Research Article

RE-EVALUATION OF THE COMPONENTS OF INTENSIVE ENGLISH PROGRAM IN TURKEY

Volume: 26 Number: 3 October 21, 2017
TR

RE-EVALUATION OF THE COMPONENTS OF INTENSIVE ENGLISH PROGRAM IN TURKEY

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to define the challenges that college students face during the intensive English program and present the potential solutions. A previously developed survey by Gökdemir (2005 pp251-264) was used for the quantitative side and for the qualitative part, a number of interview questions were prepared with the help of four experts and 32 students were randomly selected and interviewed with the questions. The interview questions were analyzed as qualitative assessment. The results revealed that the demographic variables are not important for attitudes toward language learning. The students determined a number of elements to be improved in the current curriculum, teacher’s and learner’s competence along with physical environment for language learning. Students also identified a number of challenges that they face while gaining the language skills along with personal strategies to overcome such challenges.  Heavy grammar based teaching strategy and evaluation along with low level of native exposure and inadequate student participation were the main problems listed by students. 

Keywords

References

  1. Alyousef, H. S. (2006). Teaching reading comprehension to ESL/EFL learners. Journal Of Language And Learning, 5(1), 63-73. Arıkan, A. (2006). Postmethod Condition and Its Implications for English Language Teacher Education. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies Vol.2, No.1 Bello, T. (1997). Improving ESL Learners' Writing Skills. Adjunct ERIC Clearinghouse for ESL Literacy Education Washington DC., National Clearinghouse for ESL Literacy Education Washington DC. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED409746) Berardo, A.S. (2006). The Use of Authentic Materials in the teaching of Reading. The reading Matrix. Vol. 6 No. 2, September, pp60-69 Brown, T. S., & Perry, F. L. (1991). A comparison of three learning strategies for ESL vocabulary acquisition. Tesol Quarterly, 25(4), 655-670. Cho, K. S., & Krashen, S. D. (1994). Acquisition of vocabulary from the Sweet Valley Kids series: Adult ESL acquisition. Journal of Reading, 37(8), 662-667. Çelebi, M. D. (2006). Türkiye’de anadili eğitimi ve yabanci dil öğretimi. Kayseri: Erciyes Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (21), 285-307 Çetinsaya, G. (2014). Büyüme, kalite, uluslararasılaşma: Türkiye yükseköğretimi için bir yol haritası. Yükseköğretim Kurulu. El‐Dib, M. A. B. (2004). Language learning strategies in Kuwait: Links to gender, language level, and culture in a hybrid context. Foreign Language Annals, 37(1), 85-95. Erdem, G., Çelik, M. (2011). Dil Bilgisi Öğretim Yöntemi Üzerine Değerlendirmeler. Turkish Studies, 6(1), 1030-1041. Eskicumalı, A., & Türedı, H. (2010). The Rise of English Teaching in Turkish Curroculum. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(3). Eurobarometer, S. (2006). Europeans and their Languages. European Commission. European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice (2017). Key Data on Teaching Languages at School in Europe – 2017 Edition. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Ferris, D., & Tagg, T. (1996). Academic Listening/Speaking Tasks for ESL Students: Problems, Suggestions, and Implications. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 297-320. Fotos, S., & Ellis, R. (1991). Communicating about grammar: A task‐based approach. TESOL quarterly, 25(4), 605-628. Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). A student's contributions to second-language learning. Part II: Affective variables. Language teaching, 26(1), 1-11. Gedikoğlu, T. (2005). Avrupa Birliği Sürecinde Türk Eitim Sistemi: Sorunlar ve Çözüm Önerileri. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(1), 66-80 Gömleksiz, M. N. (2002). Üniversitelerde Yürütülen Yabanci Dil Derslerine İlişkin Öğrenci Görüşlerinin Değerlendirilmesi (Fırat Üniversitesi Örneği). F.Ü.Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 12 (1), 143-158 Gökdemir, C. V. (2005). Üniversitelerimizde Verilen Yabancı Dil Öğretimindeki Başarı Durumumuz. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(2), 251-264. Heltai, P. (1989). Teaching vocabulary by oral translation. Elt Journal, 43(4), 288-293. İnal, B. (2007). Akademik Amaçlı Okuma İzlencesi Oluşturmadaki Temel Kriterler. Cankaya University Journal of Arts and Sciences, 1(7), 49-59 Krashen, S. D. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research: Insights from the research. ABC-CLIO. Lawson, M. J., & Hogben, D. (1996). The vocabulary‐learning strategies of foreign‐language students. Language learning, 46(1), 101-135. McIver, N. (2006). How do I help students read?. English Teaching Professional, (19) 117-119 Miranda, A. O., & Umhoefer, D. L. (1998). Acculturation, Language Use, and Demographic Variables as Predictors of the Career Self‐Efficacy of Latino Career Counseling Clients. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 26(1), 39-51. Nation, I. S. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Bailey, P., & Daley, C. E. (2000). Cognitive, affective, personality, and demographic predictors of foreign-language achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(1), 3-15. Prowse, P. (1999). The secret of reading. English Teaching Professional, (13), 120-123. Sawir, E. (2005). Language difficulties of international students in Australia: The effects of prior learning experience. International Education Journal, 6(5), 567-580. Shen, W. W. (2003). Current trends of vocabulary teaching and learning strategies for EFL settings. Feng Chia Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 7, 187-224. Sökmen, A. J. (1997). Current trends in teaching second language vocabulary. In N. Schmitt and M. McCarthy (Ed.) Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy. Cambridge University Press. Şirin, M., (2012). Yabancı Dil Dilbilgisi sitelerine yönelik öğrenci görüşleri. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Trakya Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Edirne Taylor, S. J. (1986). Classroom Inquiry: Grammar Curriculum--Back to Square One. The English Journal, 75(1), 94-98. Thornbury, S. (2000). Accuracy, fluency and complexity. English Teaching Professional, 16, 3-6. Tosun, C. (2006). Yabancı Dil Öğretim ve Öğreniminde Eski ve Yeni Yöntemlere Yeni Bir Bakış. Cankaya University Journal of Arts and Sciences,1(5), 79-87. Waring, R., & Nation, I. S. P. (2004). Second language reading and incidental vocabulary learning. Angles on the English Speaking World, 4, 97-110.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Halil İbrahim Kaya This is me

Publication Date

October 21, 2017

Submission Date

November 9, 2017

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 26 Number: 3

APA
Ünsal Şakiroğlu, H., & Kaya, H. İ. (2017). RE-EVALUATION OF THE COMPONENTS OF INTENSIVE ENGLISH PROGRAM IN TURKEY. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 26(3), 200-213. https://izlik.org/JA44NJ28ET
AMA
1.Ünsal Şakiroğlu H, Kaya Hİ. RE-EVALUATION OF THE COMPONENTS OF INTENSIVE ENGLISH PROGRAM IN TURKEY. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2017;26(3):200-213. https://izlik.org/JA44NJ28ET
Chicago
Ünsal Şakiroğlu, Hülya, and Halil İbrahim Kaya. 2017. “RE-EVALUATION OF THE COMPONENTS OF INTENSIVE ENGLISH PROGRAM IN TURKEY”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 26 (3): 200-213. https://izlik.org/JA44NJ28ET.
EndNote
Ünsal Şakiroğlu H, Kaya Hİ (October 1, 2017) RE-EVALUATION OF THE COMPONENTS OF INTENSIVE ENGLISH PROGRAM IN TURKEY. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 26 3 200–213.
IEEE
[1]H. Ünsal Şakiroğlu and H. İ. Kaya, “RE-EVALUATION OF THE COMPONENTS OF INTENSIVE ENGLISH PROGRAM IN TURKEY”, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 200–213, Oct. 2017, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA44NJ28ET
ISNAD
Ünsal Şakiroğlu, Hülya - Kaya, Halil İbrahim. “RE-EVALUATION OF THE COMPONENTS OF INTENSIVE ENGLISH PROGRAM IN TURKEY”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 26/3 (October 1, 2017): 200-213. https://izlik.org/JA44NJ28ET.
JAMA
1.Ünsal Şakiroğlu H, Kaya Hİ. RE-EVALUATION OF THE COMPONENTS OF INTENSIVE ENGLISH PROGRAM IN TURKEY. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2017;26:200–213.
MLA
Ünsal Şakiroğlu, Hülya, and Halil İbrahim Kaya. “RE-EVALUATION OF THE COMPONENTS OF INTENSIVE ENGLISH PROGRAM IN TURKEY”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 26, no. 3, Oct. 2017, pp. 200-13, https://izlik.org/JA44NJ28ET.
Vancouver
1.Hülya Ünsal Şakiroğlu, Halil İbrahim Kaya. RE-EVALUATION OF THE COMPONENTS OF INTENSIVE ENGLISH PROGRAM IN TURKEY. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi [Internet]. 2017 Oct. 1;26(3):200-13. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA44NJ28ET