BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

A RESEARCH ON THE EFFECT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE ON PERCEPTION OF SUPPORT FOR INNOVATION

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2, 145 - 161, 25.12.2012

Öz

The management of organizational climate is fairly important in terms of improving innovation in organizations. For that reason, the aim of this study is to investigate the effects of organizational climate dimensions (organizational encouragement, supervisory support, team support, otonomy, participation flexibility and communication) on perception of support for innovation. Here the aim is trying to help administrators by determining the factors that increase or prevent innovation. Data obtained from 86 enterprises that are operating in Kocaeli is used in order to analyze the relationships among variables. After factor analysis, data is tested through correlation analysis and regression analysis. The findings of research indicate that organizational climate dimensions affect perception of support for innovation.

Kaynakça

  • Abbey Augustus, Dickson W. John, R&D (1983), “Work Climate and Innovation in Semiconductors”, Academy of Management Journal, V:26, No:2.
  • Aiken Michael and Hage Jerald (1971), “ The Organic Organization and Innovation” Sociology, 5(1).
  • Amabile M. Teresa, Conti Regina, Coon Heather, Lazenby Jeffrey and Heron Michael (1996), “Assesing The Work Enviroment for Creativity”, Acedemy of Management Journal, V:39, No:5.
  • Alegrea Joaquin and Chiva Ricardo (2008), “Assessing The Impact Of Organizational Learning Capability On Product Innovation Performance: An Empirical Test”, Technovation, 28.
  • Anderson R. Neil and West A.Michael (1998), “Measuring Climate for Work Group Innovation;Development and Validition of the Team Climate Inventory”, Journal Of Organizational Behavior, V:19, N:3, May.
  • Cummings Anne and Oldham Greg R. (1997),”Enhancing Creativity: Managing Work Contexts For The High Potential Employee”, California Management Review, 40/1.
  • Damanpour Fariborz. (1991) “Organizatinal Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determiants and Moderators”, Academy of Management Journal, 34(3).
  • Damanpour Fariborz and Gopalakrishnan Shanthi., (2001), “The Dynamics Of The Adoption Of Product and Process Innovations In Organizations” Journal of Management Studies, V:38, No:1.
  • Dean Schroeder M., (1990), “A Dynamic Perspective On The Impact Of Process Innovation Upon Competitive Strategies” Strategic Management Journal. V:11, No:1.
  • Dewar Robert D. and Dutton, Jane E. (1986) “The Adoption Of Radical And Incrementa Innovations: An Empirical Analysis “ Management Science, 32/11.
  • Day S. George (1994), “The Capabilities Of Market-Driven Organisations”, Journal Of Marketing, No:58.
  • Dougherty Deborah and Hardy Cynthia (1996), “Sustained Product Innovation In Large, Mature Organizations: Overcoming Innovation-to- Organization Problems”, The Academy of Management Journal, 39/5, Aralık.
  • Eren Erol (1982) , “İşletmelerde Yenilik Politikası”, Formül Matbaası, İstanbul.
  • Gopalakrishnan Shanthi and Damanpour Fariborz (2000), “The Impact Of Organizational Context On Innovation Adoption in Commercial Banks”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Manegement, 47(1).
  • Güleş K. Hasan and Bülbül Hasan (2004), “Toplam Kalite Yönetiminin İşletmelerde Yenilik Çalışmalarına Katkıları”, G.Ü. İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi.
  • Hansen T. Morten and Birkinshaw Julian (2007), “The Innovation Value Chain”, Harvard Business Review, June.
  • Henderson Rebecca and Cockburn Iain (1996), “Scale, Scope and Spill overs: The Determinants Of Research Productivitiy In Drug Discovery”, Rand Journal of Economics, 27(1).
  • Higgins M. James (1995), “Innovation: The Core Competence”, Planning Review, Kasım-Aralık, 23(6).
  • Im Subin, Nakata Cheryl (2008), “Crafting An Environment To Foster Integration In New Product Teams”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, V:25, September.
  • İşcan Ömer Faruk (2002), “Küresel İşletmecilikte Dönüştürücü Liderlik Anlayışı Büyük Ölçekli İşletmelerde Bir Uygulama”, Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Ana Bilim Dalı, Yayımlanmış Doktora Tezi.
  • Judge A.William, Frxell E. Gerald and Doley S. Robert (1997), “The New Task Of RYD Management; Creating Gool-Directed Communuties For Innovotion”, California Management Review, V:39, No:3, Spring.
  • Kimberly J.R. and Evanisko M. (1981), “Organizational Innovation:The Influence of Individual, Organizational and Contextual Factors On Hospital Adoption of Technological and Administrative Innovations” Academy of Management Journal, No:24.
  • Meyer Alan D. and Goes James B. (1988), “Organizational Assimilation of Innovations: A Multilevel Contextual Analysis” Academy of Management Journal, V: 31, No:4,
  • Oldham Greg R. and Cummings Anne (1996),” Employee Creativity: Personal And Contextual Factors At Work”, Academy of Management Journal, 39/3.
  • Prajogo Daniel and Ahmed Pervaiz K. (2006), “Relationships Between Innovation Stimulus, Innovation Capacity, And Innovation Performance”, R&D Management, V:36, No:5.
  • Pritchard, Robert D. and Karasick, Bernard W. (1973) “The Effects of Organizational Climate Satisfaction” Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 9/1. on Managerial Job Performance and Job
  • Reichers, A. E. and Schneider, B. (1990), “Climate and culture: An evolution of constructs”, in B.Schneider (ed.), Organizational culture and climate (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass).
  • Schneider, Benjamin and Reichers, Arnon E., (1983), “On The Etiology Of Climates”, Personnel Psychology, V:36, No:1.
  • Schein, E. H. (1990), “Organizational culture”, American Psychologist, 45, 2.
  • Scott G.Suzanne and Bruce A.Reginald (1994), “Determinants of Innovative Behavior:A Path Model of Individual Innovation In The Workplace”, Academy of Management Journal, 37/3.
  • Van de Ven, Andrew H., (1986), “Central Problems In The Management Of Innovation” Management Science, V: 32, No:5.
  • Wolfe A.Richard (1994), “Organizational Innovation Review, Critique and Suggestesd Research Directions”, Journal of Management Studies, V:31, No:3, May.

ÖRGÜT İKLİMİNİN YENİLİĞE DESTEK ALGISI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİ BELİRLEMEYE YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2, 145 - 161, 25.12.2012

Öz

Örgüt ikliminin yönetimi, organizasyonlarda yeniliğin geliştirilmesi açısından oldukça önemlidir. Bu nedenle, bu çalışmanın amacı örgüt iklimi boyutlarının (örgütsel cesaretlendirme, yönetim desteği, takım desteği, otonomi, katılım esnekliği, iletişim) yeniliğe destek algısı üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektir. Burada amaç, yeniliği artıracak ya da engelleyecek örgüt iklimi faktörlerini belirlemeye çalışarak, işletme yöneticilerine yardımcı olmaktır. Kocaeli bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren 86 işletmeden elde edilen veriler, değişkenler arasındaki ilişkileri incelemek üzere kullanılmıştır. Veriler, faktör analizinden sonra korelasyon analizi ve regresyon modelleri ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma bulguları, örgüt iklimi boyutlarının yeniliğe destek algısını etkilediğini göstermektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Abbey Augustus, Dickson W. John, R&D (1983), “Work Climate and Innovation in Semiconductors”, Academy of Management Journal, V:26, No:2.
  • Aiken Michael and Hage Jerald (1971), “ The Organic Organization and Innovation” Sociology, 5(1).
  • Amabile M. Teresa, Conti Regina, Coon Heather, Lazenby Jeffrey and Heron Michael (1996), “Assesing The Work Enviroment for Creativity”, Acedemy of Management Journal, V:39, No:5.
  • Alegrea Joaquin and Chiva Ricardo (2008), “Assessing The Impact Of Organizational Learning Capability On Product Innovation Performance: An Empirical Test”, Technovation, 28.
  • Anderson R. Neil and West A.Michael (1998), “Measuring Climate for Work Group Innovation;Development and Validition of the Team Climate Inventory”, Journal Of Organizational Behavior, V:19, N:3, May.
  • Cummings Anne and Oldham Greg R. (1997),”Enhancing Creativity: Managing Work Contexts For The High Potential Employee”, California Management Review, 40/1.
  • Damanpour Fariborz. (1991) “Organizatinal Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determiants and Moderators”, Academy of Management Journal, 34(3).
  • Damanpour Fariborz and Gopalakrishnan Shanthi., (2001), “The Dynamics Of The Adoption Of Product and Process Innovations In Organizations” Journal of Management Studies, V:38, No:1.
  • Dean Schroeder M., (1990), “A Dynamic Perspective On The Impact Of Process Innovation Upon Competitive Strategies” Strategic Management Journal. V:11, No:1.
  • Dewar Robert D. and Dutton, Jane E. (1986) “The Adoption Of Radical And Incrementa Innovations: An Empirical Analysis “ Management Science, 32/11.
  • Day S. George (1994), “The Capabilities Of Market-Driven Organisations”, Journal Of Marketing, No:58.
  • Dougherty Deborah and Hardy Cynthia (1996), “Sustained Product Innovation In Large, Mature Organizations: Overcoming Innovation-to- Organization Problems”, The Academy of Management Journal, 39/5, Aralık.
  • Eren Erol (1982) , “İşletmelerde Yenilik Politikası”, Formül Matbaası, İstanbul.
  • Gopalakrishnan Shanthi and Damanpour Fariborz (2000), “The Impact Of Organizational Context On Innovation Adoption in Commercial Banks”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Manegement, 47(1).
  • Güleş K. Hasan and Bülbül Hasan (2004), “Toplam Kalite Yönetiminin İşletmelerde Yenilik Çalışmalarına Katkıları”, G.Ü. İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi.
  • Hansen T. Morten and Birkinshaw Julian (2007), “The Innovation Value Chain”, Harvard Business Review, June.
  • Henderson Rebecca and Cockburn Iain (1996), “Scale, Scope and Spill overs: The Determinants Of Research Productivitiy In Drug Discovery”, Rand Journal of Economics, 27(1).
  • Higgins M. James (1995), “Innovation: The Core Competence”, Planning Review, Kasım-Aralık, 23(6).
  • Im Subin, Nakata Cheryl (2008), “Crafting An Environment To Foster Integration In New Product Teams”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, V:25, September.
  • İşcan Ömer Faruk (2002), “Küresel İşletmecilikte Dönüştürücü Liderlik Anlayışı Büyük Ölçekli İşletmelerde Bir Uygulama”, Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Ana Bilim Dalı, Yayımlanmış Doktora Tezi.
  • Judge A.William, Frxell E. Gerald and Doley S. Robert (1997), “The New Task Of RYD Management; Creating Gool-Directed Communuties For Innovotion”, California Management Review, V:39, No:3, Spring.
  • Kimberly J.R. and Evanisko M. (1981), “Organizational Innovation:The Influence of Individual, Organizational and Contextual Factors On Hospital Adoption of Technological and Administrative Innovations” Academy of Management Journal, No:24.
  • Meyer Alan D. and Goes James B. (1988), “Organizational Assimilation of Innovations: A Multilevel Contextual Analysis” Academy of Management Journal, V: 31, No:4,
  • Oldham Greg R. and Cummings Anne (1996),” Employee Creativity: Personal And Contextual Factors At Work”, Academy of Management Journal, 39/3.
  • Prajogo Daniel and Ahmed Pervaiz K. (2006), “Relationships Between Innovation Stimulus, Innovation Capacity, And Innovation Performance”, R&D Management, V:36, No:5.
  • Pritchard, Robert D. and Karasick, Bernard W. (1973) “The Effects of Organizational Climate Satisfaction” Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 9/1. on Managerial Job Performance and Job
  • Reichers, A. E. and Schneider, B. (1990), “Climate and culture: An evolution of constructs”, in B.Schneider (ed.), Organizational culture and climate (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass).
  • Schneider, Benjamin and Reichers, Arnon E., (1983), “On The Etiology Of Climates”, Personnel Psychology, V:36, No:1.
  • Schein, E. H. (1990), “Organizational culture”, American Psychologist, 45, 2.
  • Scott G.Suzanne and Bruce A.Reginald (1994), “Determinants of Innovative Behavior:A Path Model of Individual Innovation In The Workplace”, Academy of Management Journal, 37/3.
  • Van de Ven, Andrew H., (1986), “Central Problems In The Management Of Innovation” Management Science, V: 32, No:5.
  • Wolfe A.Richard (1994), “Organizational Innovation Review, Critique and Suggestesd Research Directions”, Journal of Management Studies, V:31, No:3, May.
Toplam 32 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA38AU87VN
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Gönül Kaya Özbağ Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 25 Aralık 2012
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2012 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Özbağ, G. K. (2012). ÖRGÜT İKLİMİNİN YENİLİĞE DESTEK ALGISI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİ BELİRLEMEYE YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(2), 145-161.
AMA Özbağ GK. ÖRGÜT İKLİMİNİN YENİLİĞE DESTEK ALGISI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİ BELİRLEMEYE YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. Aralık 2012;27(2):145-161.
Chicago Özbağ, Gönül Kaya. “ÖRGÜT İKLİMİNİN YENİLİĞE DESTEK ALGISI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİ BELİRLEMEYE YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 27, sy. 2 (Aralık 2012): 145-61.
EndNote Özbağ GK (01 Aralık 2012) ÖRGÜT İKLİMİNİN YENİLİĞE DESTEK ALGISI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİ BELİRLEMEYE YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 27 2 145–161.
IEEE G. K. Özbağ, “ÖRGÜT İKLİMİNİN YENİLİĞE DESTEK ALGISI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİ BELİRLEMEYE YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 27, sy. 2, ss. 145–161, 2012.
ISNAD Özbağ, Gönül Kaya. “ÖRGÜT İKLİMİNİN YENİLİĞE DESTEK ALGISI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİ BELİRLEMEYE YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 27/2 (Aralık 2012), 145-161.
JAMA Özbağ GK. ÖRGÜT İKLİMİNİN YENİLİĞE DESTEK ALGISI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİ BELİRLEMEYE YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2012;27:145–161.
MLA Özbağ, Gönül Kaya. “ÖRGÜT İKLİMİNİN YENİLİĞE DESTEK ALGISI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİ BELİRLEMEYE YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 27, sy. 2, 2012, ss. 145-61.
Vancouver Özbağ GK. ÖRGÜT İKLİMİNİN YENİLİĞE DESTEK ALGISI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİ BELİRLEMEYE YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2012;27(2):145-61.