GEÇİŞ EKONOMİLERİNDE LİBERALLEŞMENİN EKONOMİK BÜYÜME ÜZERİNDE ETKİSİ

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, 25 geçiş ekonomisinde Sosyalist bloğunun dağılmasından sonra piyasa ekonomisine yönelik liberalleşme reformlarının, bütçe açıklarının, dış ticaret gelişmelerinin ve siyasi kısıtlamaların ekonomik büyüme etkileri incelenmiştir. Büyüme analizi 1994-2008 yıllarına ait veri seti ve panel veri yöntemleri kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Kullanılan yöntemler kapsamında elde edilen bulgulara göre, geçiş ekonomilerinde piyasa ekonomisine yönelik gerçekleştirilen yapısal dönüşüm reformları ve bütçe açıklarının azaltılması ekonomik büyümeyi artırıcı etki etmiştir. Liberalleşme reformlarının büyüme üzerindeki başlangıç etkisi negatif, sonraki ve nihai etkisi pozitiftir. Bununla birlikte, araştırmaya konu olan ülkelerin uluslararası topluma entegrasyonu da büyümeyi olumlu yönde etkilemiştir. Siyasi haklar üzerindeki kısıtlamaların ise büyüme üzerinde herhangi bir etkisi tespit edilememiştir.

Keywords

• Geçiş Ekonomileri, Ekonomik Büyüme, Liberalleşme Reformları, Panel Veri Yöntemleri.

Geçiş Ekonomilerinde Liberalleşmenin Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerinde Etkisi

Abstract

The present study investigates the effects of market oriented structural reforms government budget deficits international trade improvements and political constraints on growth in 25 transition countries after the break up of the socialist block and collapse of the centrally planned economic system Using panel data for the period 1994 2008 growth determinants of transition countries are examined Estimation results suggest that realization of market oriented structural reforms and reducing budget deficit have positive effects on growth performance of transition countries The initial effect of liberalization reforms is found negative but subsequent and cumulative effect of market oriented reforms is found positive Aditionally according to the test results the integration of transition countries to the world economy has positive growth effects Finally the results do not provide any argument that supporting the effect of political rights restrictions on economic growth Key Words: Transition Economies Economic Growth Liberalization Reforms Panel Data Methods

Keywords

• -

References

1. Abed, G. T. ve Davoodi, H. R. (2000), “Corruption, Structural Reforms, and Economic Performance in the Transition Economies”, IMF Working Paper, WP/00/132.
2. Ağayev, S., Yamak, N. (2009), “Bağımsız Devletler Topluluğu Ülkelerinde Ekonomik Büyümenin Belirleyicileri”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 23, Sayı: 4, s.179-204.
3. Aslund, A., Boone, P. ve Johnson, S. (1996), “How to Stabilize: Lessons from Post- communist Countries”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, s.217-291.
4. Aslund, A. ve Jenish, N. (2005), “The Eurasian Growth Paradox”, Institute for International Economics Working Paper, 06-5.
5. Awokuse, O. T. (2007), “Causality between Exports, Imports, and Economic Growth: Evidence from Transition Economies”, Economics Letters, 94, s.389-395.
6. Baltagi, B. H. (2005), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, England.
7. Barlow, D. (2006), “Growth in Transition Economies: A Trade Policy Perspective”, Economics of Transition, Vol. 14, No. 3, s.505-515.
8. Berengaut, J. ve Woytek, K. E. (2005), “Who is Still Haunted by the Specter of Communism? Explaining Relative Output Contractions under Transition”, IMF Working Paper, WP/05/68.

9. Berg, A., Borensztein, E., Sahay, R. ve Zettelmeyer, J. (1999), “The Evolution of Output in Transition Economies: Explaining the Differences”, IMF Working Paper, WP/99/73.
10. Christoffersen, P. ve Doyle, P. (1998), “From Inflation to Growth: Eight Years of Transition”, IMF Working Paper, WP/98/100.
11. Chubrik, A. (2003), “Market Reforms and Economic Growth in Post-Communist Economies: A Panel Data Approach”, Web: http://pdc.ceu.hu/archive/ 00002188/01/ReformsandGrowth.pdf.
12. Dawson, P. J. (2003), “Financial Development and Growth in Economies in Transition”, Applied Economics Letters, 10, s.833-836.
13. Değer, M. K. ve Emsen, Ö. S. (2006), “Geçiş Ekonomilerinde Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımları ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkileri: Panel Veri Analizleri (1990-2002)”, C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt 7, Sayı 2, s.121-137.
14. De Macedo, J. B. ve Martins, O. J. (2006), “Growth, Reform Indicators and Policy Complementarities”, FEUNL Working Papers, No. 484.
15. De Melo, M., Denizer, C. ve Gelb, A. (1996), “From Plan to Market: Patterns of Transition”, The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 1564.
16. De Melo, M., Denizer, C., Gelb, A. ve Tenev, S. (1997), “Circumstance and Choice: The Role of Initial Conditions and Policies in Transition Economies”, The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 1866.
17. Denizer, C. (1997), “Stabilization, Adjustment and Growth Prospects in Transition Economies”, The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 1855.
18. Dethier, J. J., Ghanem, H. ve Zoli, E. (1999), “Does Democracy Facilitate the Economic Transition? An Empirical Study of Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union”, The World Bank Polcy Research Working Paper, 2194.
19. EBRD, Transition Report, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, London (several issues).
20. Emsen, Ö. S., Değer, M. K. ve Karaköy, Ç. (2006), “Liberalizasyon ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkileri: Göreceli Gelişmiş ve Az Gelişmiş Geçiş Ekonomileri Deneyimleri”, Kırgızistan-Türkiye Manas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı: 16, s.1-19.
21. Enders, W. (1995), Applied Econometric Time Series, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
22. Erlat, H. (2006), Panel Data: A Selective Survey, Unpublished Lecture Notes, Department of Economics, Middle East Technical University.
23. Falcetti, E., Raiser, M. ve Sanfey, P. (2000), “Defying the Odds: Initial Conditions, Reforms and Growth in the First Decade of Transition”, EBRD Working Paper, No.55.
24. Falcetti, E., Lysenko, T. ve Sanfey, P. (2005), “Reform and Growth Re-examining the Evidence”, EBRD Working Paper, No.90.
25. Fidrmuc, J. (2001), “Economic Reform, Growth and Democracy during Post- communist Transition”, William Davidson Institute Working Paper, No. 372.
26. Fischer, S., Sahay, R. ve Vegh, C. A. (1996), “Economies in Transition: The Beginnings of Growth”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No. 2, s.229-233.
27. Fischer, S., Sahay, R. ve Vegh, C. A. (1996), “Stabilization and Growth in Transition Economies: The Early Experience”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Volume 10, Number 2, ss.45-66.
28. Fischer, S., Sahay, R. ve Vegh, C. A. (1998), “From Transition to Market: Evidence and Growth Prospects”, IMF Working Paper, WP/98/52.
29. Fischer, S. ve Sahay, R. (2004), “Transition Economies: The Role of Institutions and Initial Conditions”, Festschrift in Honor of Guillermo A. Calvo, International Monetary Fund.
30. Gillman, M. ve Haris, M. N. (2004), “Inflation, Financial Development and Growth in Transition Countries”, Monash University Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Paper, 23/04.
31. Godoy, S. ve Stiglitz, J. E. (2006), “Growth, Initial Conditions, Law and Speed of Privatization in Transition Countries: 11 Years Later”, NBER Working Paper, 11992.
32. Greene, W. H. (2000), Econometric Analysis, Fourth Edition, Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
33. Grigorian, D. A. ve Martinez, A. (2000), “Industrial Growth and the Quality of Institutions: What Do (Transition) Economies Have to Gain from the Rule of Law?”, The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2475.
34. Grogan, L. ve Moers, L. (2001), “Growth Empirics with Institutional Measures for Transition Countries”, Economic Systems, 25, s.323-344.
35. Güngör, B. ve Yamak, R. (2002), “Growth and Inflation Effects of Economic and Political Reforms in Transition Economies”, Russian and East European Finance and Trade, Vol. 38, No. 1, s.102-114.
36. Havrylyshyn, O., Izvorski, I. ve Rooden, R. (1998), “Recovery and Growth in Transition Economies 1990-97: A Stylized Regression Analysis”, IMF Working Paper, WP/98/141.
37. Havrylyshyn, O. ve Rooden, R. (2000), “Institutions Matter in Transition, but so do Policies”, IMF Working Paper, WP/00/70.
38. Havrylyshyn, O. ve Wolf, T. (1999), “Determinants of Growth in Transition Countries”, Finance & Development, Vol. 36, No. 2.
39. Hernandez-Cata, E. (1997), “Liberalization and the Behavior of Output during the Transition from Plan to Market”, IMF Working Paper, WP/97/53.
40. Heybey, B. ve Murrell, P. (1999), “The Relationship between Economic Growth and the Speed of Liberalization during Transition”, Journal of Policy Reform, Vol. 3, No. 2, s.121-137.
41. Hsiao, C. (2003), Analysis of Panel Data, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
42. Hsiao, C. (2005), “Why Panel Data?”, The Singapore Economic Review, Vol. 50, No. 2.
43. Hsiao, C. (2006), “Panel Data Analysis – Advantages and Challenges”, University of Southern California IEPR Working Paper, No. 49.
44. Iradian, G. (2007), “Rapid Growth in Transition Economies: Growth-Accounting Approach”, IMF Working Paper, WP/07/164.
45. Iradian, G. (2007), “Rapid Growth in Transition Economies: Panel Regression Approach”, IMF Working Paper, WP/07/170.
46. Kim, B. Y. ve Pirttila, J. (2003), “The Political Economy of Reforms: Empirical Evidence from Post-Communist in the 1990s”, Bank of Finland Institute for Economies in Transition (BOFIT) Discussion Paper, No. 4/2003.
47. Koivu, T. (April 10, 2002), “Does Financial Sector Development Affect Economic Growth in Transition Countries?”, Nordic Conference in Development Economics, Norway.
48. Loukoianova, E. ve Unigovskaya, A. (2004), “Analysis of Recent Growth in Low- Income CIS Countries”, IMF Working Paper, WP/04/151.
49. Maddala, G. S. (2001), Introduction to Econometrics, Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, England.
50. Mervar, A. (2002), “Economic Growth and Countries in Transition”, Economic Trends and Economic Policy, No. 92, s.53-87.
51. Mickiewicz, T. (2005), “Is the Link between Reforms and Growth Spurious? A Comment”, William Davidson Institute Working Paper, No. 775.
52. Moers, L. (1999), “How Important are Institutions for Growth in Transition Countries?”, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers, No. 99-004/2.
53. Nath, H. K. (2005), “Trade, Foreign Direct Investment and Growth: Evidence from Transition Economies”, Sam Houston State University Department of Economics and International Business Working Paper Series, No. 05-04.
54. Pushak, T., Tiongson, E. R. ve Varoudakis, A. (2007), “Public Finance, Governance, and Growth in Transition Economies: Empirical Evidence from 1992-2004”, The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 4255.
55. Redulescu, R. ve Barlow, D. (2002), “The Relation between Policies and Growth in Transition Countries”, Economics of Transition, Vol. 10, No. 3, ss. 719-745.
56. Rusinova, D. (2007), “Growth in Transition: Reexamining the Roles of Factor Inputs and Geography”, Economic Systems, 31, s.233-255.
57. Sachs, J.D. (1996), “The Transition at Mid Decade”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No. 2, s.128-133.
58. Segura-Ubiergo, A., Simone, A. ve Gupta, S. (2006), “New Evidence on Fiscal Adjustment and Growth in Transition Economies”, IMF Working Paper, WP/06/244.
59. Selowsky, M. ve Martin, R. (1997), “Policy Performance and Output Growth in the Transition Economies”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 87, No. 2, s.349-353.
60. Staehr, K. (2005), “Reforms and Economic Growth in Transition Economies: Complementarity, Sequencing and Speed”, The European Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 2, No. 2, s.177-202.
61. Stock, J. H., and Waston, M. W. (2003), Introduction to Econometrics, Addison- Wesley, Boston USA.
62. Wolf, H.C. (1999), “Transition Strategies: Choices and Outcomes”, Princeton Studies in International Finance, No. 85.
63. Wyplosz, C. (2000), “Ten Years of Transformation: Macroeconomic Lessons”, The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2288.