ARRANGEMENT OF PROTECTIVE SHELTERS AND WALKING PLATFORMS IN ARCHEOLOGICAL SITES

Abstract

In the case when the cultural and historical values that are founded by the excavations are movable cultural assests like sculptures, they are carried to the museums to be exhibited after a serious conservation process. But in the contrary situation, the inmovable cultural assests have to be preserved within the site. The context of this study is to discuss the principles, needs, design and application process of the “Preservation Roofs-Shelters” and “Walking Platforms” which are produced for obtaining the purpose of protecting the cultural assets, and exhibiting them in situ, on site.

Keywords

• Protective Shelters, Conservation of Archeological Sites

ARKEOLOJİK ALANLARDA KORUMA ÇATILARI VE GEZİ PLATFORMLARININ DÜZENLENMESİ KRİTERLERİ

Abstract

movable cultural assests like sculptures, they are carried to the museums to be exhibited after a serious conservation process. But in the contrary situation, the inmovable cultural assests have to be preserved within the site. The context of this study is to discuss the principles, needs, design and application process of the “Preservation Roofs-Shelters” and “Walking Platforms” which are produced for obtaining the purpose of protecting the cultural assets, and exhibiting them in situ, on site

Keywords

• Koruma Çatıları, Arkeolojik Alanların Korunması

References

1. Z. Ahunbay (1999): “Tarihi Çevre Koruma ve Restorasyon”, İstanbul, Yapı Endüstri merkezi yayınları.
2. M. Bachmann (2006): “The Shelter over Bau Z in Pergamon”, Z. Ahunbay, Ü. İzmirligil içinde, Management and Preservation of Archeological Sites, İstanbul: Yapı Endüstri M., sf. 40-44.
3. D. C. Çamurcuoğlu (2008): “Construction of the New Shelter”, Haziran 2008, tarihinde Çatalhöyük Archieve Report 2007. adresinden alındı.
4. C. Doumas, N . Fintikakis (2007): “ Replacement of the Shelter-Conservation, Arrangement, and Enhancement of the Archaeological Site at Akrotiri”, 9 Mart 2007 tarihinde www.santorini.net/94.html. adresinden alındı.
5. V. Graeve (2005): 2001-2003 Milet Çalışmaları, 26. kazı sonuçları toplantısı, Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Dösim Basımevi, sf. 207-222.
6. O. Hauselmayer (2000): “Mimarlık ve Proje Gelişimi”, E. Wien içinde, Efes için bir çatı Yamaç Ev 2 koruma Binası, Viyana: Österreichisches Archaologisches Institut., sf. 101-114.
7. F. Krizinger (2000): “The Terrace Houses in Ephesos: The new Shelter”, Z. Ahunbay, Ü. İzmirligil içinde, Management and Preservation of Archeological Sites, İstanbul: Yapı- Endüstri Merkezi Yayınları, sf. 36-39.
8. V. Tokyay (2002): “ Tarihi Kentlerde Kentsel Mekan Verona-Müze Şehir”, Ege Mimarlık, sf. 37-41.

9. M. Uluengin (2006): “Mimari Metaller Özellikleri, Bozulma Nedenleri, Koruma ve Restorasyon Teknikleri”, İstanbul: Birsen Yayınevi.
10. E. Wunderer (2000): “Koruma Binası Hakkında Klimatoloik Düşünceler”, E. Wien içinde, Efes için bir çatı Yamaç Ev 2 Koruma Binası, Viyana: Österreichisches Archaologisches Institut., sf. 115-122.