Özel Yetenekli Öğrencilerde Beklenenin Altında Başarı Araştırmalarının Bibliyometrik Analizi

Year 2025, Issue: 63, 595 - 616, 27.03.2025

Marilena Leana Taşcılar

https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1544939

Abstract

Bu araştırma özel yetenekli öğrencilerde beklenenin altında başarı konusunda yapılan akademik çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizini yapmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu doğrultuda akademik yayınların listelendiği en güvenilir veri tabanı olarak bilinen Web of Science (WoS) incelenmiştir. Çalışmada yapılan bibliyometrik analiz, özel yetenekli öğrencilerde beklenenin altında başarı sergileme durumu ile ilgili araştırmaların yıllarını, atıf sayısını, en çok yayın yapan araştırmacıları, etki sahibi dergileri, ülkeleri, kurumları, yazar ve ülke ortaklıklarını ve anahtar kelimelemeri incelemektedir. Çalışmada betimsel tarama modeli kullanılmıştır. Analizler VOSviewer programı ile yapılmış ve bu alanda en fazla çalışmayı yapan ülkenin Amerika Birleşik Devletleri olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, bu konu ile ilgili en fazla yayını olan dergi Gifted Child Quarterly, en çok yayın yapan yazar McCoach, en fazla atıf alan yazarların Reis ve McCoach olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Konu ile ilgili gelişen çalışma alanları incelenmiş ve bu konuda yeni araştırmalar yapmayı planlayan araştırmacılar için önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Keywords

Üstün yetenekli öğrenciler, beklenenin altında başarı, bibliyometrik analiz

Ethical Statement

Bibliyometri analiz çalışması olduğu için etik beyan bulunmamaktadır.

Supporting Institution

-

Project Number

-

Thanks

-

Bibliometric Analysis of Reseach on Underachievement in Gifted Students

Abstract

The objective of this study is to conduct a bibliometric analysis of academic studies on the underachievement of gifted students. To this end, the Web of Science (WoS) database, which is widely regarded as the most reliable repository of academic publications, was subjected to analysis. The bibliometric analysis in the study examines the years, number of citations, researchers with the highest number of publications, impact journals, countries, institutions, author and country partnerships, and keywords of the studies related to below-expected achievement in gifted students. A descriptive survey model was employed in the study. The analyses were conducted using the VOSviewer program, which revealed that the United States of America was the country that had conducted the greatest number of studies in this field. Furthermore, the journal with the highest number of publications on this subject was identified as Gifted Child Quarterly, while the author with the most publications was McCoach. Additionally, the author with the highest number of citations was Reis and McCoach. The study also examined emerging areas of study on the subject and provided recommendations for researchers planning to conduct new research in this field.

Keywords

underachievement, gifted students, bibliometric analysis

Project Number

-

References

• Başlantı, U. (2008). Investigating the underachievement of university students in Turkey: Exploring subscales. International Journal of Progressive Education, 4(2), 40-56.
• Başlantı, U., & McCoach, D. B. (2006). Factors related to the underachievement of university students in Turkey. Roeper Review, 28(4), 210-215.
• Bergner, S., & Neubauer, A. C. (2011). Sex and training differences in mental rotation: A behavioral and neurophysiological comparison of gifted achievers, gifted underachievers and average intelligent achievers. High Ability Studies, 22(2), 155-177. 10.1080/13598139.2011.628849
• Berube, B. N., (Ed.). (1995). What educators need to know about underachievement and gifted students. University of Connecticut, National Research Center for the Gifted and Talented.
• Büyüköztürk, S., Çakmak, E., Akgün, O., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2018). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (25. Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
• Colangelo, N., Kerr, B., Christensen, P., & Maxey, J. (1993). A comparison of gifted underachievers and gifted high achievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(4), 155-160. 10.1177/001698629303700404
• Çelik, C., Kaymakçı, G., & Can, Ş. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of research on career development of gifted students. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 14(2), 68-82. 10.19160/e-ijer.1206389
• Desmet, O. A., Pereira, N., & Peterson, J. S. (2020). Telling a tale: How underachievement develops in gifted girls. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 85-99. 10.1177/0016986219888633
• Gallagher, G. (2005). Underachievement: How do we define, analyse, and address it in schools? ACEPapers, 15, 26-35.
• Garn, A. C., Matthews, M. S., & Jolly, J. L. (2010). Parental influences on the academic motivation of gifted students: A self-determination theory perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(4), 263-272. 10.1177/0016986210377657
• Köseoğlu, M. A., Rahimi, R., Okumus, F., & Liu, J. (2016). Bibliometric studies in tourism. Annals Of Tourism Research, 61, 180-198. 10.1016/j.annals.2016.10.006
• Leana-Taşcılar, M. Z. (2024). Psychometric analysis of underachievement tool for gifted students. Cogent Education, 11(1), 1-11. 10.1080/2331186x.2024.2397167
• Lupart, J. L., & Pyryt, M. C. (1996). “Hidden gifted” students: Underachiever prevalence and profile. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20(1), 36-53. 10.1177/016235329602000103
• Matthews, M. S., & McBee, M. T. (2007). School factors and the underachievement of gifted students in a talent search summer program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(2), 167-181. 10.1177/0016986207299473
• McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2003a). The school attitude assessment survey-revised: A new instrument to identify academically able students who underachieve. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(3), 414-429. 10.1177/0013164403063003005
• McCoach, D. B. & Siegle, D. (2003b). Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high-achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 144-154. 10.1177/001698620304700205
• Montgomery, D. (2009). Nature and identification of underachivement. In D. Montgomery (Ed.), Able, gifted and talented underachievers. Wiley-Blackwell Publications.
• Obergriesser, S. & Stoeger, H. (2015). The role of emotions, motivation, and learning behavior in underachievement and results of an intervention. High Ability Studies, 26(1), 167-190. 10.1080/13598139.2015.1043003
• OECD, (2008). Education at a glance highlights report.https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/eag_highlights2010-8en.pdf?expires=.1733227584&id=id&accna me=guest&checksum=4E22B62176F049AF078F79F53371C5E5
• Pauna, V. H., Picone, F., Le Guyader, G., Buonocore, E., & Franzese, P. P. (2018). The scientific research on ecosystem services: A bibliometric analysis. Ecological Questions, 29(3), 53-62. 10.12775/EQ.2018.022
• Ramos, A., De Fraine, B., & Verschueren, K. (2021). Learning goal orientation in high-ability and average-ability students: Developmental trajectories, contextual predictors, and long-term educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(2), 370. 10.1037/edu0000476
• Raoof, K., Shokri, O., Fathabadi, J., & Panaghi, L. (2024). Unpacking the underachievement of gifted students: A systematic review of internal and external factors. Heliyon, 10(17), 1-22. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36908
• Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 152-170. 10.1177/001698620004400302
• Reis, S. M., Renzulli, J. S, & Burns, D. E (2016). Curriculum compacting: A guide to differentiating curriculum and instruction through enrichment and acceleration. Routledge.
• Renzulli, J. S. (2020). Reflections on my work: The identification and development of creative/productive giftedness. In D. Y. Dai & R. Sternberg (Eds), Scientific inquiry into human potential (pp. 197-211). Routledge.
• Ridgley, L. M., Rubenstein, L. D., & Callan, G. L. (2020). Gifted underachievement within a self‐regulated learning framework: Proposing a task‐dependent model to guide early identification and intervention. Psychology in the Schools, 57(9), 1365-1384. 10.1002/pits.22408
• Ritchotte, J. A., Matthews, M. S., & Flowers, C. P. (2014). The validity of the achievement-orientation model for gifted middle school students: An exploratory study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(3), 183-198. 10.1177/0016986214534890
• Rimm, S. (1997). Underachievement syndrome: A national epidemic. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education. Allyn & Bacon.
• Rubenstein, L. D., Siegle, D., Reis, S. M., Mccoach, D. B., & Burton, M. G. (2012). A complex quest: Developing and researching underachievement interventions for gifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 678-694. 10.1002/pits.21620
• Siegle, D., & McCoach, D. B. (2002). Promoting a positive achievement attitude with gifted and talented students. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson & S. M. Moon (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children. National Association of Gifted Children.
• Siegle, D., McCoach, D. B., & Shea, K. (2014). Applying the achievement orientation model to the job satisfaction of teachers of the gifted. Roeper Review, 36(4), 210-220. 10.1080/02783193.2014.945219
• Siegle, D., McCoach, D. B., & Roberts, A. (2017). Why I believe I achieve determines whether I achieve. High Ability Studies, 28(1), 59-72. 10.1080/13598139.2017.1302873
• Siegle, D., Rubenstein, L. D., & McCoach, D. B. (2020). Do you know what I'm thinking? A comparison of teacher and parent perspectives of underachieving gifted students' attitudes. Psychology in the Schools, 57(10), 1596-1614. 10.1002/pits.22345
• Siegle, D., Rubenstein, L. D., & Mitchell, M. S. (2014). Honors students’ perceptions of their high school experiences: The influence of teachers on student motivation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(1), 35-50. 10.1177/0016986213513496
• Snyder, K. E., Malin, J. L., Dent, A. L., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2014). The message matters: The role of implicit beliefs about giftedness and failure experiences in academic self-handicapping. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 230. 10.1037/a0034553
• Staudt, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2006). Achievement, underachievement and cortical activation: a comparative EEG study of adolescents of average and above‐average intelligence. High Ability Studies, 17(1), 3-16. 13598130600946855
• Sternberg, R. J. (1999). The theory of successful intelligence. Review of General Psychology, 3(4), 292-316. 10.1037/1089-2680.3.4.292
• Sternberg, R. J. & Dashtaki, A. S. (2024). Effectivity: An alternative to conceptions of gifted under- and over – achievement. Gifted Education International, 0(0), 10.1177/02614294241280862
• Şeref, İ., & Karagöz, B. (2019). Türkçe eğitimi akademik alanına ilişkin bir değerlendirme: Web of Science veri tabanına dayalı bibliyometrik inceleme. Journal of Language Education and Research, 5(2), 213-231. 10.31464/jlere.578224
• Yeşiltaş, E., & Şeker, G. (2021). Sosyal medya ile ilgili yapılan eğitim araştırmalarının bibliyometrik analizi. Journal of World of Turks/Zeitschrift für die Welt der Türken, 13(2), 169-189. 10.46291/ZfWT/130209