WHICH HYPOTHESIS IS VALID IN OECD COUNTRIES, KUZNETS U CURVE OR GREAT U-TURN? SYSTEM GMM ESTIMATION FOR DYNAMIC PANEL DATA

Year 2016, Volume: 25 Issue: 3, 411 - 426, 30.10.2016

Nükhet Doğan Reyhan Cafrı

Abstract

The results of research in recent years have claimed that the relationship between economic growth and income inequality no longer supports Kuznets' inverse-U hypothesis. The expectation of “Inverse-U” in explaining the relationship between economic growth and income inequality replaced with “Great U-Turn” instead. In this context, this research aims to explain the relationship between income inequality and economic growth per capita in OECD countries for the period of 2000-2012. The analysis made using Dynamic Panel Data Method to explain the relationship between income inequality and economic growth per capita which shows evidence in support of Great U-Turn. The result of variables which alleged to cause income inequality to turn positive again, such as rapid technological change (positive), the labor force in the agriculture sector (positive), interest rate (negative) and foreign direct investment (negative) were all statistically significant. The results also indicated that labor force with a higher level of education has the effect of reducing income inequality while the effect of the unemployment rate on inequality was negative.

Keywords

The Kuznets curve, The great U-turn, Income inequality, System GMM

References

• Acemoglu, D. and Pischke, J. (2000). Certification of training and training outcomes. European Economic Review 44(4), pp. 917-27. Alderson, A. S., Nielsen, F. (2002). Globalization and the Great U-Turn: income inequality trends in 16 OECD Countries. American Journal of Sociology, 107(5), 1244-1299. Arellano, M., Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The review of economic studies, 58(2), pp.277-297. Arellano, M., Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of econometrics, 68(1), pp.29-51. Baltagi, B. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data (4th ed.). John Wiley&Sons Ltd, UK. Bishop, J., Formby, J., Thistle, P. (1991) Changes in US earnings distributions in the 1980s. Applied Economics 23, pp.425-434. Bluestone, B., Harrison, B. (1988). The great U-turn: corporate restructuring and the polarizing of America. New York: Basic Books. Bluestone, B. (1990), The Great U-Turn revisited: economic restructuring, jobs, and the redistribution of earnings. Jobs, Earnings, and Employment Growth Policies in the United States, ed. (J. D. Kasarda). Boston, MA: Kluwer, pp.7-37. Blundell, R., Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of econometrics, 87(1), pp.115-143. Bound, J., Johnson, G. (1992). Changes in the structure of wages in the 1980s.: an evaluation of alternative explanations. American Economic Review 82, pp.371-392. Chen, B. (2003). An inverted-U relationship between inequality and long-run growth. Economics Letters 78, pp.205-212. Conceicao, P. and Galbraith, J. (2000). Technology adoption and inequality: empirical evidence from a selection of OECD countries. 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 7. Dawson, P. (1997). On testing Kuznets' economic growth hypothesis. Applied Economics Letters, 4, pp.409-410. Deininger, K., Squire, L. (1998). New ways of looking at old issues: inequality and growth. Journal of Development Economics Vol. 57, pp.259-287. Deller, S. C. (2005). What has caused the “Great U-Turn” in income inequality?. Community Economics Newsletter, No:344. Freeman, R. (1997). When earnings diverge: causes, consequences, and cures for the new inequality in the U.S. Washington, DC: National Policy Association. Hall, J. (2009). The diffusion of technology, education and income inequality: evidence from developed and developing countries. http://www.pages.drexel.edu/~jdh56/p2_09_nov.pdf (Accessed 04. 20.2016). Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of panel data (2nd ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Pres. Hung, T. T. (2005). Impacts of foreign direct investment on poverty reduction in Vietnam. Discussed paper, GRIPS, Vietnam. Galor, O. and Zeira, J. (1993). Income Distribution and Macroeconomics. Review of Economic Studies, 60, pp.35-52. Jaumotte, F.; Lall, S. and Papageorgiou, C. (2008). Rising income inequality: technology, or trade and financial globalization? IMF Working Paper, WP/08/185. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2008/wp08185.pdf (Accessed 04.11.2016). Jensen, N. M., and Rosas, G. (2007). Foreign direct investment and income inequality in Mexico, 1990–2000. International Organization, 61(03), pp.467-487. Katz, L, Murphy, K. (1992). Changes in relative wages, 1963-87: supply and demand factors. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, pp.35-78. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American economic review, 45(1), pp.1-28. Kwon, R. (2016). A new Kuznetsian dynamic: the knowledge economy and income inequality in the United States, 1917–2008. The Sociological Quarterly,57(1), pp.174-204. Lantican, C. P., Gladwin, C.H., Seale, J.L. (1996). Income and gender inequalities in Asia: testing alternative theories of development. Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp.235-263. List J. A., Gallet C. A. (1999). The Kuznets curve: what happens after the inverted-U?. Review of Development Economics, 3(2), pp.200-206. Montecino, J. A. and Epstein, G. (2015). Did Quantitative Easing Increase Income Inequality?. Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series, (28). Moran, T. P. (2005). Kuznets’s inverted U-curve hypothesis: The rise, demise and continued relevance of a socioeconomic law. Sociological Forum, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp.209-244. Nielsen, F., A. S. Alderson (1997). The Kuznets curve and the Great U-Turn: income inequality in U.S. counties, 1970 to 1990. American Sociological Review, Vol. 62, No. 1, pp.12-33. Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system gmm in stata. Stata Journal, 9 (1), pp.86-136. for online publication. Shin I. (2012). Income inequality and economic growth. Economic Modelling, 29, pp.2049-2057. Smeeding T. (2002). Globalization, inequality, and the rich countries of the G-20: evidence from the Luxembourg income study. Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No. 320. Solt, Frederick. (2014). The standardized world income inequality database. Working paper. SWIID Version 5.0, October 2014. Thornton J. (2001). The Kuznets inverted-U hypothesis: panel data evidence from 96 countries. Applied Economics Letters, 8:1, pp.15-16. Thurow, L. (1987). A surge in inequality. Scientific American 256 (5) pp.30-37. Tsakloglou, P. (1988). Development and inequality revisited. Applied Economics, 20, pp.509-531. Vindigni, A. (2002). Income distribution and skilled biased technological change. Princeton, Department of Economics - Industrial Relations Sections working paper number 464, www.irs.princeton.edu/pubs/pdfs/464.pdf (Accessed 04.11.2016).