Research Article

Can Peer-Mentoring be a Model for Retention in Higher Education?

Number: 59 March 29, 2024
EN TR

Can Peer-Mentoring be a Model for Retention in Higher Education?

Abstract

Research highlights the benefits of peer mentoring in helping less experienced students understand their university roles and achieve academic goals. The current study aims to explore the perspectives of mentees and mentors, focusing on program expectations, challenges faced, and suggestions for improvement. This single-case study investigates a 12-week mentoring program at a foundation university using qualitative surveys, monthly reports, and focus group interviews. The findings suggest that both mentors and mentees have academic and social expectations, encompassing the enhancement of problem-solving, leadership, and communication skills and mentees’ adjustment to campus life. As for the challenges encountered, the key themes emerged, establishing boundaries/relationship, time management, meeting diverse needs and expectations and coping with a lack of information/miscommunication. Mentors and mentees reported that the effectiveness of the mentoring program was influenced by factors such as support from academic programs, a well-structured program, and the training provided to the mentors before the program started. The participants stated that they took advantages of the mentoring program, acquired personal, professional, and academic skills, facilitating a smooth transition to the campus life. The results are expected to inform future mentoring programs and promote peer mentoring in higher education.

Keywords

Peer mentoring , mentoring program , retention , higher education.

References

  1. Altonji, S.J., Baños, J.H., & Harada, G. N. (2019). Perceived benefits of a peer mentoring program for first-year medical students. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 31(10), 1-8.
  2. Andreanoff, J. (2016). Coaching and mentoring in higher education: A step-by-step guide to exemplary practice. Palgrave Macmillan. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-45150-7
  3. Bansal, K. (2013). Barriers to college completion: an overview of Bay Area non-profit solutions & efforts. Stanford Center on Philanthropy and Civil Society Publishing.
  4. Beltman, S., & Schaeben, M. (2012). Institution-wide peer mentoring: Benefits for mentors. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 3(2), 33-44. http://doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v3i2.124
  5. Campbell, T. A., & Campbell, D. E. (2007). Outcomes of mentoring at-risk college students: gender and ethnic matching effects. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 15(2), 135-148.
  6. Collier, P.J. (2015). Developing effective student peer mentoring programs: a practitioner's guide to program design, delivery, evaluation, and training (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003444145
  7. Colvin, J.W., & Ashman M. (2010). Roles, risks, and benefits of peer mentoring relationships in higher education. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 18(2), 121–134. http://doi.org/10.1080/13611261003678879
  8. Conner, K. (2015). Expectations and experiences of undergraduate students who participated in an alumni mentoring program. [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. The University of San Fransisco.
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, California, Sage Publishers.
  10. Crisp, G., & Cruz, I. (2009). Mentoring college students: a critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. Research in Higher Education, 50(6), 525–545.
APA
Üstünlüoğlu, E. (2024). Can Peer-Mentoring be a Model for Retention in Higher Education? Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 59, 747-464. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1401709