ADLİ DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDE KİMLİKLENDİRME VE CİNSİYET TAYİNİ

Year 2022, Volume: 32 Issue: 1, 92 - 99, 15.02.2022

Hazal Karslıoğlu Mesude Çıtır

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.824035

Abstract

Sosyal, yasal ve adli nedenlerle kimliklendirme gereklidir. Cinsiyet tayini ise şüpheli sayısını azaltıp kimliklendirme işlemini kolaylaştırır. Dişler iskeletteki en sert dokudur ve çevresel etkenlerden çok etkilenmemektedir. Bu nedenle antemortem ve postmortem dental veriler kimliklendirmede kullanılmaktadır. Adli diş hekimliğinde, biyokimyasal, metrik ve non metrik yöntemlerin yanısıra yeni teknikler de geliştirilmiştir. Bu derlemenin amacı, adli dişhekimliğinde kullanılan kimliklendirme ve cinsiyet tayini yöntemlerini tanımlamaktır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Adli, cinsiyet belirleme teknikleri, diş hekimliği, kimliklendirme

Abstract
Identification is required for social, legal and forensic reasons. Gender determination reduces the number of suspects and facilitates the identification. Teeth are the hardest tissue in the skeleton and are not affected by environmental factors. For this reason, antemortem and postmortem dental data are used for identification. In forensic dentistry, new techniques have been developed in addition to biochemical, metric and non-metric methods. The purpose of this review is to define the methods of identification and gender determination used in forensic dentistry.
Keywords: Dentistry, forensic, human identification, sex determination tecnics

Keywords

Adli, cinsiyet belirleme teknikleri, diş hekimliği, kimliklendirme

References

• 1. Subramanyam BV, editor. Modi’s Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology. 22nd. New Delhi: Butterworths India Persl Ident. 2001:37–90.
• 2. David S, Paul G. Forensic Dentistry. 2nd. Boca Raton; CRC Press: 2010.
• 3. Prachi J. Sex determination in forensic odontology. J Forensic Odontostomat. 2012;23:11- 16.
• 4. Richardson ER, Malhotra SK. Mesiodistal crown dimension of the permanent dentition of American Negroes. Am J Orthod. 1975;68(2):157–164.
• 5. Senn DR, Weems M. Manual of forensic odontology. 5th. Boca Raton: FL;CRC; 2013; 978(1):4298-5133.
• 6. Rai B, Kaur J. Evidence-based forensic dentistry: Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. 2013;1-11
• 7. Rötzscher K. Forensic and Legal Dentistry: Springer Int Pub Switzerland. 2014;37-43.
• 8. Nagalaxmi V, Ugrappa S, Naga Jyothi M, Ch L, Maloth KN, Kodangal S. Cheiloscopy, palatoscopy and odontometrics in sex prediction and discrimination – A comparative study. Open Dent J. 2015;8:269–279.
• 9. Kaul R, Padmashree SM, Shilpa PS, Sultana N, Bhat S. Cheiloscopic patterns in Indian population and their efficacy in sex determination: A randomized cross-sectional study. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2015;7(2):101–106.
• 10. Burris BG, Harris EF. Identification of race and sex from palate dimensions. J Forensic Sci. 1998;43(5):959–963.
• 11. Saraf A, Bedia S, Indurkar A. Rugae patterns as an adjunct to sex differentiation in forensic identification. J. Forensic Odontostomatol. 2011;29:14–19.
• 12. Verma S, Mahima VG, Patil K. Radiomorphometric analysis of frontal sinus for sex determination. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2014;6(3):177-182.
• 13. Paknahad M, Shahidi S, Zarei Z. Sexual Dimorphism of Maxillary Sinus Dimensions Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. J Forensic Sci. 2017;62(2):395–398.
• 14. Tsuchimochi T, Iwasa M, Maeno Y, et al. Chelating resin-based extraction of DNA from dental pulp and sex determination from incinerated teeth with Y-chromosomal alphoid repeat and short tandem repeats. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2002 Sep; 23(3):268-271.
• 15. Pawar RK, More CB. Sex determination from tooth pulp deoxyribonucleic acid using polymerase chain reaction. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2018;10(2):107-110.
• 16. Sivagami AV, Rao AR, Varshney U. A simple and cost-effective method for preparing DNA from the hard tooth tissue, and its use in polymerase chain reaction amplification of amelogenin gene segment for sex determination in an Indian population. Forensic Sci Int. 2000;110(2):107-115.
• 17. Murakami H, Yamamoto Y, Yoshitome K, Ono T, Okamoto O, Shigeta Y, et al. Forensic study of sex determination using PCR on teeth samples. Acta Med Okayama. 2000;54:21-32.
• 18. Hemanth M, Vidya M, Karkera BV. Sex determination using dental tissue. Med Leg Update. 2008;12:2.
• 19. Rubio L, Martinez LJ, Martinez E, Martin de las Heras S. Study of short- and long-term storage of teeth and its influence on DNA. J Forensic Sci. 2009;54(6):1411-1413.
• 20. Chowdhury RM, Singhvi A, Bagul N, Bhatia S, Singh G, Goswami S. Sex determination by amplification of amelogenin gene from dental pulp tissue by polymerase Chain Reaction. Indian J Dent Res. 2018;29(4):470-476.
• 21. Keiser-Neilsen S. Person Identification by Means of Teeth. John Wright & Sons, Bristol, 1980
• 22. Lund H, Mörnstad H. Gender determination by odontometrics in a Swedish population. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 1999;17(2):30–34.
• 23. Gorea K, Manish S. Odontometeric study of canines in Indian population for sex determination. J Indo Pac Acad Forensic Odontol. 2010;1:34–37.
• 24. Ye L, Le TQ, Zhu L, et al. Amelogenins in human developing and mature dental pulp. J Dent Res. 2006;85(9):814-818.
• 25. Vemuri S, Ramya R, Rajkumar K, Rajashree P. Influence of various environmental conditions on DNA isolation from dental pulp for sex determination using polymerase chain reaction. SRM J Res Dent Sci. 2012;3(4):231-235.
• 26. Dayal PK. Textbook of Forensic Odontology. 1st. Hyderabad Paras Med Pub.: 1998;210-220.
• 27. Kobayashi K, Hecker K. Gender Determination Using Amelogenin specific PCR. Application Note 113. San Jose, CA: Transgenomic Inc; 2000.
• 28. Dutta P, Bhosale S, Singh R, et al. Amelogenin gene-the pioneer in gender determination from forensic dental samples. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(2):56-59.
• 29. Veeraraghavan G, Lingappa A, Shankara SP, Mamatha GP, Sebastian BT, Mujib A. Determination of sex from tooth pulp tissue. Libyan J Med. 2010;5:10.3402.
• 30. Duffy JB, Waterfield JD, Skinner MF. Isolation of tooth pulp cells for sex chromatin studies in experimental dehydrated and cremated remains. Forensic Sci Int. 1991;49(2):127-141.
• 31. Barr ML, Bertram LF, Lindsay HA. The morphology of the nerve cell nucleus, according to sex. Anat Rec. 1950;107(3):283-297.
• 32. Anoop UR, Ramesh V, Balamurali PD, Nirima O, Premalatha B, Karthikshree VP. Role of Barr bodies obtained from oral smears in the determination of sex. Indian J Dent Res. 2004;15(1):5-7.
• 33. Suazo GI, Roa HI, Cantín LM. Sex chromatin in dental pulp. Performance of diagnosis test and gold standard generation. Int J Morphol. 2010;28(4):1093-1096.
• 34. Seno, M. Sex Identification of the Human Tooth by Y Chromatin in the Nucleus of Dental Pulp Cell. Jpn J Legal Med. 1977;31:172-179.
• 35. Das N, Gorea RK, Gargi J, Singh JR. Sex determination from pulpal tissue. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2004;26:122–125.
• 36. Duz S. A determinação do sexo através da cromatina sexual na pulpa dentaria e sua importância pericial. Tese para obtenção do grau de Mestre de Odontologia legal e Deontología. Piracicaba, SP, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2000.
• 37. Suazo GI, Flores A, Roa I, Cantín M, Zavando D. Sex determination by observation of Barr body in teeth subjected to high temperatures. Int J Morphol. 2011;29(1):199–203.
• 38. Reddy AVS, Prakash AR, Killampalli LK, Rajinikanth M, Sreenath G, Sabiha PB. Gender determination using barr bodies from teeth exposed to high temperatures. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2017;9(1):44. 39. Scott GR, Turner-II CG. The Anthropology of Modem Human Teeth: Dental Morphology and its Variation in Recent Human Populations. Cambridge: Camb Uni Press; 1997.p
• 40. Pettenati-Soubayroux I, Signoli M, Dutour O. Sexual dimorphism in teeth: Discriminatory effectiveness of permanent lower canine size observed in a XVIII th century osteological series. Forensic Sci Int. 2002;126(3):227–232.
• 41. Saxena S, Sharma P, Gupta N. Experimental studies of forensic odontology to aid in the identification process. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2010; 2(2):69-76.
• 42. Nagare SP, Chaudhari RS, Birangane RS, Parkarwar PC. Sex determination in forensic identification, a review. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2018;10(2):61-66.
• 43. Tsuchihashi Y. Studies on personal identification by means of lip print. Forensic Sci Int. 1974;3:233–248.
• 44. Suzuki K, Tsuchihashi Y. New attempt of personal identification by means of lip prints. Can Soc Forens Sci J. 1971;4:154-158.
• 45. Prabhu RV, Dinakar AD, Prabhu AD, Rao AP. Cheiloscopy: revisited. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2012;4(1):47-53.
• 46. Kautilya V, Bodkha P, Rajamohan N. Efficacy of cheiloscopy in determination of sex among South Indians. J. Clin Diagn Res. 2013; 7(10):2193-2196.
• 47. Kasprzak J. Possibilities of cheiloscopy. Forensic Sci Int. 1990;46:145-151.
• 48. Kumar GS, Vazhavendhan, Vendhan P. A study of lip prints among Pondicherry population J Forensic Dent Sci. 2012;4(2):84-87.
• 49. Sivapathasundharam B, Prakash PA, Sivakumar G. Lip prints (cheiloscopy) Indian J Dent Res. 2001;12:234–237.
• 50. Vahanwala SP, Parekh BK. Study of lip prints as an aid to forensic methodology. J Indian Dent Assoc. 2000;71:268–271.
• 51. Gondivkar SM, Indurkar A, Degwekar S, Bhowate R. Cheiloscopy for sex determination. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2009;1:56–60.
• 52. Multani S, Thombre V, Thombre A, Surana P. Assessment of lip print patterns and its use for personal identification among the populations of Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, India. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2014;4(3):170-174.
• 53. Büyük SK. Evaluation of Morpfological pattern of lip print in a Turkish Subpopulation. J For Med. 2016;30(3):237-242.
• 54. Venegas V, Valenzuela J, López M, Galdames I. Palatal rugae: Systematic analysis of its shape and dimensions for use in human identification. Int J Morphol. 2009;27(3):819-825.
• 55. De Angelis D, Riboli F, Gibelli D, Cappella A, Cattaneo C. Palatal rugae as an individualising marker: Reliability for forensic odontology and personal identification. Sci Justice. 2012;52(3):181-184.
• 56. Ramakrishnan K, Sharma S, Sreeja C, Pratima DB, Aesha I, Vijayabanu B. Sex determination in forensic odontology: A review. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015;7(2):398–402.
• 57. Sha SK, Rao BV, Rao MS, Kumari KVH, Chinna SK, Sahu D. Are Tooth Prints a Hard Tissue Equivalence of Finger Print in Mass Disaster: A Rationalized Review. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2017;9(1):29-33.
• 58. Saadeh M, Ghafari JG, Haddad RV, Ayoub F. Palatal rugae morphology in an adult mediterranean population. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2017;35(1):21-32.
• 59. Andrade RNM, Vieira WA, Bernardino IM, Franco A, Paranhos LR. Reliability of palatal rugoscopy for sexual dimorphism in forensic dentistry: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Arch Oral Biol. 2019;97:25-34.
• 60. Thomas CJ, Kotze TJ. The palatal rugae pattern: A new classification. J Dent Assoc S Afr. 1983;38(3):153–157.
• 61. Dhoke M, Osato S. Morphological study of the palatal rugae in Japanese. Bilateral difference in the regressive evolution of the palatal rugae. Jpn J Oral Biol.1994;36:126–140.
• 62. Shetty SK, Kalia S, Patil K, Mahima VG. Palatal rugae pattern in Mysorean and Tibetan populations. Indian J Dent Res. 2005;16(2):51-55.
• 63. Caldas IM, Magalhães T, Afonso A. Establishing identity using cheiloscopy and palatoscopy. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;165(1):1-9.
• 64. Thabitha RS, Reddy RE, Manjula M, Sreelakshmi N, Rajesh A, Kumar VL. Evaluation of palatal rugae pattern in establishing identification and sex determination in Nalgonda children. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2015;7(3):232-237.
• 65. Bharath ST, Kumar GR, Dhanapal R, Saraswathi T. Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of palatal rugae from a population of coastal Andhra. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2011;3(2):58–62.
• 66. Ibeachu PC, Didia BC, Arigbede AO. A Comparative study of palatal rugae patterns among Igbo and Ikwerre ethnic groups of Nigeria: A university of Port Harcourt study. Anat Res Int. 2014;2014:123925.
• 67. Gandikota C, Venkata YP, Challa P, Juvvadi SR, Mathur A. Comparative study of palatal rugae pattern in class II div 1 and class I individuals. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2012(2);4:358-363.
• 68. Mustafa AG, Allouh MZ, Alshehab RM. Morphological changes in palatal rugae patterns following orthodontic treatment. J Forensic Leg Med. 2015;31:19-22.
• 69. Kapoor P, Miglani R. Transverse changes in lateral and medial aspects of palatal rugae after mid palatal expansion: A pilot study. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2015;7(1):8-13.
• 70. Banker A, Pillai JP, Trivedi I. Quantitative and transverse changes in the position of palatal rugae after palatal expansion. Dentistry. 2016;6:38725.
• 71. Bavaresco D, Von Meusel LD, Franco A, Makeeva I, Paranhos LR, Cericato GO. Morphology of the palatal rugae before and after orthodontic treatment with and without rapid maxillary expansion and dental extractions. Indian J Dent Res. 2020;31(2):241-246.
• 72. Barrett MJ, Brown T, Macdonald MR. Tooth size in Australian aborigines. Aust Dent J. 1963;8:150-155.
• 73. Kaushal S, Patnaik VV, Agnihotri G. Mandibular canine in sex determination. J Anat Soc India. 2003;52:119-124.
• 74. Teschler-Nicola M, Prossinger H. Dental Anthropology, Fundamentals, Limits and Prospects. Wien: Springer-Verlag; 1998. Sex determination using tooth dimensions. In: Alt KFW, Rosing F, Teschler-Nicola M, editors; 479–501.
• 75. Işcan MY, Kedici PS. Sexual variation in bucco-lingual dimensions in Turkish dentition. Forensic Sci Int. 2003;137(2-3):160-164.
• 76. Boaz K, Gupta C. Dimorphism in human maxillary and mandibular canine in establishment of gender. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2009;1(1):42–44.
• 77. Kapila R, Nagesh KS, R Iyengar A, Mehkri S. Sexual dimorphism in human mandibular canines: A radiomorphometric study in South Indian population. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2011;5(2):51–54.
• 78. Garn SM, Lewis AB, Kerewsky RS. Sex difference in tooth shape. J Dent Res 1967;46:1470.
• 79. Rao NG, Rao NN, Pai ML, Kotian MS. Mandibular canine index – A clue for establishing sex identity. Forensic Sci Int. 1989;42(3):249–254.
• 80. Nair P, Rao BB, Annigeri RG. A study of tooth size, symmetry and sexual dimorphism. J Forensic Med Toxicol.1999;16(1):10-13.
• 81. Reddy V, Saxena S, Bansal P. Mandibular canine index as a sex determinant: A study on the population of Western Uttar Pradesh. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2008;12(2):56–9.
• 82. Dahlberg AA. Dental traits as identification tools. Dent Brog. 1963;3(3):155-160.
• 83. Kuwana T. On sex difference of maxillary canines observed in the moiretribes. NihonUniv Dent J.1983;57:88.
• 84. Potter RHY, Alcazaren AB, Herbosa FM, Tomaneng J. Dimensional characteristics of the Filipino dentition. Am J Phys Anthropol.1981;55(1):33–42.
• 85. Acharya AB, Mainali S. Univariate sex dimorphism in the Nepalese dentition and the use of discriminant functions in gender assessment. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;173(1):47–56.
• 86. Townsend GC, Brown T. Tooth size characteristics of Australian aborigines. Occas Pap Hum Biol. 1979;1(1):17–38.
• 87. Shrestha RM. Measurement of mesio-distal tooth diameter of Nepalese permanent dentition. J Nepal Dent Assoc. 2005;7:55–66.
• 88. Babu SS, Nair SS, Gopakumar D, Kurian N, Parameswar A, Baby TK. Linear Odontometric Analysis of Permanent Dentition as A Forensic Aid: A Retrospective Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(5):24-28.
• 89. Banerjee A, Kamath VV, Satelur K, Rajkumar K, Sundaram L. Sexual dimorphism in tooth morphometrics: An evaluation of the parameters. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2016;8(1):22-27.
• 90. Celebi AA, Tan E, Gelgor IE. Determination and application of Pont’s Index in Turkish population. Scientific World J. 2012;2012:494-623.
• 91. Karaman F. “Use of diagonal teeth measurements in predicting gender in a turkish population,” J Forensic Sci. 2006;51(3):630–635.
• 92. Anna J, Harish K. How reliable is sex differentiation from teeth measurements. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2013;4(1):289–292.
• 93. Yadav S, Nagabhushana D, Rao BB, Mamatha GP. Mandibular canine index in establishing sex identity. Indian J Dent Res. 2002;13(3-4):143–6.
• 94. Anderson DL, Thompson GW. Interrelationships and sex differences of dental and skeletal measurements. J Dent Res. 1973;52(3):431-438.
• 95. Pont A. Der zahn-index in der orthodontie,” Zeitschrifi fur ¨ Zahnfirtzliche Orthopaedie. 1909;3:306–321.
• 96. Gupta J, Daniel MJ. Crown size and arch width dimension as an indicator in gender determination for a Puducherry population. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2016;8(3):120-125.
• 97. Grewal DS, Khangura RK, Sircar K, Tyagi KK, Kaur G, David S. Morphometric Analysis of Odontometric Parameters for Gender Determination. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(8):09-13.
• 98. Rosenzweig KA. Tooth form as a distinguishing trait between sexes and human populations. J Dent Res. 1970;49:1423-1426.
• 99. Goose DH. Dental measurement: an assessment of its value in anthropological studies. In: Brothwell DR. Ed. Dental anthropology. New York: Pergamon Press, 1963;125-148
• 100. Acharya AB, Mainali S. Are dental indexes useful in sex assessment? J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2008;26(2):53-59.
• 101. Harris EF, Rathburn TA. Ethnic differences in the apportionment of tooth sizes. In: Kelley MA. Ed. Advances in dental anthropology. New York: Wiley Liss:1991;121.
• 102. Introna F Jr, Cantatore F, Dragone M, Colonna M. Sexual dimorphism of deciduous teeth in medico-legal identification (abstract). Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper 1993;69(4):223-230.
• 103. Humphrey LT, Dean MC, Stringer CB. Morphological variation in great ape and modern human mandibles. J Anat. 1999;195(4):491–513.
• 104. Phillip E. Introduction to forensic science. Dent Clin North Am. 2001;45(2):217–227.
• 105. Saini V, Srivastava R, Rai RK, Shamal SN, Singh TB, Tripathi SK. Mandibular ramus: An indicator for sex in fragmentary mandible. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(1):13–16.
• 106. Carvalho SP, Brito LM, Paiva LA, Bicudo LA, Crosato EM, Oliveira RN. Validation of a physical anthropology methodology using mandibles for gender estimation in a Brazilian population. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013;21(4):358–362.
• 107. Indira AP, Markande A, David MP. Mandibular ramus: An indicator for sex determination – A digital radiographic study. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2012;4(2):58–62.
• 108. Damera A, Mohanalakhsmi J, Yellarthi PK, Rezwana BM. Radiographic evaluation of mandibular ramus for gender estimation: Retrospective study. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2016;8(2):74-78.
• 109. More CB, Vijayvargiya R, Saha N. Morphometric analysis of mandibular ramus for sex determination on digital orthopantomogram. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2017;9(1):1-5.
• 110. Bhuyan R, Mohanty S, Bhuyan SK, Pati A, Priyadarshini S, Das P. Panoramic radiograph as a forensic aid in age and gender estimation: Preliminary retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2018;22(2):266-270.
• 111. Ghosh S, Vengal M, Pai K. Remodeling of the human mandible in the gonial angle region: A panoramic, radiographic, cross-sectional study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15(5):802-807.
• 112. Joo JK, Lim YJ, Kwon HB, Ahn SJ. Panoramic radiographic evaluation of the mandibular morphological changes in elderly dentate and edentulous subjects. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71(2):357-362.
• 113. Samatha K, Byahatti SM, Ammanagi RA, Tantradi P, Sarang CK, Shivpuje P. Sex determination by mandibular ramus: A digital orthopantomographic study. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2016;8(2):95-98.
• 114. AbuTaleb NS, El Beshlawy Taleb DM. Mandibular ramus and gonial angle measurements as predictors of sex and age in an Egyptian population sample: A digital panoramic study. J Forensic Res. 2015;6(1):5.
• 115. Sairam V, Geethamalika MV, Kumar PB, Naresh G, Raju GP. Determination of sexual dimorphism in humans by measurements of mandible on digital panoramic radiograph. Contemp Clin Dent. 2016;7(4):434-439.
• 116. Steyn M, Işcan MY. Sexual dimorphism in the crania and mandibles of South African whites. Forensic Sci Int. 1998; 98(1-2):9-16.
• 117. Lin C, Jiao B, Liu S, Guan F, Chung NE, Han SH et al. Sex determination from the mandibular ramus flexure of Koreans by discrimination function analysis using three-dimensional mandible models. Forensic Sci Int. 2014;236:191.e1-6.
• 118. Lopez TT, Michel-Crosato E, Benedicto EN, de Paiva LAS, Silva DCB, Biazevic MGH. Accuracy of mandibular measurements of sexual dimorphism using stabilizer equipment. Braz. Oral Res. 2017;31:e1.
• 119. Hanihara K. Sex diagnosis of Japanese skulls and scapulae by means of discriminant functions. J Anthropol Soc Nippon 1959;67:191197.
• 120. Giles E. Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of the mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1964;22(2):129135.
• 121. Vodanovic M, Dumancic J, Demo Z, Mihelic D. Determination of sex by discriminant function analysis of mandibles from two Croatian archaeological sites. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2006;40(3):263277.
• 122. Dayal MR, Spocter MA, Bidmos MA. An assessment of sex using the skull of black South Africans by discriminant function analysis. Homo. 2008;59(3):209221.
• 123. Mary C, Matthew M, Scott I. Fairgrieve. A new digital method for the objective comparison of frontal sinuses for identification. J Forensic Sci. 2009;54(4):761771.
• 124. Cristiane RR, Nader N. AnatomoRadiological and morphometrical study of the frontal sinus in humans. Braz J Morphol Sci. 2004;21:5356.
• 125. Tatlisumak E, Yilmaz OG, Asirdizer M, et al. CT study on maophometry of frontal sinus. Clin Anat. 2008;21(4):287293.
• 126. Asherson N. Identification by frontal sinus prints. A forensic medical pilot Survey. London: Lewis and Co:1965.
• 127. Camargo JR, Daruge E, Prado FB, et al. The frontal sinus morphology in radiographs of brazilian subjects; its forensic importance. Braz J Morphol Sci. 2007;24(4):239243.
• 128. Tang JP, Hu DY, Jiang FH, Yu XJ. Assessing forensic applications of the frontal sinus in a Chinese Han population. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;183(1-3):104.e1-3.
• 129. Uthman AT, AlRavi NH, AlNaaini AS, Tanfeeq AS, Suhail EH. Evaluation of frontal sinus and skull measurements using spiral CT scanning: An aid in unknown person identification. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;197(1-3):124.e17.
• 130. Schuller A. A note on the identification of skulls by x-ray pictures of the frontal sinuses. Med J Aust. 1943;1(1):554–556.
• 131. Pondé JM, Andrade RN, Via JM, Metzger P, Teles AC. Anatomical Variations of the frontal sinus. Int J Morphol. 2008;26(4):803–808.
• 132. Belaldavar C, Kotrashetti VS, Hallikerimath SR, Kale AD. Assessment of frontal sinus dimensions to determine sexual dimorphism among Indian adults. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2014;6(1):25-30.
• 133. Fernandes CL. “Forensic ethnic identification of crania: the role of themaxillary sinus—a new approach,” Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2004; 25(4):302–313.
• 134. Vidya CS, Shamasundar NM, Manjunatha B, Raichurkar K. “Evaluation of size and volume ofmaxillary sinusto determine gender by 3D computerized tomography scan method using dry skulls of South Indian origin,” Int J Current Res Rev. 2013;5(3):97–100.
• 135. Kanthem R, Guttikonda V, Yeluri S, Kumari G. “Sex determination using maxillary sinus,” J Foren Dent Sci. 2015; 7(2):163–167.
• 136. Azhar A, Ibrahim G, Salah F. Ct scan images analysis of maxillary sinus dimensions as a forensic tool for sexual and racial detection in a sample of kurdish population. Europ Sci J. 2015;11(18):271-281.
• 137. Urooge A Patil BA. Sexual Dimorphism of Maxillary Sinus – A Morphometric Analysis using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(3):67-70.
• 138. Teke HY, Duran S, Canturk N, Canturk G. Determination of gender by measuring the size of the maxillary sinuses in computerized tomography scans. Surg Radio Anat. 2007;29(1):9–13.
• 139. Uthman AT, Al-Rawi NH, Al-Naaimi AS, Al- Timimi JF. Evaluation of maxillary sinus dimensions in gender determination using helical CT scanning. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(2):403-408.
• 140. Chandra S, Devi P, Taneja N, Sah K, Kaur N. Forensic importance of maxillary sinus in gender determination: a morphometric analysis from Western Uttar Pradesh, India. Eur J General Dent. 2014; 3(1):53–56.
• 141. Ekizoglu O, Inci E, Hocaoglu E, Sayin I, Kayhan FT, Can IO. The use of maxillary sinus dimensions in gender determination: a thin-slice multidetector computed tomography assisted morphometric study. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(3):957-960.
• 142. Bangi BB, Ginjupally U, Nadendla LK, Vadla B. 3D Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus Using Computed Tomography: A Sexual Dimorphic Study. Int J Dent. 2017;2017:9017078
• 143. Musa OA, Elsheikh TE, Hassona ME. Tongues: Could they also be another fingerprint? Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2014;8(1):171–175.
• 144. Gaganpreet K, Dheerendra S. A Novel Biometric System based on Hybrid Fusion Speech, Signature and Tongue. Int J Comp App. 2015;119(1):30–39.
• 145. Stefanescu CL, Popa MF, Candea LS. Preliminary study on the tongue-based forensic identification. Rom J Leg Med. 2014;22(2):263–266.
• 146. Radhika T, Jeddy N, Nithya S. Tongue prints: A novel biometric and potential forensic tool. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2016;8(3):117-119.
• 147. Bowers CM, Bell GL, editors. Manual of Forensic Odontology. 3rd. Ontario: Manticore; 1997;184190.
• 148. Dorion RB. Bite mark evidence. J Can Dent Assoc. 1982;48(12):795–798.
• 149. Sweet D, Pretty IA. A look at forensic dentistry - Part 2: teeth as weapons of violence - identification of bitemark perpetrators. Br Dent J. 2001;190(8):415–418.
• 150. Pretty IA. Forensic dentistry: 2. Bitemarks and bite injuries. Dent Update. 2008;35(1):48-58.
• 151. van der Velden A, Spiessens M, Willems G. Bite mark analysis and comparison using image perception technology. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2006;24(1):14-17.
• 152. Tuceryan M, Li F, Blitzer HL, Parks ET, Platt JA. A framework for estimating probability of a match in forensic bite mark identification. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(Suppl 1):83-90.
• 153. American Board of Forensic Odontology, Inc. ABFO Bite mark Analysis Guidelines. In Bowers CM, Bell GL, eds. Manual of Forensic Odontology 3rd. Saratog Springs: American Soc Foren Odon. 1997:299-357.
• 154. Tedeschi-Oliveira SV, Melani RF, de Almeida NH, de Paiva LA. Facial soft tissue thickness of Brazilian adults. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;193(1-3):e1–127.e1277
• 155. Sweet D. Human Bitemarks: Examination, Recovery, and Analysis. In: Bowers CM, Bell GL, editors. Manual of Forensic Odontology (3rd edition). Saratoga Springs, NY: American Soc Foren Odon. 1997:148-169.
• 156. Rothwell BR. Bite marks in forensic odontology: fact or fiction? In: Worthington P, Evans JR, Oral and maxillofacial surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders,1994:588–600.
• 157. Martin-de las Heras S, Valenzuela A, Ogayar C, Valverde AJ, Torres JC. Computer-based production of comparison overlays from 3D-scanned dental casts for bite mark analysis. J Forensic Sci. 2005;50(1):127-133.
• 158. Divakar KP. Forensic Odontology: The New Dimension in Dental Analysis. Int J Biomed Sci. 2017;13(1):1-5.
• 159. Manica S. Difficulties and limitations of using bite mark analysis in Forensic Dentistry -a lack of science. RBOL 2016;3:83-91.
• 160. Gonzalez MEL, Sánchez Sánchez JA, Cienfuegos-Jovellanos BB. Bite marks: latest techniques of analysis. Revista de La Escuela de Medicina Legal 2006;47-53.
• 161. Stenberg I, Borrman HI. Dental condition and identification marking of dentures in homes for the elderly in Göteborg, Sweden. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 1998;16(2):35-7.
• 162. Rathee M, Yadav K. Denture identification methods: a review. J Dent Med Sci. 2014;1(13):58-61.
• 163. Richmond R, Pretty IA. Contemporary methods of labelling dental prostheses – a review of the literature. J Forensic Sci. 2006;51(5):1120–1126.
• 164. Gordon I, Shapiro HA. Forensic Medicine: A Guide to the Principles. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1975.
• 165. Polson CJ, Gee DJ, Knight B. The Essentials of Forensic Medicine. 4th edn. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1985.
• 166. Taylor K. Forensic Art and Illustration. Boca Ratan: CRC Press; 2001;4-82, 361-523.
• 167. Cavanagh D, Steyn M. Facial reconstruction: Soft tissue thickness values for South African black females. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;206(1-3):215e1-215.e2157.
• 168. Lee WJ, Wilkinson CM, Hwang H. An Accuracy assessment of forensic computerized facial reconstruction employing cone-beam computed tomography from live subjects. J Forensic Sci. 2012;57(2):318–327.
• 169. Fernandes CM, Serra Mda C, da Silva JV, Noritomi PY, Pereira FD, Melani RF. Tests of one Brazilian facial reconstruction method using three soft tissue depth sets and familiar assessors. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;214(1-3):211.e1-211.e2117.
• 170. Gatliff BP, Snow CC. From skull to visage. J Biocommun. 1979;6(2):27–30.
• 171. Gerasimov MM. The Face Finder. New York: Lippincott; 1971
• 172. Kahler K, Haber J, Seidel HP. Reanimating the dead: reconstruction of expressive faces from skull data. ACM/SIGGRAPH Comp Graph Proc. 2003;22(3):554–567.
• 173. Wilkinson CM, “Virtual” sculpture as a method of computerized facial reconstruction. Proceedings of the first International Conference on Reconstruction of Soft Facial Parts (RSFP), Potsdam, Germany, 2003;59–63.
• 174. Fernandes CM, Pereira FD, da Silva JV, Serra Mda C. Is characterizing the digital forensic facial reconstruction with hair necessary? A familiar asssessors’ analysis. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;229(1-3):164.e1-5.
• 175. Harorlı A. Adli Dişhekimliği. 1. Baskı. Erzurum: Atatürk Üni Yay. 2006; 25-6(1):53-68.
• 176. Lebedinskaya G, Balueva T, Veselovskaya E. Principles of facial reconstruction. in: M. Ìscan, R. Helmer (Eds.) Forensic Analysis of the Skull: craniofacial Analysis, Reconstruction and Identification. Wiley-Liss. New York: 1993;183–198.
• 177. Turner W, Brown R, Kelliher T, Tu P, Taister M, Miller K. A novel method of automated skull registration for forensic facial approximation. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;154(2-3):149–158.
• 178. Tu P, Book R, Liu X, Krahnstoever N, Adrian C, Williams P. Automatic Face Recognition from Skeletal Remains. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR); 2007;1–7.
• 179. Romeiro R, Marroquim R, Esperança C, Breda A, Figueredo CM. Forensic Facial Reconstruction Using Mesh Template Deformation with Detail Transfer over HRBF. In: 27th SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images; 2014;266–273.
• 180. Shui W, Zhou M, Deng Q, Wu Z, Ji Y, Li K, et al. Densely Calculated Facial Soft Tissue Thickness for Craniofacial Reconstruction in Chinese Adults. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;266:573.e1–573.e12.
• 181. Shui W, Zhou M, Maddock S, He T, Wang X, Deng Q. A PCA-Based Method for Determining Craniofacial Relationship and Sexual Dimorphism of Facial Shapes. Comput Biol Med. 2017;90:33-49.
• 182. Pitanguy I, Quintaes GA, Cavalcanti M, Leite L. Anatomy of facial aging. Rev Bras Cir 1977;67:385-390.
• 183. Albert AM, Ricanek K, Patterson E. A review of the literature on the aging adult skull and face: Impl icat ions for forens ic science research and applications. Forensic Sci Int 2007;172(1):1-9.
• 184. Machado CEP, Lacerda Filho EM, Arruda GHM, Reis PMGI. Facial recognition. Brasília, DF. INC-PF; 2014.
• 185. Charman SD, Carol RN. Age-progressed images may harm recognition of missing children by increasing the number of plausible targets. J Appl Res Mem Cogn 2012;1(3):171-178.