Yerel Yönetimlerde Algoritmik Yönetişim: Belediye Hizmetlerinin Dijital Dönüşümü

Yahya Gençay; Sena Şahin

TR

Yerel Yönetimlerde Algoritmik Yönetişim: Belediye Hizmetlerinin Dijital Dönüşümü

Abstract

Bu çalışma yerel yönetimlerde algoritmik yönetişim olgusunu belediyelerdeki güncel uygulama örnekleri üzerinden incelemektedir. Kamu hizmetlerinin dijitalleşmesiyle belediyelerde kullanılan algoritmik sistemler, hizmet sunumunun teknik araçları olmaktan çıkarak karar alma, planlama ve uygulama süreçlerinde etkili olan yönetsel mekanizmalar haline gelmiştir. Bu çerçevede çalışma algoritmik yönetişimi dijital belediyecilik uygulamalarından ayırarak, algoritmaların belediye hizmetlerinde yönetsel işlevler üstlendiği yeni bir yönetim pratiği olarak ele almaktadır. Çalışma nitel araştırma yaklaşımı kapsamında literatür taraması ve belge analizi yöntemlerine dayanmaktadır. Farklı ülkelerden seçilen belediye örnekleri üzerinden ulaşım, kentsel güvenlik, çevre ve atık yönetimi, sosyal yardım, imar planlama ve kurumsal yönetim gibi çeşitli hizmet alanlarında kullanılan algoritmik yönetişim uygulamaları analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, algoritmik sistemlerin belediyelerde hizmet süreçlerinin planlanması, kaynakların yönetimi, önceliklendirme mekanizmalarının oluşturulması ve operasyonel süreçlerin izlenmesi gibi yönetsel işlevlerde yaygın biçimde kullanıldığını göstermektedir. Bu uygulamaların yerel yönetimlerde veri temelli yönetim anlayışını güçlendirdiği ve kurumsal kapasiteyi artırdığı görülmektedir. Fakat algoritmik yönetişim verimlilik, analitik kapasite ve vatandaş odaklı hizmet sunumu gibi önemli fırsatlar sunmasının yanı sıra algoritmik önyargılar, şeffaflık ve hesap verebilirlik sorunları, veri gizliliği ve güvenliğine ilişkin riskler gibi yönetsel ve normatif tartışmaları da beraberinde getirmektedir. Çalışma, belediyelerde algoritmik yönetişimin mevcut görünümünü ortaya koyarak bu uygulamaların yerel düzeyde doğurduğu fırsat ve risklerin birlikte değerlendirilmesine yönelik analitik bir zemin sunmaktadır. Bu yönüyle çalışma yerel yönetimlerde dijital dönüşüm sürecinin algoritmalar aracılığıyla nasıl yönetsel bir nitelik kazandığını göstermekte, kamu yönetimi literatürüne kavramsal ve karşılaştırmalı bir katkı sunmaktadır.

Keywords

References

Ahmed, K., Dubey, M. K., Kumar, A., & Dubey, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence and IoT driven system architecture for municipality waste management in smart cities: A review. Measurement: Sensors, 36, 101395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2024.101395
Alemi, F., Rodier, C. J., & Drake, C. (2018). Cruising and on-street parking pricing: A difference-in-difference analysis of measured parking search time and distance in San Francisco. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 111, 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.03.007
Aljabri, B. S. (2024). Driving efficiency: The role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in enhancing municipal operations in Saudi Arabia. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 22(02), 1936-1944.
Alsulaili, A., Ali, O., Alenezi, N., & Al-Dabbous, A. N. (2025). Selection of municipal solid waste disposal technology using the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Genetic Algorithm for Gulf Cooperation Council Countries. Journal of Engineering Research, 13, 865-873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2024.03.015
Anttiroiko, A.-V. (2019). Towards an algorithmic city: Transformation in politics, regulation, governance, and service provision. In N. Komninos & C. Kakderi (Eds.), Smart Cities in the Post-algorithmic era: Integrating technologies, platforms and governance (pp. 36-69). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Avcı, E. (2024). Akıllı şehirler için üretken yapay zekâ kavramsal çerçevesi. Kent Akademisi Dergisi, 17(5), 1654-1675. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1490925 Barış, Ş., Zülfikar, A. C., Korkmaz, M., & Tunç, S. (2023). Akıllı Şehirlerde afet riski azaltılması uygulamaları. Şura Akademi Dergisi, (2), 27-41.
Basori, A. H., Abdul Hamid, A. L. bin, Mansur, A. B. F., & Yusof, N. (2019). iMars: Intelligent municipality augmented reality service for efficient ınformation dissemination based on deep learning algorithm in smart city of Jeddah. Procedia Computer Science, 163, 93-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.12.091
Baydan, E., Yenigül, S. B., & Gürel, Z. A. (2025). Kır-kent ikileminde yeni arayışlar: K-means algoritması ile yerleşim birimlerinin kümelendirilmesi. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(3), 1467-1478. https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.1417659

Bettemir, Ö. H., Özdemir, Ö., & Fırat, M. (2017). İçme suyu şebeke arızalarına müdahale için karar destek sisteminin geliştirilmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(9), 1049-1054. https://doi.org/10.5505/pajes.2017.56823
Bıçkı, D., & Eyiuslu, S. (2025). Eleştirel açıdan akıllı kentler: Büyükşehir belediyeleri üzerine bir farkındalık araştırması. KMÜ Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 27(48), 405-430.
Busuioc, M. (2021). Accountable artificial intelligence: Holding algorithms to account. Public administration review, 81(5), 825-836. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13293
Brauneis, R., & Goodman, E. P. (2018). Algorithmic transparency for the smart city. The Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 20(2), 103-176.
Bright, J., Ganesh, B., Vogl, T., & Seidelin, C. (2019). Data science for local government. Oxford Internet Institute.
Bruun, M. H. (2024). Algorithmic governance, public participation and trust: Citizen–state relations in a smart city project. Social Anthropology, 32(4), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.3167/saas.2024.320402
Bulut, Y., & Aslan, M. M. (2019). Yerel yönetimlerde bilişim teknolojilerinin ve yapay zekânın kullanımı: Akıllı Park Ankara Harikalar Diyarı örneği. 1. Uluslararası İletişim ve Yönetim Bilimleri Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, 761-776.
Cath, C., & Jansen, F. (2022). Dutch comfort: The limits of AI governance through municipal registers. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 26(3), 395-412. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne202323172
Cerrillo i Martinez, A. (2019). How can we open the black box of public administration? Transparency and accountability in the use of algorithms. Revista Catalana de Dret Públic, (58), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.2436/rcdp.i58.2019.3277
Çakır, M. E., Demir Yetiş, A., Yeşilnacar, M. İ., & Ulukavak, M. (2019). Katı atıklar için optimum güzergâh tespiti ve alansal dağılım haritalarının CBS ortamında oluşturulması: Suruç (Şanlıurfa) örneği. BEÜ Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2), 595-603. https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.482893
Danaher, J., Hogan, M. J., Noone, C., Kennedy, R., Behan, A., De Paor, A., Felzmann, H., Haklay, M., Khoo, S.-M., Morison, J., Murphy, M. H., O'Brolchain, N., Schafer, B., & Shankar, K. (2017). Algorithmic governance: Developing a research agenda through the power of collective intelligence. Big Data & Society, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717726554
David, A., Yigitcanlar, T., Desouza, K., Li, R. Y. M., Cheong, P. H., Mehmood, R., & Corchado, J. (2024). Understanding local government responsible AI strategy: An international municipal policy document analysis. Cities, 155, 105502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105502
Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167-194). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.003.0009
Güler, B. A. (2006). Sosyal devlet ve yerelleşme. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim, 2, 29-43.
Hansen, T. M., Sinatra, R., & Sekara, V. (2024). Failing our youngest: On the biases, pitfalls, and risks in a decision support algorithm used for child protection. In FAccT ’24: Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 290-300). https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3658906
Henden, H. B., & Henden, R. (2005). Yerel yönetimlerin hizmet sunumlarındaki değişim ve e-belediyecilik. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(14), 48-66.
Issar, S., & Aneesh, A. (2022). What is algorithmic governance?. Sociology Compass, 16(1), e12955. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12955
Just, N., & Latzer, M. (2017). Governance by algorithms: Reality construction by algorithmic selection on the Internet. Media, Culture & Society, 39(2), 238-258.
Kalpokas, I. (2019). Algorithmic governance: Politics and law in the post-human era. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31922-9
Karaca, M. (2023). Yapay zekâ tabanlı stratejik afet yönetimi: Verilerin tam kullanımı. Afet ve Risk Dergisi, 6(4), 1312-1331. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.1324323
Karaca, Y., & Öztürk, N. K. (2019). Yeni nesil belediyecilik: Dijital belediye uygulamaları. Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi Dergisi, 2(3), 528-537. https://doi.org/10.33712/mana.649557
Karadimas, N. V., Papatzelou, K., & Loumos, V. G. (2007). Optimal solid waste collection routes identified by the ant colony system algorithm. Waste Management & Research, 25(2), 139-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X07071312
Kasapoglu, T., Masso, A., & Calzati, S. (2021). Unpacking algorithms as technologies of power: Syrian refugees and data experts on algorithmic governance. Digital Geography and Society, 2, 100016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2021.100016
Katzenbach, C., & Ulbricht, L. (2019). Algorithmic governance. Internet Policy Review, 8(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1424
Kayacı, M. (2025). Kamu yönetiminin şeffaflığından algoritmaların şeffaflığına geçiş: Şeffaflığı, algoritmaların opaklığı ve kara kutu problemi çerçevesinde yeniden değerlendirmek. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 25(2), 827-841. https://doi.org/10.11616/asbi.1658320
Kinder, T., Stenvall, J., Koskimies, E., Webb, H., & Janenova, S. (2023). Local public services and the ethical deployment of artificial intelligence. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4), 101865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101865
Kitchin, R. (2017). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication and Society 20(1), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087
König, P. D. (2020). Dissecting the algorithmic leviathan: On the socio-political anatomy of algorithmic governance. Philosophy & Technology, 33(3), 467-485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00363-w
Köseoğlu, Ö., & Demirci, Y. (2018). Akıllı şehirler ve yerel sorunlarin çözümünde yenilikçi teknolojilerin kullanımı. Uluslararası Politik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(2), 40-57.
Lee, M. K., Kusbit, D., Kahng, A., Kim, J. T., Yuan, X., Chan, A., Noothigattu, R., See, D., Lee, S., Psomas, C.-A., & Procaccia, A. D. (2019). WeBuildAI: Participatory framework for, fair and efficient, algorithmic governance. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), Article 181. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359283
Lazar, S. (2025). Governing the algorithmic city. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 53(2), 102-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12279
Leftwich, A. (1993). Governance, democracy and development in the Third World, Third World Quarterly, 14(3), 605-624. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436599308420345
Levy, K., Chasalow, K. E., & Riley, S. (2021). Algorithms and decision-making in the public sector. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 17(1), 309-334. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-041221-023808
Liu, W., Wang, B., & Song, Z. (2022). Failure prediction of municipal water pipes using machine learning algorithms. Water Resources Management, 36(4), 1271-1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03080-w
Lucero, K. (2020). Algorithmic governance policy and implementation approaches in the United States. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3902733
Meriç-Atakan, K. B. (2025). İşe alımda algoritmik yanlılığı gidermeye yönelik yapay zekâ tekniklerinin incelenmesi. İş, Güç Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 27(2), 18-62.
Miyazaki, S. (2012). Algorhythmics: Understanding micro-temporality in computational cultures. Computational Culture, Issue 2.
Naralan, A., Kaleli, S. S., & Baygin, M. (2017). Erzurum Büyükşehir Belediyesi için klonal seçim algoritması kullanılarak en kısa yol tespiti. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology, 3(2), 138-142. https://doi.org/10.22531/muglajsci.357621
Odelberg, T. (2024). Artificial intelligence handbook for local government. Science, Technology, and Public Policy Program, University of Michigan Ford School of Public Policy.
Özgül, H. B. (2025). Belediyelerde mekansal karar destek sistemi (SDSS) kullanımı: İstanbul üzerine bir saha araştırması. International Journal of Public Finance, 10(1), 87-108. https://doi.org/10.30927/ijpf.1605915
Park, W. (2025). Digital-algorithmic urban governmentality: “Borders through cities” and “cities through borders.” International Area Studies Review, 28(2), 204-222. https://doi.org/10.69473/iasr.2025.28.2.204
Peeters, R., & Schuilenburg, M. (2021). The algorithmic society: An introduction. In M. Schuilenburg & R. Peeters (Eds.), The algorithmic society: Technology, power, and knowledge (pp. 1-15). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429261404-1
Peeters, R., & Schuilenburg, M. (2023). Algorithmic governance: Technology, knowledge and power. In W. Housley, A. Edwards, R. Beneito-Montagut, & R. Fitzgerald (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of digital society (pp. 439-457). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529783193.n25
Sano, A. V. D., & Nindito, H. (2016). Application of K-Means algorithm for cluster analysis on poverty of provinces in Indonesia. ComTech: Computer, Mathematics and Engineering Applications, 7(2), 141-150. https://doi.org/10.21512/comtech.v7i2.2254
Seaver, N. (2019). Knowing algorithms. In J. Vertesi & D. Ribes (Eds.), digitalSTS: A field guide for science & technology studies (pp. 412-422). Princeton University Press.
Senadheera, S., Yigitcanlar, T., Desouza, K. C., Mossberger, K., Corchado, J., Mehmood, R., Li, R. Y. M., & Cheong, P. H. (2025). Understanding chatbot adoption in local governments: A review and framework. Journal of Urban Technology, 32(3), 35-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2023.2297665
Sevim, M. A., Kircova, İ., & Çuhadar, E. (2019). Yerel yönetimlerde akıllı şehir vizyonu: Şehir yönetim araçları ve trendleri. Strategic Public Management Journal, 5(9), 109-126. https://doi.org/10.25069/spmj.499391
Smuha, N. A. (2025). The use of algorithmic systems by public administrations: Practices, challenges and governance frameworks. In N. A. Smuha (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Law, Ethics and Policy of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 383-410). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009367783.023
Smith, G. J. D. (2020). The politics of algorithmic governance in the black box city. Big Data & Society, 7(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720933989
Söyler, H., & Fendoğlu, E. (2018). Route optimization of Malatya Metropolitan Municipality pesticide vehicles. Alphanumeric Journal, 6(1), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.17093/alphanumeric.368417
Steiner, C. (2012). Automate this: How algorithms took over our markets, our jobs, and the world. Portfolio.
Şen, E. (2023). Yerel yönetimlerde dijital dönüşüm ve akıllı kent uygulamaları: Çeşitli tartışmalar. Ekonomi İşletme Siyaset ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi (JEBPIR), 9(2-1), 141-165.
Tuğaç, Ç. (2025). Yerel yönetimlerde yapay zekâ, dijitalleşme ve etik yönetişim: Barselona, Şanghay ve Ankara kentleri üzerinden karşılaştırmalı bir analiz. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 34(Uygarlığın Dönüşümü: Yapay Zekâ), 160-191. https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1683790
Ulvi, C., & Özkan, G. (2019). Taşınmaz değerlemede yapay zekâ tekniklerinin kullanılabilirliği ve yöntemlerin karşılaştırılması. Geomatik Dergisi, 4(2), 134-140. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.501042
Uysal, Y., & Öztürk, K. (2024). Büyükşehir belediyeleri perspektifinden yerel kamu hizmetlerinde yapay zekâ kullanımı üzerine değerlendirmeler. Uluslararası Sosyal ve Ekonomik Çalışmalar Dergisi, 5(2), 269-287. https://doi.org/10.62001/gsijses.1523313
Ünal, S., & Sezgin, A. A. (2021). Büyük Veri (Big Data)'nin yapay zekâ uygulamalarında toplumsal sınıflandırmaya yönelik kaygılar. AJIT-e: Bilişim Teknolojileri Online Dergisi, 12(44), 47-70. https://doi.org/10.5824/ajite.2021.01.004.x
Van der Graaf, S. (2018). In Waze we trust: Algorithmic governance of the public sphere. Media and Communication, 6(4), 153-162. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1710 Van der Voort, H. G., Klievink, A. J., Arnaboldi, M., & Meijer, A. J. (2019). Rationality and politics of algorithms. Will the promise of big data survive the dynamics of public decision making? Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.10.011
Varnalı, T. (2025a). Robotik teknolojilerin toplumsal ve sektörel etkileri: Belediyelerde gelecek vizyonu. Uluslararası Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(2), 17-38.
Varnalı, T. (2025b). Belediyelerde dijital dönüşüm ve mobil uygulamaların rolü: İlçe belediyelerinin mobil uygulamalarının ısı haritası yöntemiyle analizi. Ekonomi İşletme ve Maliye Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 135-168. https://doi.org/10.38009/ekimad.1658593
Vogl, T. M., Seidelin, C., Ganesh, B., & Bright, J. (2020). Smart technology and the emergence of algorithmic bureaucracy: Artificial intelligence in UK local authorities. Public Administration Review, 80(6), 946-961. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13286
Vrabie, C. (2023). E-Government 3.0: An AI model to use for enhanced local democracies. Sustainability, 15(12), 9572. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129572
World Bank. (1989). Sub-Saharan Africa: From crisis to sustainable growth: A long-term perspective study. The World Bank.
Yeung, K. (2018). Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation. Regulation & Governance, 12(4), 505-523. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12158
Yigitcanlar, T., Senadheera, S., Marasinghe, R., Bibri, S. E., Sanchez, T., Cugurullo, F., & Sieber, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence and the local government: A five-decade scientometric analysis on the evolution, state-of-the-art, and emerging trends. Cities, 152, 105151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105151
Yigitcanlar, T., Corchado, J. M., Mehmood, R., Li, R. Y. M., Mossberger, K., & Desouza, K. (2021). Responsible urban innovation with local government artificial intelligence (AI): A conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), Article 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010071

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Local Administrations

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Yahya Gençay
0000-0003-1304-2245
Türkiye

Sena Şahin
0000-0003-2728-9839
Türkiye

Publication Date

October 23, 2026

Submission Date

January 1, 2026

Acceptance Date

March 18, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 35 Number: 2026

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA67ZD78NY

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Gençay, Y., & Şahin, S. (2026). Yerel Yönetimlerde Algoritmik Yönetişim: Belediye Hizmetlerinin Dijital Dönüşümü. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, 35(2026). https://izlik.org/JA67ZD78NY

AMA

1.Gençay Y, Şahin S. Yerel Yönetimlerde Algoritmik Yönetişim: Belediye Hizmetlerinin Dijital Dönüşümü. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler. 2026;35(2026). https://izlik.org/JA67ZD78NY

Chicago

Gençay, Yahya, and Sena Şahin. 2026. “Yerel Yönetimlerde Algoritmik Yönetişim: Belediye Hizmetlerinin Dijital Dönüşümü”. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler 35 (2026). https://izlik.org/JA67ZD78NY.

EndNote

Gençay Y, Şahin S (October 1, 2026) Yerel Yönetimlerde Algoritmik Yönetişim: Belediye Hizmetlerinin Dijital Dönüşümü. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler 35 2026

IEEE

[1]Y. Gençay and S. Şahin, “Yerel Yönetimlerde Algoritmik Yönetişim: Belediye Hizmetlerinin Dijital Dönüşümü”, Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, vol. 35, no. 2026, Oct. 2026, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA67ZD78NY

ISNAD

Gençay, Yahya - Şahin, Sena. “Yerel Yönetimlerde Algoritmik Yönetişim: Belediye Hizmetlerinin Dijital Dönüşümü”. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler 35/2026 (October 1, 2026). https://izlik.org/JA67ZD78NY.

JAMA

1.Gençay Y, Şahin S. Yerel Yönetimlerde Algoritmik Yönetişim: Belediye Hizmetlerinin Dijital Dönüşümü. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler. 2026;35. Available at https://izlik.org/JA67ZD78NY.

MLA

Gençay, Yahya, and Sena Şahin. “Yerel Yönetimlerde Algoritmik Yönetişim: Belediye Hizmetlerinin Dijital Dönüşümü”. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, vol. 35, no. 2026, Oct. 2026, https://izlik.org/JA67ZD78NY.

Vancouver

1.Yahya Gençay, Sena Şahin. Yerel Yönetimlerde Algoritmik Yönetişim: Belediye Hizmetlerinin Dijital Dönüşümü. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler [Internet]. 2026 Oct. 1;35(2026). Available from: https://izlik.org/JA67ZD78NY

ARTICLE PUBLICATION PRINCIPLES AND WRITING RULES

General Principles

General Rules for the Article Submission Process

Before formatting your work according to our journal's writing rules, please review our Ethical Principles and Publication Policy page.

If your article meets the necessary prerequisites for publication in our journal, please confirm that all documents are ready by checking the Article Submission Process Checklist before clicking the submit button.

All applications, evaluations, publication processes, and notifications are handled through the TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM DergiPark system at https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/cyy. The article uploaded to the system must be formatted according to the principles, formal requirements, citation styles, and writing rules of the language in which it is written, as specified on the journal's Writing Rules page, and the Copyright Transfer Form must be filled out and signed by all authors. You can access the Copyright Transfer Form from the Forms and Guides tab and the Ethical Principles and Publication Policy tab.

Articles submitted to the journal are checked during the initial evaluation phase for the presence of the following:

Information required to be entered into the DergiPark system.
The article file prepared according to the writing rules template.
An ethics committee approval, if required, or a statement declaring that the research is not subject to ethics committee approval.
The Ethics Statement Form.
The Copyright Transfer Form.
The Plagiarism Report.
The Author Contribution Statement Form.

Submissions that do not comply with the journal's Article Publication Principles and Writing Rules will be rejected.

General Rules for the Article Submission Process

Articles must be saved in "MS Word" format and uploaded to the Comtemporary Local Governments page on the TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM DergiPark system at https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/cyy after logging in.
The Copyright Transfer Form and the Plagiarism Report must be uploaded along with the article file. The maximum similarity rate determined by the editorial board is 20%.
For studies requiring ethics committee approval, the Ethics Committee Approval must be uploaded to the system. If ethics committee approval is not required, the Research Statement Form Not Subject to Ethics Committee Approval must be filled out and signed by all authors and uploaded to the system. To download the form and view other documents and forms, please visit the Forms and Guides tab.
The Ethics Statement Form must be filled out.
Please fill out and sign the Author Contribution Statement Form, which contains statements explaining the authors' contributions to the article, and upload it to the system. To download the form and view other documents and forms, please visit the Forms and Guides tab.
Author information must be entered completely into the system. If there is more than one author, all authors must be added using the "add author" option, paying attention to the author order, and the corresponding author must be specified. In accordance with ethical principles, adding or removing authors and/or changing the author order is not permitted after the article submission. The ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) number, which can be obtained from the internationally valid address https://orcid.org/, must also be entered in the author information.
When uploading the article to the DergiPark system, the following information should be written in the "Note to the Editor" section (other notes that authors wish to convey to the editor can also be written in this field): A note explaining if the article has been presented as a paper, thesis, etc., elsewhere or prepared with the support of a project/research grant; the type of article (research article, review, case study, etc.); and the "field of science" and "code" appropriate to the article's subject area from the "UAK Associate Professorship Exam Application Requirements" "main field" tables.
Since the article file uploaded to DergiPark for evaluation is the version shared with the reviewers, it must meet the following anonymity requirements in accordance with the blind peer-review policy:

a. Information identifying the author must be removed from the full-text file.

b. Document author names, comments, or other identifying information in the file properties must be anonymized. (To do this in Microsoft Word format, follow the steps below from the menu: File > Inspect Document > Inspect Document > Inspect > Document Properties and Personal Information > Remove All > Close > Save.)

c. File names of uploaded documents (including the article file and supplementary materials) should not contain author names or identifying information.

d. Authors should avoid making self-citations in a way that reveals their identity in the current article.

Authors who have made the revisions as a result of the peer review and uploaded the updated article to the system must also upload a response to reviewers file, showing what changes were made for each correction suggested by the reviewers.

B. General Rules for Article Format

You can access the Article Writing Template from the Forms and Guides tab.

Articles submitted to the journal, including figures, tables, and references, but excluding the extended abstract, should be between 5000-9000 words.
The Turkish abstract (approximately 150-250 words) and keywords (maximum 5 words), as well as the English title, abstract, and keywords, must be complete.
Each work must contain the following sections in order: Turkish title and abstract, Turkish keywords, English title and abstract, English keywords, Introduction, Main Text, Method, Findings, Conclusion and Discussion, References, and Extended Abstract.
An English Extended Abstract should be added at the very end of the article (after the References). The extended abstract should preferably be between 1000-1200 words and should clearly state the purpose, problem, method, findings, and conclusions of the study, preferably with subheadings. The subheadings within the extended abstract may vary depending on the type of study.
Publications Produced from a Thesis/Project: If the work contains a part of a thesis or project, or has been produced from one, this information must be stated in a footnote and the necessary explanation must be provided.

Sızan, E. B. (2015). Mecliste Ankara: 1920-1923 Yılları Arasında Ankara Belediyesi. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler Dergisi. 33 (3), 39-70.

FORMAL SPECIFICATIONS

The page must have 2.5 cm margins on the right, left, bottom, and top.
Use Times New Roman 12-point font with a line spacing of 1 (Single).
Paragraphs should be "justified text".
Paragraphs should start with a one-tab indent (1.25 cm).
Paragraph Spacing should be (before) 0 nk and (after) 6 nk.
Footnote and Footnote Text Size: Times New Roman – 9-point font.
While the APA Citation system is required in the text, explanatory footnotes may be provided if necessary. These explanatory footnotes should be numbered from the References section as 1, 2, 3... Footnotes for author information should be given as *, **, ***...
Information inside Tables: 10-point font.
References should be 10-point and left-aligned.
Article title: 18-point font, bold, title case, centered.
Author names: 14-point font, bold, first names in lowercase, surnames in uppercase, right-aligned.
Abstract, Keywords, and their texts: italic, 10-point font.
English title of the article: bold, italic, 12-point font, and left-aligned.
Introduction and Conclusion Titles: should not be numbered. 14-point font, left-aligned, bold.

HEADINGS

1st Level: Left-aligned, Bold, Title Case, 14-point font.
1.1. Level: Left-aligned, Bold, Title Case, 12-point font.
1.1.1. Level: Left-aligned, bold, lowercase, 11-point font.
1.1.1.1. Level: Left-aligned, italic, lowercase, 11-point font.

Abbreviations should be written out in full the first time they are used, with the abbreviation in parentheses. In subsequent uses, only the abbreviation should be given.
A period should be placed after the table and figure number, followed by the table or figure title. The first words of the titles should be capitalized (Example: Table 1. Per Capita Income by Years). If the table or figure is taken from another work, the source should be placed under the table or figure in italics, with a smaller font size, and in accordance with citation rules.
For direct quotes of no more than three lines, "double quotation marks" should be used. Double quotation marks should not be used for anything other than direct quotes in the text.
When quoting a long passage (more than three lines) from a source, it should be indented from the right and left (0.5 cm) and written in 10-point font (without quotation marks). At the end of the quote, the source cited should be given in parentheses with the page number.
Special terms and phrases in the text should be shown in 'single quotation marks'. If not a proper noun, the words inside the quotes should be written in lowercase. For words or phrases to be emphasized (instead of underlined or bold), single quotes or italics should be preferred.
Foreign words in the text should be written in italics. If the foreign language equivalent of a Turkish term or phrase is also to be given, it should be written in italics in parentheses.
When numbers appear in the text, single-digit numbers should be written out, while two or more-digit numbers should be written as numerals.
When numbering in the text, a period should be used instead of the ordinal suffixes (e.g., -st, -nd, -rd, -th).
The % sign should be used for the word "percent".
If a quote is from another quote, the citation should be given with the expression 'as cited in'.
The Contemporary Local Governments journal references and citation rules are based on the APA system. The references should be listed under the heading 'References'. Articles must be formatted according to APA 7 rules before being uploaded to the system. Works not formatted according to the APA 7 system are returned to the author to fix this issue before being evaluated.
Detailed information about the APA 7 format can be accessed at: https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/references/examples. When citing and referencing within the text, the differences between Turkish and English citation and referencing should be observed, taking into account the language of the main text.
The references list should only include sources cited/referenced in the text; any source not used in the text should not be included. The sources should be listed alphabetically by the author's surname.
If multiple publications by the same author in the same year have been used, the expressions “a, b, c...” should be used to distinguish the publications, and this usage should be included both in the in-text citation and in the references section.
The spelling and punctuation of the works should be based on the Turkish Language Association's Spelling Guide: https://www.tdk.gov.tr/tdk/kurumsal/yazim-kilavuzu.
When citing multiple authors within a single parenthesis, the works should be separated by a semicolon “;”: (Creswell, 2014; Yıldırım & Şimşek, 2013).

In-text citation examples:

Single-author work: (Mardin, 2005: 56) (Creswell, 2014: 126)
Two-author work: (Horkheimer and Adorno, 1995: 35)
Three or more-author work: (Held et al., 2012: 215)
Institutional names:

First citation in the text: (World Health Organization [WHO], 2020)
Subsequent citations: (WHO, 2020)
When citing multiple authors within a single parenthesis, the works should be separated by a semicolon “;”: (Held et al., 2012: 215; Horkheimer and Adorno, 1995: 35).

References examples:

Book:

Single-author books:

Mardin, Ş. (2005). Jön Türklerin Siyasi Fikirleri, 1895-1908. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
If the same author has multiple publications in the same year:

Mardin, Ş. (1990a). Türk Toplumunu İnceleme Aracı Olarak “Sivil…
Mardin, Ş. (1990b). Türkiye’de İktisadî Düşüncenin Gelişmesi…
Two-author books:

Horkheimer, M. & T. Adorno (1996). Aydınlanmanın Diyalektiği, Felsefi Fragmanlar I. (Trans. Oğuz Özügül). İstanbul: Kabalcı Yayınevi.
More than three authors:

Held, D., A. McGrew, D. Goldblatt, & J. Perraton (1999). “Globalization”. Global Governance, 5(4), 483-496.
No author:

Book Title. (2002). Publisher.
Note: In APA 7, the "publication location" information is not included in book entries. If there is a DOI number, it should be added at the end as “http...”. In APA 7, the rule of writing the full address starting with “http” has replaced the previous “Doi: ...” format.
Authorless/collective publications:

TODAİE (1963). Merkezi Hükümet Teşkilatı Kuruluş ve Görevleri, Merkezi Hükümet Teşkilatı Araştırma Projesi Raporu. Ankara: TODAİE Yayını.
Edited Book (Entire Book):

Sağır, Hayriye (2019). Küreselleşme ve Dönüşen Kent. Ankara: Orion Kitabevi.
Note: For books with a single editor, use the expression (Editor), and for books with more than one editor, use (Editors). In APA 7, the rule of writing the full address starting with “http” has replaced the previous “Doi: ...” format.
Edited Book Chapter:

Gül, Hüseyin (2019). Sürdürülebilir Akıllı Kent Yönetimi ve Politikaları. In Küreselleşme ve Dönüşen Kent. (Ed. Hayriye Sağır) (pp. 97-118). Orion Yayınevi.
Note: If there are DOI numbers, they should be added. In APA 7, the rule of writing the full address starting with “http” has replaced the previous “Doi: ...” format.

Article:

Erol, A. M., & Gormez, K., (2025). Fragmentation in the Sense of Community Comparison in Housing Estate and Single-Family Housing Residential Areas. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, vol.13, no.1, 279-302. https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.13.1_279

Note: In APA 7, the rule of writing the full address starting with “http” has replaced the previous “Doi: ...” format. If the article has a DOI number, it should be added. The article title should be in lowercase and a regular font, while the journal name should be in italics and title case. The journal volume number should be in italics, and the issue number should be in parentheses and a regular font.

Thesis:

Erol, Arzu Maltaş (2020). Yeni şehircilik akımı çerçevesinde insan odaklı kentsel dönüşüm ve geleneksel mahalle planlaması: Eskişehir Karapınar Mahallesi örneği [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Gazi University.

Paper:

Görmez, K., & Sızan, E. B., (2018, May 11-13). Kent Mekanını Kullanmak: Kentsel Dönüşüm – Kentsel Ayrışma Bır Çukurambar Hıkayesı. [Abstract Paper]. 8th International Conference Of Strategic Research On Scientific Studies And Education 2018, Vienna, Austria.

Internet:

OECD (2024). Bir Bakışta OECD Bölgeleri ve Şehirleri 2024. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/support-materials/2024/12/oecd-regions-and-cities-at-a-glance-2024_134d05a6/RACG-Policy-Highlights-2024-turkish.pdf

Citing news from a website:

Tharoor, Kanishk (2016, June 27). The rise and fall of great world cities: 5,700 years of urbanisation – mapped. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/jun/27/rise-fall-great-world-cities-5700-years-urbanisation-mapped
For other citation examples, please visit: https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/references/examples/

These rules were updated as of September 22, 2025.

ETHICAL PRINCIPLES AND PUBLICATION POLICY

Ethical Principles

Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler (Journal of Contemporary Local Governments - CYY) operates in accordance with international publication ethics standards. CYY adopts the Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing published by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). The journal also follows the ethical standards published by the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) and the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA).

Principle of Transparency

The journal's operations are transparent and subject to predetermined procedures. The manuscript submission and review process is managed through the Dergipark system, allowing relevant units and individuals to access information and track every stage at any time.

Plagiarism Policy

Before the review process begins, the Journal of Contemporary Local Governments requires author(s) to upload a plagiarism report from a plagiarism detection software, such as "iThenticate," "Turnitin," or "İntihal.net." After reviewing the similarity rate in the plagiarism report and checking for compliance with the journal's writing rules and principles, the Editorial Board initiates the evaluation process. The similarity rate in the plagiarism report for manuscripts must not exceed 20%; manuscripts with a similarity rate of over 20% are rejected.

Confidentiality Statement

Any data entered into the Journal of Contemporary Local Governments Management System (such as personal information, including names and email addresses) will not be shared with third parties or used for any other purpose.

Copyright

Authors are responsible for the accuracy of the ideas, suggestions, and sources in their articles. No royalties are paid for articles published in the journal. While the copyright of published articles belongs to the author(s), the author(s) accept the journal's authority to publish the article and to identify themselves as the original publisher. When uploading the manuscript, a wet-signed Copyright Transfer Form must also be uploaded as a PDF file.

Open Access

All works in the Journal of Contemporary Local Governments are published under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license.

Artificial Intelligence Policy

In submissions to the Journal of Contemporary Local Governments, the name(s) of any generative AI tools used, as well as the purpose and extent of their use, must be declared in the notes section at the end of the paper. If this declaration is not made and the use of generative AI tools is detected, the submission will be directly rejected and considered an ethical violation. A core principle is that the content of the work should not be generated by AI. However, the following rules must be observed:

If generative AI tools are used, they should not be added as authors.
Generative AI tools can be used for the translation of limited sections like the abstract or extended abstract, or for grammar checks. However, the translation of an entire text by generative AI tools is not accepted.
For editors and reviewers: Uploading authors' works to AI applications and platforms during the peer review process would violate the double-blind review policy and ethical principles, and could also create issues regarding intellectual property rights.

Publication Policy

The Journal of Contemporary Local Governments accepts original articles in the fields of local governments, urban planning, and the environment. Manuscripts that are derived from ongoing or defended master's theses, or ongoing doctoral dissertations, as well as articles prepared by expanding on papers presented at a conference (published or unpublished abstracts), are not accepted or considered for review.

Authors submit their manuscripts to the journal through the Dergipark system (for detailed information on Dergipark, see: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/page/about). All journal processes, including correspondence, are conducted through the Dergipark system. Manuscript processes, files, and correspondence are archived via Dergipark.

Authors cannot submit more than one manuscript at a time. An author (or one of the authors) can submit another manuscript only after their current one has been published. The publication of an author's other accepted manuscript can only take place in a subsequent volume.

During their term, journal editors and editorial board members cannot submit or publish manuscripts for consideration in the journal.

Since communication with authors and reviewers is carried out through the DergiPark system and the journal's email address (cyydergisi@hbv.edu.tr), authors and reviewers must check the email address they have provided for communication.

Manuscripts deemed suitable for submission after the required documents have been uploaded undergo a preliminary review by the Editorial Board. They are examined for scope, journal policy, writing rules, original contribution to the field, and scientific expression. Manuscripts that are not deemed suitable are rejected outright.

If the works meet the preliminary review criteria, they are sent to two reviewers. If the two reviewers have conflicting opinions, a third reviewer may be consulted at the editor's discretion. The identities of the reviewers and the author are kept confidential during this process in accordance with the double-blind peer review policy. The evaluation period for reviewers is 15 days from the date they accept the review. Upon the reviewer's request, this period can be extended by an additional 15 days. For manuscripts where the review process is complete, the reviewer reports are sent to the authors via email through the system. If revisions are requested, the revised manuscript and a revision report must be uploaded to the system within 15 days of the date the reviewer reports were sent to the author. Upon the author's request, this period can be extended by an additional 15 days.

The editors and editorial board decide whether to publish the manuscript based on the reviewer reports. The completion of revisions does not guarantee that the manuscript will be accepted. The process may also result in a rejection decision by the editor and the editorial board based on the peer reviews.

As a rule, works that have completed the publication process are published in the next available issue. However, the Editorial Board may postpone the publication of manuscripts that have successfully completed the review process to a subsequent issue based on criteria such as thematic coherence of the issue, technical layout processes, or the number of articles on a similar topic in previous issues.

Manuscripts approved for publication are moved to the typesetting stage, while those that are not approved are rejected. The scientific responsibility for the articles in the journal rests with the author. No royalties are paid to the authors of published works. Articles published in the journal cannot be published or reproduced elsewhere without the approval of the Journal of Contemporary Local Governments.

In accordance with the journal's open access policy, the journal content, including the full text of articles, is provided to all users free of charge. Citing published works is permitted with proper attribution.

Authors who submit a manuscript for review are considered to have accepted the journal's "Article Publication Principles and Writing Rules" and the specified copyright terms. The author(s) are responsible for any articles that do not comply with these rules and principles. The Editorial Board reserves the right to reject any manuscript found not to comply with the relevant rules and principles at any stage of the review process.

Authors' Responsibilities

Submitted manuscripts must align with the journal's aims and scope.
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their manuscripts comply with scientific and ethical rules. Plagiarism, duplication, fake authorship/denied authorship, research/data fabrication, slicing, salami-slicing, copyright infringement, and the concealment of conflicts of interest are considered unethical behaviors. All manuscripts that do not meet ethical standards will be removed from the publication process (if detected).
The author must upload a signed printed Ethics Declaration Form to the system, stating that the manuscript is original, has not been published elsewhere before, and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere or in another language.
Copyrighted materials (e.g., tables, figures, or large quotations) must be used with the necessary permissions and acknowledgments. The work of other authors and contributors or sources used must be properly cited and included in the references.
Individuals who have not made a direct academic and scientific contribution to the content of the work should not be listed as authors. The order of authors' names reflects the authors' collective decision. All authors must indicate their author order with their signatures on the Copyright Transfer Form.
All individuals and institutions who have contributed to the work but do not meet the criteria for authorship (e.g., those providing technical support, writing assistance, or general support, financial, and material support) are listed in the "acknowledgments / information" section.
Authors must declare any financial relationships, conflicts of interest, and competing interests that could potentially influence the results of the research or the scientific evaluation.
If an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in their published article, they are responsible for immediately contacting the editor and collaborating to make a correction or retraction.
Authors must have documents showing that they have the rights to use the data, the necessary permissions for the research/analysis, or the consent of the subjects involved.
Authors cannot have their work under submission to more than one journal at the same time. Each submission can be initiated only after the previous one has been completed.

Responsibilities of Editors and Assistant Editors

The Editor is responsible for managing the entire publication and peer review process from the time a manuscript is received until it is published, and is also responsible for the journal's quality and performance. The Editor is appointed by the Rector of Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University from among the University's academic staff with at least a doctoral degree, for a term of three years. The Editor, as the chief editor, is also responsible for the harmony and coordination among the assistant editors and other editors working for the journal, and for the quality of the publication.
Each manuscript has an assistant editor assigned to it, which is visible to the authors via the Dergipark system.
Editors evaluate manuscripts independently of the authors' ethnic origin, gender, nationality, religious beliefs, political philosophy, and institution.
Editors assess the manuscripts submitted to the journal for their scientific quality, content, and contribution to the field, and decide whether the manuscript should enter the publication process. At this stage, a manuscript may be rejected without being sent for further review.
Assistant editors verify that the manuscripts comply with the journal's writing rules and ensure that authors make the necessary revisions. Assistant editors initiate the peer review process for manuscripts that have completed the preliminary review. Assistant editors communicate with authors and provide necessary information and reminders to the editors.
Manuscripts are sent for a double-blind peer review by the assistant editors. Editors do not allow conflicts of interest among authors, editors, and reviewers. If a peer review is not completed within a reasonable time, editors may contact the reviewer to expedite the process or assign a new reviewer.
Following the peer review, editors evaluate the reviewer reports. The Editorial Board convenes to decide on the acceptance, submission to a third reviewer, or rejection of the manuscript. The reason for the rejection and the reviewer reports are sent to the author.
All information regarding manuscripts is kept confidential until the manuscript is published.
The chief editor can publish an erratum or make corrections if necessary, with the author's knowledge.
The Editorial Board, composed of the chief editor, assistant editors, and other editorial roles, is in constant communication and collaboration to ensure that the publication processes proceed in accordance with the publication principles and rules. They hold regular meetings and make collective decisions regarding the journal's publication policy. Gender equality in the formation of the Editorial Board is a core principle.

Reviewers' Responsibilities and Double-Blind Peer Review Policy

For scientific research articles, double-blind peer reviewers are assigned by the assistant editors.
It is essential that reviewers do not have a conflict of interest with the research, authors, and/or funding sources of the research.
It is essential that the reviewers assigned to a manuscript are not from the same institution as the author. Peer reviews are conducted by independent external reviewers who do not have a conflict of interest with the authors. If the authors are academics, reviewers are chosen from academics with a higher rank if possible, or at least the same rank. Care is also taken to avoid academic relationships between the author and the reviewer, such as graduate thesis advising.
Within the context of double-blind peer review, the identities of the reviewers are kept confidential.
Reviewers are expected to respond within 10 days to the invitation sent to them via email through Dergipark, which includes the manuscript abstract. This period can be extended twice by 5 days if necessary. If a reviewer does not accept or rejects the invitation within the given period, the relevant assistant editor can cancel the invitation in the system and send a new invitation to another person.
A reviewer who accepts the invitation can access the manuscript file and the reviewer evaluation form via their Dergipark account.
The peer review is generally completed within 15 days. If necessary, the assistant editor can extend this period. If a reviewer does not feel qualified on the topic of the manuscript or cannot provide timely feedback, they should inform the editor or assistant editor and request the cancellation of the review process.
Reviewers are obligated to complete the Reviewer Evaluation Form truthfully and provide a scientific assessment.
For a manuscript to be published, it must be approved by at least two reviewers. Reviewers may request minor or major revisions to the manuscript. In this case, the author is asked to revise their manuscript in line with the reviewer's comments. In the case of minor revisions, the revised manuscript is checked by the relevant assistant editor. In the case of major revisions, the manuscript is sent back to the same reviewer to decide on the suitability of the revised version for publication.
Manuscripts that are not approved for publication by both reviewers will not be published. If one of the reviewers does not approve the manuscript for publication, the manuscript may be rejected by the editorial board or sent to a third reviewer, taking into consideration the other reviewer's comments.
Reviewers keep all information about the submitted manuscripts confidential. Reviewers and editorial board members cannot discuss manuscripts with other individuals. If they notice any copyright infringement or plagiarism by the author, they report the situation to the editor.
Reviewers are evaluated based on criteria such as timely response and performance. Uncivil and unscientific evaluations are prevented.

Responsibilities of the Advisory Board

The advisory board, consisting of academics from various institutions, monitors the journal's operations and provides feedback and suggestions.

SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ETHICS

The following points should be considered for the ethics committee report:

For studies that do not require an ethics committee decision, the Research Declaration Form Not Subject to Ethics Committee Approval (available in the Forms section) must be completed. For studies that do require an ethics committee decision, an Ethics Committee Approval must be obtained, mentioned in the article, and documented. Additionally, the Ethics Declaration Form (available in the Forms section) regarding compliance with research and publication ethics must be completed and uploaded to the system. In studies requiring ethics committee approval, information about the approval (committee name, date, and number) must be provided in the methodology section and also at the end of the article.
The following research requires ethics committee approval: All kinds of research conducted with qualitative or quantitative approaches that require data collection from participants using surveys, interviews, focus group studies, observation, and interview techniques. Furthermore, it is required to obtain and state permission from the owners for the use of scales, surveys, and photos belonging to others, and to state that copyright regulations have been complied with for the use of ideas and works of art. Manuscripts derived from thesis works that have used a portion of the research data must be specifically mentioned in a footnote. Researchers who are not university staff can apply to the Ethics Committees in their region for an Ethics Committee Report if necessary.

These rules have been updated as of September 22, 2025.