Divan’ın İkilemi: Temel Haklar ve Temel Özgürlükler Arasında Denge?

Dr. A. Aslı Bilgin

Divan’ın İkilemi: Temel Haklar ve Temel Özgürlükler Arasında Denge?

Abstract

1951 tarihli Avrupa Kömür ve Çelik Topluluğunu kuran Paris Antlaşması ve 1957 tarihli Avrupa Ekonomik Topluluğu ve Avrupa Atom Enerjisi Topluluğunu kuran Roma Antlaşmaları ile temelleri atılan ve o dönemde özellikle ekonomik alanda bir bütünleşme sağlayıp tüm Avrupa’da tek bir pazar kurma hedefine sahip olan Avrupa Birliği (Birlik)*** geçen zaman içerisinde ekonomik bütünleşmeyi öngören hedefinin yanında siyasi birlik olma amacına da yönelmiştir.

References

Alter, Karen, “The European Court’s Political Power”, West European Politics, Cilt 19, 1996, s. 458-487.
Alter, Karen, Establishing the Supremacy of the EU Law, Oxford University Press, 2002.
Arnull, Anthony, “The European Court and Judicial Objectivity: A Reply To Prof. Hartley”, Law Quarterly Review, Cilt 112, 1996, s. 411-423.
Avbelj, Matej, “European Court of Justice and the Question of Value Choices, Fundamental Human Rights as an Exception to the Freedom of Movement of Goods”, Jean Monnet Working Paper, 06/04.
Barnard, Catherine, “The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: Happy 10th Birthday’”, European Union Studies Association (EUSA) Review, Cilt 24, Sayı 1, 2011, s. 9.
Barnard, Catherine, “Social Dumping or Dumping Socialism?”, The Cambridge Law Journal, Cilt 67, Sayı 2, 2008, s. 262-264.
Barnard, Catherıne, The Substantive Law of the EU, The Four Freedoms, Oxford University Press 2007.
Bercusson, Brian, “The Lisbon Treaty and Social Europe”, ERA Forum, Cilt 10, 2009, s. 87-105.

Biondi, Andrea, “Free Trade, a Mountain Road and the Right to Protest: European Economic Freedoms and Fundamental Individual Rights”, European Human Rights Law Review, Cilt 9, 2004, s.51-61.
Binder, Darcy, “The European Court of Justice and The Protection of Fundamental Rights in the European Community: New Developments and Future Possibilities in Expanding Fundamental Rights Review to Member State Action”, Jean Monnet Working Papers, No.95/04, 1995.
Bilgin, A. Aslı, “Avrupa Birliği Temel Haklar Şartı ve Lizbon Antlaşması”, Akçay, Belgin - Baykal, Sanem - Kahraman, Sevilay (Eds.), Avrupa Birliği’nin Güncel Sorunları ve Gelişmeler, Seçkin Yayınevi, 2008, içinde, s. 317-348.
Colvin, Cathleen M., “Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (Ireland) Ltd. v. Grogan: Irish Abortion Law and the Free Movement of Services in the European Community”, Fordham International Law Journal, C. 15, S. 2, 1991, s. 476-526.
Coppel, Jason, - O’neill, Aidan, “The European Court of Justice: Taking Rights Seriously?”, Common Market Law Review, Cilt 29, 1992, s. 669- 692.
Craig, Paul - De Burca, Grainne, EU Law:Text, Cases and Materials, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011.
Davies, Anne, “One Step Forward Two Steps Back? The Viking and Laval Cases in the ECJ”, Industrial Law Journal, Cilt 37, Sayı 2, 2008, s. 126- 148.
Dorssemont, Filip, “A Judicial Pathway to overcome Laval and Viking“, OSE paper series, No. 5, September 2011, s. 1-20.
Drzemczewski, Andrew, “The Domestic Application of the European Human Rights Convention as European Community Law”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Cilt 30, 1981, s. 118-140.
Dyevre, Arthur, “The German Federal Constitutional Court and Judicial Politics”, West European Politics, Cilt 34, Sayı 2, 2011, s. 346-361. Gündüz, Aslan, “Avrupa Birliği’nde İnsan Haklarının Yeri: Kurumsal Düzenleme ve Bireylerin Hakları”, MÜ AT Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1999, Cilt 7, Sayı 1-2, s. 93-108.
Haapea, Arto, Between Minimum and Maximum Standards Current State and Future Challenges of the Protection of Fundamental Rights in the European Union, University of Helsinki, Faculty of Law 2004, Master’s Thesis.
Hartley, Trevor, “The European Court, Judicial Objectivity and the Constitution of the European Union”, Law Quarterly Review, Cilt 112, 1996, s. 95-109.
Hartley, Trevor, The Foundations of European Community Law, Oxford University Press, 2010.
Herzog, Roman – Gerken, Lüder, “Stop The European Court of Justice”, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 08.09.2008.
Hjalte, Rasmussen, On Law and Policy in the European Court of Justice: A Comparative Study in Judicial Policy Making, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 1986.
Hjalte, Rasmussen, “Between Self Restraint and Activism a Judicial Policy for the European Court”, European Law Review, Cilt 13, 1988, s. 28-39. Janc i, Davor, “Caveats from Karlsruhe and Berlin: Whither Democracy After Lisbon?”, Columbia Law Journal of European Law, Cilt 16, 2010, s. 337-383.
Karakaş, Işıl, Avrupa Topluluğu Hukuk Düzeni ve Ulus Devlet Egemenliği, Der Yayınları, İstanbul, 1993.
Kombos, Costas, “Fundamental Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: A Symbiosis on the Basis of Subsidiarity”, European Public Law, Cilt 12, Sayı 3, 2006, s. 433-460.
Kruger, Hans Christian, “The European Union Charter and the European Convention on Human Rights: An Overview”, Peers, Steve – Ward, Angela (Eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Politics, Law and Policy, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2004, içinde, xvii-xxvii.
Lenaerts, Koen, Constitutional Law of the European Union, Sweet and Maxwell, 2005.
Lenaerts, Koen - Van Nuffel, Piet, European Union Law, Sweet and Maxwell, 3rd Edition, 2011.
Maduro, M. P., “Reforming the Market or the State? Article 30 and the European Constitution: Economic Freedom and Political Rights”, European Law Journal, Cilt 3, Sayı 1, 1997, s. 55-82.
Manners, Ian, “Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Cilt 40, Sayı 2, s. 235-258.
Mathijsen, P. S. R. F., A Guide to European Union Law, Sweet and Maxwell, 10th Edition, 2010.
Mayer, Franz, “Rashomon In Karlsruhe, A Reflection On Democracy and Identity in the Europen Union: The German Constitutional Court’s Lisbon decisiona nd the changing landscape of European constitutionalism”, Jean Monnet Working Paper, 05/10, 2010, s. 1-40.
Metin, Yüksel - Kaygısız, Ümmühan, “Avrupa Birliğinde Temel Hakların Korunması ve Lizbon Antlaşmasının Getirdiği Yenilikler” Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 1, Sayı 1, 2011, s.125-158.
Monti, Mario, “A New Strategy for the Single Market”, Report to the President of the European Commission José Manuel Barroso, , (erişim tarihi, 06.03.2012).
Morijn, John, “Balancing Fundamental Rights and Common Market Freedoms in Union Law: Schmidberger and Omega in the Light of the European Constitution”, European Law Journal, Cilt 12, Sayı 1, 2006 s. 15-40.
O’leary, Siofra, “Aspects of the Relationship Between Community Law and National Law”, Neuwahl, Nanette - Rosas, Allan (Eds.), The European Union and Human Rights Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Netherlands, 1995, içinde, s. 23-50.
Oddvar Eriksen, Erik - Fossum, John, “Bringing European Democracy Back In-Or How to Read the German Constitutional Court’s Lisbon Treaty Ruling?”, European Law Journal, Cilt 17, Sayı 2, 2011, s. 153- 171.
Perisin, Tamara, “Interaction of Fundamental (Human) Rights and Fundamental (Market) Freedoms in the EU”, Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, Cilt 2, 2006, s. 69-98.
Pernice, Ingolf, “The Treaty of Lisbon and Fundamental Rights”, Walter Hallstein-Institut für Europaisches Verfassungsrecht, WHI Paper No. 7, 2008.
Pollicino, Oreste, “Legal Reasoning of the Court of Justice in the Context of the Principle of Equality Between Judicial Activism and Self-restraint, Part One/Two”; German Law Journal, Cilt 5, 2004.
Reich, Norbert, “Free Movement v. Social Rights in an Enlarged Union: The Laval and Viking Cases Before The ECJ”, German Law Journal, Cilt 9, Sayı 2, 2008, s. 125-160.
Sabel, Charles F. – Gerstenber, Oliver, “Constitutionalising an Overlapping Consensus: the ECJ and the Emergence of a Co-ordinate Constitutional Order”, European Law Journal, Cilt 16, 2010, s. 511-550.
Saltinyte, Loreta, “European Union Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights: Stronger Protection of Fundamental Rights in Europe?”, 2010, , (erişim tarihi, 18.08.2010)
Schömann, Isabella, “The Lisbon Treaty: a more Social Europe at last?”, ETUI Policy Brief, Sayı 1, 2010, s. 1-6.
Spaventa, Eleanor, “Federalisation Versus Centralisation: Tensions in Fundamental Rights Discourse in the EU”, DOUGAN, Michael – Currie, Samantha (Eds.), 50 Years of the European Treaties, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2009, içinde, s. 343-364.
Steiner, Josephine - Woods, Lorna - Twigg-Flesner, Christian, EU Law, 9 th Edition, Oxford University Press, 2006.
Syrpis, Phil, “The Treaty of Lisbon: Much Ado … But About What?”, Industrial Law Journal, Cilt 37, Sayı 3, 2008, s. 219-235.
Şaramet, Oana - Tama-Bianov, Anamaria - Aramet, Radu, “Juridical Protection of Fundamental Rights After Lisbon”, Legal Practice and International Law, 2011, s. 116-121.
Tangör, Burak, “Avrupa Birliği’nde Avrupa insan Hakları Sözleşmesi”, Gazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, Cilt 3, Sayı 1, 2001, s. 233-248. Tekinalp, Ünal - Tekinalp, Gülören, Avrupa Birliği Hukuku, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul, 1987.
Tezcan, Ercüment, Avrupa Birliği Hukuku’nda Birey, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul, 2002.
Toth, Akos, G., “The European Union and Human Rights: The Way Forward”, Common Market Law Review, Cilt 34, 1997, s. 491-529.
Tridimas, Takis, “The Court of Justice and Judicial Activism”, European Law Review, Cilt 21, 1996, s. 199-210.
Tridimas, Takis, General Principles of EU Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006.
Usen, Şelale, “2008/104/EC Sayılı Ödünç İş İlişkisine İlişkin AB Yönergesinin Getirdiği yeni Düzenlemelerin Türkiye Açısından Değerlendirilmesi”, Çalışma ve Toplum Dergisi, Cilt 3, Sayı 26, 2010, s. 169-190.
Voßkuhle, Andreas, “Multilevel Cooperation of the European Constitutional Courts”, European Constitutional Law Review, Cilt 6, 2010, s. 175-198. Warneck, Wiebke, “ECJ Decisions”, Bücker, Andrean - Warneck, Wiebke (Eds.), Viking-Laval-Rüffert: Consequences and Policy Perspectives, European Trade Union Institute, Report 111, ETUI aisbl, Brüksel, 2010, içinde, s. 10.
Weatherill, Stephen, “Whose Internal Market? Companies’ or Workers’, Judges’ or Politicians’”, European Union Studies Association (EUSA) Review, Cilt 24, Sayı 1, 2011, s. 2-5.
Weiler, Joseph, “The Court of Justice On Trial”, Common Market Law Review, Cilt 24, 1987, s. 555-589.
Weiler, Joseph, - Fries, Sybilla, “A Human Rights Policy for the European Community and Union: The Question of Competences”, Alston, Philip (Ed.), The EU and Human Rights Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999, içinde, s. 147-166.
Weiler, Joseph, - Lockhart, Nicolas, “Taking Rights Seriously: The European Court and Its Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence-Part II”, Common Market Law Review, Cilt 32, 1995, s. 579-627.
Young, Alison, “The Charter, Constitution and Human Rights: Is This the Beginning or the End for Human Rights Protections by Community Law?”, European Public Law, Cilt 11, Sayı 2, 2005, s. 219-240.
Zimmer, Reingard, “Labour Market Politics through Jurisprudence: The Influence of the Judgements of the European Court of Justice (Viking, Laval, Rüffert, Luxembourg) on Labour Market Policies“, German Policy Studies, Cilt 7, Sayı 1, 2011, s. 211-234.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Dr. A. Aslı Bilgin This is me

Publication Date

June 1, 2011

Submission Date

-

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2011 Volume: 13 Number: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA92HN96CM

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Bilgin, D. A. A. (2011). Divan’ın İkilemi: Temel Haklar ve Temel Özgürlükler Arasında Denge? Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1), 51-93. https://izlik.org/JA92HN96CM

AMA

1.Bilgin DAA. Divan’ın İkilemi: Temel Haklar ve Temel Özgürlükler Arasında Denge? Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 2011;13(1):51-93. https://izlik.org/JA92HN96CM

Chicago

Bilgin, Dr. A. Aslı. 2011. “Divan’ın İkilemi: Temel Haklar Ve Temel Özgürlükler Arasında Denge?”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 13 (1): 51-93. https://izlik.org/JA92HN96CM.

EndNote

Bilgin DAA (June 1, 2011) Divan’ın İkilemi: Temel Haklar ve Temel Özgürlükler Arasında Denge? Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 13 1 51–93.

IEEE

[1]D. A. A. Bilgin, “Divan’ın İkilemi: Temel Haklar ve Temel Özgürlükler Arasında Denge?”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 51–93, June 2011, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA92HN96CM

ISNAD

Bilgin, Dr. A. Aslı. “Divan’ın İkilemi: Temel Haklar Ve Temel Özgürlükler Arasında Denge?”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 13/1 (June 1, 2011): 51-93. https://izlik.org/JA92HN96CM.

JAMA

1.Bilgin DAA. Divan’ın İkilemi: Temel Haklar ve Temel Özgürlükler Arasında Denge? Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 2011;13:51–93.

MLA

Bilgin, Dr. A. Aslı. “Divan’ın İkilemi: Temel Haklar Ve Temel Özgürlükler Arasında Denge?”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 13, no. 1, June 2011, pp. 51-93, https://izlik.org/JA92HN96CM.

Vancouver

1.Dr. A. Aslı Bilgin. Divan’ın İkilemi: Temel Haklar ve Temel Özgürlükler Arasında Denge? Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi [Internet]. 2011 Jun. 1;13(1):51-93. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA92HN96CM