A Research on Raising Work Well-Being Awareness and Developing Strategy in The Work Environment

Year 2024, , 200 - 210, 27.05.2024

Emre Yaşar , Muharrem Kemal Özfırat

https://doi.org/10.21205/deufmd.2024267702

Abstract

The term of wellbeing has been used extensively in the literature over the years, and there is a broad diagnosis that it is very effective in terms of both the health of workers and the productivity and profitability of the work. Workplace wellbeing concerns all aspects of the work environment such as safety&healty working environment, how employees feel their work, and the work organization. The aim of the measures to be taken for wellbeing in the workplace is to complete OHS measures to ensure that workers are safe, healthy, satisfied and engaged in the work. The aim of this study was to raise awareness about working welfare for workers working in a petrochemical factory. It is assumed that all white-collar employees working in the petrochemical factory in Aliağa, İzmir represent the universe. In the research, data were collected by answering the questions in the interview form. It is assumed that the employees answered these questions correctly. The study was completed with a total of 50 people. As a result of the study, the three most important work well-being issues to focus on were determined as stress (45.5%), ergonomics (37.3%) and a healthy working environment (31%), respectively.

Keywords

Occupational health, Work Welfare, Occupational Safety

Çalışma Ortamında Çalışma Refahı Farkındalığını Artırma ve Strateji Geliştirme Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Abstract

“İş yerinde refah” terimi, yıllar içerisinde literatürde yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır ve hem işçilerin sağlığı hem de işin verimliliği ve karlılığı açısından çok etkili olduğu konusunda geniş bir tanı vardır. İşyeri Refahı; çalışma ortamının, fiziksel ortamın kalitesi ve güvenliğinden, çalışanların işlerini nasıl hissettikleri, çalışma ortamları, çalışma ortamı ve iş organizasyonu ile ilgili tüm yönleriyle ilgilidir. İşyerinde refah için alınacak önlemlerin amacı, işçilerin güvenli, sağlıklı, memnun ve iş ile meşgul olmalarını sağlamak için İSG önlemlerini tamamlamaktır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, petrokimya ürünleri üreten bir fabrikada çalışan işçilere yönelik çalışma refahı ile ilgili farkındalığı arttırmak amacıyla yapılmıştır. İzmir ili Aliağa ilçesinde bulunan petrokimya üreten fabrikada çalışan tüm beyaz yakalı çalışanların evreni temsil ettiği varsayılmaktadır. Araştırmada veriler görüşme formunda bulunan soruların cevaplandırılmasıyla toplanmıştır. Çalışanların bu sorulara doğru cevap verdiği varsayılmıştır. Toplam 50 kişi ile çalışma tamamlanmıştır. Yapılan çalışma sonucunda odaklanılması gereken en önemli üç çalışma refahı konusu sırasıyla stres (%45,5), ergonomi (%37,3) ve sağlıklı çalışma ortamı (%31) olarak tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

İş sağlığı, Çalışma Refahı, İş Güvenliği

References

• Cameron, E., Mathers, J., Parry, J. 2006. Health and wellbeing’: Questioning the use of health concepts in public health policy and practice. Critical Public Health, 16(4), 347–354. DOI: 10.1080/09581590601128166
• Larson, J. S. 1999. The conceptualization of health. Medical Care Research and Review, 56(2), 123–136. DOI: 10.1177/107755879905600201
• Galvin, K., Todres, L. 2011. Kinds of well-being: A conceptual framework that provides direction for caring. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 6(4), 10362. DOI: 10.3402/qhw.v6i4.10362
• Medin, J., Alexanderson, K. 2001. Health and healh promotion – A literature study. Lund, Swedish: Studentlitteratur.
• ILO, 2019. International Labor Organisation
• Donnachie, I. 2000. Robert Owen: Owen of New Lanark and New Harmony. Edinburgh: Tuckwell Press.
• Thackrah, C. T. 1832. The effects of the principal arts, trades, and professions, and of civic states and habits of living, on health and longevity: With a particular reference to the trades and manufacturers of Leeds, and suggestions for the removal of many of the agents, which produce diseases, and shorten the du ration of life. From the London ed., with improvements. London: Porter.
• Owens, D. M. 2006. EAPs for a diverse world: Employers that provide culturally competent employee assistance programs show employees they care. HR Magazine, 51(10), 91–96.
• Reardon, J. 1998. The history and impact of worksite wellness. Nursing Economics, 16(3), 117–121.
• DeJoy, M., Southern, J. 1993. An integrative perspective on worksite health promotion. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 35(12), 1221–1229.
• Greiner, P. 1987. Nursing and worksite wellness: Missing the boat. Holistic Nursing Practice, 2(1), 53–60.
• Call, C., Gerdes, R., Robinson, K. 2009. Health and wellness research study: Corporate and worksite wellness programs: A research review focused on individuals with disabilities (Government Contract Number: DOLU089428186). Gaithersburg, MD: Social Dynamics, LLC. Retrievedfrom:http://www.dol.gov/odep/research/CorporateWellnessResearchLiteratureReview.pdf
• Pencak, M. 1991. Workplace health promotion programs: An overview. The Nursing Clinics of North America, 26(1), 233–240. DOI: 10.1016/S0029-6465(22)03020-1
• Hughes, M. C., Patrick, D. L., Hannon, P. A., Harris, J. R., Ghosh, D. L. 2011. Understanding the decision-making process for health promotion programming at small to midsized businesses. Health Promotion Practice, 12(4),512. DOI:10.1177/1524839909349162
• Wieczner J. 2013. Your company wants to make you healthy. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323393304578360252284151378
• McPeck, W., Ryan, M., Chapman, L. S. 2009. Bringing wellness to the small employer. American Journal of Health Promotion, 23(5), 1–10. DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.23.5.tahp
• Carter, M., Gaskins, S., Shaw, L. 2005. Employee wellness program in a small rural industry: Employee evaluation. AAOHN Journal, 53(6), 244–248.
• Burke, B. 2006. Public policy options for small employer health insurance. North Carolina Medical Journal, 67(3), 222–224.
• Divine, R. 2005. Determinants of small business interest in offering a wellness program to their employees. Health Marketing Quarterly, 22(3), 43–58. DOI: 10.1300/J026v22n03_04
• Yörük, E., Çam, N. F., Öztürk, B. C. 2021. Güvenli Çalışma Ortamları İçin Radyasyon Riskinin Değerlendirilmesi. DEUFMD, 23(68), 357-367.