SUPPORTING HAZAR LAKE FOR LIFE WATER WITH PUMPED STORAGE HEPP

Abstract

Non-storage water power plants that will be built according to the law no. 4628 and 5346 will hold a big place in installed power of Turkey. The energy that is produced in these plants will not be consumed and energy lost will emerge because energy storage is not possible. This energy that is not stored in the form of electricity will be stored in the form of water at the time that demand is little and price is low and this water converted to electricity will be put in use at the time that demand is high. In 01 July 2006 and 12 January 2012, Bursa natural gas plant that has an installed capacity of 1210 MW broke down and electricity cuts occurred in Marmara Region because there is no any pumped storage system that will supply peak energy demand in Turkey.In this paper, a pre-feasibility study for pumped storage HEPP that Turkey has not had yet and is built to ensure security of energy supply and price equilibrium is made. The pumped storage facilities and firm energy capacity of Hazar Lake that has features like large reservoir capacity, a lot of economic benefits and ease of construction is investigated and profitability study is made.

Keywords

• Pumped storage HEPP, Hydroelectric energy, Power tunnel

HAZAR GÖLÜ CANSUYU VE POMPAJ DEPOLAMALI HES PROJESİ

Abstract

hold a big place in installed power of Turkey. The energy that is produced in these plants will not be consumed and energy lost will emerge because energy storage is not possible. This energy that is not stored in the form of electricity will be stored in the form of water at the time that demand is little and price is low and this water converted to electricity will be put in use at the time that demand is high. In 01 July 2006 and 12 January 2012, Bursa natural gas plant that has an installed capacity of 1210 MW broke down and electricity cuts occurred in Marmara Region because there is no any pumped storage system that will supply peak energy demand in Turkey.In this paper, a pre-feasibility study for pumped storage HEPP that Turkey has not had yet and is built to ensure security of energy supply and price equilibrium is made. The pumped storage facilities and firm energy capacity of Hazar Lake that has features like large reservoir capacity, a lot of economic benefits and ease of construction is investigated and profitability study is made

Keywords

• Pompaj depolamalı HES, Hidroelektrik enerji, Enerji tüneli

References

1. BİB (2011): “Bayındırlık ve İskan Bakanlığı Birim Fiyat Tarifleri Kitabı”.
2. Çetin H., Güneyli H., Mayer L. (2003): “Paleoseismology of the Palu-Lake Hazar Segment of the East Anatolian Fault Zone”, Turkey, Tectonophysics, Cilt 374, s.163-197.
3. Çoban F. (2007): “Hazar Gölü Su Kalitesinin Araştırılması”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fırat Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
4. Doğru M., Külahcı F. (2004): “Iso-Radioactivity Curves of the Water of the Hazar Lake”, Elazig, Turkey, Journal of Radioanaltical and Nuclear Chemistry, Cilt 260, No. 3, s.557- 562.
5. DSİ (1971): “Elazığ-Uluova Sulama Projesi”, Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı, DSİ Genel Müdürlüğü İşletme ve Bakım Dairesi Başkanlığı Yayınları: Ankara.
6. DSİ (1993): “Elazığ Hatunköy Projesi Planlama Raporu”.
7. GEPA : http://www.eie.gov.tr/MyCalculator/Default.aspx.
8. Kuan T. (1989): “Basic Planning Analysis of Pumped-Storage”, Doktora Tezi, Colorado State University, USA: Civil Engineering Department.

9. Külahcı F., Özer A. B., Doğru M. (2006): “Prediction of the Radioactivity in Hazar Lake (Sivrice, Turkey) by Artificial Neural Networks”, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Cilt 269, No. 1, s.63-68.
10. Ramage J. (2000): “Hydroelectricity”, in Renewable Energy, Power for a Sustainable Future, Oxford University Press: Glasgow; s.183–226.
11. Tatar Y., Turan M., Aksoy E. (1995): “Hazar Gölünün Oluşumu ve Jeolojik Özellikleri”, 1. Hazar Gölü ve Çevresi Sempozyumu Bildiriler,Sivrice Kaymakamlığı Yayın No: 2, s.1- 13, Sivrice.
12. TEDAŞ : “Tükiye Elektrik Enerjisi Üretim Projeksiyonu 2008-2017”.
13. Ter-Cazarian A. (1994): “In: Energy Storage for Power Systems”, 1st ed. London: Peter Peregrinus Ltd. on behalf of the IEE.
14. Tuna M. C. (2011): “Feasibility Assessment of Hydroelectric Power Plant in Ungauged River Basin A Case Study Cardakli HEPP”, AJSE, Springer. Accept. In press. SEMBOLLER N: Güç (KWh) W:Enerji (KWh/saat) Q. Debi (m3/s) T: Zaman (Saat)
15. HES: Hidroelektrik santral
16. PHES: Pompaj depolamalı didroelektrik santral
17. H: Düşü yüksekliği (m) Hk: Düşü Kaybı (m)
18. Hnet: Net düşü Hb: Brüt düşü
19. HKT: Enerji tünelinde yük kaybı (m) D: Çap (m)
20. R: Hidrolik yarıçap A: Alan (m2)
21. F: Denge Bacası Alanı (m2)
22. Yk: Kabarma yüksekliği (m)
23. Ymaks: Maksimum kabarma yüksekliği (m) L: Boy (m)
24. Lc: Cebri boru uzunluğu (m)
25. fh : Kazı Fiyatı (TL/m3)
26. fe : Elektirk satış fiyatı (TL/KWh)
27. α : Amortisman yıllık payı
28. Mh : Kazı toplam maliyeti (TL) V: Hız (m/s) J: Eğim
29. k: pürüzlülük katsayısı
30. g: Yer çekimi ivmesi (m/s2)
31. Me : Elektrik toplam maliyeti (TL)
32. ∑M : Son maliyet (TL)