Research Article

Museum as Object: From Postcard to Post

Volume: 3 Number: 2 November 5, 2024
EN TR

Museum as Object: From Postcard to Post

Abstract

Whether it’s through sharing picture postcards or visitor-produced photographs of museums on social media, these processes of image sharing, often dismissed as trivial, are acts which create and sustain relationships between the visitor, museum, and a wider audience. This paper positions picture souvenirs as significant, performative media, and understands postcards and Instagram posts as social, objective and subjective mediums which reflect museum values and visitor decision-making. Using the British Museum as a case study, this paper analyses postcards and Instagram posts within their networks of production, use, and distribution. Visitor messages are analysed alongside imagery, and grounded theory is used to offer an interpretive understanding of decision making and inherent meaning potential. This approach responds to Haldrup and Larsen’s (2010) call for greater emphasis on ‘photographing’ in studies of tourist media and contributes to a deeper understanding of the role of photography in museum visitor experiences. Photography of the museum transforms 3D spaces into 2D objects, miniaturising the institution, making it mobile, and readying the museum for ‘new’, social uses and research indicates that whilst the aims of photography differs between museum, commercial publisher, and visitor, the decisions which underpin production are consistent. Through use, a connection is fostered between museum and person, and institutional and personal messages are read congruently. This connection is heightened online with photographs shared in ‘real-time’ alongside narratives which more closely reflect lived experiences. These photo-sharing practices enrich the visitor experience, allow visitors to ‘own’ the museum, and facilitate and support social interaction.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

As part of the PhD study of Charlotte Simpson at the University of Nottingham, the study has the Faculty of Engineering Ethics Committee approval.

References

  1. Barthes, R. (1993). A roland barthes reader. Vintage Press. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA74348984
  2. Beard, M. (1992). Souvenirs of culture: deciphering (in) the museum. Art History, 15(4), 505-532. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8365.1992.tb00504.x
  3. British Museum. (n.d.1). British Museum. The suicide exhibition (part 2). Retrieved January 9, 2024 from https://soundcloud.com/britishmuseum/the-suicide-exhibition-part-2.
  4. British Museum. (n.d.2). The British Museum, towards 2020, the british museum’s strategy. Retrieved January 10, 2024 from https://www.britishmuseum.org/sites/default/files/2019-10/Towards_2020-The_British_Museum_Strategy.pdf
  5. British Museum. (n.d.3). Architecture. Retrieved 9th June 2024 from https://www.britishmuseum.org/about-us/british-museum-story/architecture
  6. British Museum (n.d.4). The British Museum story. Retrieved 30th June 2024 from https://www.britishmuseum.org/about-us/british-museum-story#:~:text=The%20Museum%20is%20driven%20by,to%20expand%20and%20share%20knowledge
  7. Budge, K., & Burness, A. (2017). Museum objects and Instagram: agency and communication in digital engage-ment. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 32(2), 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2017.1337079
  8. Budge, K. (2017). Objects in focus: museum visitors and Instagram. Curator The Museum Journal, 60(1), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12183

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Architectural History, Theory and Criticism

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

November 5, 2024

Publication Date

November 5, 2024

Submission Date

July 2, 2024

Acceptance Date

October 15, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 3 Number: 2

APA
Simpson, C., Hale, J., & Hanks, L. (2024). Museum as Object: From Postcard to Post. DEPARCH Journal of Design Planning and Aesthetics Research, 3(2), 139-160. https://doi.org/10.55755/DepArch.2024.31
AMA
1.Simpson C, Hale J, Hanks L. Museum as Object: From Postcard to Post. DEPARCH. 2024;3(2):139-160. doi:10.55755/DepArch.2024.31
Chicago
Simpson, Charlotte, Jonathan Hale, and Laura Hanks. 2024. “Museum As Object: From Postcard to Post”. DEPARCH Journal of Design Planning and Aesthetics Research 3 (2): 139-60. https://doi.org/10.55755/DepArch.2024.31.
EndNote
Simpson C, Hale J, Hanks L (November 1, 2024) Museum as Object: From Postcard to Post. DEPARCH Journal of Design Planning and Aesthetics Research 3 2 139–160.
IEEE
[1]C. Simpson, J. Hale, and L. Hanks, “Museum as Object: From Postcard to Post”, DEPARCH, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 139–160, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.55755/DepArch.2024.31.
ISNAD
Simpson, Charlotte - Hale, Jonathan - Hanks, Laura. “Museum As Object: From Postcard to Post”. DEPARCH Journal of Design Planning and Aesthetics Research 3/2 (November 1, 2024): 139-160. https://doi.org/10.55755/DepArch.2024.31.
JAMA
1.Simpson C, Hale J, Hanks L. Museum as Object: From Postcard to Post. DEPARCH. 2024;3:139–160.
MLA
Simpson, Charlotte, et al. “Museum As Object: From Postcard to Post”. DEPARCH Journal of Design Planning and Aesthetics Research, vol. 3, no. 2, Nov. 2024, pp. 139-60, doi:10.55755/DepArch.2024.31.
Vancouver
1.Charlotte Simpson, Jonathan Hale, Laura Hanks. Museum as Object: From Postcard to Post. DEPARCH. 2024 Nov. 1;3(2):139-60. doi:10.55755/DepArch.2024.31

CREATIVE COMMONS


Open access articles in DEPARCH are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.