KONTEYNER TAŞIMACILIĞI AKTARMA LİMANI SEÇİMİ: DOĞU AKDENİZ LİMANLARINA YÖNELİK BİR İNCELEME

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 1 - 43, 28.06.2025

Mustafa Özkara , Volkan Çetinkaya , Durmuş Ali Deveci

https://doi.org/10.54410/denlojad.1579230

Öz

BBu çalışmada Doğu Akdeniz Limanları arasında denizyolu konteyner taşımacılığı aktarma limanı seçimi ile ilgili olarak en ideal olabilecek aktarma limanı nitel ve nicel metotlarla bulunmaya çalışılmıştır. Araştırma kapsamında incelenen limanlar Doğu Akdeniz coğrafyasında bulunan Aliağa Limanı, Ambarlı Limanı, Mersin Limanı, Pire Limanı ve Port Said limanlarıdır. Limanlara ait veriler limanların web sayfalarından veya bağlı oldukları kurumlardan alınmıştır. Öncelikle literatür çalışması yapılarak liman seçimi üzerine yapılan araştırmalar incelenmiş ve incelenen çalışmalardan denizyolu konteyner taşımacılığı aktarma liman seçiminde kullanılan kriterler tespit edilmiştir. Literatür araştırması ile belirlenen kriterler; taşıtan, taşıma işleri organizatörleri, tarifeli denizyolu gemi işletmecileri ve liman operatörlerinden oluşan on iki kişilik gruba anket yöntemiyle kriterler arasından hangisinin daha önemli olduğu sorulmuştur. Yapılan anketlerin neticeleri AHP (Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci) yöntemiyle analiz edilerek kriterlerin ağırlıkları tespit edilmiştir.
Araştırmanın son kısmında TOPSIS yöntemi kullanılarak, Doğu Akdeniz coğrafyası içinde denizyolu konteyner taşımacılığı aktarma liman faaliyeti için en ideal liman tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Liman seçimi , Karar verme süreçleri , Konteyner liman ve terminalleri , Doğu Akdeniz , aktarma limanları , AHP , TOPSIS

Kaynakça

• Anderson, C. M., J. J. Opaluch, and T. A. Grigalunas (2009). The Demand for Import Services at US Container Ports. Maritime Economics and Logistics 11, no. 2, 156-185.
• Brooks, M. R., and A. A. Pallis (2008). Assessing Port Governance Models: Process and Performance Components. Maritime Policy and Management 35, no. 4, 411-432.
• Chang, Y. T., Lee, S. Y., & Tongzon, J. L. (2008). Port Selection Factors by Shipping Lines: Different Perspectives Between Trunk Liners and Feeder Service Providers. Marine Policy, 32(6), 877-885.
• Chou, C. C. (2010). AHP Model for the Container Port Choice in the Multiple-Ports Region. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 18(2), 211-232.
• Çelik Y.A. Başarıcı, Başarıcı, A.S. (2021). Konteyner Limanlarında Performans Değerlendirmesi ve Kriterleri. Mersin Üniversitesi Denizcilik ve Lojistik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 136-159.
• Da Cruz, M. R. P., Ferreira, J. J., & Azevedo, S. G. (2013). Key Factors of Seaport Competitiveness Based on the Stakeholder Perspective: An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Model. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 15(4), 416-443.
• Drewry Shipping Consultants, (2015). Container Forecaster and Annual Review 2015–2016. London: Drewry Shipping Consultants Publishings.
• Ferrari, C., Parola, F., & Tei, A. (2011). North Africa and International Trade Networks: Port Investments and Market Opportunities. In T. Notteboom (Ed.), Current Issues in Shipping, Ports and Logistics (pp. 203-220). Antwerp: University Press Antwerp.
• Fleming, D. K., & Hayuth, Y. (1994). Spatial Characteristics of Transportation Hubs: Centrality and Intermediacy. Journal of Transport Geography, 2(1), 3-18.
• Guy, E., & Urli, B. (2006). Port Selection and Multicriteria Analysis: An Application to the Montreal-New York Alternative. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 8, 169-186.
• Hwang, C., & Yoon, K. (1981). Lecturer Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 128-141. New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
• Karataş, Ç., & Oral, E. Z. (2007). Aktarma Limanlarının Seçim Kriterleri. In 6. Ulusal Kıyı Mühendisliği Sempozyumu (pp. 149-156). İzmir: Ekim 25-28.
• Lirn, T. C., Thanopoulou, H. A., & Beresford, A. K. (2003). Transhipment Port Selection and Decisionmaking Behaviour: Analysing the Taiwanese Case. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 6(4), 229-244.
• Lirn, T. C., Thanopoulou, H. A., Beynon, M. J., & Beresford, A. K. C. (2004). An Application of AHP on Transhipment Port Selection: A Global Perspective. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 6(1), 70-91.
• Magala, M., & Sammons, A. (2008). A New Approach to Port Choice Modelling. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 10, 9-34.
• Malchow, M., & Kanafani, A. (2001). A Disaggregate Analysis of Factors Influencing Port Selection. Maritime Policy and Management, 28(3), 265-277.
• Malchow, M. B., & Kanafani, A. (2004). A Disaggregate Analysis of Port Selection. Transportation Research Part E, 40, 317-337.
• Merk, O., & Notteboom, T. (2013). "The Competitiveness of Global Port-Cities," OECD Regional Development Working Papers.
• Moya, J. M., & Valero, M. F. (2017). Port Choice in Container Market: A Literature Review. Transport Reviews, 37(3), 300-321.
• Nazemzadeh, M., & Vanelslander, T. (2015). The Container Transport System: Selection Criteria and Business Attractiveness for North-European Ports. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 17, 221-245.
• Ng, K. Y. A. (2006). Assessing the Attractiveness of Ports in the North European Container Transhipment Market: An Agenda for Future Research in Port Competition. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 8, 234-250.
• Ng, A. S. F., Sun, D., & Bhattacharjya, J. (2013). Port Choice of Shipping Lines and Shippers in Australia. Asian Geographer, 30(2), 143-168.
• Onut, S., Tuzkaya, U. R., & Torun, E. (2010). Selecting Container Port via a Fuzzy ANP-Based Approach: A Case Study in the Marmara Region, Turkey. Transport Policy, 18, 182-193.
• Park, B. I., & Min, H. (2011). The Selection of Transshipment Ports Using a Hybrid Data Envelopment Analysis/Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Transportation Management, 22(1), 47-64.
• Rodrigue, J. P., & Notteboom, T. H. (2010). Foreland-Based Regionalization: Integrating Intermediate Hubs with Port Hinterlands. Research in Transportation Economies, 27(1), 19-29.
• Robinson, R. (2002). Ports as Elements in Value-Driven Chain Systems: The New Paradigm. Maritime Policy and Management, 29(3), 241-255.
• Saaty, R. W. (1987). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: What It Is and How It Is Used. Math Modelling, 9, 161-176.
• Tai, H. H., & Hwang, C. C. (2005). Analysis of Hub Port Choice for Container Trunk Lines in East Asia. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6, 907-919.
• Talley, W. K., & Ng, M. (2013). Maritime Transport Chain Choice by Carriers, Ports and Shippers. International Journal of Production Economics, 142(2), 311-316.
• Tongzon, J. L., & Sawant, L. (2007). Port Choice in a Competitive Environment: From The Shipping Liners’ Perspective. Applied Economics, 39(4), 447-492.
• Tongzon, J. L. (2009). Port Choice and Freight Forwarders. Transportation Research Part E, 45(1), 186-195.
• Veldman, S. J., & Bükmann, E. W. (2003). A Model on Container Port Competition: An Application for The West European Container Hub-Ports. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 5, 3-22.
• Vis, I. F. A., & de Koster, R. (2003). Transshipment of Containers at A Container Terminal: An Overview. European Journal of Operational Research, 147, 1-16.
• Wiegmans, B. W., Van Der Hoest, A., & Notteboom, T. E. (2008). Port and Terminal Selection by Deepsea Container Operators. Maritime Policy and Management, 35(6), 517-533.
• Yuen, C. L. A., Zhang, A., & Cheung, W. (2012). Port Competitiveness from the Users’ Perspective: An Analysis of Major Container Ports in China and Its Neighboring Countries. Research in Transportation Economics, 35(1), 34-40.