The Relationship Between Edom, Rome and Christianity in Jewish Tradition

Abstract

In Jewish tradition, the concept of Edom acquired a broad interpretive scope beginning with the narrative of Esau and extending to its association with Rome and Christianity. In the Tanakh, Esau is portrayed as Jacob’s brother, Isaac’s son, and a figure close to the blessing yet excluded from the ultimate inheritance. At the same time, Edom denotes both his descendants and a historical community positioned against Israel. This early semantic framework was later reinterpreted in Jewish exegesis beyond a merely historical designation, serving to explain political and religious powers encountered in different periods. The first clear stage of this transformation emerged under Roman rule. The destruction of the Second Temple, the suppression of the Bar Kokhba revolt, the incorporation of Jerusalem into imperial control, and the continuation of Jewish life under Roman pressure created the conditions for reading the Esau/Edom narratives in relation to the Roman experience. In the Talmud and Midrash, Esau’s sword, hunting, rivalry with Jacob, redness, and status as the elder brother who lost the blessing were associated with Rome’s military power and domination over Israel. The phrase “The voice is the voice of Jacob, but the hands are the hands of Esau” became one of the central interpretations through which Jewish resistance was identified with prayer and the voice of Torah. At the same time, Roman violence was explained through the hands of Esau. The Caesarea-Jerusalem contrast shows that the association between Edom and Rome was also constructed through symbolic urban opposition. The explanation that the rise of one entails the decline of the other reveals that the rivalry between Jacob and Esau was interpreted as a historical struggle for sovereignty. In these texts, Edom functioned as a concept that enabled Jewish communities to understand their experiences of defeat, exile, and oppression through the language of sacred Scripture. After the Christianization of Rome, the semantic range of Edom expanded further. Medieval Jewish commentators associated Edom not only with Rome’s political legacy but also with Christianity’s theological claims vis-à-vis Judaism. In the interpretations of Rashi, Ibn Ezra, Radak, Nahmanides, and Abarbanel, Edom was discussed in relation to Rome, the Christian world, the experience of exile, and eschatological expectation. This connection was established more explicitly, particularly in the works of Radak and Nahmanides, where the Christianization of the Roman Empire was regarded as a central element in the Edom-Rome-Christianity continuum. Christianity’s appropriation of Jewish sacred texts and its interpretation of them as testimonies to Jesus as the Messiah were explained in Jewish polemics through the rivalry between Esau and Jacob. In this context, Edom became an interpretive category denoting a rival religious tradition that shared a scriptural heritage with Judaism yet claimed an inheritance. The study demonstrates that the concept of Edom did not possess a fixed or univocal meaning in Jewish thought. It was reinterpreted in different contexts: as historical Edom in the Tanakh, as Rome in rabbinic literature, and as the Christian world in medieval Jewish exegesis. This process reveals how Jewish tradition constructed the relationship between sacred text, history, political experience, and polemic.

Keywords

• History of Religions
• Judaism
• Esau
• Edom
• Rome

Yahudi Geleneğinde Edom, Roma ve Hıristiyanlık İlişkisi

Abstract

Yahudi geleneğinde Edom kavramı, Esav anlatısından başlayarak Roma ve Hıristiyanlıkla ilişkilendirilen geniş bir yorum alanı kazanmıştır. Tanah’ta Esav ve Edom’a yüklenen anlamlar, Talmud ve Midraşlarda Roma’nın askeri gücü, siyasi tahakkümü ve Yahudi hayatı üzerindeki etkisiyle birlikte okunmuştur. İkinci Mabed’in yıkılışı, Bar Kohba isyanının bastırılması ve Roma hakimiyetinin oluşturduğu travma, bu özdeşliğin tarihsel zeminini hazırlamıştır. Orta Çağ Yahudi yorumcuları ise Roma’nın Hıristiyanlaşmasıyla birlikte Edom’u Hıristiyan dünya için de açıklayıcı bir kavram olarak kullanmıştır. Raşi, İbn Ezra, Radak, Nahmanides ve Abarbanel gibi birçok din adamının yorumları, Edom’un Yahudi-Hıristiyan polemiklerinde önemli bir teolojik karşılık kazandığını göstermektedir. Bu çerçevede Edom, düşmanlık, miras rekabeti, sürgün tecrübesi ve nihai kurtuluş beklentisiyle bağlantılı biçimde ele alınmıştır. Böylece kavram, Yahudi geleneğinde kutsal metin, tarih ve kimlik arasında kurulan sürekliliği ifade eden bir yorum biçimine dönüştürülmüştür.

Keywords

• Dinler Tarihi
• Yahudilik
• Esav
• Edom
• Roma

References

1. Abarbanel, Yitshak. Peruş al ha-Neviim. https://www.sefaria.org/texts.
2. Akhiezer, Golda. “Between History and Theology: Text and Metatext in Jewish Historical Writing”. Harvard Theological Review 119/1 (2026), 121-142.
3. Altuncu, Abdullah. Kilise ve Sansür: Papalığın İbrani Matbuatına Yönelik Sansürü. Ankara: Ankara Okulu Yayınları, 2023.
4. Altuncu, Abdullah. “Yahudiliğin Kutsal Metinleri ve Okuma Yöntemi”. Klasikleri Okuma Yöntemi: Dinlerin Kutsal Metinleri. ed. Cemil Kutlutürk-Hayrunnisa Düzgün. 113-142. Ankara: FCR Yayın Ltd.-Eskiyeni, 2025.
5. Anderson, Bradford A. Brotherhood and Inheritance: A Canonical Reading of the Esau and Edom Traditions. New York-London: T & T Clark International, 2011.
6. Anderson, Bradford A. “Edom in the Book of Numbers: Some Literary Reflections”. Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 124/1 (2012), 38-51. Erişim 29 Mayıs 2026. https://doras.dcu.ie/25247/1/Anderson.Edom%20in%20numbers.revised.pdf.
7. Araz, Ömer Faruk. “Antik Çağdan Orta Çağa Yahudi Karşıtlığının Ortaklaşan Söylemi”. Marmara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 67 (2024), 280-310.
8. Araz, Ömer Faruk. “Yahudi Dini Literatüründe İsmail ile İlgili Rivayetlerin Analizi”. Kocaeli İlahiyat Dergisi 6/1 (2022), 119-150.

9. Araz, Ömer Faruk. Yahudi Kaynaklarına Göre Hz. Musa. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi İlâhiyat Fakültesi Vakfı Yayınları, 2022.
10. Araz, Ömer Faruk. Yahudilikte Tefsir Geleneği: Midraşik Literatürün Tarihsel Gelişimi. İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık, 2019.
11. Assis, Elie. Identity in Conflict: The Struggle between Esau and Jacob, Edom and Israel. Winona Lake-Indiana: Eisenbrauns, 2016.
12. Babil Talmudu. https://www.sefaria.org/texts.
13. Bereşit Raba. https://www.sefaria.org/texts.
14. Becking, Bob. “The Betrayal of Edom: Remarks on a Claimed Tradition”. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 72/4 (2016), 1-4. Erişim 3 Haziran 2026. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3467/fabd6cd8b498f537f43718639b275a92a2da.pdf.
15. Berger, David. The Jewish-Christian Debate in the High Middle Ages: A Critical Edition of the Nizzahon Vetus with an Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1979.
16. Berthelot, Katell. Jews and Their Roman Rivals: Pagan Rome’s Challenge to Israel. Princeton-Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2021.
17. Chan, Man Ki-Venter, Pieter M. “Midrash as Exegetical Approach of Early Jewish Exegesis, with Some Examples from the Book of Ruth”. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 66/1 (2010), 1-6.
18. Chazan, Robert. Fashioning Jewish Identity in Medieval Western Christendom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
19. Cohen, Jeremy. Living Letters of the Law: Ideas of the Jew in Medieval Christianity. Berkeley-Los Angeles-London: University of California Press, 1999.
20. Elman, Yaakov. “The Rebirth of Omnisignificant Biblical Exegesis in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries”. Jewish Studies, an Internet Journal 2 (2003), 199-249. Erişim 29 Mayıs 2026. https://jewish-faculty.biu.ac.il/files/jewish-faculty/shared/JSIJ2/elman.pdf.
21. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Hakikat ve Yöntem. çev. Hüsamettin Arslan-İsmail Yavuzcan. 2. Cilt. İstanbul: Paradigma Yayıncılık, 2009.
22. Hacohen, Malachi Haim. Jacob & Esau: Jewish European History Between Nation and Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
23. Halbertal, Moshe. People of the Book: Canon, Meaning, and Authority. Cambridge-Massachusetts-London: Harvard University Press, 1997.
24. Hensel, Benedikt. “Edom in the Jacob Cycle (Gen *25-35): New Insights on Its Positive Relations with Israel, the Literary-Historical Development of Its Role, and Its Historical Background(s)”. ed. Benedikt Hensel. The History of the Jacob Cycle (Genesis 25-35). 57-133. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2021.
25. Himmelfarb, Martha. Jewish Messiahs in a Christian Empire: A History of the Book of Zerubbabel. Cambridge-Massachusetts-London: Harvard University Press, 2017.
26. Inglebert, Hervé. “Biblical Images of Rome in Jewish and Christian Texts: Kittim, Babylon, Tyre, and Esau-Edom”. Revue de l’histoire des religions 233/2 (2016), 223-254.
27. İbn Ezra, Abraham. Peruş al ha-Neviim. https://www.sefaria.org/texts.
28. Kimhi, David. Peruş al ha-Neviim. https://www.sefaria.org/texts.
29. McClintock, John-Strong, James, haz. “Edomite”. Cyclopædia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature. 3/59-60. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1891.
30. McClintock, John-Strong, James, haz. “Esau”. Cyclopædia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature. 3/284-287. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1891.
31. Mekilta de-Rabbi Yişmael. https://www.sefaria.org/texts.
32. Meral, Yasin. “Osmanlı Saray Hekimliğinden Papalığın Hizmetinde İbranice Kitap Sansürcülüğüne Bir Yahudi Âlimin Hayat Hikâyesi: Domenico Yeruşalmî (ö. 1622) ve Sefer ha-Zikuk”. Oksident 3/2 (2021), 105-134.
33. Meral, Yasin. Yahudi Dinî Literatüründe Mesih, Deccal ve Gog-Magog. Ankara: Ankara Okulu Yayınları, 2019.
34. Meral, Yasin. Yahudi Düşüncesinde İslam Algısı -İbn Meymûn (Maimonides) Örneği-. Ankara: Ankara Okulu Yayınları, 2017.
35. Meral, Yasin. Yahudi Kaynakları Işığında Yahudilik. İstanbul: MilelNihal Yayınları, 2021.
36. Meral, Yasin. Yahudilerin Ahir Zamanı: Yahudilikte Gog-Magog, Deccal ve Mesih. Ankara: Ankara Okulu Yayınları, 2019.
37. Mişna. https://www.sefaria.org/texts.
38. Morgenstern, Matthias. “The Image of Edom in Midrash Bereshit Rabbah”. Revue de l’histoire des religions 233/2 (2016), 193-222.
39. Moşe ben Nahman. Peruş al ha-Tora. https://www.sefaria.org/texts.
40. Moşe ben Nahman. Sefer ha-Geula. London: Yaakov Lipschitz, 1909.
41. Pirke de Rabbi Eliezer. The Chapters of Rabbi Eliezer the Great. çev. Gerald Friedlander. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. Ltd.; New York: The Bloch Publishing Company, 1916.
42. Raz-Krakotzkin, Amnon. The Censor, the Editor, and the Text: The Catholic Church and the Shaping of the Jewish Canon in the Sixteenth Century. Çeviren Jackie Feldman. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007.
43. Sarı, Ayhan. “Apartheid Suçları ve Etnik Ayrımcılık: İsrail Örneği”. Mevzu: Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 12 (2024), 853-880.
44. Sifre Dvarim. https://www.sefaria.org/texts.
45. Sonne, Isaiah. Expurgation of Hebrew Books: The Work of Jewish Scholars: A Contribution to the History of the Censorship of Hebrew Books in Italy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: New York Public Library, 1943.
46. Şengül, Fatma Seda. Yahudi-Hıristiyan Münazaralarında İsa ve Mesih Tartışmaları -Paris, Barselona, Tortosa Örnekleri-. Bursa: Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, 2022.
47. Şlomo Yitshaki. Peruş al ha-Tora. https://www.sefaria.org/texts.
48. Targum Onkelos. https://www.sefaria.org/texts.
49. Targum Yeruşalmi. https://www.sefaria.org/texts.
50. Targum Yonatan. https://www.sefaria.org/texts.
51. Trautner-Kromann, Hanne. “Jewish Polemics against Christianity and the Christians in Northern and Southern France from 1100 to 1300”. Nordisk Judaistik/Scandinavian Jewish Studies 7/2 (1986), 71-83.
52. Vayikra Raba. https://www.sefaria.org/texts.