Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2022, Volume: 32 Issue: 4 - 2022, 32:4, 261 - 265, 21.10.2022
https://doi.org/10.54614/CRDS.2022.6268

Abstract

References

  • 1. Wang J, Bidari S, Inoue K, Yang H, Rhoton A Jr. Extensions of the sphenoid sinus: A new classification. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(4):797-816. [CrossRef]
  • 2. Tan HKK, Ong YK, Teo MSK, Fook-Chong SMC. The development of sphenoid sinus in Asian children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003;67(12):1295-1302. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Hamid O, El Fiky L, Hassan O, Kotb A, El Fiky S. Anatomic variations of the sphenoid sinus and their impact on trans-sphenoid pituitary surgery. Skull Base. 2008;18(1):9-15. [CrossRef]
  • 4. ELKammash TH, Enaba MM, Awadalla AM. Variability in sphenoid sinus pneumatization and its impact upon reduction of complications following sellar region surgeries. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2014;45(3):705-714. [CrossRef]
  • 5. Anusha B, Baharudin A, Philip R, Harvinder S, Shaffie BM. Anatomical variations of the sphenoid sinus and its adjacent structures: A review of existing literature. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014;36(5):419-427. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Yilmaz N, Köse E, Dedeoğlu N, Colak C, Ozbag D, Durak MA. Detailed anatomical analysis of the sphenoid sinus and sphenoid sinus ostium by cone-beam computed tomography. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(6):e549-e552. [CrossRef]
  • 7. Göçmez C, Göya C, Hamidi C, Teke M, Hattapoğlu S, Kamaşak K. Evaluation of the surgical anatomy of sphenoid ostium with 3D computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014;36(8):783-788. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Kieff DA, Busaba N. Treatment of isolated sphenoid sinus inflammatory disease by endoscopic sphenoidotomy without ethmoidectomy. Laryngoscope. 2002;112(12):2186-2188. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Kim HU, Kim SS, Kang SS, Chung IH, Lee JG, Yoon JH. Surgical anatomy of the natural ostium of the sphenoid sinus. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(9):1599-1602. [CrossRef]
  • 10. Babbel RW, Harnsberger HR. A contemporary look at the imaging issues of sinusitis-sinonasal anatomy, physiology, and computedtomography techniques. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1991;12(6):526-540.
  • 11. Zinreich SJ. Functional anatomy and computed tomography imaging of the paranasal sinuses. Am J Med Sci. 1998;316(1):2-12. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Scuderi AJ, Harnsberger HR, Boyer RS. Pneumatization of the paranasal sinuses-normal features of importance to the accurateinterpretation of CT-scans and MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;160(5):1101-1104. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Štoković N, Trkulja V, Dumić-Čule I, et al. Sphenoid sinus types, dimensions and relationship with surrounding structures. Ann Anat. 2016;203:69-76. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Wang SS, Zhang JC, Xue L, Wei L, Xi Z, Wang R. Anatomy and CT reconstruction of the anterior area of sphenoid sinus. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(4):5217-5226.
  • 15. Cellina M, Gibelli D, Floridi C, et al. Sphenoid sinuses: Pneumatisation and anatomical variants-what the radiologist needs to know and report to avoid intraoperative complications. Surg Radiol Anat. 2020;42(9):1013-1024. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Lentzen MP, Zirk M, Riekert M, Buller J, Kreppel M. Anatomical and volumetric analysis of the sphenoid sinus by semiautomatic segmentation of cone beam computed tomography. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(3):1166-1170. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am. 2008;52(4):707-730. [CrossRef]
  • 18. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation. 7th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby; 2014.
  • 19. Eren H, İnceoğlu B, Kirşan Büyükkoçak B, Eren İ, Orhan K. Evaluation of referral of cone-beam CT investigations at a dentomaxillofacial radiology clinic of University Hospital. Curr Res Dent Sci. 2020;30(2):1-1. [CrossRef]
  • 20. Şirikci A, Bayazıt YA, Bayram M, Mumbuç S, Güngör K, Kanlikama M. Variations of sphenoid and related structures. Eur Radiol. 2000;10(5):844-848. [CrossRef]
  • 21. Yalcin ED. Assessment of sphenoid sinus types in patients with cleft lip and palate on cone-beam CT. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277(4):1101-1108. [CrossRef]
  • 22. Alrumaih RA, Ashoor MM, Obidan AA, Al-Khater KM, Al-Jubran SA. Radiological sinonasal anatomy. Exploring the Saudi population. Saudi Med J. 2016;37(5):521-526. [CrossRef]
  • 23. Doubi A, Albathi A, Sukyte-Raube D, Castelnuovo P, Alfawwaz F, AlQahtani A. Location of the sphenoid sinus ostium in relation to adjacent anatomical landmarks. Ear Nose Throat J. 2021;100(10_ suppl):961S-968S. [CrossRef]
  • 24. Jaworek-Troć J, Walocha JA, Skrzat J, et al. A computed tomography comprehensive evaluation of the ostium of the sphenoid sinus and its clinical significance. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2021. [CrossRef]
  • 25. Gupta T, Aggarwal A, Sahni D. Anatomical landmarks for locating the sphenoid ostium during endoscopic endonasal approach: A cadaveric study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013;35(2):137-142. [CrossRef]
  • 26. Campero A, Emmerich J, Socolovsky M, et al. Microsurgical anatomy of the sphenoid ostia. J Clin Neurosci. 2010;17(10):1298-1300. [CrossRef

Morphometric assessment of sphenoid sinus ostium by cone-beam computed tomography: A retrospective study

Year 2022, Volume: 32 Issue: 4 - 2022, 32:4, 261 - 265, 21.10.2022
https://doi.org/10.54614/CRDS.2022.6268

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the sizes of the sphenoid sinuses ostia, the distance between them, and the distance between the lateral margin of the sphenoid sinuses ostia
and the anterolateral wall of the sinuses in the Turkish population.
Methods: The analysis was performed as a retrospective study of 240 cone-beam computed tomography scans of patients using NNT Viewer software program (CeflaGroup, Verona, Italy).
Patients over 18 years old with no pathologies present in the sphenoid sinuses were included in the study. Patients who had suffered from head trauma or undergone nasal, orbital, or cranial
basis surgery were excluded from the study.
Results: The mean size of both sphenoid sinuses ostia was 2.18 ± 0.42 mm for females and 2.26 ±0.53 mm for males. The mean distance between both sphenoid sinuses ostia was 6.19 ± 2.10 mm
for females and 6.87 ± 2.10 mm for males. The mean distance between the lateral margin of the sphenoid sinuses ostia and the anterolateral wall of the sinuses was 9.66 ± 2.06 mm for females
and 10.61 ± 1.95 mm for males. There was no statistically significant difference between the right and left ostium sizes of males and females. Right ostium diameters of cases over 45 years of age
were statistically significantly higher than those under 45 years of age.
Conclusion: Intraoperative identification of sphenoid sinus ostium is difficult, and its inadequate excision could lead to potential iatrogenic complications. Therefore, detailed morphometric measurements in populations are needed to perform safe and effective procedures.
Keywords: Anatomy, CBCT, morphometric, sphenoid sinus, spheonid sinus ostium

References

  • 1. Wang J, Bidari S, Inoue K, Yang H, Rhoton A Jr. Extensions of the sphenoid sinus: A new classification. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(4):797-816. [CrossRef]
  • 2. Tan HKK, Ong YK, Teo MSK, Fook-Chong SMC. The development of sphenoid sinus in Asian children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003;67(12):1295-1302. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Hamid O, El Fiky L, Hassan O, Kotb A, El Fiky S. Anatomic variations of the sphenoid sinus and their impact on trans-sphenoid pituitary surgery. Skull Base. 2008;18(1):9-15. [CrossRef]
  • 4. ELKammash TH, Enaba MM, Awadalla AM. Variability in sphenoid sinus pneumatization and its impact upon reduction of complications following sellar region surgeries. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2014;45(3):705-714. [CrossRef]
  • 5. Anusha B, Baharudin A, Philip R, Harvinder S, Shaffie BM. Anatomical variations of the sphenoid sinus and its adjacent structures: A review of existing literature. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014;36(5):419-427. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Yilmaz N, Köse E, Dedeoğlu N, Colak C, Ozbag D, Durak MA. Detailed anatomical analysis of the sphenoid sinus and sphenoid sinus ostium by cone-beam computed tomography. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(6):e549-e552. [CrossRef]
  • 7. Göçmez C, Göya C, Hamidi C, Teke M, Hattapoğlu S, Kamaşak K. Evaluation of the surgical anatomy of sphenoid ostium with 3D computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014;36(8):783-788. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Kieff DA, Busaba N. Treatment of isolated sphenoid sinus inflammatory disease by endoscopic sphenoidotomy without ethmoidectomy. Laryngoscope. 2002;112(12):2186-2188. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Kim HU, Kim SS, Kang SS, Chung IH, Lee JG, Yoon JH. Surgical anatomy of the natural ostium of the sphenoid sinus. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(9):1599-1602. [CrossRef]
  • 10. Babbel RW, Harnsberger HR. A contemporary look at the imaging issues of sinusitis-sinonasal anatomy, physiology, and computedtomography techniques. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1991;12(6):526-540.
  • 11. Zinreich SJ. Functional anatomy and computed tomography imaging of the paranasal sinuses. Am J Med Sci. 1998;316(1):2-12. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Scuderi AJ, Harnsberger HR, Boyer RS. Pneumatization of the paranasal sinuses-normal features of importance to the accurateinterpretation of CT-scans and MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;160(5):1101-1104. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Štoković N, Trkulja V, Dumić-Čule I, et al. Sphenoid sinus types, dimensions and relationship with surrounding structures. Ann Anat. 2016;203:69-76. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Wang SS, Zhang JC, Xue L, Wei L, Xi Z, Wang R. Anatomy and CT reconstruction of the anterior area of sphenoid sinus. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(4):5217-5226.
  • 15. Cellina M, Gibelli D, Floridi C, et al. Sphenoid sinuses: Pneumatisation and anatomical variants-what the radiologist needs to know and report to avoid intraoperative complications. Surg Radiol Anat. 2020;42(9):1013-1024. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Lentzen MP, Zirk M, Riekert M, Buller J, Kreppel M. Anatomical and volumetric analysis of the sphenoid sinus by semiautomatic segmentation of cone beam computed tomography. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(3):1166-1170. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am. 2008;52(4):707-730. [CrossRef]
  • 18. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation. 7th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby; 2014.
  • 19. Eren H, İnceoğlu B, Kirşan Büyükkoçak B, Eren İ, Orhan K. Evaluation of referral of cone-beam CT investigations at a dentomaxillofacial radiology clinic of University Hospital. Curr Res Dent Sci. 2020;30(2):1-1. [CrossRef]
  • 20. Şirikci A, Bayazıt YA, Bayram M, Mumbuç S, Güngör K, Kanlikama M. Variations of sphenoid and related structures. Eur Radiol. 2000;10(5):844-848. [CrossRef]
  • 21. Yalcin ED. Assessment of sphenoid sinus types in patients with cleft lip and palate on cone-beam CT. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277(4):1101-1108. [CrossRef]
  • 22. Alrumaih RA, Ashoor MM, Obidan AA, Al-Khater KM, Al-Jubran SA. Radiological sinonasal anatomy. Exploring the Saudi population. Saudi Med J. 2016;37(5):521-526. [CrossRef]
  • 23. Doubi A, Albathi A, Sukyte-Raube D, Castelnuovo P, Alfawwaz F, AlQahtani A. Location of the sphenoid sinus ostium in relation to adjacent anatomical landmarks. Ear Nose Throat J. 2021;100(10_ suppl):961S-968S. [CrossRef]
  • 24. Jaworek-Troć J, Walocha JA, Skrzat J, et al. A computed tomography comprehensive evaluation of the ostium of the sphenoid sinus and its clinical significance. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2021. [CrossRef]
  • 25. Gupta T, Aggarwal A, Sahni D. Anatomical landmarks for locating the sphenoid ostium during endoscopic endonasal approach: A cadaveric study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013;35(2):137-142. [CrossRef]
  • 26. Campero A, Emmerich J, Socolovsky M, et al. Microsurgical anatomy of the sphenoid ostia. J Clin Neurosci. 2010;17(10):1298-1300. [CrossRef
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Dentistry
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Özlem Okumuş This is me

Zeliha Zuhal Yurdabakan This is me

Publication Date October 21, 2022
Submission Date December 30, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 32 Issue: 4 - 2022, 32:4

Cite

AMA Okumuş Ö, Yurdabakan ZZ. Morphometric assessment of sphenoid sinus ostium by cone-beam computed tomography: A retrospective study. Curr Res Dent Sci. October 2022;32(4):261-265. doi:10.54614/CRDS.2022.6268

Current Research in Dental Sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

29936