Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ESKİ TERÖRİZM, YENİ TERÖRİZM: 9/11 VE ESKİMEYEN TERÖRİZM SÖYLEMİ

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 2, 275 - 298, 17.08.2018
https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.333616

Öz

Bu
makalede “yeni terörizm” kavramı eleştirel olarak analiz edilmektedir. 11 Eylül
2001 Saldırıları’nı (9/11) takip eden süreçte yeni terörizm kavramı bir siyasal
söyleme dönüşerek, Batılı toplumlarda da doğal biçimde içkin olarak var olan
yıkıcı şiddeti maskelemek ve yenidenyeryurt sahibi yapmak için kullanılmıştır.
Bu argüman bağlamında, Batılı devletlerin küresel terörizm söylemi ve terörle
mücadele politikaları ele alınarak yeni terörizm üzerine mevcut yaklaşımlar
sorunsallaştırılacak ve aşındırılmaya çalışılacaktır. Bu makaleyle, Türkiye’de
eksikliği görülen eleştirel terörizm çalışmalarına; ilk olarak yeni terörizmin
önce akademik alanda ortaya çıktığı ve daha sonra Batılı devletlerin tekeline
almaya çalıştığı bir siyasal söyleme sıkıştığı savunularak katkıda bulunulması
amaçlanmaktadır. İkinci olarak, yeni terörizmin siyasallaşmasına bağlı olarak
analitik değerini kaybettiği savunulmaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Akay, A. (1996). Yersiz-yurdsuzlaşma üzerine. Toplum-Bilim Dergisi, 5, (Gilles Deleuze Özel Sayısı): 15-18.
  • Aydınlı, E. (2008). Before jihadists there were anarchists: A failed case of transnational violence. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 31 (10): 903-923.
  • Bin Ladin, U. (2001). FBIS report: Compilation of Usama Bin Ladin Statements, 1994 – January 2004. (21 Ekim 2001). http://www.fas.org/irp/world/para/ubl-fbis.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 24.7.2017).
  • Bozaslan, H. (2014). Ortadoğu: Bir şiddet tarihi (Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nun sonundan El-Kaide’ye). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Brown, C. (2007). The new terrorism debate. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, 6 (3): 28-43.
  • Burnett, J. ve Whyte, D. (2005). Embedded expertise and the new terrorism. Journal for Crime, Conflict and the Media, 1 (4): 1-18.
  • Bush, G. W. (2001). Address to joint session of congress and the American people. (20.9.2001) http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010920-8.html, (Erişim Tarihi: 22.7.2017).
  • Bush, G. W. (2001). President’s remarks at National Day of Prayer and Remembrance. (14.9.2001) https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010914-2.html (Erişim Tarihi: 23.7.2017).
  • Chailand, G. (2015). Il n’y a rien à négocier avec les islamistes. (22 Kasım 2015), Libération, http://www.liberation.fr/planete/2015/11/22/gerard-chaliandil-n-y-a-rien-a-negocier-avec-les-islamistes_1415309, (Erişim Tarihi: 9.7.2017).
  • CNN (2017). Deadliest mass shootings in modern US history: Fast facts, 10.11.2017, http://edition.cnn.com/2013/09/16/us/20-deadliest-mass-shootings-in-u-s-history-fast-facts/index.html, (Erişim Tarihi: 16.1.2017)
  • Copeland, T. (2001). Is the ‘new terrorism’ really new? An analysis of the new paradigm for terrorism. The Journal of Conflict Studies, 21 (2): 91-105.
  • Crenshaw, M. (2007), The debate over “new” vs. “old” terrorism. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
  • Croft, S. ve Moore, C. (2010). The evolution of threat narratives in the age of terror: understanding terrorist threats in Britain, International Affairs, 86 (4): 821-835.
  • Deleuze, G. (1995a). On A thousand plateaus. M. Joughin (Çev.) Negotitations: İçinde 25-34. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (1995b). Three questions on Six Times Two. M. Joughin (Çev.) Negotitations: İçinde 37-45. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Deleuze, G. ve Guattari, F. (1982). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. R. Hurley vd. (Çev.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Deleuze, G. ve Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. B. Massumi (Çev.). Londra: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Deleuze, G. ve Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? H. Tomlinson ve G. Burchell (Çev.). New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Deleuze, G. ve Parnet, C. (1987). Dialogues. H. Tomlinson ve B. Habberjam (Çev.). New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Der Derian, J. (1997). Post-theory: The eternal return of ethics in international relations. M. Doyle ve J. Ikenberry (Der.). New Thinking in International Relations Theory:İçinde 55-75. New York: Westview Press.
  • Duyvesteyn, I. (2004). How new is the new terrorism?. Studies in Conlict & Terrorism, 27 (5): 439-454.
  • Field, A. (2009). The ‘new terrorism’: revolution or evolution?. Political Studies Review, 7 (2): 195-207.
  • Fielding, N. (2008). Al Qaeda’s propaganda war. Perspectives on radicalisation and political violence: Papers from the first international conference on radicalisation and political violence:İçinde 15-19. Londra: ICSR.
  • Gelvin, J. L. (2008). Al-Qaeda and anarchism: A historians reply to terrorology. Terrorism and Political Violence, 20 (4): 563-581.
  • Genet, J. (2008). Açık düşman. S. Dolanoğlu (Çev.), İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
  • Gofas, A. (2012). ‘Old’ vs. ‘new’ terrorism: What's in a name?. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 8 (32): 17-32.
  • Hindess, B. (2006). Terrortory. Alternatives, 31: 243–257.
  • Hofman, B. (1998). Inside terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Jackson, R. (2005a). Language, power and politics: Critical discourse analysis and the war on terrorism. 49th Parallel, Güz (15): 1-17.
  • Jackson, R. (2005b). Writing the war on terrorism: Language, politics and counter-terrorism. New York: Manchester University Press.
  • Jackson, R. (2012). The study of terrorism 10 years after 9/11: Successes, issues, challenges. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 8 (2): 1-16.
  • Jenkins, B. M. (1974). International terrorism: A new kind of warfare. The Rand Paper Series: 1-12.
  • Krueger, A. B. (2007). What makes a terrorist: Economics and the roots of terrorism. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Kurtuluş, E. N. (2011). The new terrorism and its critics. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 34 (6): 476-500.
  • Lahoud, N. (2011). Barry Hindess’s ‘‘territorial fundamentalism’’: Goliath without David?. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 36 (1): 72-78.
  • Laqueur, W. (1999). The new terroism: Fanaticism and the arms of mass destruction. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Lesser, I. O. (vd.) (1999). Countering the new Terrorism, Washington: RAND.
  • Lynch, O. ve Ryder, C. (2012). Deadliness, organisational change and suicide attacks: understanding the assumptions inherent in the use of the term ‘new terrorism’. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 5 (2): 257-275.
  • Mannik, E. (2009). Terrorism: Its past, present and future prospects. Saumet, A. (Der.) Religion and Politics in Multicultural Europe: Perspectives and Challenges: İçinde 151-171. Tartu: Tartu University Press.
  • Martin, G. (2010). Understanding terrorism: challenges, perspectives, and issues. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  • Morgan, M. J. (2004). The origins of the new terrorism. Parameters: U.S. Army War College, 34 (1): 29-43.
  • Neumann, P. (2009). Old and new terrorism: Late modernity, globalization and the transformation of political violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • New York Times (2014). Japanese men were planning to fight for ISIS, police say. (6.10.2014). https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/07/world/asia/japanese-men-were-planning-to-fight-for-isis-police-say.html, (Erişim Tarihi: 2.7.2017).
  • Radikal. (2015). 60 bin dolar maaş alan atom mühendisi IŞİD'e giderken yakalandı. http://www.radikal.com.tr/turkiye/60-bin-dolar-maas-alan-atom-muhendisi-iside-giderken-yakalandi-1477138/ (Erişim Tarihi: 4.8.2017).
  • Ramsay, G. (2015). Why terrorism can, but should not be defined. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 8 (2): 211-228.
  • Randal, J. (2005). Osama: The making of a terrorist. New York: I. B. Tauris.
  • Rapoport, D. C. (1984). Fear and trembling: Terrorism in three religious traditions. The American Political Science Review, 78 (3): 658-677.
  • Rapoport, D. C. (2004). The four waves of modern terrorism. A. K. Cronin ve J. M. Ludes (Der.) Attacking Terrorism: Elements of a Grand Strategy. İçinde 46-73. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
  • Roy, O. (2008). Radicalisation and de-radicalisation. Perspectives on Radicalisation and Political Violence: Papers from the First International Conference on Radicalisation and Political Violence:İçinde 8-14.Londra: ICSR.
  • Shanahan, T. (2010). Betraying a certain corruption of mind: how (and how not) to define ‘terrorism’. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 3 (2): 173-190.
  • Spencer, A. (2006). Questioning the concept of ‘new terrorism’. Peace Conflict & Development, 8: 1-33.
  • Spencer, A. (2011). Sic[k] of the ‘new terrorism’ debate? A response to our critics. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 4 (3): 459-467.
  • The Guardian (2003). Tony Blair’s speech to the US Congress. (18.7.2003). https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2003/jul/18/iraq.speeches, (Erişim Tarihi: 8.8.2017).
  • Tucker, D. (2001). What is new about the new terrorism and how dangerous is it?.Terrorism and Political Violence, 13 (3): 1-14.
  • Wardlaw, G. (1989). Political terrorism: Theory, tactics and countermeasures. New York: Cambridge Univesty Press.
  • Wiktorowicz, Q. (2005). A genealogy of radical Islam. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 28 (2): 75-97.
  • Wilkinson, P. (2003). Observations on the New Terrorism. https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/cmselect/cmfaff/405/3060302.htm, (Erişim Tarihi: 11.7.2017)
  • Woodward, B. (2005). Bush savaşta. Ş. Kamcez (Çev.). Ankara: Arkadaş Yayınevi.

OLD TERRORISM, NEW TERRORISM: ‘9/11’ AND THE UNCHANGED TERRORISM DISCOURSE

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 2, 275 - 298, 17.08.2018
https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.333616

Öz

This
article critically analyses the concept of ‘new terrorism’. Following the
attacks on 11th of September 2001 (aka 9/11) the term of new terrorism
transformed into a political discourse and was deployed to efface and re-territorialize
the destructive violence which was organically embedded in the Western
societies as no exception. In the light of this argument, terrorism discourses
and counter-terrorism policies applied by the Western states in international
society, some orthodox approaches on new terrorism will be problematized and
corroded. This article aims to contribute to critical terrorism studies which
apparently lack interest in Turkey in the following ways: firstly, the study
suggests that the term of new terrorism is a concept that was invented in the
academic field, and then confined into a political discourse. Secondly, it
argues that the new terrorism has lost its analytic value as since it has been
highly politicised.

Kaynakça

  • Akay, A. (1996). Yersiz-yurdsuzlaşma üzerine. Toplum-Bilim Dergisi, 5, (Gilles Deleuze Özel Sayısı): 15-18.
  • Aydınlı, E. (2008). Before jihadists there were anarchists: A failed case of transnational violence. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 31 (10): 903-923.
  • Bin Ladin, U. (2001). FBIS report: Compilation of Usama Bin Ladin Statements, 1994 – January 2004. (21 Ekim 2001). http://www.fas.org/irp/world/para/ubl-fbis.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 24.7.2017).
  • Bozaslan, H. (2014). Ortadoğu: Bir şiddet tarihi (Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nun sonundan El-Kaide’ye). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Brown, C. (2007). The new terrorism debate. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, 6 (3): 28-43.
  • Burnett, J. ve Whyte, D. (2005). Embedded expertise and the new terrorism. Journal for Crime, Conflict and the Media, 1 (4): 1-18.
  • Bush, G. W. (2001). Address to joint session of congress and the American people. (20.9.2001) http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010920-8.html, (Erişim Tarihi: 22.7.2017).
  • Bush, G. W. (2001). President’s remarks at National Day of Prayer and Remembrance. (14.9.2001) https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010914-2.html (Erişim Tarihi: 23.7.2017).
  • Chailand, G. (2015). Il n’y a rien à négocier avec les islamistes. (22 Kasım 2015), Libération, http://www.liberation.fr/planete/2015/11/22/gerard-chaliandil-n-y-a-rien-a-negocier-avec-les-islamistes_1415309, (Erişim Tarihi: 9.7.2017).
  • CNN (2017). Deadliest mass shootings in modern US history: Fast facts, 10.11.2017, http://edition.cnn.com/2013/09/16/us/20-deadliest-mass-shootings-in-u-s-history-fast-facts/index.html, (Erişim Tarihi: 16.1.2017)
  • Copeland, T. (2001). Is the ‘new terrorism’ really new? An analysis of the new paradigm for terrorism. The Journal of Conflict Studies, 21 (2): 91-105.
  • Crenshaw, M. (2007), The debate over “new” vs. “old” terrorism. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
  • Croft, S. ve Moore, C. (2010). The evolution of threat narratives in the age of terror: understanding terrorist threats in Britain, International Affairs, 86 (4): 821-835.
  • Deleuze, G. (1995a). On A thousand plateaus. M. Joughin (Çev.) Negotitations: İçinde 25-34. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (1995b). Three questions on Six Times Two. M. Joughin (Çev.) Negotitations: İçinde 37-45. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Deleuze, G. ve Guattari, F. (1982). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. R. Hurley vd. (Çev.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Deleuze, G. ve Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. B. Massumi (Çev.). Londra: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Deleuze, G. ve Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? H. Tomlinson ve G. Burchell (Çev.). New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Deleuze, G. ve Parnet, C. (1987). Dialogues. H. Tomlinson ve B. Habberjam (Çev.). New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Der Derian, J. (1997). Post-theory: The eternal return of ethics in international relations. M. Doyle ve J. Ikenberry (Der.). New Thinking in International Relations Theory:İçinde 55-75. New York: Westview Press.
  • Duyvesteyn, I. (2004). How new is the new terrorism?. Studies in Conlict & Terrorism, 27 (5): 439-454.
  • Field, A. (2009). The ‘new terrorism’: revolution or evolution?. Political Studies Review, 7 (2): 195-207.
  • Fielding, N. (2008). Al Qaeda’s propaganda war. Perspectives on radicalisation and political violence: Papers from the first international conference on radicalisation and political violence:İçinde 15-19. Londra: ICSR.
  • Gelvin, J. L. (2008). Al-Qaeda and anarchism: A historians reply to terrorology. Terrorism and Political Violence, 20 (4): 563-581.
  • Genet, J. (2008). Açık düşman. S. Dolanoğlu (Çev.), İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
  • Gofas, A. (2012). ‘Old’ vs. ‘new’ terrorism: What's in a name?. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 8 (32): 17-32.
  • Hindess, B. (2006). Terrortory. Alternatives, 31: 243–257.
  • Hofman, B. (1998). Inside terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Jackson, R. (2005a). Language, power and politics: Critical discourse analysis and the war on terrorism. 49th Parallel, Güz (15): 1-17.
  • Jackson, R. (2005b). Writing the war on terrorism: Language, politics and counter-terrorism. New York: Manchester University Press.
  • Jackson, R. (2012). The study of terrorism 10 years after 9/11: Successes, issues, challenges. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 8 (2): 1-16.
  • Jenkins, B. M. (1974). International terrorism: A new kind of warfare. The Rand Paper Series: 1-12.
  • Krueger, A. B. (2007). What makes a terrorist: Economics and the roots of terrorism. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Kurtuluş, E. N. (2011). The new terrorism and its critics. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 34 (6): 476-500.
  • Lahoud, N. (2011). Barry Hindess’s ‘‘territorial fundamentalism’’: Goliath without David?. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 36 (1): 72-78.
  • Laqueur, W. (1999). The new terroism: Fanaticism and the arms of mass destruction. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Lesser, I. O. (vd.) (1999). Countering the new Terrorism, Washington: RAND.
  • Lynch, O. ve Ryder, C. (2012). Deadliness, organisational change and suicide attacks: understanding the assumptions inherent in the use of the term ‘new terrorism’. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 5 (2): 257-275.
  • Mannik, E. (2009). Terrorism: Its past, present and future prospects. Saumet, A. (Der.) Religion and Politics in Multicultural Europe: Perspectives and Challenges: İçinde 151-171. Tartu: Tartu University Press.
  • Martin, G. (2010). Understanding terrorism: challenges, perspectives, and issues. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  • Morgan, M. J. (2004). The origins of the new terrorism. Parameters: U.S. Army War College, 34 (1): 29-43.
  • Neumann, P. (2009). Old and new terrorism: Late modernity, globalization and the transformation of political violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • New York Times (2014). Japanese men were planning to fight for ISIS, police say. (6.10.2014). https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/07/world/asia/japanese-men-were-planning-to-fight-for-isis-police-say.html, (Erişim Tarihi: 2.7.2017).
  • Radikal. (2015). 60 bin dolar maaş alan atom mühendisi IŞİD'e giderken yakalandı. http://www.radikal.com.tr/turkiye/60-bin-dolar-maas-alan-atom-muhendisi-iside-giderken-yakalandi-1477138/ (Erişim Tarihi: 4.8.2017).
  • Ramsay, G. (2015). Why terrorism can, but should not be defined. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 8 (2): 211-228.
  • Randal, J. (2005). Osama: The making of a terrorist. New York: I. B. Tauris.
  • Rapoport, D. C. (1984). Fear and trembling: Terrorism in three religious traditions. The American Political Science Review, 78 (3): 658-677.
  • Rapoport, D. C. (2004). The four waves of modern terrorism. A. K. Cronin ve J. M. Ludes (Der.) Attacking Terrorism: Elements of a Grand Strategy. İçinde 46-73. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
  • Roy, O. (2008). Radicalisation and de-radicalisation. Perspectives on Radicalisation and Political Violence: Papers from the First International Conference on Radicalisation and Political Violence:İçinde 8-14.Londra: ICSR.
  • Shanahan, T. (2010). Betraying a certain corruption of mind: how (and how not) to define ‘terrorism’. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 3 (2): 173-190.
  • Spencer, A. (2006). Questioning the concept of ‘new terrorism’. Peace Conflict & Development, 8: 1-33.
  • Spencer, A. (2011). Sic[k] of the ‘new terrorism’ debate? A response to our critics. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 4 (3): 459-467.
  • The Guardian (2003). Tony Blair’s speech to the US Congress. (18.7.2003). https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2003/jul/18/iraq.speeches, (Erişim Tarihi: 8.8.2017).
  • Tucker, D. (2001). What is new about the new terrorism and how dangerous is it?.Terrorism and Political Violence, 13 (3): 1-14.
  • Wardlaw, G. (1989). Political terrorism: Theory, tactics and countermeasures. New York: Cambridge Univesty Press.
  • Wiktorowicz, Q. (2005). A genealogy of radical Islam. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 28 (2): 75-97.
  • Wilkinson, P. (2003). Observations on the New Terrorism. https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/cmselect/cmfaff/405/3060302.htm, (Erişim Tarihi: 11.7.2017)
  • Woodward, B. (2005). Bush savaşta. Ş. Kamcez (Çev.). Ankara: Arkadaş Yayınevi.
Toplam 58 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Onur Ağkaya

Yayımlanma Tarihi 17 Ağustos 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi 8 Ağustos 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Ağkaya, O. (2018). ESKİ TERÖRİZM, YENİ TERÖRİZM: 9/11 VE ESKİMEYEN TERÖRİZM SÖYLEMİ. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20(2), 275-298. https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.333616