Review
BibTex RIS Cite

Güçlendirilmiş cam iyonomer siman çeşitleri

Year 2022, Volume: 32 Issue: 4 - 2022, 32:4, 297 - 304, 21.10.2022

Seda Nur Karakaş

Abstract

The chemical, physical, and mechanical properties of the restorative materials have great importance for the longevity of the restoration and patient satisfaction. At the present time, amalgam, composite resin, and glass ionomer cements are used in common clinical applications as permanent restorative materials. Glass ionomer cements have been used for different clinical applications since their introduction in the market in 1972. Glass ionomer cements have many advantages such as chemically bonding to tooth tissues, fluoride release, anti-caryogenic and remineralization potentials. However, its low abrasion resistance and mechanical properties and its high sensitivity to moisture during the setting phase limit its use in permanent teeth. Recently, many research and development studies have started to be used as permanent restorative material due to its positive properties. In order to eliminate the negative properties of glass ionomer cements, many changes have been made in their contents, powder ratios and hardening reactions. Thus, its weak physical and mechanical properties are strengthened and used as a permanent restorative material. In this review, the content and recent developments of glass ionomer cements which are increasingly used as restorative materials are examined.

Keywords

Amalgomer giomer glass ionomer cements high viscosity glass ionomer cements zirconomer

References

  • 1. Croll TP, Nicholson J. Glass ionomer cements in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:423-9.
  • 2. Mickenautsch S, Mount G, Yengopal V. Therapeutic effect of glass‐ionomers: an overview of evidence. Aust Dent J 2011;56:10-5.
  • 3. Wilson A, Kent B, Clinton D, Miller R. The formation and microstructure of dental silicate cements. J Mater Sci 1972;7:220-38.
  • 4. Bowen RL, Marjenhoff WA. Dental composites/glass ionomers: the materials. Adv Dent Res 1992;6(1):44-9.
  • 5. Sakaguchi R, Powers J. Restorative materials–ceramics. Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials 13th ed Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier. 2012. p.25.
  • 6. Affairs A. Direct and indirect restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:463-72.
  • 7. Murdoch-Kinch CA, McLEAN ME. Minimally invasive dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:87-95.
  • 8. Peters MC, McLean ME. Minimally Invasive Operative Care: II. Contemporary Techniques and Materials: an Overview. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:17-31
  • 9. Najeeb S, Khurshid Z, Zafar M, Khan A, Zohaib S, Martí J, et al. Modifications in glass ionomer cements: Nano-sized fillers and bioactive nanoceramics. Int J Mol Sci 2016;17:1134-48.
  • 10. Lohbauer U. Dental glass ionomer cements as permanent filling materials?–Properties, limitations and future trends. Mater 2009;3(1):76-96.
  • 11. Sakaguchi R, Powers J. Restorative materials-composites and polymers. Craig’s Restorative dental materials 2012.p.13.
  • 12. Baig MS, Fleming GJ. Conventional glass-ionomer materials: a review of the developments in glass powder, polyacid liquid and the strategies of reinforcement. J Dent 2015;43:897-912.
  • 13. Davidson CL. Advances in glass-ionomer cements. J Appl Oral Sci 2006;14:3-9.
  • 14. Fareed MA, Stamboulis A. Nanoclay addition to a conventional glass ionomer cements: Influence on physical properties. Eur J Dent 2014;8:456-63.
  • 15. Fejerskov O, Kidd E. Dental caries: the disease and its clinical management. 2nd ed. Oxford, Blackwell Munksgaard, 2008.p. 385-426
  • 16. Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials—fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater 2007;23:343-62.
  • 17. Lohbauer U. Dental glass ionomer cements as permanent filling materials?–properties, limitations and future trends. Mater 2010;3:76-96.
  • 18. Burke F, Ray N, McConnell R. Fluoride‐containing restorative materials. Int J Dent 2006;56:33-43.
  • 19. Hattab F, Amin W. Fluoride release from glass ionomer restorative materials and the effects of surface coating. Biomater 2001;22:1449-58.
  • 20. Kleverlaan CJ, van Duinen RN, Feilzer AJ. Mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements affected by curing methods. Dent Mater 2004;20:45-50.
  • 21. Ngo HC, Mount G, Mc Intyre J, Tuisuva J, Von Doussa R. Chemical exchange between glass-ionomer restorations and residual carious dentine in permanent molars: an in vivo study. J Dent 2006;34:608-13
  • 22. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P. Glass-ionomer adhesion: the mechanisms at the interface. J Dent 2006;34:615-8.
  • 23. Sidhu S. Glass‐ionomer cement restorative materials: a sticky subject? Aust Dent J 2011;56:23-30
  • 24. Diamanti I, Koletsi-Kounari H, Mamai-Homata E, Vougiouklakis G. In vitro evaluation of fluoride and calcium sodium phosphosilicate toothpastes, on root dentine caries lesions. J Dent 2011;39(9):619-28.
  • 25. Berg JH, Croll TP. Glass ionomer restorative cement systems: an update. Pediatric Dentistry. 2015;37(2):116-24.
  • 26. Sidhu SK. Glass‐ionomer cement restorative materials: a sticky subject? Australian dental journal. 2011;56:23-30.
  • 27. Köroğlu A, Ekren DO, Kurtoğlu C. Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme çalışması. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2012;2012:205-216.
  • 28. Torabzadeh H, Ghasemi A, Shakeri S, Baghban AA, Razmavar S. Effect of powder/liquid ratio of glass ionomer cements on flexural and shear bond strengths to dentin. Braz J Oral Sci 2016:204-7.
  • 29. Caughman WF, Caughman GB, Dominy WT, Schuster GS. Glass ionomer and composite resin cements: effects on oral cells. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:513-21.
  • 30. Khoroushi M, Keshani F. A review of glass-ionomers: From conventional glass-ionomer to bioactive glass-ionomer. Dent Res J 2013;10:411-20.
  • 31. B Burke F, Fleming G, Owen F, Watson D. Materials for restoration of primary teeth: 2. Glass ionomer derivatives and compomers. Dent Update 2002;29:10-7.
  • 32. Nicholson JW, Czarnecka B. The biocompatibility of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements for dentistry. Dent Mater 2008;24:1702-8.
  • 33. Uysal T, Yagci A, Uysal B, Akdogan G. Are nano-composites and nano-ionomers suitable for orthodontic bracket bonding? Eur J Orthod 2009;32:78-82.
  • 34. Chen M-H. Update on dental nanocomposites. J Dent Res 2010;89:549-60.
  • 35. Oxman JD, Craig BD, Kalgutkar RS, Peuker M, Bissinger P. Processes for forming dental materials and device. Google Patents; 2006.
  • 36. Xu X, Burgess JO. Compressive strength, fluoride release and recharge of fluoride-releasing materials. Biomater 2003;24:2451-61.
  • 37. Nicholson JW. Polyacid-modified composite resins (“compomers”) and their use in clinical dentistry. Dent Mater 2007;23:615-22.
  • 38. Çapan BŞ, Akyüz S. Çocuk Diş Hekimliğinde Fluorid Salınımı Yapan Güncel Restoratif Materyaller. Clin Exp Health Sci 2016;6:129-34.
  • 39. Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Pataridou A. Fluoride release and uptake by four new fluoride releasing restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:866-72.
  • 40. Attar N, Turgut M. Fluoride release and uptake capacities of fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Oper Dent-University Of Washington 2003;28:395-402
  • 41. Mutluay MS. Süt dişlerinde restoratif materyal seçimi ve etkileyen faktörler. Selcuk Dent J 2016;3:151-8.
  • 42. Guggenberger R, May R, Stefan K. New trends in glass-ionomer chemistry. Biomater 1998;19:479-83.
  • 43. Duinen RN, Kleverlaan CJ, de Gee AJ, Werner A, Feilzer AJ. Early and long-term wear of ‘Fast-set’conventional glass–ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2005;21:716-20.
  • 44. Basting R, Serra M, Rodrigues A. In situ microhardness evaluation of glass–ionomer/composite resin hybrid materials at different post‐irradiation times. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:1187-95.
  • 45. Crowley C, Doyle J, Towler M, Hill R, Hampshire S. The influence of capsule geometry and cement formulation on the apparent viscosity of dental cements. J Dent 2006;34:566-73.
  • 46. Dowling AH, Fleming GJ. Are encapsulated anterior glass-ionomer restoratives better than their hand-mixed equivalents? J Dent 2009;37:133-40.
  • 47. Celik EU, Ermis B. Koruyucu Rezin Uygulamasinin Yüksek Viskoziteli Geleneksel Cam İyonomer Simanin Mikrosertliği Üzerine Etkisinin In Vitro Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. Cumhuriyet Üni Diş Hek Fak Derg 11:91-5.
  • 48. Wang X, Yap AUJ, Ngo H. Effect of early water exposure on the strength of glass ionomer restoratives. Oper Dent 2006;31:584-9.
  • 49. Şener Y, Koyutürk A. Üç farklı cam iyonomer simanın yüzey sertliklerinin karşılaştırılması. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Diş Hek Fak Derg 2006;9:91-4.
  • 50. Gurgan S, Kutuk ZB, Ergin E, Oztas SS, Cakir FY. Clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system: a 6-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:2335-43.
  • 51. Türkün L, Kanik Ö. A prospective six-year clinical study evaluating reinforced glass ionomer cements with resin coating on posterior teeth: quo vadis? Oper Dent 2016;41:587-98.
  • 52. Friedl K, Hiller K-A, Friedl K-H. Clinical performance of a new glass ionomer based restoration system: a retrospective cohort study. Dent Mater 2011;27:1031-7.
  • 53. Kavrık F, Savaş S, Küçükyilmaz E, Çelik EU. Yüksek Çürük Riskli Adölesanlarda Farklı Tedavi Yaklaşımları. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci Cases 2016;2:35-43.
  • 54. Ikemura K, Tay FR, Endo T, Pashley DH. A review of chemical-approach and ultramorphological studies on the development of fluoride-releasing dental adhesives comprising new pre-reacted glass ionomer (PRG) fillers. Dent Mater J 2008;27:315-39
  • 55. Gordan VV, Mondragon E, Watson RE, Garvan C, Mjör IA. A clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and a giomer restorative material: results at eight years. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:621-7.
  • 56. Deliperi S, Bardwell D, Wegley C, Congiu M. In vitro evaluation of giomers microleakage after exposure to 33% hydrogen peroxide: self-etch vs total-etch adhesives. Oper Dent 2006;31:227-32.
  • 57. Kimyai S, Savadi-Oskoee S, Ajami A-A, Sadr A, Asdagh S. Effect of three prophylaxis methods on surface roughness of giomer. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16:110-4.
  • 58. Sengul F, Gurbuz T. Clinical evaluation of restorative materials in primary teeth class II lesions. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015;39(4):315-21.
  • 59. Koenraads H, Van der Kroon G, Frencken J. Compressive strength of two newly developed glass-ionomer materials for use with the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach in class II cavities. Dent Mater 2009;25:551-6.
  • 60. Zainuddin N, Karpukhina N, Law RV, Hill RG. Characterisation of a remineralising Glass Carbomer® ionomer cement by MAS-NMR spectroscopy. Dent Mater 2012;28:1051-8.
  • 61. Rao A, Rao A. Fluoride rechargability of a non-resin auto-cured glass ionomer cement from a fluoridated dentifrice: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2011;29:202-4.
  • 62. Algera TJ, Kleverlaan CJ, Prahl-Andersen B, Feilzer AJ. The influence of environmental conditions on the material properties of setting glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2006;22:852-6.
  • 63. Cehreli SB, Tirali RE, Yalcinkaya Z, Cehreli ZC. Microleakage of newly developed glass carbomer cement in primary teeth. Eur J Dent 2013;7:15.
  • 64. Menne-Happ U, Ilie N. Effect of gloss and heat on the mechanical behaviour of a glass carbomer cement. J Dent 2013;41:223-30.
  • 65. Nicholson JW. Fluoride-releasing dental restorative materials: An update. Balk J Dent Med 2014;18:60-9.
  • 66. Walia R, Jasuja P, Verma KG, Juneja S, Mathur A, Ahuja L. A comparative evaluation of microleakage and compressive strength of Ketac Molar, Giomer, Zirconomer, and Ceram-x: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2016;34:280-4.
  • 67. Patel MU, Punia SK, Bhat S, Singh G, Bhargava R, Goyal P, et al. An in vitro evaluation of microleakage of posterior teeth restored with amalgam, composite and zirconomer–A stereomicroscopic study. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:65-2
  • 68. Tiwari S, Kenchappa M, Bhayya D, Gupta S, Saxena S, Satyarth S, et al. Antibacterial Activity and Fluoride Release of Glass-Ionomer Cement, Compomer and Zirconia Reinforced Glass-Ionomer Cement. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10(4):90-3.
  • 69. Abdulsamee N, Elkhadem AH. Zirconomer and Zirconomer Improved (White Amalgams): Restorative Materi-als for the Future. Review. EC Dent Sci 2017;15:134-50.
  • 70. Khoroushi M, Mousavinasab S, Keshani F, Hashemi S. Effect of resin-modified glass ionomer containing bioactive glass on the flexural strength and morphology of demineralized dentin. Oper Dent 2013;38:21-30.
  • 71. Bhattacharya A, Vaidya S, Tomer AK, Raina A. GIC at It’s best–A review on ceramic reinforced GIC. Internatinal Journal of Applied Dental Sciences 2017;3:405-8.
  • 72. Bariker RH, Mandroli PS. An in-vitro evaluation of antibacterial effect of Amalgomer CR and Fuji VII against bacteria causing severe early childhood caries. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2016;34:23.
  • 73. Ayad NM, Elnogoly SA, Badie OM. An in-vitro study of the physico-mechanical properties of a new esthetic restorative versus dental amalgam. Rev Clín Pesq Odontol 2008;4:137-44.
  • 74. Nigam AG, Jaiswal J, Murthy R, Pandey R. Estimation of fluoride release from various dental materials in different media—an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2009;2:1-8.
  • 75. Choudhary K, Nandlal B. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of nano-hydroxyapatite incorporated glass ionomer cement and conventional glass ionomer cement on dense synthetic hydroxyapatite disk: An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2015;26:170-5.
  • 76. Barandehfard F, Rad MK, Hosseinnia A, Khoshroo K, Tahriri M, Jazayeri H, et al. The addition of synthesized hydroxyapatite and fluorapatite nanoparticles to a glass-ionomer cement for dental restoration and its effects on mechanical properties. Ceram Int 2016;42:17866-75.
  • 77. Hench LL. The story of Bioglass®. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2006;17:967-78.
  • 78. Kadiyala SV, Raj JD. Recent advances and modifications of dental restorative materials. A review IJAMR 2016;3:1609-16.
  • 79. Jyothi K, Annapurna S, Kumar AS, Venugopal P, Jayashankara C. Clinical evaluation of giomer-and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in class V noncarious cervical lesions: An in vivo study. Journal of Conserv Dent 2011;14:409.
  • 80. Ebaya MM, Ali AI, Mahmoud SH. Evaluation of marginal adaptation and microleakage of three glass ionomer-based Class V restorations: in vitro study. Eur J Dent 2019;13:599-606.
  • 81. Sharma A, Singh M, Pandey V. Glass ionomer cement-a phoenix and its new flight. Int J Res Health Allied Sci. 2015;1:9-12.
  • 82. Piekarz C, Ranjitkar S, Hunt D, McIntyre J. An in vitro assessment of the role of Tooth Mousse in preventing wine erosion. Aust Dent J 2008;53:22-5
  • 83. Reynolds EC. Anticariogenic complexes of amorphous calcium phosphate stabilized by casein phosphopeptides: a review. Spec Care Dentist 1998;18:8-16
  • 84. Mazzaoui S, Burrow M, Tyas M, Dashper S, Eakins D, Reynolds E. Incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate into a glass-ionomer cement. J Dent Res 2003;82:914-8.
  • 85. Botelho MG. Inhibitory effects on selected oral bacteria of antibacterial agents incorporated in a glass ionomer cement. Caries Res 2003;37:108-14.
  • 86. GPV S, Elsa N, Agrawal A. Newer Advances In Glass Ionomer Cement: A Review. Annals and Essences of Dentistry 2016;8: 19-23
  • 87. Gu Y, Yap A, Cheang P, Khor K. Effects of incorporation of HA/ZrO2 into glass ionomer cement (GIC). Biomater 2005;26:713-20.
  • 88. Elsaka SE, Hamouda IM, Swain MV. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles addition to a conventional glass-ionomer restorative: influence on physical and antibacterial properties. J Dent 2011;39:589-98.
  • 89. AlOtaibi G. Recent advancements in glass ionomer materials with introduction of nanotechnology: A review. Int J Oral Care Res 2019;7:21-3.

Güçlendirilmiş cam iyonomer siman çeşitleri

Year 2022, Volume: 32 Issue: 4 - 2022, 32:4, 297 - 304, 21.10.2022

Seda Nur Karakaş

Abstract

Restoratif materyallerin kimyasal, fiziksel ve mekanik özellikleri yapılan restorasyonun uzun ömürlü olabilmesi ve hasta memnuniyeti için büyük önem taşımaktadır. Günümüzde daimi restoratif materyaller olarak amalgam, kompozit rezin ve cam iyonomer simanlar rutin klinik uygulamalarda kullanılmaktadır. Cam iyonomer simanlar 1972’de piyasa çıkarıldıkları tarihten itibaren farklı klinik uygulamalar için kullanılmıştır. Cam iyonomer simanların diş dokularına kimyasal olarak bağlanabilmesi, flor salınımı, antikaryojenik ve remineralizasyon potansiyellerinin olması gibi birçok avantajları bulunmaktadır. Ancak aşınmaya dirençlerinin ve mekanik özelliklerinin zayıf olması ve sertleşme aşamasında neme hassasiyetlerinin yüksek olması gibi olumsuzluklar daimi dişlerde kullanımını sınırlamaktadır. Son zamanlarda sahip olduğu olumlu özellikler nedeniyle daimi restoratif materyal olarak kullanmak için birçok araştırma ve geliştirme çalışması başlamıştır. Cam iyonomer simanların olumsuz özelliklerini giderebilmek amacıyla, içeriklerinde, toz oranlarında ve sertleşme reaksiyonlarında bir çok değişiklik yapılmıştır. Böylece zayıf fiziksel ve mekanik özellikleri güçlendirilerek daimi restoratif materyal olarak kullanılmaktadır. Bu derlemede restoratif materyal olarak kullanımı artmakta olan cam iyonomer simanların içeriği ve güçlendirilmiş cam iyonomer simanlardaki son gelişmeler incelenmiştir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Amalgomer, giomer, cam iyonomer simanlar, yüksek viskoziteli cam iyonomer simanlar, zirconomer

Keywords

Amalgomer giomer glass ionomer cements high viscosity glass ionomer cements zirconomer

References

  • 1. Croll TP, Nicholson J. Glass ionomer cements in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:423-9.
  • 2. Mickenautsch S, Mount G, Yengopal V. Therapeutic effect of glass‐ionomers: an overview of evidence. Aust Dent J 2011;56:10-5.
  • 3. Wilson A, Kent B, Clinton D, Miller R. The formation and microstructure of dental silicate cements. J Mater Sci 1972;7:220-38.
  • 4. Bowen RL, Marjenhoff WA. Dental composites/glass ionomers: the materials. Adv Dent Res 1992;6(1):44-9.
  • 5. Sakaguchi R, Powers J. Restorative materials–ceramics. Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials 13th ed Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier. 2012. p.25.
  • 6. Affairs A. Direct and indirect restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:463-72.
  • 7. Murdoch-Kinch CA, McLEAN ME. Minimally invasive dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:87-95.
  • 8. Peters MC, McLean ME. Minimally Invasive Operative Care: II. Contemporary Techniques and Materials: an Overview. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:17-31
  • 9. Najeeb S, Khurshid Z, Zafar M, Khan A, Zohaib S, Martí J, et al. Modifications in glass ionomer cements: Nano-sized fillers and bioactive nanoceramics. Int J Mol Sci 2016;17:1134-48.
  • 10. Lohbauer U. Dental glass ionomer cements as permanent filling materials?–Properties, limitations and future trends. Mater 2009;3(1):76-96.
  • 11. Sakaguchi R, Powers J. Restorative materials-composites and polymers. Craig’s Restorative dental materials 2012.p.13.
  • 12. Baig MS, Fleming GJ. Conventional glass-ionomer materials: a review of the developments in glass powder, polyacid liquid and the strategies of reinforcement. J Dent 2015;43:897-912.
  • 13. Davidson CL. Advances in glass-ionomer cements. J Appl Oral Sci 2006;14:3-9.
  • 14. Fareed MA, Stamboulis A. Nanoclay addition to a conventional glass ionomer cements: Influence on physical properties. Eur J Dent 2014;8:456-63.
  • 15. Fejerskov O, Kidd E. Dental caries: the disease and its clinical management. 2nd ed. Oxford, Blackwell Munksgaard, 2008.p. 385-426
  • 16. Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials—fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater 2007;23:343-62.
  • 17. Lohbauer U. Dental glass ionomer cements as permanent filling materials?–properties, limitations and future trends. Mater 2010;3:76-96.
  • 18. Burke F, Ray N, McConnell R. Fluoride‐containing restorative materials. Int J Dent 2006;56:33-43.
  • 19. Hattab F, Amin W. Fluoride release from glass ionomer restorative materials and the effects of surface coating. Biomater 2001;22:1449-58.
  • 20. Kleverlaan CJ, van Duinen RN, Feilzer AJ. Mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements affected by curing methods. Dent Mater 2004;20:45-50.
  • 21. Ngo HC, Mount G, Mc Intyre J, Tuisuva J, Von Doussa R. Chemical exchange between glass-ionomer restorations and residual carious dentine in permanent molars: an in vivo study. J Dent 2006;34:608-13
  • 22. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P. Glass-ionomer adhesion: the mechanisms at the interface. J Dent 2006;34:615-8.
  • 23. Sidhu S. Glass‐ionomer cement restorative materials: a sticky subject? Aust Dent J 2011;56:23-30
  • 24. Diamanti I, Koletsi-Kounari H, Mamai-Homata E, Vougiouklakis G. In vitro evaluation of fluoride and calcium sodium phosphosilicate toothpastes, on root dentine caries lesions. J Dent 2011;39(9):619-28.
  • 25. Berg JH, Croll TP. Glass ionomer restorative cement systems: an update. Pediatric Dentistry. 2015;37(2):116-24.
  • 26. Sidhu SK. Glass‐ionomer cement restorative materials: a sticky subject? Australian dental journal. 2011;56:23-30.
  • 27. Köroğlu A, Ekren DO, Kurtoğlu C. Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme çalışması. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2012;2012:205-216.
  • 28. Torabzadeh H, Ghasemi A, Shakeri S, Baghban AA, Razmavar S. Effect of powder/liquid ratio of glass ionomer cements on flexural and shear bond strengths to dentin. Braz J Oral Sci 2016:204-7.
  • 29. Caughman WF, Caughman GB, Dominy WT, Schuster GS. Glass ionomer and composite resin cements: effects on oral cells. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:513-21.
  • 30. Khoroushi M, Keshani F. A review of glass-ionomers: From conventional glass-ionomer to bioactive glass-ionomer. Dent Res J 2013;10:411-20.
  • 31. B Burke F, Fleming G, Owen F, Watson D. Materials for restoration of primary teeth: 2. Glass ionomer derivatives and compomers. Dent Update 2002;29:10-7.
  • 32. Nicholson JW, Czarnecka B. The biocompatibility of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements for dentistry. Dent Mater 2008;24:1702-8.
  • 33. Uysal T, Yagci A, Uysal B, Akdogan G. Are nano-composites and nano-ionomers suitable for orthodontic bracket bonding? Eur J Orthod 2009;32:78-82.
  • 34. Chen M-H. Update on dental nanocomposites. J Dent Res 2010;89:549-60.
  • 35. Oxman JD, Craig BD, Kalgutkar RS, Peuker M, Bissinger P. Processes for forming dental materials and device. Google Patents; 2006.
  • 36. Xu X, Burgess JO. Compressive strength, fluoride release and recharge of fluoride-releasing materials. Biomater 2003;24:2451-61.
  • 37. Nicholson JW. Polyacid-modified composite resins (“compomers”) and their use in clinical dentistry. Dent Mater 2007;23:615-22.
  • 38. Çapan BŞ, Akyüz S. Çocuk Diş Hekimliğinde Fluorid Salınımı Yapan Güncel Restoratif Materyaller. Clin Exp Health Sci 2016;6:129-34.
  • 39. Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Pataridou A. Fluoride release and uptake by four new fluoride releasing restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:866-72.
  • 40. Attar N, Turgut M. Fluoride release and uptake capacities of fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Oper Dent-University Of Washington 2003;28:395-402
  • 41. Mutluay MS. Süt dişlerinde restoratif materyal seçimi ve etkileyen faktörler. Selcuk Dent J 2016;3:151-8.
  • 42. Guggenberger R, May R, Stefan K. New trends in glass-ionomer chemistry. Biomater 1998;19:479-83.
  • 43. Duinen RN, Kleverlaan CJ, de Gee AJ, Werner A, Feilzer AJ. Early and long-term wear of ‘Fast-set’conventional glass–ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2005;21:716-20.
  • 44. Basting R, Serra M, Rodrigues A. In situ microhardness evaluation of glass–ionomer/composite resin hybrid materials at different post‐irradiation times. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:1187-95.
  • 45. Crowley C, Doyle J, Towler M, Hill R, Hampshire S. The influence of capsule geometry and cement formulation on the apparent viscosity of dental cements. J Dent 2006;34:566-73.
  • 46. Dowling AH, Fleming GJ. Are encapsulated anterior glass-ionomer restoratives better than their hand-mixed equivalents? J Dent 2009;37:133-40.
  • 47. Celik EU, Ermis B. Koruyucu Rezin Uygulamasinin Yüksek Viskoziteli Geleneksel Cam İyonomer Simanin Mikrosertliği Üzerine Etkisinin In Vitro Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. Cumhuriyet Üni Diş Hek Fak Derg 11:91-5.
  • 48. Wang X, Yap AUJ, Ngo H. Effect of early water exposure on the strength of glass ionomer restoratives. Oper Dent 2006;31:584-9.
  • 49. Şener Y, Koyutürk A. Üç farklı cam iyonomer simanın yüzey sertliklerinin karşılaştırılması. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Diş Hek Fak Derg 2006;9:91-4.
  • 50. Gurgan S, Kutuk ZB, Ergin E, Oztas SS, Cakir FY. Clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system: a 6-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:2335-43.
  • 51. Türkün L, Kanik Ö. A prospective six-year clinical study evaluating reinforced glass ionomer cements with resin coating on posterior teeth: quo vadis? Oper Dent 2016;41:587-98.
  • 52. Friedl K, Hiller K-A, Friedl K-H. Clinical performance of a new glass ionomer based restoration system: a retrospective cohort study. Dent Mater 2011;27:1031-7.
  • 53. Kavrık F, Savaş S, Küçükyilmaz E, Çelik EU. Yüksek Çürük Riskli Adölesanlarda Farklı Tedavi Yaklaşımları. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci Cases 2016;2:35-43.
  • 54. Ikemura K, Tay FR, Endo T, Pashley DH. A review of chemical-approach and ultramorphological studies on the development of fluoride-releasing dental adhesives comprising new pre-reacted glass ionomer (PRG) fillers. Dent Mater J 2008;27:315-39
  • 55. Gordan VV, Mondragon E, Watson RE, Garvan C, Mjör IA. A clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and a giomer restorative material: results at eight years. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:621-7.
  • 56. Deliperi S, Bardwell D, Wegley C, Congiu M. In vitro evaluation of giomers microleakage after exposure to 33% hydrogen peroxide: self-etch vs total-etch adhesives. Oper Dent 2006;31:227-32.
  • 57. Kimyai S, Savadi-Oskoee S, Ajami A-A, Sadr A, Asdagh S. Effect of three prophylaxis methods on surface roughness of giomer. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16:110-4.
  • 58. Sengul F, Gurbuz T. Clinical evaluation of restorative materials in primary teeth class II lesions. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015;39(4):315-21.
  • 59. Koenraads H, Van der Kroon G, Frencken J. Compressive strength of two newly developed glass-ionomer materials for use with the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach in class II cavities. Dent Mater 2009;25:551-6.
  • 60. Zainuddin N, Karpukhina N, Law RV, Hill RG. Characterisation of a remineralising Glass Carbomer® ionomer cement by MAS-NMR spectroscopy. Dent Mater 2012;28:1051-8.
  • 61. Rao A, Rao A. Fluoride rechargability of a non-resin auto-cured glass ionomer cement from a fluoridated dentifrice: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2011;29:202-4.
  • 62. Algera TJ, Kleverlaan CJ, Prahl-Andersen B, Feilzer AJ. The influence of environmental conditions on the material properties of setting glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2006;22:852-6.
  • 63. Cehreli SB, Tirali RE, Yalcinkaya Z, Cehreli ZC. Microleakage of newly developed glass carbomer cement in primary teeth. Eur J Dent 2013;7:15.
  • 64. Menne-Happ U, Ilie N. Effect of gloss and heat on the mechanical behaviour of a glass carbomer cement. J Dent 2013;41:223-30.
  • 65. Nicholson JW. Fluoride-releasing dental restorative materials: An update. Balk J Dent Med 2014;18:60-9.
  • 66. Walia R, Jasuja P, Verma KG, Juneja S, Mathur A, Ahuja L. A comparative evaluation of microleakage and compressive strength of Ketac Molar, Giomer, Zirconomer, and Ceram-x: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2016;34:280-4.
  • 67. Patel MU, Punia SK, Bhat S, Singh G, Bhargava R, Goyal P, et al. An in vitro evaluation of microleakage of posterior teeth restored with amalgam, composite and zirconomer–A stereomicroscopic study. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:65-2
  • 68. Tiwari S, Kenchappa M, Bhayya D, Gupta S, Saxena S, Satyarth S, et al. Antibacterial Activity and Fluoride Release of Glass-Ionomer Cement, Compomer and Zirconia Reinforced Glass-Ionomer Cement. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10(4):90-3.
  • 69. Abdulsamee N, Elkhadem AH. Zirconomer and Zirconomer Improved (White Amalgams): Restorative Materi-als for the Future. Review. EC Dent Sci 2017;15:134-50.
  • 70. Khoroushi M, Mousavinasab S, Keshani F, Hashemi S. Effect of resin-modified glass ionomer containing bioactive glass on the flexural strength and morphology of demineralized dentin. Oper Dent 2013;38:21-30.
  • 71. Bhattacharya A, Vaidya S, Tomer AK, Raina A. GIC at It’s best–A review on ceramic reinforced GIC. Internatinal Journal of Applied Dental Sciences 2017;3:405-8.
  • 72. Bariker RH, Mandroli PS. An in-vitro evaluation of antibacterial effect of Amalgomer CR and Fuji VII against bacteria causing severe early childhood caries. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2016;34:23.
  • 73. Ayad NM, Elnogoly SA, Badie OM. An in-vitro study of the physico-mechanical properties of a new esthetic restorative versus dental amalgam. Rev Clín Pesq Odontol 2008;4:137-44.
  • 74. Nigam AG, Jaiswal J, Murthy R, Pandey R. Estimation of fluoride release from various dental materials in different media—an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2009;2:1-8.
  • 75. Choudhary K, Nandlal B. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of nano-hydroxyapatite incorporated glass ionomer cement and conventional glass ionomer cement on dense synthetic hydroxyapatite disk: An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2015;26:170-5.
  • 76. Barandehfard F, Rad MK, Hosseinnia A, Khoshroo K, Tahriri M, Jazayeri H, et al. The addition of synthesized hydroxyapatite and fluorapatite nanoparticles to a glass-ionomer cement for dental restoration and its effects on mechanical properties. Ceram Int 2016;42:17866-75.
  • 77. Hench LL. The story of Bioglass®. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2006;17:967-78.
  • 78. Kadiyala SV, Raj JD. Recent advances and modifications of dental restorative materials. A review IJAMR 2016;3:1609-16.
  • 79. Jyothi K, Annapurna S, Kumar AS, Venugopal P, Jayashankara C. Clinical evaluation of giomer-and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in class V noncarious cervical lesions: An in vivo study. Journal of Conserv Dent 2011;14:409.
  • 80. Ebaya MM, Ali AI, Mahmoud SH. Evaluation of marginal adaptation and microleakage of three glass ionomer-based Class V restorations: in vitro study. Eur J Dent 2019;13:599-606.
  • 81. Sharma A, Singh M, Pandey V. Glass ionomer cement-a phoenix and its new flight. Int J Res Health Allied Sci. 2015;1:9-12.
  • 82. Piekarz C, Ranjitkar S, Hunt D, McIntyre J. An in vitro assessment of the role of Tooth Mousse in preventing wine erosion. Aust Dent J 2008;53:22-5
  • 83. Reynolds EC. Anticariogenic complexes of amorphous calcium phosphate stabilized by casein phosphopeptides: a review. Spec Care Dentist 1998;18:8-16
  • 84. Mazzaoui S, Burrow M, Tyas M, Dashper S, Eakins D, Reynolds E. Incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate into a glass-ionomer cement. J Dent Res 2003;82:914-8.
  • 85. Botelho MG. Inhibitory effects on selected oral bacteria of antibacterial agents incorporated in a glass ionomer cement. Caries Res 2003;37:108-14.
  • 86. GPV S, Elsa N, Agrawal A. Newer Advances In Glass Ionomer Cement: A Review. Annals and Essences of Dentistry 2016;8: 19-23
  • 87. Gu Y, Yap A, Cheang P, Khor K. Effects of incorporation of HA/ZrO2 into glass ionomer cement (GIC). Biomater 2005;26:713-20.
  • 88. Elsaka SE, Hamouda IM, Swain MV. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles addition to a conventional glass-ionomer restorative: influence on physical and antibacterial properties. J Dent 2011;39:589-98.
  • 89. AlOtaibi G. Recent advancements in glass ionomer materials with introduction of nanotechnology: A review. Int J Oral Care Res 2019;7:21-3.
There are 89 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Dentistry
Journal Section Reviews
Authors

Seda Nur Karakaş This is me

Publication Date October 21, 2022
Submission Date September 9, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 32 Issue: 4 - 2022, 32:4

Cite

AMA Karakaş SN. Güçlendirilmiş cam iyonomer siman çeşitleri. Curr Res Dent Sci. October 2022;32(4):297-304.
 Download Cover Image

Current Research in Dental Sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

29936