Research Article

THE SALVATION OF THE PEOPLE OF THE BOOK (CHRISTIANS) AND MUSLIMS: A COMPARISON OF SULEYMAN ATES AND WILFRED CANTWELL SMITH

Number: 40 December 19, 2014
EN TR

THE SALVATION OF THE PEOPLE OF THE BOOK (CHRISTIANS) AND MUSLIMS: A COMPARISON OF SULEYMAN ATES AND WILFRED CANTWELL SMITH

Abstract

Throughout the history the view of religious traditions to each other has been largely negative and exclusionary. However, by the beginning of the modern era, Christian - Muslim communications and relationships make this approaches largely ineffective. In this context, moderate Eastern and Western religios scholars started to devise satisfiying  approaches to compromise the two parties. Two of the most important of these scholars are Suleyman Ates and W. Cantwell Smith, who have made comparisons which critizes the traditional perspectives between Christianity and Islam. They have used different methods in their studies, but have reached the same conclusion that the salvation is possible for both of the People of The Book (the Christians) and the Muslims within their sacred books and in their religious traditions. At this stage, their approaches to some extent disturbed both sides rather than trying to persuade.  Nevertheless these new approaches have great value since they contribute to the Christian and Muslim groups to understand each other correctly and lead future objective researches.

Keywords

The People of The Book,Christian,Muslim,Torah,Bible,Qoran,Salvation

References

  1. Akgündüz, Ahmet, Çan'dan Minare'ye Büyük İtiraf, İstanbul 2010.
  2. Ateş, Süleyman, “Cennet Kimsenin Tekelinde Değildir”, İslami Araştırmalar, Cilt 3, Sayı 1, s. 7-24, Ankara Ocak 1989.
  3. Ateş, Süleyman, Yüce Kur’an’ın Çağdaş Tefsiri, İstanbul 1991.
  4. el-Buharî, Muhammed b. Ali, el-Camiu’s-Sahih, İstanbul tz.
  5. Cragg, Kenneth, The Call of The Minaret, New York 1956.
  6. Cragg, Kenneth, Sandals at The Mosque; Londra-New York 1958.
  7. Erkal, Mehmet, “Cizye”, Diyanet İslam Ansiklopedisi, İstanbul 1993.
  8. Fazlurrahman, Probhecy in Islam: Philosophy and Orthodoxy, Londra-New York, 1958.
  9. Gibb, Hamilton A. R., “Pre-Islamic Monotheism in Arabia”, Harvard Theological Review, 55, 1962.
APA
Erbaş, M. (2014). SÜLEYMAN ATEŞ VE W. CANTWELL SMİTH’E GÖRE EHLİ KİTAB (HRİSTİYANLAR)’IN VE MÜSLÜMANLARIN KURTULUŞU. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 40, 33-68. https://doi.org/10.21054/deuifd.282465
AMA
1.Erbaş M. SÜLEYMAN ATEŞ VE W. CANTWELL SMİTH’E GÖRE EHLİ KİTAB (HRİSTİYANLAR)’IN VE MÜSLÜMANLARIN KURTULUŞU. DEUIFD. 2014;(40):33-68. doi:10.21054/deuifd.282465
Chicago
Erbaş, Muammer. 2014. “SÜLEYMAN ATEŞ VE W. CANTWELL SMİTH’E GÖRE EHLİ KİTAB (HRİSTİYANLAR)’IN VE MÜSLÜMANLARIN KURTULUŞU”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, nos. 40: 33-68. https://doi.org/10.21054/deuifd.282465.
EndNote
Erbaş M (December 1, 2014) SÜLEYMAN ATEŞ VE W. CANTWELL SMİTH’E GÖRE EHLİ KİTAB (HRİSTİYANLAR)’IN VE MÜSLÜMANLARIN KURTULUŞU. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 40 33–68.
IEEE
[1]M. Erbaş, “SÜLEYMAN ATEŞ VE W. CANTWELL SMİTH’E GÖRE EHLİ KİTAB (HRİSTİYANLAR)’IN VE MÜSLÜMANLARIN KURTULUŞU”, DEUIFD, no. 40, pp. 33–68, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.21054/deuifd.282465.
ISNAD
Erbaş, Muammer. “SÜLEYMAN ATEŞ VE W. CANTWELL SMİTH’E GÖRE EHLİ KİTAB (HRİSTİYANLAR)’IN VE MÜSLÜMANLARIN KURTULUŞU”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi. 40 (December 1, 2014): 33-68. https://doi.org/10.21054/deuifd.282465.
JAMA
1.Erbaş M. SÜLEYMAN ATEŞ VE W. CANTWELL SMİTH’E GÖRE EHLİ KİTAB (HRİSTİYANLAR)’IN VE MÜSLÜMANLARIN KURTULUŞU. DEUIFD. 2014;:33–68.
MLA
Erbaş, Muammer. “SÜLEYMAN ATEŞ VE W. CANTWELL SMİTH’E GÖRE EHLİ KİTAB (HRİSTİYANLAR)’IN VE MÜSLÜMANLARIN KURTULUŞU”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, no. 40, Dec. 2014, pp. 33-68, doi:10.21054/deuifd.282465.
Vancouver
1.Muammer Erbaş. SÜLEYMAN ATEŞ VE W. CANTWELL SMİTH’E GÖRE EHLİ KİTAB (HRİSTİYANLAR)’IN VE MÜSLÜMANLARIN KURTULUŞU. DEUIFD. 2014 Dec. 1;(40):33-68. doi:10.21054/deuifd.282465