FARKLI YÜZEY DEKONTAMİ̇NASYON YÖNTEMLERİ̇Nİ̇N CAD/CAM YÜZEYLERİ̇N BAĞLANMA DAYANIM DEĞERLERİ̇ ÜZERİ̇NE ETKİ̇Sİ

Elif İlgi Sancak; Neslihan Tekçe

doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.1009758

Research Article

FARKLI YÜZEY DEKONTAMİ̇NASYON YÖNTEMLERİ̇Nİ̇N CAD/CAM YÜZEYLERİ̇N BAĞLANMA DAYANIM DEĞERLERİ̇ ÜZERİ̇NE ETKİ̇Sİ

Year 2022, Volume: 32 Issue: 1, 38 - 43, 15.02.2022

Elif İlgi Sancak Neslihan Tekçe

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.1009758

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, CAD/CAM yüzeylerinde gerçekleştirilen yapıştırma prosedürünün farklı aşamalarında gerçekleşen tükürük kontaminasyonun, su ya da etanol ile temizlenmesinin bağlanma dayanıma etkisini incelemektir.
Yöntemler: Cerasmart (GC) ve Shofu Block (Shofu) CAD/CAM materyallerden (7×7×2 mm) hazırlanan örnekler, otopolimerizan akrilik ile sabitlendi. Örneklerin yüzeyleri Al2O3 kum ile kumlandı, arkasından çalışma protokollerine göre şu şekilde gruplara ayrıldı: Grup-1(kontrol): Firma önerisi yapıştırma protokolü (Primer/Siman/Kompozit), Grup-2: Tükürük-kontaminasyonu / Su ile temizleme/Primer/Siman/Kompozit, Grup-3: Tükürük-kontaminasyonu / %70 etanol ile temizleme /Primer/Siman/Kompozit, Grup-4: Primer-uygulaması/ Tükürük-kontaminasyonu / Su ile temizleme / Tekrar primer-uygulaması/Siman/Kompozit, Grup-5: Primer-uygulaması / Tükürük-kontaminasyonu / %70 etanol ile temizleme / Tekrar-primer uygulaması /Siman/Kompozit. Her grup için CAD/CAM materyallere primer olarak Z-Prime Plus 10 sn uygulandı. Ardından hazırlanan kompozit rezinler (Clearfil Majesty ES-2, Kuraray), dual-cured rezin siman (Duo-Link Universal Light Curing Resin Cement, BİSCO) aracılığıyla yapıştırıldı. Örnekler 24 saat 37oC suda bekletildi ve bağlanma dayanım testine tabi tutuldu. Veriler tek yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA) ve Tukey HSD testi kullanılarak analiz edildi (P < .05).
Bulgular: En yüksek bağlanma dayanımı değeri Cerasmart Grup-1’de (19.86±5.27.), en düşük bağlanma dayanımı değeri Shofu Block HC Grup-5’te (13.02±4.83) bulundu (P = .67). Tükürük kontaminasyonun primer uygulamasından önce veya sonra gerçekleşmesi bağlanma dayanım değerlerini etkilemedi. Her iki materyal içinde dekontaminasyon işleminin su ya da %70 etanol ile gerçekleştirilmesi arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık bulunmadı.
Sonuç: Kontaminasyonun primer uygulamasından önce veya sonra meydana gelmesinin bağlanma dayanımına etkisi bulunmamaktadır. Uygulanan her iki dekontaminasyon yöntemi de klinik olarak yeterli bağlanma dayanımı sağlamaktadır. Primer kullanımı, gelişmiş bağlanma dayanımı değerleri üzerinde etkilidir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: CAD/CAM, rezin seramik, bağlanma dayanımı, kontaminasyon, tükürük
The effect of different surface decontamination procedures on bond strength values of CAD/CAM
restoratives
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the effect of saliva contamination, which occurs at different stages of the bonding procedure on CAD/CAM surfaces, on the bond strength of decontamination with water or ethanol.
Methods: Samples prepared from GC Cerasmart and Shofu Block CAD/CAM materials (7×7×2 mm) were fixed with autopolymerizing acrylic. The surfaces of the samples were sandblasted with Al2O3, then were divided into groups according to study protocols. Group-1 (control): Company recommendation bonding protocol (Primer/Cement/Composite), Group-2: Saliva-contamination/Cleaning with water/primer/cement/composite, Group-3: Saliva-contamination/Cleaning with 70% ethanol/primer/cement/composite Group-4: Primer-application/Saliva-contamination/Cleaning with water/Re-primer-application/cement/composite, Group-5: Primer-application/Saliva-contamination/Cleaning with 70% ethanol/Re-primer-application/cement/composite. For each groups, Z-Prime Plus was applied to the CAD/CAM for 10-seconds as a primer. After, the composite resins (Clearfil Majesty ES-2, Kuraray) were bonded via dual-cured resin cement (Duo-Link resin cement, Bisco). The samples were kept in 37oC water for 24 hours and subjected to the bond strength test. Data were analyzed with one way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD tests (P < .05).
Results: The highest bond strength value was found in Cerasmart Group-1 (19.86±5.27.) and the lowest value was found in Shofu Block Group-5 (13.02±4.83) (P = .67). The occurrence of saliva contamination before or after primer didn’t affect the bond strength values. There was no statistically significant difference between decontamination with water or 70% ethanol for both materials.
Conclusion: Contamination occurred before or after the primer has no effect on bond strength. Both decontamination methods provide clinically sufficient bond strength. The use of primer is effective on improved bond strength values.
Keywords: CAD/CAM, resin ceramic, bond strength, contamination, saliva

Keywords

CAD/CAM, rezin seramik, bağlanma dayanımı, kontaminasyon, tükürük

References

1. Cantürk K, Karalar B, Sağsöz Ö, Seven N, Polat Sağsöz N. Farklı üniversal bağlayıcı ajanların CAD/CAM seramiklerin kompozit rezin ile tamiri sonrası bağlanma kuvvetine etkisi. Curr Res Dent Sci. 2019;29(3):381-386.
2. Kawaguchi A, Matsumoto M, Higashi M, et al. Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive and conventional-type adhesive resin cements to CAD/CAM resin blocks. Part 2: Effect of ultrasonic and acid cleaning. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(1):29-36.
3. Coldea A, Swain MV. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater. 2013;29(4):419-426.
4. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98(5):389-404.
5. Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res. 2014;93(12):1232-1234.
6. Vichi A, Carrabba M, Paravina R, Ferrari M. Translucency of ceramic materials for CEREC CAD/CAM system. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014;26(4):224-231.
7. Della Bona A, Nogueira AD, Pecho OE. Optical properties of CAD-CAM ceramic systems. J Dent. 2014;42(9):1202-1209.
8. Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. In-vitro strength degradation of dental ceramics and novel PICN material by sharp indentation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013;26:34-42.
9. Della Bona A, Corazza PH. Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material. Dent Mater. 2014;30(5):564-569.
10. Schepke U, Meijer HJ, Vermeulen KM, Raghoebar GM. Clinical Bonding of Resin Nano Ceramic Restorations to Zirconia Abutments: A Case Series within a Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18(5):984-992.
11. Bonfante EA, Suzuki M, Lorenzoni FC, et al. Probability of survival of implant-supported metal ceramic and CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic crowns. Dent Mater. 2015;31(8):e168-e177.
12. Higashi M, Matsumoto M, Kawaguchi A, et al. Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive and conventional-type adhesive resin cements to CAD/CAM resin blocks. Part 1: Effects of sandblasting and silanization. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(1):21-28.
13. Zhang S, Kocjan A, Lehmann F, Kosmac T. Influence of contamination on resin bond strength to nano-structured alumina-coated zirconia ceramic. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010;118(4):396-403.
14. Ishii R, Tsujimoto A, Takamizawa T, et al. Influence of surface treatment of contaminated zirconia on surface free energy and resin cement bonding. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(1):91-97.
15. Yang B, Scharnberg M, Wolfart S, et al. Influence of contamination on bonding to zirconia ceramic. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007;81(2):283-290.
16. Samran A, Al-Ammari A, El Bahra S, Halboub E, Wille S. Bond strength durability of self-adhesive resin cements to zirconia ceramic: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(3):477-484.
17. Angkasith P, Burgess JO, Bottino MC. Cleaning Methods for Zirconia Following Salivary Contamination. J Prosthodont. 2016;25(5):375-379.
18. Eiriksson SO, Pereira PN, Swift EJ Jr, Heymann HO. Effects of saliva contamination on resin-resin bond strength. Dent Mater. 2004;20(1):37-44.
19. Chung CW, Yiu CK, King NM, Hiraishi N. Effect of saliva contamination on bond strength of resin luting cements to dentin. J Dent. 2009;37(12):923-931.
20. Papia E, Larsson C, du Toit MV von SP. Bonding between oxide ceramics and adhesive cement systems: a systematic review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2014;102(2):395-413.
21. Yang B, Lange-Jansen HC, Scharnberg M, et al. Influence of saliva contamination on zirconia ceramic bonding. Dent Mater. 2008;24(4):508-513.
22. Takahashi A, Takagaki T, Wada T, Uo M, Nikaido T. The effect of different cleaning agents on saliva contamination for bonding performance of zirconia ceramics. Dent Mater J. 2018;37(5):734-739.
23. Güers P, Wille S, Strunskus T, Polonskyi O. Durability of resin bonding to zirconia ceramic after contamination and the use of various cleaning methods. Dent Mater. 2019;35(10):1388-1396.
24. Irmak Ö, Yaman BC, Orhan EO, Kılıçarslan MA, Mante FK. Influence of cleaning methods on bond strength to saliva contaminated zirconia. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(6):551-556.
25. Piest C, Wille S, Strunskus T, Polonskyi O. Efficacy of Plasma Treatment for Decontaminating Zirconia. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(4):289-297.
26. Quaas AC, Yang B, Kern M. Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures. Dent Mater. 2007;23(4):506-512.
27. Yoshida K. Influence of cleaning methods on resin bonding to saliva-contaminated zirconia. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(3):259-264.
28. McDonnell G, Russell AD. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12(1):147-179.
29. Aboush Y. Removing saliva contamination from porcelain veneers before bonding. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80(6):649-653.
30. Kawaguchi-Uemura A, Mine A, Matsumoto M, et al. Adhesion procedure for CAD/CAM resin crown bonding: Reduction of bond strengths due to artificial saliva contamination. J Prosthodont Res. 2018;62(2):177-183.
31. Romero MJ, Nakashima S, Nikaido T, Ichinose S, Sadr A. Inhibition of hydroxyapatite growth by casein, a potential salivary phosphoprotein homologue. Eur J Oral Sci. 2015;123(4):288-296.
32. Noronha MDS, Fronza BM, André CB et al. Effect of zirconia decontamination protocols on bond strength and surface wettability. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32(5):521-529.
33. Hatırlı H, Karaarslan EŞ, Tekiroğlu Yelken Z, Tonga G, Demir O. Hibrid Seramik ve Kompozit Rezin Bağlanma Dayanımında, Farklı Yüzey Hazırlıkları ve Üniversal Adeziv Uygulamalarının Etkisi. Turkiye Klin J Dent Sci. 2020;26(3):443-449.
34. Spitznagel FA, Horvath SD, Guess PC. Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials: a review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014;26(6):382-393.
35. Ellakwa AE, Shortall AC, Burke FJ. Effects of grit blasting and silanization on bond strengths of a resin luting cement to Belleglass HP indirect composite. Am J Dent. 2003;16(1):53-57.
36. Oyagüe RC, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osorio E, Ferrari M. Effect of water aging on microtensile bond strength of dual-cured resin cements to pre-treated sintered zirconium-oxide ceramics. Dent Mater. 2009;25(3):392-399.
37. Hitmi L, Attal JP DM. Influence of the time-point of salivary contamination on dentin shear bond strength of 3 dentin adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1(3):219-232.
38. Cobanoglu N, Unlu N, Ozer FF, Blatz MB. Bond strength of self-etch adhesives after saliva contamination at different application steps. Oper Dent. 2013;38(5):505-511.
39. Nair P, Hickel R, Ilie N. Adverse effects of salivary contamination for adhesives in restorative dentistry. A literature review. Am J Dent. 2017;30(3):156-164.
40. Neelagiri K, Kundabala M, Shashi RA, Thomas MS PA. Effects of saliva contamination and decontamination procedures on shear bond strength of self-etch dentine bonding systems: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13(2):71-75.
41. Santschi K, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A, Flury S. Effect of salivary contamination and decontamination on bond strength of two one-step self-etching adhesives to dentin of primary and permanent teeth. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17(1):51-57.
42. Elkassas D, Arafa A. Assessment of post-contamination treatments affecting different bonding stages to dentin. Eur J Dent. 2016;10(3):327-332.
43. Nair P, Ilie N. The long-term consequence of salivary contamination at various stages of adhesive application and clinically feasible remedies to decontaminate. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(12):4413-4426.
44. Türkmen C, Durkan M, Cimilli H, Öksüz M. Tensile bond strength of indirect composites luted with three new self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(4):363-369.
45. Afrasiabi A, Mostajir E, Golbari N. The effect of Z-primer on the shear bond strength of zirconia ceramic to dentin: in vitro. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018;10(7):e661-e664.
46. Tanaka R, Fujishima A, Shibata Y, Manabe A, Miyazaki T. Cooperation of phosphate monomer and silica modification on zirconia. J Dent Res. 2008;87(7):666-670.
47. Inokoshi M, De Munck J, Minakuchi S, Van Meerbeek B. Meta-analysis of bonding effectiveness to zirconia ceramics. J Dent Res. 2014;93(4):329-334.
48. Magne P, Paranhos MP, Burnett LH Jr. New zirconia primer improves bond strength of resin-based cements. Dent Mater. 2010;26(4):345-352.
49. Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Maruo Y, et al. Sandblasting may damage the surface of composite CAD-CAM blocks. Dent Mater. 2017;33(3):e124-e135.

FARKLI YÜZEY DEKONTAMİ̇NASYON YÖNTEMLERİ̇Nİ̇N CAD/CAM YÜZEYLERİ̇N BAĞLANMA DAYANIM DEĞERLERİ̇ ÜZERİ̇NE ETKİ̇Sİ

Year 2022, Volume: 32 Issue: 1, 38 - 43, 15.02.2022

Elif İlgi Sancak Neslihan Tekçe

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.1009758

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, CAD/CAM yüzeylerinde gerçekleştirilen yapıştırma prosedürünün farklı aşamalarında gerçekleşen tükürük kontaminasyonun, su ya da etanol ile temizlenmesinin bağlanma dayanıma etkisini incelemektir.
Yöntemler: Cerasmart (GC) ve Shofu Block (Shofu) CAD/CAM materyallerden (7×7×2 mm) hazırlanan örnekler, otopolimerizan akrilik ile sabitlendi. Örneklerin yüzeyleri Al2O3 kum ile kumlandı, arkasından çalışma protokollerine göre şu şekilde gruplara ayrıldı: Grup-1(kontrol): Firma önerisi yapıştırma protokolü (Primer/Siman/Kompozit), Grup-2: Tükürük-kontaminasyonu / Su ile temizleme/Primer/Siman/Kompozit, Grup-3: Tükürük-kontaminasyonu / %70 etanol ile temizleme /Primer/Siman/Kompozit, Grup-4: Primer-uygulaması/ Tükürük-kontaminasyonu / Su ile temizleme / Tekrar primer-uygulaması/Siman/Kompozit, Grup-5: Primer-uygulaması / Tükürük-kontaminasyonu / %70 etanol ile temizleme / Tekrar-primer uygulaması /Siman/Kompozit. Her grup için CAD/CAM materyallere primer olarak Z-Prime Plus 10 sn uygulandı. Ardından hazırlanan kompozit rezinler (Clearfil Majesty ES-2, Kuraray), dual-cured rezin siman (Duo-Link Universal Light Curing Resin Cement, BİSCO) aracılığıyla yapıştırıldı. Örnekler 24 saat 37oC suda bekletildi ve bağlanma dayanım testine tabi tutuldu. Veriler tek yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA) ve Tukey HSD testi kullanılarak analiz edildi (P < .05).
Bulgular: En yüksek bağlanma dayanımı değeri Cerasmart Grup-1’de (19.86±5.27.), en düşük bağlanma dayanımı değeri Shofu Block HC Grup-5’te (13.02±4.83) bulundu (P = .67). Tükürük kontaminasyonun primer uygulamasından önce veya sonra gerçekleşmesi bağlanma dayanım değerlerini etkilemedi. Her iki materyal içinde dekontaminasyon işleminin su ya da %70 etanol ile gerçekleştirilmesi arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık bulunmadı.
Sonuç: Kontaminasyonun primer uygulamasından önce veya sonra meydana gelmesinin bağlanma dayanımına etkisi bulunmamaktadır. Uygulanan her iki dekontaminasyon yöntemi de klinik olarak yeterli bağlanma dayanımı sağlamaktadır. Primer kullanımı, gelişmiş bağlanma dayanımı değerleri üzerinde etkilidir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: CAD/CAM, rezin seramik, bağlanma dayanımı, kontaminasyon, tükürük

Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the effect of saliva contamination, which occurs at different stages of the bonding procedure on CAD/CAM surfaces, on the bond strength of decontamination with water or ethanol.
Methods: Samples prepared from GC Cerasmart and Shofu Block CAD/CAM materials (7×7×2 mm) were fixed with autopolymerizing acrylic. The surfaces of the samples were sandblasted with Al2O3, then were divided into groups according to study protocols. Group-1 (control): Company recommendation bonding protocol (Primer/Cement/Composite), Group-2: Saliva-contamination/Cleaning with water/primer/cement/composite, Group-3: Saliva-contamination/Cleaning with 70% ethanol/primer/cement/composite Group-4: Primer-application/Saliva-contamination/Cleaning with water/Re-primer-application/cement/composite, Group-5: Primer-application/Saliva-contamination/Cleaning with 70% ethanol/Re-primer-application/cement/composite. For each groups, Z-Prime Plus was applied to the CAD/CAM for 10-seconds as a primer. After, the composite resins (Clearfil Majesty ES-2, Kuraray) were bonded via dual-cured resin cement (Duo-Link resin cement, Bisco). The samples were kept in 37oC water for 24 hours and subjected to the bond strength test. Data were analyzed with one way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD tests (P < .05).
Results: The highest bond strength value was found in Cerasmart Group-1 (19.86±5.27.) and the lowest value was found in Shofu Block Group-5 (13.02±4.83) (P = .67). The occurrence of saliva contamination before or after primer didn’t affect the bond strength values. There was no statistically significant difference between decontamination with water or 70% ethanol for both materials.
Conclusion: Contamination occurred before or after the primer has no effect on bond strength. Both decontamination methods provide clinically sufficient bond strength. The use of primer is effective on improved bond strength values.
Keywords: CAD/CAM, resin ceramic, bond strength, contamination, saliva

Keywords

CAD/CAM, rezin seramik, bağlanma dayanımı, kontaminasyon, tükürük

References

1. Cantürk K, Karalar B, Sağsöz Ö, Seven N, Polat Sağsöz N. Farklı üniversal bağlayıcı ajanların CAD/CAM seramiklerin kompozit rezin ile tamiri sonrası bağlanma kuvvetine etkisi. Curr Res Dent Sci. 2019;29(3):381-386.
2. Kawaguchi A, Matsumoto M, Higashi M, et al. Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive and conventional-type adhesive resin cements to CAD/CAM resin blocks. Part 2: Effect of ultrasonic and acid cleaning. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(1):29-36.
3. Coldea A, Swain MV. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater. 2013;29(4):419-426.
4. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98(5):389-404.
5. Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res. 2014;93(12):1232-1234.
6. Vichi A, Carrabba M, Paravina R, Ferrari M. Translucency of ceramic materials for CEREC CAD/CAM system. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014;26(4):224-231.
7. Della Bona A, Nogueira AD, Pecho OE. Optical properties of CAD-CAM ceramic systems. J Dent. 2014;42(9):1202-1209.
8. Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. In-vitro strength degradation of dental ceramics and novel PICN material by sharp indentation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013;26:34-42.
9. Della Bona A, Corazza PH. Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material. Dent Mater. 2014;30(5):564-569.
10. Schepke U, Meijer HJ, Vermeulen KM, Raghoebar GM. Clinical Bonding of Resin Nano Ceramic Restorations to Zirconia Abutments: A Case Series within a Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18(5):984-992.
11. Bonfante EA, Suzuki M, Lorenzoni FC, et al. Probability of survival of implant-supported metal ceramic and CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic crowns. Dent Mater. 2015;31(8):e168-e177.
12. Higashi M, Matsumoto M, Kawaguchi A, et al. Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive and conventional-type adhesive resin cements to CAD/CAM resin blocks. Part 1: Effects of sandblasting and silanization. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(1):21-28.
13. Zhang S, Kocjan A, Lehmann F, Kosmac T. Influence of contamination on resin bond strength to nano-structured alumina-coated zirconia ceramic. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010;118(4):396-403.
14. Ishii R, Tsujimoto A, Takamizawa T, et al. Influence of surface treatment of contaminated zirconia on surface free energy and resin cement bonding. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(1):91-97.
15. Yang B, Scharnberg M, Wolfart S, et al. Influence of contamination on bonding to zirconia ceramic. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007;81(2):283-290.
16. Samran A, Al-Ammari A, El Bahra S, Halboub E, Wille S. Bond strength durability of self-adhesive resin cements to zirconia ceramic: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(3):477-484.
17. Angkasith P, Burgess JO, Bottino MC. Cleaning Methods for Zirconia Following Salivary Contamination. J Prosthodont. 2016;25(5):375-379.
18. Eiriksson SO, Pereira PN, Swift EJ Jr, Heymann HO. Effects of saliva contamination on resin-resin bond strength. Dent Mater. 2004;20(1):37-44.
19. Chung CW, Yiu CK, King NM, Hiraishi N. Effect of saliva contamination on bond strength of resin luting cements to dentin. J Dent. 2009;37(12):923-931.
20. Papia E, Larsson C, du Toit MV von SP. Bonding between oxide ceramics and adhesive cement systems: a systematic review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2014;102(2):395-413.
21. Yang B, Lange-Jansen HC, Scharnberg M, et al. Influence of saliva contamination on zirconia ceramic bonding. Dent Mater. 2008;24(4):508-513.
22. Takahashi A, Takagaki T, Wada T, Uo M, Nikaido T. The effect of different cleaning agents on saliva contamination for bonding performance of zirconia ceramics. Dent Mater J. 2018;37(5):734-739.
23. Güers P, Wille S, Strunskus T, Polonskyi O. Durability of resin bonding to zirconia ceramic after contamination and the use of various cleaning methods. Dent Mater. 2019;35(10):1388-1396.
24. Irmak Ö, Yaman BC, Orhan EO, Kılıçarslan MA, Mante FK. Influence of cleaning methods on bond strength to saliva contaminated zirconia. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(6):551-556.
25. Piest C, Wille S, Strunskus T, Polonskyi O. Efficacy of Plasma Treatment for Decontaminating Zirconia. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(4):289-297.
26. Quaas AC, Yang B, Kern M. Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures. Dent Mater. 2007;23(4):506-512.
27. Yoshida K. Influence of cleaning methods on resin bonding to saliva-contaminated zirconia. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(3):259-264.
28. McDonnell G, Russell AD. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12(1):147-179.
29. Aboush Y. Removing saliva contamination from porcelain veneers before bonding. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80(6):649-653.
30. Kawaguchi-Uemura A, Mine A, Matsumoto M, et al. Adhesion procedure for CAD/CAM resin crown bonding: Reduction of bond strengths due to artificial saliva contamination. J Prosthodont Res. 2018;62(2):177-183.
31. Romero MJ, Nakashima S, Nikaido T, Ichinose S, Sadr A. Inhibition of hydroxyapatite growth by casein, a potential salivary phosphoprotein homologue. Eur J Oral Sci. 2015;123(4):288-296.
32. Noronha MDS, Fronza BM, André CB et al. Effect of zirconia decontamination protocols on bond strength and surface wettability. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32(5):521-529.
33. Hatırlı H, Karaarslan EŞ, Tekiroğlu Yelken Z, Tonga G, Demir O. Hibrid Seramik ve Kompozit Rezin Bağlanma Dayanımında, Farklı Yüzey Hazırlıkları ve Üniversal Adeziv Uygulamalarının Etkisi. Turkiye Klin J Dent Sci. 2020;26(3):443-449.
34. Spitznagel FA, Horvath SD, Guess PC. Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials: a review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014;26(6):382-393.
35. Ellakwa AE, Shortall AC, Burke FJ. Effects of grit blasting and silanization on bond strengths of a resin luting cement to Belleglass HP indirect composite. Am J Dent. 2003;16(1):53-57.
36. Oyagüe RC, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osorio E, Ferrari M. Effect of water aging on microtensile bond strength of dual-cured resin cements to pre-treated sintered zirconium-oxide ceramics. Dent Mater. 2009;25(3):392-399.
37. Hitmi L, Attal JP DM. Influence of the time-point of salivary contamination on dentin shear bond strength of 3 dentin adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1(3):219-232.
38. Cobanoglu N, Unlu N, Ozer FF, Blatz MB. Bond strength of self-etch adhesives after saliva contamination at different application steps. Oper Dent. 2013;38(5):505-511.
39. Nair P, Hickel R, Ilie N. Adverse effects of salivary contamination for adhesives in restorative dentistry. A literature review. Am J Dent. 2017;30(3):156-164.
40. Neelagiri K, Kundabala M, Shashi RA, Thomas MS PA. Effects of saliva contamination and decontamination procedures on shear bond strength of self-etch dentine bonding systems: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13(2):71-75.
41. Santschi K, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A, Flury S. Effect of salivary contamination and decontamination on bond strength of two one-step self-etching adhesives to dentin of primary and permanent teeth. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17(1):51-57.
42. Elkassas D, Arafa A. Assessment of post-contamination treatments affecting different bonding stages to dentin. Eur J Dent. 2016;10(3):327-332.
43. Nair P, Ilie N. The long-term consequence of salivary contamination at various stages of adhesive application and clinically feasible remedies to decontaminate. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(12):4413-4426.
44. Türkmen C, Durkan M, Cimilli H, Öksüz M. Tensile bond strength of indirect composites luted with three new self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(4):363-369.
45. Afrasiabi A, Mostajir E, Golbari N. The effect of Z-primer on the shear bond strength of zirconia ceramic to dentin: in vitro. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018;10(7):e661-e664.
46. Tanaka R, Fujishima A, Shibata Y, Manabe A, Miyazaki T. Cooperation of phosphate monomer and silica modification on zirconia. J Dent Res. 2008;87(7):666-670.
47. Inokoshi M, De Munck J, Minakuchi S, Van Meerbeek B. Meta-analysis of bonding effectiveness to zirconia ceramics. J Dent Res. 2014;93(4):329-334.
48. Magne P, Paranhos MP, Burnett LH Jr. New zirconia primer improves bond strength of resin-based cements. Dent Mater. 2010;26(4):345-352.
49. Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Maruo Y, et al. Sandblasting may damage the surface of composite CAD-CAM blocks. Dent Mater. 2017;33(3):e124-e135.

There are 49 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language	Turkish
Subjects	Dentistry
Journal Section	Research Articles
Authors	Elif İlgi Sancak This is me Neslihan Tekçe This is me
Publication Date	February 15, 2022
Submission Date	May 15, 2021
Published in Issue	Year 2022 Volume: 32 Issue: 1

Cite

AMA	İlgi Sancak E, Tekçe N. FARKLI YÜZEY DEKONTAMİ̇NASYON YÖNTEMLERİ̇Nİ̇N CAD/CAM YÜZEYLERİ̇N BAĞLANMA DAYANIM DEĞERLERİ̇ ÜZERİ̇NE ETKİ̇Sİ. Curr Res Dent Sci. February 2022;32(1):38-43. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.1009758

Download Cover Image

Article Files

Full Text

Current Research in Dental Sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

29936