Bibliometric Analysis of Articles Published on Online Learning Videos in Scopus Database Between 2012-2022

Year 2023, Issue: 58, 2409 - 2429, 27.12.2023

Yusuf Yıldırım , Efgan Kaçar , Hakan Altınpulluk

https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1268857

Cited By: 1

Abstract

The aim of this study is to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the articles on online learning videos published in the Scopus database between 2012 and 2022. Thus, the current status of articles on online learning videos in the last ten years is determined and trends are revealed. As a result of the review, it is seen that 451 articles were published. The bibliometric data of these articles were exported as CSV files and analyzed with VOSviewer software. According to the findings of the study, these articles were produced by researchers from 84 different countries and published in 278 different journals. When the 11 clusters formed according to co-authorship networks are analyzed, it is seen that the United States of America (USA), China and the United Kingdom are leading. Online Learning Journal was the journal that published the most articles on this subject with 11 publications. Of the 1606 authors who published these articles, 75 of them produced at least two publications. Jamie Costley ranked first in terms of number of articles with 5 articles and Yang Jianbo ranked first in terms of number of citations with 133 citations. When the keywords were analyzed, it was observed that the concepts of Covid-19, higher education and blended learning were prominent. When the change of keywords according to years is examined, it was determined that the keywords massive open online courses in 2016; distance education, video courses in 2017; active learning, social presence in 2018; higher education, blended learning, engagement in 2019; distance learning, medical education in 2020; and Covid-19 and medical students in 2021 were more preferred.

Keywords

Online learning, video, bibliometric analysis, scopus

2012-2022 Yılları Arasında Scopus Veri Tabanında Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Videoları Üzerine Yayınlanmış Makalelerin Bibliyometrik Analizi

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Scopus veri tabanında çevrimiçi öğrenme videoları üzerine 2012-2022 yılları arasında yayınlanmış makalelerin bibliyometrik analizinin yapılmasıdır. Böylece çevrimiçi öğrenme videolarına ilişkin makalelerin son on yıldaki mevcut durumu tespit edilerek eğilimler ortaya çıkarılmaktadır. Gerçekleştirilen tarama sonucunda, 451 makalenin yayınlandığı görülmektedir. Bu makalelerin bibliyometrik verileri CSV dosyası olarak dışarı aktarılmış ve VOSviewer yazılımıyla analiz edilmiştir. Çalışma bulgularına göre, bu makaleler 84 farklı ülkeden araştırmacılar tarafından üretilirken 278 farklı dergide yayınlanmıştır. Ortak yazarlık ağlarına göre oluşan 11 küme incelendiğinde Amerika Birleşik Devletleri (ABD), Çin ve Birleşik Krallık’ın önde geldiği görülmektedir. Online Learning Journal ise 11 yayınla bu konuda en çok makale yayınlayan dergi olmuştur. Bu makaleleri yayınlayan 1606 yazarın 75’i en az iki yayın üretmiştir. Jamie Costley 5 makale ile makale sayısı, Yang Jianbo ise 133 atıf ile atıf sayısı açısından ilk sırada yer almıştır. Anahtar kelimeler incelendiğinde Covid-19, yüksek öğretim ve harmanlanmış öğrenme kavramlarının öne çıktığı gözlenmiştir. Anahtar kelimelerin yıllara göre değişimi incelendiğindeyse, 2016’da kitlesel açık çevrimiçi dersler; 2017’de uzaktan eğitim, video dersler; 2018’de aktif öğrenme, sosyal bulunurluk; 2019’da yüksek öğretim, harmanlanmış öğrenme, bağlılık; 2020’de uzaktan öğrenme, tıp eğitimi; 2021 yılına gelindiğinde de Covid-19 ve tıp öğrencileri anahtar kelimelerinin daha fazla tercih edildiği belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

Çevrimiçi öğrenme, video, bibliyometrik analiz, scopus

References

• Adams, J., Johnson, J., & Grant, J. (2022). The rise of UK–China research collaboration: Trends, opportunities and challenges. Science and Public Policy, 49(1), 132-147. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab069
• Albert, E. (2020). The cost of ending Fulbright in China. https://thediplomat.com/2020/07/the-cost-of-ending-fulbright-in-china/
• Ata, A. & Arslan, M. (2021). 2000-2019 yılları arasında uzaktan eğitimde video kullanımı üzerine yapılan makalelerin incelenmesi. Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 18(40), 2480-2499. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.864252
• Ally, M. (2011). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In Anderson, T. (Ed). The theory and practice of online learning (pp. 15-44). Edmonton: AU Press.
• Bates, T. (2016). Online learning for beginners: 1. What is online learning? https://www.tonybates.ca/2016/07/15/online-learning-for-beginners-1-what-is-online-learning
• Chan, Y. M. (2010). Video instructions as support for beyond classroom learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1313-1318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.326
• Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation.
• Çiftçi, S. K., Danisman, S., Yalcin, M., Tosuntas, S. B., Ay, Y., Sölpük, N., & Karadag, E. (2016). Map of scientific publication in the field of educational sciences and teacher education in Turkey: A bibliometric study. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 16(4), 1097-1123. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.4.0009
• Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
• Dufour, J. C., Cuggia, M., Soula, G., Spector, M., & Kohler, F. (2007). An integrated approach to distance learning with digital video in the French-speaking Virtual Medical University. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76, 369-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.01.011
• Foreign Agricultural Service. (2023). Scientific cooperation exchange program. https://www.fas.usda.gov/programs/scientific-cooperation-exchange-program
• Goksu, I. (2021). Bibliometric mapping of mobile learning. Telematics and Informatics, 56, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101491
• Gülmez, D., Özteke, İ., & Gümüş, S. (2020). Uluslararası dergilerde yayımlanan Türkiye kaynaklı eğitim araştırmalarının genel görünümü: Bibliyometrik analiz. Eğitim ve Bilim, 46(206), 213-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.9317
• Hansch, A., Hillers, L., McConachie, K., Newman, C., Schmidt, P., & Schildhauer, T. (2015). The role of video in online learning: Findings from the field and critical reflections. Alexander von Humboldt Institut Fur Internet und Gesellschaft. https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4939118/mod_resource/content/15/Video%20Interfaces-2015.pdf
• Henderson, M. L., & Schroeder, N. L. (2021). A Systematic review of instructor presence in instructional videos: Effects on learning and affect. Computers and Education Open, 2, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100059
• Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (2005). Education goes digital: The evolution of online learning and the revolution in higher education. Communications of the ACM, 48(10), 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1145/1089107.1089139
• Jang, H. W., & Kim, K. (2014). Use of online clinical videos for clinical skills training for medical students: Benefits and challenges. BMC Medical Education, 14(56), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-56
• Kasemodel, M.G.C., Makishi, F., Souza, R.C., & Silva, V.L. (2016). Following the trail of crumbs: A bibliometric study on consumer behavior in the Food Science and Technology field. International Journal of Food Studies 5(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/5.1.2016.a7.
• Kay, R. H., & Mann, A. (2022). Effective video use in online learning. In R. Kay & W. Hunter J. (Eds.). Thriving online: A guide for busy educators (pp. 298-309). Ontario Tech University.
• Kılınç, H., Fırat, M. & Yüzer, T. V. (2017). Uzaktan eğitimde video kullanım eğilimleri: Bir araştırma sentezi. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 7(1), 55-82. https://dx.doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2017.003
• Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. http://repository.alt.ac.uk/id/eprint/629
• Nagy, J. T. (2018). Evaluation of online video usage and learning satisfaction: An extension of the technology acceptance model. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 160-185. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.2886
• National Science Foundation. (2023). NSF invites collaborations between U.S. and U.K. research communities on engineering and physical sciences. https://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=307831&org=ENG
• Oliveira, L. R., Fontes, R., Collus, J., & Cerisier, J. F. (2019). Video and online learning in higher education: A bibliometric analysis of the open access scientific production, through web of science. INTED 2019 Conference. Valencia, Spain.
• Poquet, O., Lim, L., Mirriahi, N., & Dawson, S. (2018). Video and learning: A systematic review (2007-2017). LAK’18: International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. Sydney, Australia.
• Quan, W., Chen, B., & Shu, F. (2017). Publish or impoverish: An investigation of the monetary reward system of science in China (1999-2016). Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69(5), 486-502. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-01-2017-0014
• Rudd, D. P. (2014). The value of video in online instruction. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 13, 1-7.
• Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988-2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082
• Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50(9), 799–813. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:9%3C799::AID-ASI9%3E3.0.CO;2-G
• Sönmez, Ö. F. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of educational research articles published in the field of social study education based on web of science database. Participatory Educational Research, 7(2), 216-229. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.20.30.7.2
• Şeref, İ., & Karagöz, B. (2019). Türkçe eğitimi akademik alanına ilişkin bir değerlendirme: Web of Science veri tabanına dayalı bibliyometrik inceleme. Journal of Language Education and Research, 5(2), 213-231. https://doi.org/10.31464/jlere.578224
• UK Science and Innovation Network in the USA. (2023). UK science and innovation network in the USA. https://www.gov.uk/world/organisations/uk-science-and-innovation-network-in-the-usa.
• Wang, X., Xu, S., Liu, D., & Liang, Y. (2012). The role of Chinese–American scientists in China–US scientific collaboration: A study in nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 91(3), 737-749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0693-x
• Whatley, J., & Ahmad, A. (2007). Using video to record summary lectures to aid students’ revision. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 185-196.
• Xiaoming, J. (2003). The China-US relationship in science and technology. https://china-us.uoregon.edu/pdf/China-US%20relationship%20in%20Science%20and%20Technology.pdf
• Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2014). The state of video-based learning: A review and future perspectives. International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences, 6(3), 122-135.
• Yuen, M., Koo, A., & Woods, P. C. (2018). Online video for self-directed learning in digital animation. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(3), 91-103.
• Yuhanna, I., Alexander, A., & Kachik, A. (2020). Advantages and disadvantages of online learning. Journal Educational Verkenning, 1(2), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.48173/jev.v1i2.54
• Zhu, Y., Kim, D., Yan, E., Kim, M. C., & Qi, G. (2020). Analyzing China’s research collaboration with the United States in high-impact and high technology research. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 363–375. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00098