisp RJ, Richter B. A practice-based evaluation of the han- dling of a new self-adhesive universal resin luting material. Int Dent J. 2006;56(3):142-146. [CrossRef]
15. 16. Hattar S, Hatamleh MM, Sawair F, Al-Rabab'ah M. Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to tooth structure. Saudi Dent J. 2015;27(2):70-74. [CrossRef]
16. 17. Aguiar TR, André CB, Correr-Sobrinho L, Arrais CA, Ambrosano GM, Giannini M. Effect of storage times and mechanical load cycling on dentin bond strength of conventional and self-adhesive resin luting cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111(5):404-410. [CrossRef]
17. 18. Rodrigues RF, Ramos CM, Francisconi PA, Borges AF. The shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin and enamel: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113(3):220-227. [CrossRef]
18. 19. Moghaddas MJ, Hossainipour Z, Majidinia S, Ojrati N. Comparison of the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to enamel and dentin with different protocol of application. Electron Phys. 2017;9(8):4985-4991. [CrossRef]
19. 20. Pilo R, Papadogiannis D, Zinelis S, Eliades G. Setting characteristics and mechanical properties of self-adhesive resin luting agents. Dent Mater. 2017;33(3):344-357. [CrossRef]
20. 21. Hitz T, Stawarczyk B, Fischer J, Hämmerle CHF, Sailer I. Are self- adhesive resin cements a valid alternative to conventional resin cements? A laboratory study of the long-term bond strength. Dent Mater. 2012;28(11):1183-1190. [CrossRef]
21. 22. Furuichi T, Takamizawa T, Tsujimoto A, Miyazaki M, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA. Mechanical properties and sliding-impact wear resistance of self-adhesive resin cements. Oper Dent. 2016;41(3):E83-E92. [CrossRef]
22. 23. Shafiei F, Kamran S, Memarpour M, Aghaei T. Bond strength and adhesive interfacial micromorphology of self-adhesive resin cements: effect of reduced times of pre-etching. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019;11(11):e984-e990. [CrossRef]
23. 24. Pathak S, Shashibhushan KK, Poornima P, Reddy VS. In vitro Evalu- ation of Stainless Steel Crowns cemented with resin-modified Glass Ionomer and Two New Self-adhesive resin Cements. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;9(3):197-200. [CrossRef]
24. 25. Petropoulou A, Vrochari AD, Hellwig E, Stampf S, Polydorou O. Water sorption and water solubility of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(5):674-679. [CrossRef]
25. 26. Pan Y, Xu X, Sun F, Meng X. Surface morphology and mechanical properties of conventional and self-adhesive resin cements after aqueous aging. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018;27:e20170449. [CrossRef]
26. 27. Almeida CM, Meereis CTW, Leal FB, Ogliari AO, Piva E, Ogliari FA. Evaluation of long-term bond strength and selected proper- ties of self-adhesive resin cements. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e15. [CrossRef]
27. 28. Kirsten M, Matta RE, Belli R, et al. Hygroscopic expansion of self- adhesive resin cements and the integrity of all-ceramic crowns. Dent Mater. 2018;34(8):1102-1111. [CrossRef]
28. 29. Roedel L, Bednarzig V, Belli R, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U, Zorzin J. Self- adhesive resin cements: pH-neutralization, hydrophilicity, and hygroscopic expansion stress. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(5):1735- 1741. [CrossRef] 30. Mjör IA, Toffenetti F. Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports. Quintessence Int. 2000;31(3):165-179.
29. 31. D'Arcangelo C, Zarow M, De Angelis F, et al. Five-year retrospective clinical study of indirect composite restorations luted with a light- cured composite in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(2):615- 624. [CrossRef]
30. 32. Pellizzari VA, Michels AC, Luiz ST, de Souza EM, Tabchoury C, Rached RN. Fluoride ion release of self-adhesive resin cements and their potential to inhibit in situ enamel and dentin demineralization. Oper Dent. 2017;42(5):548-558. [CrossRef]
31. 33. Abo-Hamar SE, Hiller KA, Jung H, Federlin M, Friedl KH, Schmalz G. Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel. Clin Oral Investig. 2005;9(3):161-167. [CrossRef]
32. 34. Bitter K, Maletic A, Neumann K, Breschi L, Sterzenbach G, Tasch- ner M. Adhesive durability inside the root canal using self-adhesive resin cements for luting fiber posts. Oper Dent. 2017;42(6):E167-E176. [CrossRef]
33. 35. Özlek E, Neelakantan P, Matinlinna JP, Belli S, Ugur M, Kavut I. Adhe- sion of two new glass fiber post systems cemented with self-adhe- sive resin cements. Dent J (Basel). 2019;7(3):80. [CrossRef]
34. 36. Sarkis-Onofre R, Skupien JA, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Pereira-Cenci T. The role of resin cement on bond strength of glass-fiber posts luted into root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Oper Dent. 2014;39(1):E31-E44. [CrossRef]
35. 37. Sokolowski G, Szczesio A, Bociong K, et al. Dental resin cements-the influence of water sorption on contraction stress changes and Hydroscopic expansion. Materials (Basel) 2018;11(6) [CrossRef]
36. 38. Skupien JA, Sarkis-Onofre R, Cenci MS, Moraes RRd, Pereira-Cenci T. A systematic review of factors associated with the retention of glass fiber posts. Braz Oral Res. 2015;29:1-8. [CrossRef]
37. 39. Aktemur Türker S, Uzunoğlu E, Yılmaz Z. Effects of dentin moisture on the push-out bond strength of a fiber post luted with different self-adhesive resin cements. Restor Dent Endod. 2013;38(4):234- 240. [CrossRef]
38. 40. Macedo VC, Faria e Silva AL, Martins LR. Effect of cement type, relin- ing procedure, and length of cementation on pull-out bond strength of fiber posts. J Endod. 2010;36(9):1543-1546. [CrossRef]
39. 41. Lopes ACO, Machado CM, Bonjardim LR, et al. The Effect of CAD/CAM Crown Material and Cement Type on Retention to Implant Abut- ments. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):e552-e556. [CrossRef]
40. 42. Ramazanzadeh BA, Merati M, Shafaee H, Dogon L, Sohrabi K. In-vitro evaluation of an experimental method for bonding of orthodontic brackets with self-adhesive resin cements. European J Gen Dent. 2013;2(3):264-269. [CrossRef]
41. 43. Calais JG, Söderholm KJ. Influence of filler type and water exposure on flexural strength of experimental composite resins. J Dent Res. 1988;67(5):836-840. [CrossRef]
42. 44. Cal E, Celik EU, Turkun M. Microleakage of IPS empress 2 inlay resto- rations luted with self-adhesive resin cements. Oper Dent. 2012;37(4):417-424. [CrossRef]
43. 45. Liebermann A, Roos M, Stawarczyk B. The effect of different storage media on color stability of self-adhesive composite resin cements for up to one year. Materials (Basel). 2017;10(3):300. [CrossRef]
44. 46. Chang B, Goldstein R, Lin CP, Byreddy S, Lawson NC. Microleakage around zirconia crown margins after ultrasonic scaling with self- adhesive resin or resin modified glass ionomer cement. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(1):73-80. [CrossRef]
45. 47. Tabatabaei MH, Matinfard F, Ahmadi E, Ranjbar Omrani L, Sadeghi Mahounak F. Color stability of ceramic veneers cemented with self- adhesive cements afteraccelerated aging. FrontDent. 2019;16(5):393-
46. 401. [CrossRef]
47. 48. Altintas SH, Usumez A. HPLC analysis of HEMA released from two different adhesive systems. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;91(2):924-929. [CrossRef]
48. 49. D'Alpino PHP, Moura GEDD, Barbosa SCA, et al. Differential cytotoxic effects on odontoblastic cells induced by self-adhesive resin cements as a function ofthe activation protocol. Dent Mater. 2017;33(12):1402- 1415. [CrossRef] 50. Kurt A, Altintas SH, Kiziltas MV, et al. Evaluation of residual monomer release and toxicity of self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater J. 2018;37(1):40-48. [CrossRef]
49. 51. Alvarez MMP, Carvalho RG, Barbosa SCA, et al. Oxidative stress induced by self-adhesive resin cements affects gene expression, cel- lular proliferation and mineralization potential of the MDPC-23 odontoblast-like cells. Dent Mater. 2019;35(4):606-616. [CrossRef]
50. 52. Şişmanoğlu S, Demirci M, Schweikl H, et al. Cytotoxic effects of dif- ferent self-adhesive resin cements: cell viability and induction of apoptosis. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020;12(2):89-99. [CrossRef]
51. 53. Alkurt M, Duymus ZY, Sisci T. Comparison of the effects of cytotoxic- ity and antimicrobial activities of self-adhesive, eugenol and non- eugenol temporary and traditional cements on gingiva and pulp living cells. J Adv Oral Res. 2019;10(1):40-48. [CrossRef]
52. 54. Beier US, Kapferer I, Dumfahrt H. Clinical long-term evaluation and failure characteristics of 1,335 all-ceramic restorations. Int J Pros- thodont. 2012;25(1):70-78.
53. 55. van Dijken JW, Hasselrot L. A prospective 15-year evaluation of extensive dentin-enamel-bonded pressed ceramic coverages. Dent Mater. 2010;26(9):929-939. [CrossRef] 56. Taschner M, Krämer N, Lohbauer U, et al. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays luted with self-adhesive resin cement: a 2-year in vivo study. Dent Mater. 2012;28(5):535-540. [CrossRef]
54. 57. Marcondes M, Souza N, Manfroi FB, Burnett LH, Jr, Spohr AM. Clini- cal evaluation of indirect composite resin restorations cemented with different resin cements. J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(1):59-67. [CrossRef]
55. 58. Vogl V, Hiller KA, Buchalla W, Federlin M, Schmalz G. Controlled, pro- spective, randomized, clinical split-mouth evaluation of partial ceramic crowns luted with a new, universal adhesive system/resin cement: results after 18 months. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(9):2481- 2492. [CrossRef]
56. 59. Brondani LP, Pereira-Cenci T, Wandsher VF, Pereira GK, Valandro LF, Bergoli CD. Longevity of metal-ceramic crowns cemented with self- adhesive resin cement: a prospective clinical study. Braz Oral Res. 2017;31:e22. [CrossRef]
57. 60. Baader K, Hiller KA, Buchalla W, Schmalz G, Federlin M. Self-adhesive luting of partial ceramic crowns: selective enamel etching leads to higher survival after 6.5 years in vivo. J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(1):69-79. [CrossRef]