BARNES’IN TAHTA KURDU İLE EMPATİ KURMAK: NUH’UN GEMİSİ EFSANESİNİN YENİDEN ANLATIMI

Year 2025, Volume: 12 Issue: 1, 247 - 259, 29.04.2025

Sevda Ayva

https://doi.org/10.69878/deuefad.1563775

Abstract

Bu çalışma, bilişsel sinirbilim alanındaki son gelişmelerden yararlanarak, bedenlenmiş zihin ve bedenlenmiş simülasyon teorilerinin, okuyucuların anlatılardaki insan olmayan karakterlerle nasıl empati kurduklarını ve yazarların okuyucuların bu karakterlerle empatik bir bağ kurmalarını sağlamak için hangi anlatı stratejilerini kullandıklarını incelemektedir. Kartezyen zihin-beden ikiliğine meydan okuyan bedenlenmiş zihin teorisi, bilişsel süreçlerde zihnin sistemin tek ve ana merkezi olmadığını, bedenle birlikte çalıştığını ve bilişsel süreçlerin bedenin dünyayla olan etkileşimleriyle de şekillendiğini öne sürer. Beyindeki ayna nöronların keşfi ile ortaya atılan bedenlenmiş simülasyon teorisi ise, bir kişinin başkalarının eylemlerini, duygu ve düşüncelerini anlamak için aynı eylemleri gerçekleştirmek zorunda olmadığını; yalnızca onları gözlemlemenin, beyindeki ayna nöronlar sayesinde bu deneyimleri sanki kendisi yaşıyormuş gibi algılamasını sağladığını öne sürer. Bedenlenmiş simülasyon, kitap okurken, bir tiyatro performansını veya film izlerken ya da bir sanat eserini inceleme sırasında da gerçekleştiği ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu açıdan bedenlenmiş simülasyon teorisi, ayna nöronlar vasıtasıyla okuyucuların kurgusal karakterlerle nasıl empati kurduklarına açıklık getirir. Yukarıda bahsedilen kuramsal çerçeve kapsamında, bu makale Julian Barnes’ın 10 ½ Bölümde Dünya Tarihi (1989) adlı eserinde okuyucuyu eserin insan olmayan anlatıcısı Woodworm ile empati kurmaya teşvik eden veya buna engel oluşturabilecek anlatım tekniklerine odaklanmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışma, anlatıların okuyucuların insan olmayan kurgusal karakterlerle empatik bir bağ kurmalarını sağlama potansiyeline sahip olduğunu savunmaktadır.

Keywords

Bedenlenmiş simülasyon teorisi , empati , insan olmayan anlatıcılar , Julian Barnes , 10 ½ Bölümde Dünya Tarihi.

EMPATHIZING WITH BARNES’S WOODWORM: A RETELLING OF NOAH’S ARK

Abstract

By co-opting a cognitive neuroscientific approach, this article investigates how the theories of the embodied mind and embodied simulation shed light on the way readers empathize with nonhuman characters in narratives, and what narrative strategies authors employ to enable readers’ empathic engagement with them. Challenging the Cartesian mind-body dualism, the embodied mind theory posits that the mind works in tandem with the body, and cognitive processes are shaped by the body’s interactions with the world. Embodied simulation theory puts forward that when people witness others performing actions, experiencing emotions, encountering situations, the mirror neurons in their brains simulate those experiences as if they were performing or experiencing them themselves. That simulative experience also occurs while reading a narrative, or watching a theatrical performance or a film, or examining an artwork. The embodied simulation, in this sense, discloses how readers/recipients empathize with imaginary characters through the mirroring mechanism. Within this theoretical context, this article concentrates on the narrative techniques in Julian Barnes’s A History of the World in 10 1/2 Chapters (1989) that promote or hinder empathy with the animal narrator, the Woodworm. Consequently, this study argues for the potential of narratives to evoke readers’ trans-species empathic engagement.

Keywords

The embodied simulation theory , empathy , animal narrators , Julian Barnes , A History of the World in 10 1/2 Chapters.

References

• Alaimo, S. (2018). Trans-corporeality. In Rosi Braidotti and Maria Hlavajova (Eds.), Posthuman glossary (pp. 435-438). Bloomsbury Academic.
• Barnes, J. (2009). A history of the world in 10 1/2 chapters. Vintage Books.
• Bernaerts, L., Caracciolo, M., Herman, L., Vervaeck, B. (2014). The storied lives of non-human narrators. Narrative, 22(1), 68-93. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24615410
• Blakemore, E. (May 18, 2019). The chernobyl disaster: What happened, and the long-term impacts. National Geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/chernobyl-disaster
• Coplan, A. (2011). Understanding empathy: Its features and effects. In Amy Coplan and Peter Goldie (Eds.), Empathy: Philosophical and psychological perspectives (pp. 19-30). Oxford UP.
• Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In W. Damon and N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. (pp. 701-778). Wiley.
• Gallese, V. (2011a). Mirror neurons and art. In Francesca Bacci and David Melcher (Eds.), Art and the sense (pp. 441-49). Oxford UP.
• Gallese, V. (2011b). Embodied simulation theory: Imagination and narrative. The International Neuropsychoanalysis Society, 13(2), 196-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/15294145.2011.10773675
• Gallese, V. (2003). The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: The quest for a common mechanism. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 517-28. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1234. PMID: 12689377; PMCID: PMC1693141.
• Gendler, T. S. (2000). The puzzle of imaginative resistance. The Journal of Philosophy, 97(2), 55–81. doi:10.2307/2678446
• Genette, G. (1980). Narrative discourse: An essay in method. Jane E. Lewin (Trans.). Cornell UP.
• Guignery, V. (2006). The fiction of Julian Barnes. Palgrave Macmillan. Gruen, L. (2015). Entangled empathy: An alternative ethic for our relationships with animals. Lantern Books.
• Hoffman, M. L. (2011). Empathy, justice and the law. In Amy Coplan and Peter Goldie (Eds.), Empathy: philosophical and psychological perspectives (pp. 230-54). Oxford UP.
• Hogan, P. C. (2016). Affect studies and literary criticism. In Lynch D.S. (Ed.). Oxford research encyclopedia of literature. Oxford UP. Web. 4 March 2020. https://oxfordre.com/literature/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.001.0001/acrefore-9780190201098-e-105
• Iacoboni, M. (2009). Mirroring people: The science of empathy and how we connect with others. Picador.
• Keen, S. (2006). A theory of narrative empathy. Narrative, 14(3), 209-36. https://english.as.uky.edu/sites/default/files/zunshineTheory%20of%20Narrative%20Empathy.pdf
• Keen, S. (2007). Empathy and the novel. Oxford UP.
• Keen, S. (2011a). Fast tracks to narrative empathy: Anthropomorphism and dehumanization in graphic narratives. Substance, 40(1), 135-155. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41300192.pdf
• Keen, S. (2011b). Empathetic Hardy: Bounded, ambassadorial, and broadcast strategies of narrative empathy. Poetics Today, 32(2), 349–389. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-1162695.
• Preston, S. D., de Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02000018
• Rimmon-Kenan, S. (2002). Narrative fiction: Contemporary poetics. Routledge.
• Rizzolatti, G., Corrado, S. (2008). Mirrors in the brain: How our emotions share actions and emotions. Frances Anderson (Trans.). Oxford UP.
• Rowlands, M. J. (2010). The new science of the mind: From extended mind to embodied phenomenology. MIT P.
• Weik von Mossner, A. (2017). Affective ecologies: Empathy, emotion, and environmental Narrative. Ohio State University.
• Weinberg, J. M., Meskin, A. (2006). Puzzling over the imagination: Philosophical problems, architectural solutions. In Shaun Nichols, (Ed.), The Architecture of the Imagination: New essays on pretense, possibility, and fiction (pp. 175-202). Oxford UP.
• Wojciehowski, H., Gallese, V. (2011). How stories make us feel: Toward an embodied narratology. California Italian Studies, 2(1). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3jg726c2