Image Presentation
BibTex RIS Cite

Tek Diş İmplant Üstü Sabit Protezlerde Dişeti Çıkış Profilinin Oluşturulması

Year 2025, Volume: 35 Issue: 1, 94 - 98, 20.01.2025
https://doi.org/10.54614/CRDS.2022.6265

Abstract

Kısmi ve tam dişsiz vakalarda implant üstü protetik restorasyonlar günümüzde sıklıkla tercih edilen tedavi seçeneklerinden biridir. İmplant tedavisi sonrası daimi protez yapımına geçilmeden önce çeşitli yöntemlerle komşu dişlerle uyumlu yumuşak doku profilinin oluşturulması gerekmektedir. Bazı kaynaklar stabil ve uygun kontura sahip geçici protezin yerleştirilmesinden sonra oluşan yumuşak doku profilinin daimi restorasyona aktarılması gerektiğini ifade etmektedir. Bu olgu raporunda 36 ve 14 numarasını kaybeden 34 yaşında kadın ve 29 yaşında erkek hastaya okluzal vidalı geçici kron kullanılarak dişeti şekillendirmesi planlandı. Uygun dişeti çıkış profili sağlandıktan sonra kişisel ti-based abutment hazırlandı. Hastaya zirkonya seramik restorasyonlar uygulanarak estetik ve fonksiyonel kayıp geri kazandırıldı. Hastanın 1,3 ve 6 aylık kontrollerde herhangi bir komplikasyon görülmedi.
Anahtar kelimeler: Dişeti çıkış profili, implant, zirkonya

References

  • 1. Azer SS. A simplified technique for creating a customized gingival emergence profile for implant-supported crowns. J Prosthodont. 2010;19(6):497-501. doi:10.1111/j.1532 849X.2010. 00612.x
  • 2. Solá-Ruiz MF, Highsmith JDR, Labaig-Rueda C, Agustín-Panadero R. Biologically oriented preparation technique (BOPT) for implant-supported fixed prostheses. J Clin Dent. 2017;9:603-607.
  • 3. Gomez-Meda R, Esquivel J, Blatz MB. The esthetic biological contour concept for implant restoration emergence profile design. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33(3):173-184. doi:10.1111/ jerd.12641
  • 4. Parpaiola A, Sbricoli L, Guazzo R, Bressan E, Lops D. Managing the peri-implant mucosa: a clinically reliable method for optimizing soft tissue contours and emergence profile. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013;25(5):317-323. doi:10.1111/jerd.12044
  • 5. Papadopoulos I, Pozidi G, Goussias H, Kourtis S. Transferring the emergence profile from the provisional to the final restoration. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014;26(3):154-161. doi:10.1111/jerd.12087
  • 6. Martin WC, Pollini A, Morton D. The influence of restorative procedures on esthetic outcomes in implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(Suppl):42-54. doi:1.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g3.4
  • 7. Luchinskaya D, Du R, Owens DM, Tarnow D, Bittner N. Various surface treatments to implant provisional restorations and their effect on epithelial cell adhesion: a comparative in vitro study. Implant Dent.2017;26(1):12-23. doi:10.1097/ID.0000000000000498
  • 8. Brugnami F, Caleffi C. Prosthetically driven implant placement. How to achieve the appropriate implant site development. Keio J Med. 2005;54(3):172-178. doi:10.2302/kjm.54.172
  • 9. Belser UC, Bernard JP, Buser D. Implant-supported restorations in the anterior region: Prosthetic considerations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1996;8(9):875-883.
  • 10. Wittneben JG, Buser D, Belser UC, Brägger U. Peri-implant soft tissue conditioning with provisional restorations in the esthetic zone: the dynamic compression technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013;33(4):447-455. doi:10.11607/prd.1441
  • 11. Tarnow D, Elian N, Fletcher P, et al. Vertical distance from the crest of bone to the height of the interproximal papilla between adjacent implants. J Periodontol. 2003;74(12):1785-1788. doi:10.1902/jop.2003.74.12.1785
  • 12. Elian N, Tabourian G, Jalbout ZN, et al. Accurate transfer of peri-implant soft tissue emergence profile from the provisional crown to the final prosthesis using an emergence profile cast. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(5):306-314. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00119.x
  • 13. Cosyn J, De Bruyn H, Cleymaet R. Soft tissue preservation and pink aesthetics around single immediate implant restorations: a 1 year prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;15(6):847-857. doi:10.1111/cid.12061
  • 14. Sailer I, Mulhemann S, Zwahlen M, et al. Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(6):163-201. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02538.x
  • 15. Gotfredsen K, Wiskott A. Consensus report-reconstructions on implants. The Third EAO Consensus Conference 2012. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 6):238-241. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02546.x
  • 16. Tsai B. A method for obtaining peri-implant soft-tissue contours by using screw-retained provisional restorations as impression copings: a clinical report. J Oral Implantol. 2011;37(5):605-609. doi:10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00111
  • 17. Linkevicius T, Apse P, Pros D. Influence of abutment material on stability of peri-implant tissues: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23(3):449-456.
  • 18. Adatia ND, Bayne SC, Cooper LF, Thompson JY. Fracture resistance of yttria-stabilized zirconia dental implant abutments. J Prosthodont. 2009;18(1):17-22. doi:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00372.x
  • 19. Hahnel S, Wieser A, Lang R, Rosentritt M. Biofilm formation on the surface of modern implant abutment materials. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(11):1297-1301. doi:10.1111/clr.12491
  • 20. Dede DÖ, Tulga A, Küçükekenci AS. Tek Diş İmplant Üstü Protezlerde Estetik Seçenekler. Turkiye Klinikleri J Prosthodont-Special Topics. 2016;2(1):52-60.

Tek Diş İmplant Üstü Sabit Protezlerde Dişeti Çıkış Profilinin Oluşturulması: İki Olgu Sunumu

Year 2025, Volume: 35 Issue: 1, 94 - 98, 20.01.2025
https://doi.org/10.54614/CRDS.2022.6265

Abstract

ÖZ

Kısmi ve tam dişsiz vakalarda implant üstü protetik restorasyonlar günümüzde sıklıkla tercih edilen tedavi seçeneklerinden biridir. İmplant tedavisi sonrası daimi protez yapımına geçilmeden önce çeşitli yöntemlerle komşu dişlerle uyumlu yumuşak doku profilinin oluşturulması gerekmektedir. Bazı kaynaklar stabil ve uygun kontura sahip geçici protezin yerleştirilmesinden sonra oluşan yumuşak doku profilinin daimi restorasyona aktarılması gerektiğini ifade etmektedir. Bu olgu raporunda 36 ve 14 numarasını kaybeden 34 yaşında kadın ve 29 yaşında erkek hastaya okluzal vidalı geçici kron kullanılarak dişeti şekillendirmesi planlandı. Uygun dişeti çıkış profili sağlandıktan sonra kişisel ti-based abutment hazırlandı. Hastaya zirkonya seramik restorasyonlar uygulanarak estetik ve fonksiyonel kayıp geri kazandırıldı. Hastanın 1,3 ve 6 aylık kontrollerde herhangi bir komplikasyon görülmedi.
Anahtar kelimeler: dişeti çıkış profili, implant, zirkonya

References

  • 1. Azer SS. A simplified technique for creating a customized gingival emergence profile for implant-supported crowns. J Prosthodont. 2010;19(6):497-501. doi:10.1111/j.1532 849X.2010. 00612.x
  • 2. Solá-Ruiz MF, Highsmith JDR, Labaig-Rueda C, Agustín-Panadero R. Biologically oriented preparation technique (BOPT) for implant-supported fixed prostheses. J Clin Dent. 2017;9:603-607.
  • 3. Gomez-Meda R, Esquivel J, Blatz MB. The esthetic biological contour concept for implant restoration emergence profile design. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33(3):173-184. doi:10.1111/ jerd.12641
  • 4. Parpaiola A, Sbricoli L, Guazzo R, Bressan E, Lops D. Managing the peri-implant mucosa: a clinically reliable method for optimizing soft tissue contours and emergence profile. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013;25(5):317-323. doi:10.1111/jerd.12044
  • 5. Papadopoulos I, Pozidi G, Goussias H, Kourtis S. Transferring the emergence profile from the provisional to the final restoration. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014;26(3):154-161. doi:10.1111/jerd.12087
  • 6. Martin WC, Pollini A, Morton D. The influence of restorative procedures on esthetic outcomes in implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(Suppl):42-54. doi:1.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g3.4
  • 7. Luchinskaya D, Du R, Owens DM, Tarnow D, Bittner N. Various surface treatments to implant provisional restorations and their effect on epithelial cell adhesion: a comparative in vitro study. Implant Dent.2017;26(1):12-23. doi:10.1097/ID.0000000000000498
  • 8. Brugnami F, Caleffi C. Prosthetically driven implant placement. How to achieve the appropriate implant site development. Keio J Med. 2005;54(3):172-178. doi:10.2302/kjm.54.172
  • 9. Belser UC, Bernard JP, Buser D. Implant-supported restorations in the anterior region: Prosthetic considerations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1996;8(9):875-883.
  • 10. Wittneben JG, Buser D, Belser UC, Brägger U. Peri-implant soft tissue conditioning with provisional restorations in the esthetic zone: the dynamic compression technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013;33(4):447-455. doi:10.11607/prd.1441
  • 11. Tarnow D, Elian N, Fletcher P, et al. Vertical distance from the crest of bone to the height of the interproximal papilla between adjacent implants. J Periodontol. 2003;74(12):1785-1788. doi:10.1902/jop.2003.74.12.1785
  • 12. Elian N, Tabourian G, Jalbout ZN, et al. Accurate transfer of peri-implant soft tissue emergence profile from the provisional crown to the final prosthesis using an emergence profile cast. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(5):306-314. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00119.x
  • 13. Cosyn J, De Bruyn H, Cleymaet R. Soft tissue preservation and pink aesthetics around single immediate implant restorations: a 1 year prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;15(6):847-857. doi:10.1111/cid.12061
  • 14. Sailer I, Mulhemann S, Zwahlen M, et al. Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(6):163-201. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02538.x
  • 15. Gotfredsen K, Wiskott A. Consensus report-reconstructions on implants. The Third EAO Consensus Conference 2012. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 6):238-241. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02546.x
  • 16. Tsai B. A method for obtaining peri-implant soft-tissue contours by using screw-retained provisional restorations as impression copings: a clinical report. J Oral Implantol. 2011;37(5):605-609. doi:10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00111
  • 17. Linkevicius T, Apse P, Pros D. Influence of abutment material on stability of peri-implant tissues: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23(3):449-456.
  • 18. Adatia ND, Bayne SC, Cooper LF, Thompson JY. Fracture resistance of yttria-stabilized zirconia dental implant abutments. J Prosthodont. 2009;18(1):17-22. doi:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00372.x
  • 19. Hahnel S, Wieser A, Lang R, Rosentritt M. Biofilm formation on the surface of modern implant abutment materials. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(11):1297-1301. doi:10.1111/clr.12491
  • 20. Dede DÖ, Tulga A, Küçükekenci AS. Tek Diş İmplant Üstü Protezlerde Estetik Seçenekler. Turkiye Klinikleri J Prosthodont-Special Topics. 2016;2(1):52-60.
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Prosthodontics
Journal Section Case Reports
Authors

Kevser Karakaya This is me

Elif Karakuş This is me

Server Afyonkarahisar Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, Afyonkarahisar,türkiye. Mutluay Ünal This is me

Publication Date January 20, 2025
Submission Date November 16, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 35 Issue: 1

Cite

AMA Karakaya K, Karakuş E, Mutluay Ünal SASBÜDHFPDTADA. Tek Diş İmplant Üstü Sabit Protezlerde Dişeti Çıkış Profilinin Oluşturulması. Curr Res Dent Sci. January 2025;35(1):94-98. doi:10.54614/CRDS.2022.6265

Current Research in Dental Sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

29936