Research Article

HOW DOES POWER AND GENDER PREDICT ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION?

Volume: 26 Number: 2 October 31, 2017
  • Gökçen Aydın
TR

HOW DOES POWER AND GENDER PREDICT ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION?

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to find out the role of power and gender in romantic relationship satisfaction (used interchangeably in regard to dating relationship) among college students. The sample was composed of 202 college students. For data collection, Relationship Assessment Scale, Sense of Power Scale and Demographic Data Form were utilized. The results of Simultaneous Regression Analysis showed that power had positive relationship with relationship satisfaction while gender did not play a role in predicting relationship satisfaction among college students. Regarding the positive relationship between power and relationship satisfaction, power should be taken into consideration as an important variable in further relationship satisfaction studies.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The experience of power: examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of personality and social psychology, 83(6), 1362. Anderson, C., John, O.P. & Keltner, D. (2012). The Personal Sense of Power. Journal of Personality, 80(2), 313-344. Anderson, C., Keltner, D., & John, O. P. (2003). Emotional convergence between people over time. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84(5), 1054. Aydın, G. & Çağ, P. (2015). İlişkilerde Güç Algısı Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. XIII. Ulusal Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Kongresi, 7-9 Ekim, Mersin. Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 154–196). New York: Guilford Press. Curun, F. (2001). The Effects of Sexism and Sex Role Orientaion on Romantic Relationship Satisfaction. Doctoral dissertation. Middle East Technical University, Ankara: Turkey. Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31–41. Feiring, C. (1996). Concept of romance in 15 year-old adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 181-200. Felmlee, D. H. (1994). Who’s on top? Power in romantic relationships. Sex Roles, 31, 275–295. French, J. & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in Social Power (pp. 150-165). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston: McGraw-Hill. Goldhamer, H., & Shils, E. A. (1939). Types of power and status. American Journal of Sociology, 45, 171–182. Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Gray-Little, B. & Burks, N. (1983). Power and satisfaction in marriage: A review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 513-538. Guerrero, L. K., Anderson, P. A. & Afifi, W. A. (2011). Close encounters: Communication in relationships (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage. Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93–98. Howard, J. A., Blumstein, P. & Schwartz, P. (1986). Sex, power, and influence tactics in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 102–109. Huston, T. L. (1983). Power. In Kelley, H.H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G.,…, Peterson, D.R. (2002), Close Relationships. New York: Percheron Press. Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284. Kenny, D. A. & Acitelli, L. K. (2001). Accuracy and bias in the perception of the partner in a close relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 439–448. Oyamot, C. M., Fuglestad, P.T. & Snyder, M. (2010). Balance of power and influence in relationships: The role of self-monitoring. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 27(1): 23–46. doi: 10.1177/0265407509347302 Rehman, U. S., Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Herron, K. & Clements, K. (2009). My way or no way: Anarchic power, relationship satisfaction and male violence. Personal Relationships, 16, 475-488. Rosand, G.M., Slinning, K., Eberhard-Gran, M., Roysamb, E. & Tambs, K. (2012). The buffering effect of relationship satisfaction on emotional distress in couples. BMC Public Health, 12, 66. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-66 Rusbult, C. E. & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 175-204. Sacher, J. A. & Fine, M. A. (1996). Predicting relationship status and satisfaction after six months among dating couples. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 58(1), 21-32. doi:10.2307/353374 Saffrey, C. & Ehrenberg, M. (2007). When thinking hurts: Attachment, rumination, and postrelationship adjustment. Personal Relationships, 14(3), 351-368. Schwarzwald, J., Koslowsky, M. & Izhak-Nir, E.B. (2008). Gender role ideology as a moderator of the relationship between social power tactics and marital satisfaction. Sex Roles, 59, 657–669. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9454-y Shulman, S. & Kipnis, O. (2001). Adolescent romantic relationships: A look from the future. Journal of Adolescence, 24(3), 337–351. Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1997). The balance of power in romantic heterosexual couples over time from “his” and “her” perspectives. Sex Roles, 37, 361–379. Sprecher, S., Schmeeckle, M., & Felmlee, D. (2006). The Principle of Least Interest Inequality in Emotional Involvement in Romantic Relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 27(9), 1255-1280. Stafford, R., Backman E. & Dibona, P. (1977). The Division of Labor among Cohabiting and Married Couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 39(1), 43-57. Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics. (5th ed.) Boston: Pearson. Van Kleef, G. A., Oveis, C., Van Der Löwe, I., LuoKogan, A., Goetz, J., & Keltner, D. (2008). Power, distress, and compassion turning a blind eye to the suffering of others. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1315-1322. Winter, D.G. (1973). The power motive. New York: Free Press. Efe, Ş. Y., & Ayaz, S. (2010). Kadına yönelik aile içi şiddet ve kadınların aile içi şiddete bakışı. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 11(1), 23-29.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Gökçen Aydın This is me

Publication Date

October 31, 2017

Submission Date

November 10, 2017

Acceptance Date

October 13, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 26 Number: 2

APA
Aydın, G. (2017). HOW DOES POWER AND GENDER PREDICT ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION? Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 26(2), 71-82. https://izlik.org/JA62TZ69XN
AMA
1.Aydın G. HOW DOES POWER AND GENDER PREDICT ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION? Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2017;26(2):71-82. https://izlik.org/JA62TZ69XN
Chicago
Aydın, Gökçen. 2017. “HOW DOES POWER AND GENDER PREDICT ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION?”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 26 (2): 71-82. https://izlik.org/JA62TZ69XN.
EndNote
Aydın G (October 1, 2017) HOW DOES POWER AND GENDER PREDICT ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION? Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 26 2 71–82.
IEEE
[1]G. Aydın, “HOW DOES POWER AND GENDER PREDICT ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION?”, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 71–82, Oct. 2017, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA62TZ69XN
ISNAD
Aydın, Gökçen. “HOW DOES POWER AND GENDER PREDICT ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION?”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 26/2 (October 1, 2017): 71-82. https://izlik.org/JA62TZ69XN.
JAMA
1.Aydın G. HOW DOES POWER AND GENDER PREDICT ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION? Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2017;26:71–82.
MLA
Aydın, Gökçen. “HOW DOES POWER AND GENDER PREDICT ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION?”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 26, no. 2, Oct. 2017, pp. 71-82, https://izlik.org/JA62TZ69XN.
Vancouver
1.Gökçen Aydın. HOW DOES POWER AND GENDER PREDICT ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION? Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi [Internet]. 2017 Oct. 1;26(2):71-82. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA62TZ69XN