Famagusta Movement Pattern and Land Use

Öz

Nowadays, the city shapes have entirely changed. They have become mere vehicular channels without any spatial definition, vitality and public usage. They are not safe especially for children and citizens have lost the sense of belonging to their neighborhood. Therefore, cities have gradually changed to unsustainable ones. Considering this fact, the main objective of this study is to put much concentration on the movement pattern and land use as a source of sustainability. Thereby, from this perspective, Famagusta’s different neighborhoods in Northern Cyprus have been selected to better understand the specific influences of patterns of movement and land use in the sustainable development of the city. Generally, this research is based on a theoretical framework with regard for the mentioned factors. Moreover, a questionnaire survey has been taken to measure the amount of citizens’ satisfaction about the current situation and to determine the criteria for the assessment of access to and utilization of public spaces. Based on the survey results, recommendations and design proposal for future development and organization of the city have been suggested in order to make Famagusta more livable. In this case, pedestrianization, cycling, reforming livable neighborhoods and combining the nature to the city can be considered. Another answer to this problem can be increasing density and mix use activity in the current context of the city.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Movement Pattern,Land Use,Famagusta,Sustainable Development

Gazimağusa Hareket Deseni Ve Arazi Kullanimi

Öz

Günümüzde şehir dokuları tamamen değişti. Mekansal bir tanım, canlılık ve kamusal kullanım olmadan sadece araç kanalları haline geldiler. Özellikle çocuklar için güvenli olmayan yerlerde, kent sakinleri semtlerine ait olma duygusunu kaybetti. Dolayısıyla, şehirler kademeli olarak sürdürülemez bir yapıya büründü. Bu gerçeği göz önünde bulundurarak, bu çalışmanın temel amacı, hareketlilik deseni ve arazi kullanımına sürdürülebilirlik kaynakları olarak yoğunlaşmaktır. Bu bağlamda, Kuzey Kıbrıs’ta bulunan Gazimağusa kentinin farklı mahalleleri, kentin sürdürülebilir kalkınmasında hareket ve arazi kullanım modellerinin belirli etkilerini daha iyi anlamak için incelenmiştir. Genel olarak, bu araştırma söz konusu faktörlerle ilgili teorik bir çerçeveye dayanmaktadır. Çalışma kapsamında ayrıca, kent sakinlerinin mevcut durumla ilgili memnuniyet miktarını ölçmek ve kamusal alanlara erişim ve kullanım ölçütlerini belirlemek için bir anket çalışması yapılmıştır. Anket sonuçlarına dayanarak, Gazimağusa kentini daha yaşanılabilir hale getirmek için, kentin gelecekteki gelişimi, organizasyonu ve tasarımı için öneriler sunulmuştur. Bunlar arasında yayalaştırma, bisiklete binme, yaşanabilir mahallelerin yenilenmesi ve doğanın şehre birleştirilmesi yer almaktadır. Kentin bu sorununa çözüm sağlayabilecek diğer bir etken ise, kentin mevcut bağlamda yoğunluğunu artırmak ve kullanım faaliyetlerini çeşitlendirmektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hareket Deseni,Arazi Kullanimi,Gazimağusa,Sürdürülebilir Kalkinma

Kaynakça

1. Akkelies, V. (2009). Measuring the Degree of Street Vitality in Excavated Towns. Configurational modelling of urban movement. UK.
2. Ashihara, Y. (1992). Hidden order: Tokyo through the twentieth century. Kodansha International. Tokyo.
3. Hiller, B. (1993). Attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: planning and design, 20,pp. 29-66.
4. Boden, D. & Molotch, H. L. (1995). ‘The compulsion of proximity’ in: Friedland R, Boden D, Now Here: Space, Time and Modernity, University of California Press, Berkeley.
5. Cranz, G. (1994). How the principles of sustainable development can and must shape our cities and parks?, research paper – Center for Environmental Design, U. C. Berkeley, California.
6. Dutton, J. A. (2001), New American urbanism, Reforming Suburban Metropolis, Skira Architecture library.
7. Gehl, J. (1996). The life between buildings: using public space. Copenhagen: Arkitektens forlag.
8. Goodey, B. Urban Design of Centralheas and Beyond. (1993). Making Better Places: Urban Design Now. Butterworth Architecture, Oxford, 53-8.

9. Graeme, E. (2010). Urban Sustaınabılıty: Mixed Use Or Mıxed Messages?. The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
10. Hassani, A., Hossienpour, A., Rahnama, M.R. & Roshani, P. (2012). Use Principles of New Urbanism Approach in Designing Sustainable Urban Spaces, International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 2-7, pp. 195-203.
11. Hillier, B. (1996), Cities as movement economies, Urban Design International, 1-1, pp. 41-60.
12. Hillier B. & Hanson J. (1984). The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Hillier, B. (2001). Centrality as a process: accounting for attraction inequalities in deformed grids. Urban Design International, 3-4,pp. 107-127.
14. Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. (1993). Natural Movement: Or, Configuration and Attraction in Urban Pedestrian Movement, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 20 (1), pp. 29–66.
15. Lair Hill, (2011). Urban supply in consideration , Bartlett School of Graduate Studies, London. University College London.
16. Madanipour, A. (1994). Urban Public Space in the Middle East. Proceedings of CARD0 Conferace: People, Place & Development. Awotona A. Newcastle upon Tyne.
17. Payn, G. (2007). Urban land supply- policies and strategies, Planning, zoning and assessments.UK
18. Satterthwaite, D. (2010). The implications of population growth and urbanization for climate change, Environment and Urbanization, 21- 2, pp. 545-567. Shaheen, S., Guzman, S., Zhang, H., (2010). The Americas, and Asia: past, present, and future. Bikesharing in Europe In: Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. Washington, DC, USA.
19. Turner, A. (2004). Urban supply in world. Bartlett School of Graduate Studies, London. University College London.URL1: david, J. (2017, 8 12). sustainable. Retrieved from www.finswimming2012.at/en/menu_main/newsshow-home-news city-graz-city-of-design
20. URL2: john, B. (2018, 4 5). urbanized. Retrieved from www.katearthur.co.uk/2010/10/stage-1-architecture-kunsthaus-graz/kunsthaus-graz-4
21. URL3: been, K. (2018, 3 5). urban. Retrieved from www.flickr.com/photos/89983902@N00/4024815718/
22. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future (Brundtl and Report). Oxford University Press: Oxford.