KLASİKTEN MODERNE DOĞRU: ADANA MOBİLYACILIK SEKTÖRÜNDE ÖRGÜTSEL FORM DEĞİŞİMİ, 1950-2018
Abstract
Bu çalışma, Adana mobilyacılık sektöründe yaşanan örgütsel form değişimini kurumsal mantık ve komünite ekolojisi perspektiflerince geliştirilen argümanlar çerçevesinde ortaya koymak istemektedir. Çalışmada, özellikle, komünitedeki ve örgütsel alandaki kurumsal yapı değişimleri ile örgütsel form ve uygulamalar arasındaki ilişkiye odaklanılmaktadır. Görüşmelerle toplanan verilere dayanılarak yapılan kodlamalar Adana mobilyacılık sektöründeki örgütsel form değişiminin komünite ve kurumsal mantıklardaki değişimlerle birlikte geliştiğine işaret etmektedir. Araştırma bulguları komünite ve örgütsel alan seviyesindeki kurumsal mantıklardaki değişimle klasik mobilya örgütsel formunun modern avangard örgütsel formuna doğru dönüştüğünü göstermektedir.
Keywords
References
- Archer, M. S. (1982). Morphogenesis versus Structuration: On Combining Structure and Action. The British Journal of Sociology, 33(4), 455-483. Astley, W. G. (1985). The Two Ecologies: Population and Community Perspectives on Organizational Evolution. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 224-241. Audia, P. G., Freeman, J. H., & Reynolds, P. D. (2006). Organizational Foundings in Community Context: Instruments Manufacturers and Their Interrelationships with Other Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 381-419. Austin, R., Hjorth, D., & Hessel, S. (2018). How Aesthetics and Economy Become Conversant in Creative Firms. Organization Studies, 39(11), 1501-1519. Barley, S. R., & Tolbert, P. S. (1997). Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution. Organization Studies, 18(1), 93-117. Baron, J. N. (2004). Employing Identities in Organizational Ecology. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(1), 3-32. Baum, J. A. C., & Mezias, S. J. (1992). Localized Competition and Organizational Failure in the Manhattan Hotel Industry, 1898-1990. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 580-604. Beverland, M. B. (2005). Crafting Brand Authenticity: The Case of Luxury Wines. Journal of Management Studies, 42(5), 1003-1029. Binder, A. (2007). For Love and Money: Organizations’ Creative Responses to Multiple Environmental Logics. Theory and Society, 36(6), 547-571. Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1989a). Density Delay in the Evolution of Organizational Populations: A Model and Five Empirical Tests. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 411-430. Carroll, G.R., & Hannan, M.T. (1989b). On Using Institutional Theory in Studying Organizational Populations. American Sociological Review, 54(4), 545-548. Carroll, G. R., & Swaminathan, A. (2000). Why the Microbrewery Movement? Organizational Dynamics of Resource Partitioning in the U.S. Brewing Industry. American Journal of Sociology, 106(3), 715-762. Cattani, G., Dunbar, R. L. M., & Shapira, Z. (2013). Value Creation and Knowledge Loss: The Case of Cremonese Stringed Instruments. Organization Science, 24(3), 813-830. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis, London: SAGE. Durand, R., & Thornton, P. H. (2018). Categorizing Institutional Logics, Institutionalizing Categories: A Review of Two Literatures. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 631-658. Ener, K., Tuğberk, A. İ., Öztan, F., Aktar, S., Gül, G., Altay, H., & Horoz, T. (1968). Adana İl Yıllığı 1967. Adana: İpek Matbaası. Fine, G. A. (2003). Crafting Authenticity: The Validation of Identity in Self-Taught Art. Theory and Society, 32, 153-180. Fox-Wolfgramm, S. J., Boal, K. B., & (Jerry) Hunt, J. G. (1998). Organizational Adaptation to Institutional Change: A Comparative Study of First-Order Change in Prospector and Defender Banks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 87-126. Freeman, J. H., & Audia, P. G. (2006). Community Ecology and the Sociology of Organizations. Annual Review of Sociology. 32, 145-169. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions. İçinde W. W. Powell – P. J. DiMaggio (Ed.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (s. 232-263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31. Glynn, M. A. (2000). When Cymbals Become Symbols: Conflict Over Organizational Identity within a Symphony Orchestra. Organization Science, 11(3), 585-298. Goffman, E. (1983). The Interaction Order: American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential Address. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 1-17. Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R. & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317-371. Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business and Market Researchers. London: SAGE Publications. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The Population Ecology of Organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929-964. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1987). The Ecology of Organizational Founding: American Labour Unions, 1836-1985. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4), 910-943. Hannan, M. T., Carroll, G. R., & Pôlos, L. (2003). The Organizational Niche. Sociological Theory, 21(4), 309-340. Hedström, P. (1994). Contagious Collectivities: On the Spatial Diffusion of Swedish Trade Unions, 1890-1940. American Journal of Sociology, 99(5), 1157-1179. Hughes, E.C. (1936). The Ecological Aspect of Institutions. American Sociological Review, 1(2), 180-189. Lok, J. (2010). Institutional Logics as Identity Projects. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1305-1335. Navis, C., & Glynn, M. A. (2010). How New Market Categories Emerge: Temporal Dynamics of Legitimacy, Identity, and Entrepreneurship in Satellite Radio, 1990-2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 439-471. Oliver, D. & Bürgi, P. (2005). Organizational Identity as a Strategic Practice. 4th International Critical Management Studies Conference, UK: Cambridge, 4-6 July. Olzak, S., & West, E. (1991). Ethnic Conflict and the Rise and Fall of Ethnic Newspapers. American Sociological Review, 56(4), 458-474. O’Mahony, S., & Bechky, B. A. (2008). Boundary Organizations: Enabling Collaboration among Unexpected Allies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 422-459. O’Mahony, S., & Ferraro, F. (2007). The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1079-1106. O’Mahony, S., & Lakhani, K. R. (2011). Organizations in the Shadow of Communities. Working Paper, 11-131, Harvard Business School. Özseven, M. & Danışman, A. (2017). Kurumsal Değişim, Örgütsel Kimlikler ve Örgütsel Uygulamalar: Türk Kamu Bankalarının 2001 Ekonomik Krizi Sonrası Durumu. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 44(Aralık), 335-374. Pache, A-C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the Hybrid Organization: Selective Coupling as a Response to Competing Institutional Logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972-1001. Peterson, R.A., & Anand, N., (2004). The Production of Culture Perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 311-334. Peterson, R. A. (2005). In Search of Authenticity. Journal of Management Studies, 42(5), 1083-1098. Romanelli, E. (1991). The Evolution of New Organizational Forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 79-103. Ruef, M. (2000). The Emergence of Organizational Forms: A Community Ecology Approach. American Journal of Sociology, 106(3), 658-714. Ruef, M. (2004). The Demise of an Organizational Form: Emancipation and Plantation Agriculture in the American South, 1860-1880. American Journal of Sociology, 109(6), 1365-1410. Scott, W. R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P. J., & Caronna, C. A. (2000). Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Suddaby, R., Ganzin, M., & Minkus, A. (2017). Craft, Magic and the Re-enchantment of the World. European Management Journal, 35, 285-296. Takuya, K., & Takayama, C. (2010). “Traditional Art Crafts (Dent# K#gei)” in Japan: From Reproductions to Original Works. The Journal of Modern Craft, 3(1), 19-36. Thornton, P. H., Jones, C., & Kury, K. (2005). Institutional Logics and Institutional Change in Organizations: Transformation in Accounting, Architecture, and Publishing. İçinde C. Jones & P. H. Thornton (Ed.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations Cilt: 23 (s.125-170), Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Thornton, P. H. & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional Logics. İçinde R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin & R. Suddaby (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, (s.99-129), Los Angeles: SAGE. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Whetten, D. A. (2006). Albert and Whetten Revisited: Strengthening the Concept of Organizational Identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(3), 219-234. Wright, A. L., & Zammuto, R. F. (2013). Wielding the Willow: Processes of Institutional Change in English County Cricket. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 308-330. Zucker, L. G. (1989). Combining Institutional Theory and Population Ecology: No Legitimacy, No History. American Sociological Review, 54(4), 542-545.
Details
Primary Language
Turkish
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Mustafa Özseven
*
0000-0003-3720-646X
Türkiye
Publication Date
December 30, 2020
Submission Date
June 1, 2020
Acceptance Date
November 24, 2020
Published in Issue
Year 2020 Volume: 29 Number: 4
APA
Özseven, M. (2020). KLASİKTEN MODERNE DOĞRU: ADANA MOBİLYACILIK SEKTÖRÜNDE ÖRGÜTSEL FORM DEĞİŞİMİ, 1950-2018. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 29(4), 277-300. https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.746658
AMA
1.Özseven M. KLASİKTEN MODERNE DOĞRU: ADANA MOBİLYACILIK SEKTÖRÜNDE ÖRGÜTSEL FORM DEĞİŞİMİ, 1950-2018. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2020;29(4):277-300. doi:10.35379/cusosbil.746658
Chicago
Özseven, Mustafa. 2020. “KLASİKTEN MODERNE DOĞRU: ADANA MOBİLYACILIK SEKTÖRÜNDE ÖRGÜTSEL FORM DEĞİŞİMİ, 1950-2018”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 29 (4): 277-300. https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.746658.
EndNote
Özseven M (December 1, 2020) KLASİKTEN MODERNE DOĞRU: ADANA MOBİLYACILIK SEKTÖRÜNDE ÖRGÜTSEL FORM DEĞİŞİMİ, 1950-2018. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 29 4 277–300.
IEEE
[1]M. Özseven, “KLASİKTEN MODERNE DOĞRU: ADANA MOBİLYACILIK SEKTÖRÜNDE ÖRGÜTSEL FORM DEĞİŞİMİ, 1950-2018”, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 277–300, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.35379/cusosbil.746658.
ISNAD
Özseven, Mustafa. “KLASİKTEN MODERNE DOĞRU: ADANA MOBİLYACILIK SEKTÖRÜNDE ÖRGÜTSEL FORM DEĞİŞİMİ, 1950-2018”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 29/4 (December 1, 2020): 277-300. https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.746658.
JAMA
1.Özseven M. KLASİKTEN MODERNE DOĞRU: ADANA MOBİLYACILIK SEKTÖRÜNDE ÖRGÜTSEL FORM DEĞİŞİMİ, 1950-2018. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2020;29:277–300.
MLA
Özseven, Mustafa. “KLASİKTEN MODERNE DOĞRU: ADANA MOBİLYACILIK SEKTÖRÜNDE ÖRGÜTSEL FORM DEĞİŞİMİ, 1950-2018”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 29, no. 4, Dec. 2020, pp. 277-00, doi:10.35379/cusosbil.746658.
Vancouver
1.Mustafa Özseven. KLASİKTEN MODERNE DOĞRU: ADANA MOBİLYACILIK SEKTÖRÜNDE ÖRGÜTSEL FORM DEĞİŞİMİ, 1950-2018. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2020 Dec. 1;29(4):277-300. doi:10.35379/cusosbil.746658