Year 2019, Volume 11 , Issue 1, Pages 87 - 116 2019-09-13

BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI

Ahmet Selçuk Başarıcı [1] , Tanzer Satır [2]


Literatürde boş konteyner konumlamasına dair pek çok çalışma mevcuttur. Bu çalışmaların sınıflandırılması, gelecek çalışmalara dair hangi alanlarda araştırma yapılabilecek bir derinlik olduğunu belirlemede kritiktir. Bu çalışma, literatürde mevcut çalışmaları stratejik, taktik ve operasyonel planlama düzeyleri bağlamında sınıflandırmıştır. Sınıflandırma yapılırken planlama düzeyi belirleme kriterleri ile 2010-2018 seneleri arasında yayınlanan çalışma içerikleri karşılaştırılmıştır. Çalışma, önerilen çözümlere dair yararlanılan matematiksel modelleri de incelemektedir. İlgi dönemde literatür çalışmalarının pek çoğu taktik planlama düzeyindedir. Operasyonel düzeydeki çalışmalar ise nispeten seyrektir. Stratejik planlamaya yönelik çalışma sayısı ise son derece kısırdır. Politik ve ekonomik gelişmelerden hızla etkilenen, belirsizliğin yüksek olduğu küresel taşımacılığa ilişkin akademik çalışmalarda stokastik modeller beklenildiği düzeyde kullanılmamaktadır. Kısa dönem konteyner kiralama uygulamalarının, boş konteyner hareket sayılarının azaltılabilmesi üzerine etkileri gelecekte araştırma yapılabilecek önde gelen bakir alanlar içinde öne çıkmaktadır. Dolu/boş konteyner bekleme sürelerinin azaltılması, gemi liman uğraklarına dair sabit günlü zaman çizelgesi oluşturulması, demirbaş ve kiralık konteynerlerin birlikte kullanımı konuları son senelerde kısıtlı çalışmaya konu olmasına rağmen sektör pratiğine hitap etme potansiyeli taşımaktadır.
konteyner taşımacılığı, boş konteyner, planlama düzeyi, makale sınıflandırma, model türleri
  • Akyuz, M.H. ve Lee, C.Y. (2016). Service type assignment and container routing with transit time constraints and empty container repositioning for liner shipping service networks. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 88, 46-71.
  • Alfandari, L., Davidovic, T., Furini, F., Ljubic, I., Maras, V. ve Sebastien, M. (2019). Tighter MIP models for Barge Container Ship Routing. Omega. The International Journal of Management Science, 82, 38-54.
  • Basarici, A.S. ve Satir, T. (2019). Empty container movements beyond the effect of trade imbalance: Turkish terminals. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management. 33(2), 141-166.
  • Bell, M.G.H., Liu, X., Angeloudis, P., Fonzone, A. ve Hosseinloo, S.H. (2011). A frequency-based maritime container assignment model. Transportaion Research Part B: Methodological, 45(8), 1152-1161.
  • Bell, M.G.H., Liu, X., Rioult J. ve Angeloudis, P. (2013). A cost-based maritime container assignment model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 58, 58-70.
  • Boile, M., Theofanis, S., ve Mittal, N. (2004). Empty Intermodal Containers A Global Issue, Annual Forum of the Transportation Research Forum, Northwestern University, Transportation Center, Evanston, Illinois, March 21 – 24.
  • Boile, M. (2006). Empty Intermodal Container Management (Final Report FHWA NJ-2006-005). Piscataway, NJ: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The State University of New Jersey in cooperation with New Jersey Department of Transportation Bureau of Research and U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, New Jersey.
  • Braekers, K., Janssens, G. K. ve Caris, A. (2011). Challenges in managing empty container movements at multiple planning levels. Transport Reviews, 31(6), 681–708.
  • Braekers, K., Caris, A., ve Janssens, G.K. (2013). Optimal shipping routes and vessel size for intermodal barge transport with empty container repositioning. Computers in Industry, 64 (2), 155-164.
  • Caglar, T. ve Esmer, S. (2015). Repositioning of empty containers problem in Turkey: A qualitative approch. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 12(31), 242-256.
  • Chang, H., Jula, H., Chassiakos, A., ve Ioannou, P. (2008). A heuristic solution for the empty container substitution problem, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44(2), 203–216.
  • Chen, J. ve Yahalom, S. (2013). Container slot co-allocation planning with joint fleet agreement in a round voyage for liner shipping. The Journal of Navigation, 66(4), 589–603.
  • Cheung, R. K. ve Chen, C. Y. (1998). A two-stage stochastic network model and solution methods for the dynamic empty container allocation problem. Transportation Science, 32(2), 142–162.
  • Cimino, A., Diaz, R., Longo, F. ve Mirabeli, G. (2010). Empty containers repositioning: A state of the art overview, SpringSim’10 Proceedings of the 2010 Spring Simulation Multiconference, Article No: 72, Orlando-Florida, April 11-15.
  • Dang, Q.V., Nielsen, I.E. ve Yun, W.Y. (2013). Replenishment policies for empty containers in an inland multi-depot system. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 15 (1), 120-149.
  • Dejax, P.J., ve Crainic, T. G. (1987). Survey Paper - A Review of Empty Flows and Fleet Management Models in Freight Transportation. Transportation Science, 21(4), 227-248.
  • Dong, J.X., Xu, J., ve Song, D.P. (2013). Assessment of empty container repositioning policies in maritime transport. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 24(1), 49-72.
  • Drozhzhyn, O. (2016). Container Traffic Optimization on Feeder Shipping Line. Transport and Telecommunication, 17(4), 314–321.
  • Edirisinghe, L., Zhihong, J. ve Wijeratne, A.W. (2016). The global impact of container inventory imbalance and the factors that influence container inventory management strategies. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Business Management (ICBM) 2016, (pp.593-621). Sri Lanka: University of Sri Jayewardenepura.
  • Epstein, E., Neely, A. ve Weintraub, A. (2012). A Strategic Empty Container Logistics Optimization in a Major Shipping Company. Interfaces, 42(1), 5–16.
  • Feng, C.M. ve Chang, C.H. (2008). Empty container reposition planning for intra-Asia liner shipping. Maritime Policy & Management: The flagship journal of international shipping and port research, 35(5), 469-489.
  • Graf von Westarp, A. ve Schinas, O. (2016). A fuzzy approch for container positioning considering sustainable profit optimization. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 92, 56-66.
  • Hilmola, O.P., Ujvari, S., Torkkeli, M., Lorentz, H. ve Andersson, T. (2010). From Northern Europe to Russia and Asia, and vice versa: traffic flow analysis – current situation and development trends. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 6(2), 205-217.
  • Jahn, C., ve Schlingmeier, J. (2014). Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management. In T. Blecker, W. Kersten, C.M. Ringle (Eds.), Cooperation in Empty Container Logistics, pp.499-51). https://hicl.org/publications/2014/19/499.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 21.08.2018.
  • Jiao, W., Yan, H. ve Pang K.W. (2016). Nonlinear pricing for stochastic container leasing system. Transportation Research Part B, 89, 1-18.
  • Jula, H., Chassiakos, A. ve Ioannou, P. (2006). Port dynamic empty container reuse. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 42(1), 43–60.
  • Liu, C., Jiang, Z., Liu, L. ve Geng, N. (2012). Solutions for flexible container leasing contracts with options under capacity and order constraints. International Journal of Production Economics, 141(1), 403-413.
  • Liu, X., Ye, H.Q. ve Yuan, X.M. (2011). Tactical planning models for managing container flow and ship deployment. Maritime Policy & Management: The flagship journal of international shipping and port research, 38(5), 487-508.
  • Løfstedt, B., Alvarez, J.F., Plum, C.E.M, Pisinger, D. ve Sigurd, M.M. (2010). An integer programming model and benchmark suite for liner shipping network design (Report No: 19). Technical University of Denmark: DTU Management Engineering.
  • Long, Y., Lee, L.H., ve Chew, E.P. (2012). The sample average approximation method for empty container repositioning with uncertainties. European Journal of Operational Research, 222(1), 65-75.
  • Meng, Q. ve Wang, S. (2011). Liner shipping service network design with empty container repositioning. Transport Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(5), 695-708.
  • Meng, Q., Wang, T., ve Wang, S. (2015). Multi-period liner ship fleet planning with dependent uncertain container shipment demand. Maritime Policy & Management, 42(1), 43-67.
  • Monemi, R.N. ve Gelareh, S. (2017). Network design, fleet deployment and empty repositioning in liner shipping. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 108, 60-79.
  • Monios, J. ve Wang, Y. (2014). Regional stakeholder solutions to empty container repositioning costs in peripheral regions, Scottish Transport Applications & Research (STAR) Conference, Glasgow. Moon, I.K. , Ngoc, A.D.D. ve Hur, Y.S. (2010). Positioning empty containers among multiple ports with leasing and purchasing considerations. OR Spectrum, 32(3), 765-786.
  • Moon, I.K., Ngoc, A.D.D., ve Konings, R. (2012). Foldable and standard containers in empty container repositioning. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 49(1), 107-124.
  • Rathnayake, J. ve Wijeratne, A.W. (2012). Second container port in Sri Lanka; Hambanthota or Trincomalee: an analysis using the game theory. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 13(3), 358-378.
  • Rodrigue, J.P. (2017). The Geography of Transport Systems. Repositioning size and cost of empty containers. https://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/ch5en/appl5en/ch5a3en.html, Erişim Tarihi: 10.10.2018.
  • Shi, N. ve Xu, D. (2011). A Markov Decision Process Model for an Online Empty Container Repositioning Problem in a Two-port Fixed Route. International Journal of Operations Research, 8(2), 8-17.
  • Song, D. P. ve Carter, J. (2009). Empty container repositioning in liner Shipping. Maritime Policy and Management, 36(4), 291–307.
  • Song, D.P. ve Dong, J.X. (2010). Effectiveness of an empty container repositioning policy with flexible destination ports. Transport Policy, 18(1), 92-101.
  • Song, D.P. ve Dong, J.X. (2011). Flow balancing-based empty container repositioning in typical shipping service routes. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 13(1), 61–77.
  • Song, D.P., ve Dong, J.X. (2012). Cargo routing and empty container positioning in multiple shipping service routes. Transportation Research Part B, 46(2012), 1556-1575.
  • Song, D.P., ve Zhang, Q. (2010). A fluid flow model for empty container repositioning policy with a single port and stochastic demand. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 48(5), 3623-3642.
  • Van der Meer, R., De Boer, M.K., Liebich, V., Hallers, C.T., Veldhuis, M. ve Ree, K. (2016). Ballast Water Risk Indication for the North Sea. Coastal Management, 44(6), 547-568.
  • Varshavets, A., Voß, S. ve Pawellek, G. (2013). Empty container repositioning and short term leasing option in global container management. http://www.isci.cl/tristan/data/Maritime%20Transport/ TRISTAN8_paper_116.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 05.09.2015.
  • Verstrepen, S., Cools, M., Cruijssen, F. ve Dullaert, W. (2009). A dynamic framework for managing horizontal cooperation in logistics. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 5(3/4), 228-248.
  • Vojdani, N., Lootz, F. ve Rosner, R. (2013). Optimizing empty container logistics based on a collaborative network approach. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 15(4), 467–493.
  • Wang, S. (2013). Essential elements in tactical planning models for container liner shipping. Transportation Research Part B, 54, 84–99.
  • Yun, W.Y., Lee, Y.M. ve Choi, Y.S. (2011). Optimal inventory control of empty containers in inland transportation system. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(1), 451-457.
  • Zheng, J., Sun, Z. ve Gao, Z. (2015). Empty container exchange among liner carriers. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 83, 158-169.
  • Zheng, J., Sun, Z. ve Zhang, F. (2016). Measuring the perceived container leasing prices in liner shipping network design with empty container repositioning. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 94, 123-140.
Primary Language tr
Subjects Science
Journal Section Full Issue
Authors

Author: Ahmet Selçuk Başarıcı (Primary Author)
Institution: İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ
Country: Turkey


Author: Tanzer Satır
Institution: İSTANBUL TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DENİZCİLİK FAKÜLTESİ, DENİZ ULAŞTIRMA İŞLETME MÜHENDİSLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ
Country: Turkey


Dates

Publication Date : September 13, 2019

Bibtex @review { deudfd614860, journal = {Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi}, issn = {1309-4246}, eissn = {2458-9942}, address = {}, publisher = {Dokuz Eylul University}, year = {2019}, volume = {11}, pages = {87 - 116}, doi = {10.18613/deudfd.614860}, title = {BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI}, key = {cite}, author = {Başarıcı, Ahmet Selçuk and Satır, Tanzer} }
APA Başarıcı, A , Satır, T . (2019). BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi , 11 (1) , 87-116 . DOI: 10.18613/deudfd.614860
MLA Başarıcı, A , Satır, T . "BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI". Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi 11 (2019 ): 87-116 <https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/deudfd/issue/48497/614860>
Chicago Başarıcı, A , Satır, T . "BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI". Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi 11 (2019 ): 87-116
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI AU - Ahmet Selçuk Başarıcı , Tanzer Satır Y1 - 2019 PY - 2019 N1 - doi: 10.18613/deudfd.614860 DO - 10.18613/deudfd.614860 T2 - Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 87 EP - 116 VL - 11 IS - 1 SN - 1309-4246-2458-9942 M3 - doi: 10.18613/deudfd.614860 UR - https://doi.org/10.18613/deudfd.614860 Y2 - 2019 ER -
EndNote %0 Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI %A Ahmet Selçuk Başarıcı , Tanzer Satır %T BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI %D 2019 %J Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi %P 1309-4246-2458-9942 %V 11 %N 1 %R doi: 10.18613/deudfd.614860 %U 10.18613/deudfd.614860
ISNAD Başarıcı, Ahmet Selçuk , Satır, Tanzer . "BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI". Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi 11 / 1 (September 2019): 87-116 . https://doi.org/10.18613/deudfd.614860
AMA Başarıcı A , Satır T . BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019; 11(1): 87-116.
Vancouver Başarıcı A , Satır T . BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019; 11(1): 116-87.