Research Article

Education Rights and Policies: A Cross-National Comparison

Number: 65 September 30, 2025
EN TR

Education Rights and Policies: A Cross-National Comparison

Abstract

This study compares education rights across countries and regions, highlighting similarities and differences in policy approaches and outcomes. Singapore from Asia, Finland from Europe, South Korea from the Far East, and Turkiye were included in the study according to the OECD's education ranking. The right-to-education policies in countries with successful education systems were analyzed to determine their similarities and differences from Turkiye. By considering the laws of these countries, similar and different practices related to the right to education are compared. Within the scope of the research, an overview of the countries' right to education policies, national and regional differences, similarities, international conventions in the right to education policies, and cultural values in the right to education policies were examined and interpreted. The research was qualitative, and a case study, a qualitative research method, was used. Various sources concerning the educational policies of the countries were analyzed in depth. While structuring Turkish education policies, it is assumed that countries such as Singapore, South Korea, and Finland, which are successful in education, can guide the Turkish education policy system from different perspectives and provide new visionary ideas for reinterpreting Turkiye’s right to education.

Keywords

Education rights , education policy , comparative education

References

  1. Adem, M. (1995). Demokratik laik çağdaş eğitim politikası. Ankara: Şafak Matbaacılık.
  2. Adiputri, R. (2021). Finnish education system as seen from an Indonesian perspective. Research on Finnish Society. https://doi.org/10.51815/fjsr.111110
  3. Ahn, S., & Baek, H.-J. (2012). Academic Achievement-Oriented Society and Its Relationship to the Psychological Well-Being of Korean Adolescents. In Quality of Life in Asia (p. 265). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4081-5_13
  4. Altbach, P. G. (1991). Trends in Comparative Education. Comparative Education Review, 35(3), 491. https://doi.org/10.1086/447049
  5. Aras, B., & Mohammed, Z. (2018). The Turkish Government Scholarship Program as a Soft Power Tool. Turkish Studies, 20(3), 421. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2018.1502042
  6. Astuti, D. S., & Sudrajat, S. (2020). Promoting Inclusive Education for Social Justice in Indonesia. In 2nd International Conference on Social Science and Character Educations (ICoSSCE 2019) (178-183). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200130.037
  7. Asuncion, J. E. L., Tamayao, A. I., Vecaldo, R. T., Mamba, M. T., Paat, F. M. G., Pagulayan, E. S., & Utrela, J. U. (2021). Human Ecological Systems Shaping College Readiness of Filipino K-12 Graduates: A Mixed-Method Multiple Case Analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Letters, 9(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.73.2021.91.34.49
  8. Aziz, A., Saad, S., & Nurfitri, A. A. (2017). Identifiıng Characteristics of Effective Leadership Based On Values of Local Ethnic Culture: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Advanced Research, 5(2), 238. https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/3138
  9. Baek, C. (2019). Understanding windows for global policy: an examination of the Free-Semester Program in Korea. Compare A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 51(3), 398. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1620595
  10. Beamish, W., Hay, S., & Yuen, M. (2024). Moving inclusion forward for students with special educational needs in the Asia-Pacific region. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1327516
APA
Hatipoğlu, G. (2025). Education Rights and Policies: A Cross-National Comparison. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 65, 3027-3056. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1598955