Systemic validity is generally in conformity with the understanding of
validity adopted by legal officials. On the other hand, it suffers from an inability
to account for why an enactment in conformity with the systemic criteria
constitutes a norm. Axio-systemic validity aims to compensate this deficiency by
introducing a hybrid understanding of validity. While the systemic component
continues the descriptive and explanatory advantages, the minimum axiological
element guarantees that the enactments possess the character of norms. While
axio-systemic validity violates the social fact and sources theses, it is compatible
with the separability thesis. Therefore, it can be conceived of as a positivist
understanding of validity
Systemic validity Axiological validity Legal positivism Reason for action Separability thesis
Primary Language | Turkish |
---|---|
Subjects | Law in Context |
Journal Section | Research Article |
Authors | |
Publication Date | May 24, 2021 |
Submission Date | December 7, 2020 |
Published in Issue | Year 2021 Volume: 23 Issue: 1 |
Dokuz Eylül University Law Review
is indexed and abstracted by
TR-DİZİN, DergiPark, HeinOnline, Academindex, Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory and Asos Index
The Dokuz Eylul Law Review will be published only online starting from the May 2024 issue.
Dokuz Eylul University Publishing House Web Page
https://kutuphane.deu.edu.tr/yayinevi/
İletişim sayfamız
https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/deuhfd/contacts