Atık Kot ile Güçlendirilmiş Zeminin CBR Değerinin Laboratuvarda İncelenmesi

Abstract

Kirliliği önlemek, sürdürülebilir çözümleri ve döngüsel ekonomiyi teşvik etmek için atık malzemelerin zeminlerin güçlendirilmesinde kullanımı araştırılmalıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, atık kotun zemin güçlendirmesi üzerindeki etkisini araştırmaktır. Bu amaçla, atık kot bir bütün olarak ve parçalar halinde kum zemine eklenerek Kaliforniya Taşıma Oranı (CBR) deneyleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Deney sonuçları CBR değerleri ve yük-deformasyon davranışı açısından güçlendirilmemiş örnekler ile karşılaştırılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Yük taşıma kapasitesi ve CBR değeri açısından, zeminin atık kot ile güçlendirilmesi, güçlendirilmemiş duruma kıyasla performansı artırmıştır. Zeminin atık kot ile güçlendirilmesi, yük taşıma kapasitesini en fazla 9,8 kat, CBR değerini ise en fazla 4,2 kat artırmıştır. Sonuçlar, atık kotun zemin güçlendirmesi için kullanılabilirliği konusunda umut vericidir.

Keywords

• Atık kot
• CBR değeri
• Yük deformasyon davranışı
• Zemin güçlendirmesi

A Laboratory Examination of CBR Value of Soil Reinforced with Waste Denim

Abstract

The utilization of waste materials for the reinforcement of soils should be investigated in order to prevent pollution and encourage sustainable solutions and a circular economy. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of waste denim on soil reinforcement. For this purpose, California Bearing Ratio (CBR) experiments were performed by adding the waste denim as a whole and in pieces on sand soil. The results of the tests were assessed with regard to CBR values and load-displacement behavior by comparing them with unreinforced test specimens. In terms of load-bearing capacity and CBR value, the reinforcement of the soil with waste denim improved the performance compared to the unreinforced condition. Reinforcement of the soil with waste denim increased the load-bearing capacity by a maximum of 9.8 times and the CBR value by a maximum of 4.2 times. The results are promising about the usability of waste denim for soil reinforcement.

Keywords

• Waste denim
• CBR value
• Load-displacement behavior
• Soil reinforcement

References

1. [1] Öztürk, M., Kayadelen, C., Altay, G., Önal, Y., 2023. Investigation of load-displacement behavior of cement-coated geotextile reinforced sandy soils. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Vol. 12(4), pp. 1232–1238. DOI: 10.28948/ngmuh.1286185.
2. [2] Önal, Y., Çalışıcı, M., Kayadelen, C., Altay, G., 2023. A comparative experimental study of geocell and geogrid-reinforced highway base layers under repeated loads. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 24(12), pp. 2877–2892. DOI: 10.1080/14680629.2023.2182126.
3. [3] Öztürk, M., Altay, G., Kayadelen, C., 2024. Assessment of the utilization of cement-treated geotextile as a reinforcement element for highway base layer under cyclic loading. Transportation Geotechnics, Vol. 48. DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101333.
4. [4] Bağriaçik, B., 2017. Soil stabilization with lime at transportation structure’s base/subbase. Çukurova University Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Vol. 32, pp. 39–48. DOI: 10.21605/cukurovaummfd.310049.
5. [5] Balkıs, A.P., Macid, S., 2019. Effect of cement amount on CBR values of different soil. European Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 16, pp. 809–815. DOI: 10.31590/ejosat.588990.
6. [6] Ceylan Bora, N., Kayadelen, C., Altay, G., Önal, Y., Öztürk, M., 2022. Comparative effectiveness research of palm tree pruning waste and geotextiles on subgrade stabilization. Građevinar, Vol. 74(10), pp. 829–839. DOI: 10.14256/JCE.3401.2021.
7. [7] Kaplan, E., Kayadelen, C., Öztürk, M., Önal, Y., Altay, G., 2022. Experimental evaluation of the usability of palm tree pruning waste (PTPW) as an alternative to geotextile. Revista de La Construcción, Vol. 21(1), pp. 69–82. DOI: 10.7764/RDLC.21.1.69.
8. [8] Öztürk, M., Önal, Y., Ok, B., Altay, G., Beycioğlu, A., Keskin, A., 2021. Load-displacement behavior of serpentine and olivine obtained as waste from the mines. International Conference on Engineering, Natural and Applied Science 2021 (ICENAS’21), pp. 166–173.

9. [9] Öztürk, M., 2024. Strength characteristics of lightweight soil with waste modified expanded polystyrene particles. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 442. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137635.
10. [10] Talukdar, D.K., 2014. A study of correlation between California Bearing Ratio (CBR) value with other properties of soil. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, Vol. 4(559), p. 562.
11. [11] Taskiran, T., 2010. Prediction of California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of fine grained soils by AI methods. Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 41(6), pp. 886–892. DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2010.01.003.
12. [12] Geçkil, T., Sarıcı, T., Karabaş, B., 2021. Effect of black carbon stabilized subgrade soil on road flexible pavement cost. European Journal of Science and Technology. DOI: 10.31590/ejosat.862682.
13. [13] Geçkil, T., Sarici, T., Yildiran, E.S., 2019. Improvement of strength of a clay soil with lime addition. Vol. 34.
14. [14] Merve, E., Kahraman, O., Batuhan, E.A., Türedi, Y., Örnek, M., 2019. Investigation of CBR value in rubber waste added soils. Osmaniye Korkut Ata University Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, Vol. 2(1), pp. 41–44.
15. [15] ASTM D2487, 2006. Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
16. [16] ASTM D6913, 2006. Standard Test Methods for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Soils Using Sieve Analysis. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
17. [17] Pinho-Lopes, M., 2022. Sand reinforced with recycled cotton textiles from waste blue-jeans: Stress–strain response. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, Vol. 8(5). DOI: 10.1007/s40891-022-00404-z.
18. [18] Önal, Y., Öztürk, M., Altay, G., Kayadelen, C., 2022. Comparison of the effect of geotextile and palm tree pruning waste on CBR value of sand soil. Osmaniye Korkut Ata University Journal of The Institute of Science and Technology, Vol. 5(2), pp. 570–579. DOI: 10.47495/okufbed.998633.
19. [19] ASTM D1883, 2016. Standard Test Method for California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of Laboratory-Compacted Soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
20. [20] Giroud, J.P., Han, J., 2004. Design method for geogrid-reinforced unpaved roads. I. Development of design method. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 130(8), pp. 775–786. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2004)130:8(775).
21. [21] Zhou, H., Wen, X., 2008. Model studies on geogrid- or geocell-reinforced sand cushion on soft soil. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 26(3), pp. 231–238. DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.10.002.
22. [22] Dash, S.K., Krishnaswamy, N.R., Rajagopal, K., 2001. Bearing capacity of strip footings supported on geocell-reinforced sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 19(4), pp. 235–256. DOI: 10.1016/S0266-1144(01)00006-1.