Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Evaluation of the effect of different fiber reinforced composite resins on the flexural strength of Bulk Fill composite resin

Year 2024, Volume: 25 Issue: 3, 79 - 85, 19.09.2024
https://doi.org/10.70509/dicledentj.1520345

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of reinforcing a Bulk Fill composite resin material with different fiber reinforced composite resins (FRCRs) on flexural strength.
Methods: For the flexural strength test, 60 specimens were prepared using 4x4x8 mm polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) blocks in accordance with the standards and the specimens were divided into four study groups [Bulk Fill composite resin (group 1), Bulk Fill composite resin+glass fiber in braided structure (group 2), Bulk Fill composite resin+polyethylene fiber in leno woven structure (group 3), Bulk Fill composite resin+short glass fiber reinforced composite resin (group 4)]. The specimens were soaked in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours and subjected to three-point bending test with Universal Test device. Data were statistically analyzed using Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis-H tests.
Results: The average bending resistance values were 654.72 Newton (N), 682.33 N, 643.87 N and 1003.91 N in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. The effect of short glass fiber reinforced composite resin+Bulk Fill composite resin group on bending resistance was statistically significantly higher than all other groups (p>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the other groups in terms of flexural strength.
Conclusion: Within the limits of this in vitro study, it was concluded that short glass fiber reinforced composite resin increases the flexural strength of Bulk Fill composite resin as a base material.

Project Number

DİŞ.23.006

References

  • Kılınç G. Tooth decay in children and the assesment of associated factors. Dokuz Eylül Uni Med Fac J. 2018;32(3):219-226.
  • Li S-H, Kingman A, Forthofer R, Swango P. Comparison of tooth surface-specific dental caries attack patterns in US schoolchildren from two national surveys. J Dent Res. 1993;72(10):1398-1405.
  • Fazeli AH, and A Fazeli. First-molar caries in primary school children of a northern city of Iran. Pakistan Oral Dent. 2005;25(1): 93-96.
  • Ernst CP, Canbek K, Aksogan K, Willershausen B. Two-year clinical performance of a packable posterior composite with and without a flowable composite liner. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7(3): 129-134.
  • Aydin N, Karaoğlanoğlu S, Oktay EA, Toksoy Topçu F, Demir F. Diş hekimliğinde Bulk Fill kompozit rezinler. Selcuk Dent. 2019; 6(2):229-238.
  • Gül Batmaz S, Dündar A, Barutçugil Ç, Yıldız B. Bulk Fill kompozit rezinlerin iki farklı tabaka kalınlığında ve ışık gücünde polimerize edilmesinin kompozitin basma dayanımına etkisi. Eur J Res Dent. 2021;5(1):38-44.
  • Opdam NJM, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BAC. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Dent Mater. 2007;23(1):2-8.
  • Oğlakçı B, Tuncer D, Halaçoğlu DM, Arhun N. The evaluation of shear bond strength of resin composite with different reinforcement techniques. Yeditepe Dent J. 2021;17(2):91-96.
  • Candan Ü, Eronat N, Türkün M. Fiberle güçlendirmenin nanofil kompozitin eğme direncine etkisinin incelenmesi. Atatürk Üni Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2015;25(1):13-20.
  • van Heumen CCM, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Lesaffre E, Creugers NHJ. Fiber-reinforced dental composites in beam testing. Dent Mater. 2008;24(11):1435-1443.
  • Ganesh M, Tandon S. Versatility of ribbond in contemporary dental practice. Trends Biomater Artif Organs. 2006;20(1):53-58.
  • Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LVJ. Short glass fiber reinforced restorative composite resin with semi-interpenetrating polymer network matrix. Dent Mater. 2007;23(11):1356-1362.
  • Garoushi S, Säilynoja E, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. Physical properties and depth of cure of a new short fiber reinforced composite. Dent Mater. 2013;29(8):835-841.
  • Belli S, Eraslan O, Eskitaşcıoğlu G. Effect of different treatment options on biomechanics of immature teeth: a finite element stress analysis study. J Endod. 2018;44(3):475-479.
  • Türkeş E, Gürtekin B, Gökçe YB. Fiber ağların farklı pozisyonlarda kompozit materyaline uygulanmasının restorasyonun kırılma direncine etkisi. Türk Klin Diş Hek Bil Derg. 2018;24(1):1-8.
  • Khan AA, Fareed MA, Alshehri AH, et al. Mechanical properties of the modified denture base materials and polymerization methods: a systematic review. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(10):5737.
  • Ellakwa AE, Morsy MA, El-Sheikh AM. Effect of aluminium oxide addition on the flexural strength and thermal diffusivity of heat‐polymerized acrylic resin. J Prosthodont. 2008;17(6):439-444.
  • Chung SM, Yap AUJ, Chandra SP, Lim CT. Flexural strength of dental composite restoratives: Comparison of biaxial and three-point bending test. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004; 71B(2):278-283.
  • Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dental Materials. 2000;16(1):33-40.
  • Selvaraj H, Krithikadatta J. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with short fiber reinforced composite and a low viscosity Bulk Fill composite in class II mesial-oclusal-distal access cavities: an ex-vivo study. Cureus. 2023;15(8):427-498.
  • Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Watts DC, Lassila LVJ. Polymerization shrinkage of experimental short glass fiber reinforced composite with semi-inter penetrating polymer network matrix. Dental Mater. 2008;24:211-215.
  • Kamble VD, Parkhedkar RD, Mowade TK. The effect of different fiber reinforcements on flexural strength of provisional restorative resins: anin-vitrostudy. J Adv Prosthodont. 2012;4(1):1-6.
  • Freilich MA, Meiers JC. Fiber-reinforced composite prostheses. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48(2):545-562.
  • Freilich MA, Karmaker AC, Burstone CJ, Goldberg AJ. Development and clinical applications of a light-polymerized fiber-reinforced composite. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80(3):311-318.
  • Özüdoğru S, Tosun G. Evaluation of microleakage and fatigue behaviour of several fiber application techniques in composite restorations. Annals Dent Spec. 2022;10(2):60-66.
  • Eapen AM, Amirtharaj LV, Sanjeev K, Mahalaxmi S. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with 2 different fiber-reinforced composite and 2 conventional composite resin core buildup materials: an in vitro study. J Endod. 2017;43(9): 1499-1504.
  • Garoushi S, Säilynoja E, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. Physical properties and depth of cure of a new short fiber reinforced composite. Dent Mater. 2013;29(8):835-841.
  • Garlapati TG, Krithikadatta J, Natanasabapathy V. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with short fiber composite used as a core material-an in vitro study. J Prosthodont Res. 2017;61(4):464-470.
  • Rajaraman G, Senthil Eagappan AR, Bhavani S, Vijayaraghavan R, Harishma S, Jeyapreetha P. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of fiber-reinforced composite and alkasite restoration in Class I cavity. Contemp Clin Dent. 2022;13(1):56-60.
  • Tanner J, Tolvanen M, Garoushi S, Säilynoja E. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced composite restorations in posterior teeth- results of 2.5 year follow-up. Open Dent J. 2018;12:476-485.
  • Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of acrylic resin polymers reinforced with unidirectional and woven glass fibers. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81(3):318-326.
  • Chung K, Lin T, Wang F. Flexural strength of a provisional resin material with fibre addition. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25(3):214-217.
  • Kanie T, Arikawa H, Fujii K, Ban S. Mechanical properties of reinforced denture base resin: the effect of position and the number of woven glass fibers. Dent Mater J. 2002;21(3):261-269.
  • Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. The effect of fiber position and polymerization condition on the flexural properties of fiber-reinforced composite. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2004;5(2):14-26.
  • Pereira CL, Demarco FF, Cenci MS, Osinaga PW, Piovesan EM. Flexural strength of composites: influences of polyethylene fiber reinforcement and type of composite. Clin Oral Investig. 2003; 7(2):116-119.
  • Bae JM, Kim KN, Hattori M, et al. The flexural properties of fiber-reinforced composite with light-polymerized polymer matrix. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14(1):33-39.
  • Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Strength of adhesive-bonded fiber-reinforced composites to enamel and dentin substrates. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5(4):301-311.
  • Belli S, Orucoglu H, Yildirim C, Eskitascioglu G. The effect of fiber placement or flowable resin lining on microleakage in class II adhesive restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9(2):175-81.
  • Lassila L, Keulemans F, Säilynoja E, Vallittu PK, Garoushi S. Mechanical properties and fracture behavior of flowable fiber reinforced composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2018;34(4):598-606.
Year 2024, Volume: 25 Issue: 3, 79 - 85, 19.09.2024
https://doi.org/10.70509/dicledentj.1520345

Abstract

Ethical Statement

Bu tez çalışmasının kendi çalışmam olduğunu; tezin planlanmasından yazımına kadar bütün safhalarda etik dışı davranışımın olmadığını, bu tezdeki bütün bilgileri akademik ve etik kurallar içinde elde ettiğimi, bu tez çalışmasıyla elde edilmeyen bütün bilgi ve yorumlara kaynak gösterdiğimi ve bu kaynakları da kaynaklar listesine aldığımı, yine bu tezin çalışılması ve yazımı sırasında patent ve telif haklarını ihlal edici bir davranışımın olmadığını ve tezimi Dicle Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi tez yazım kılavuzu standartlarına uygun olarak hazırladığımı beyan ederim.

Supporting Institution

Dicle Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırmalar Projeleri Komisyonu

Project Number

DİŞ.23.006

Thanks

Bu tez çalışmasını destekleyen Dicle Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırmalar Projeleri Komisyonu'na teşekkür ederim.

References

  • Kılınç G. Tooth decay in children and the assesment of associated factors. Dokuz Eylül Uni Med Fac J. 2018;32(3):219-226.
  • Li S-H, Kingman A, Forthofer R, Swango P. Comparison of tooth surface-specific dental caries attack patterns in US schoolchildren from two national surveys. J Dent Res. 1993;72(10):1398-1405.
  • Fazeli AH, and A Fazeli. First-molar caries in primary school children of a northern city of Iran. Pakistan Oral Dent. 2005;25(1): 93-96.
  • Ernst CP, Canbek K, Aksogan K, Willershausen B. Two-year clinical performance of a packable posterior composite with and without a flowable composite liner. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7(3): 129-134.
  • Aydin N, Karaoğlanoğlu S, Oktay EA, Toksoy Topçu F, Demir F. Diş hekimliğinde Bulk Fill kompozit rezinler. Selcuk Dent. 2019; 6(2):229-238.
  • Gül Batmaz S, Dündar A, Barutçugil Ç, Yıldız B. Bulk Fill kompozit rezinlerin iki farklı tabaka kalınlığında ve ışık gücünde polimerize edilmesinin kompozitin basma dayanımına etkisi. Eur J Res Dent. 2021;5(1):38-44.
  • Opdam NJM, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BAC. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Dent Mater. 2007;23(1):2-8.
  • Oğlakçı B, Tuncer D, Halaçoğlu DM, Arhun N. The evaluation of shear bond strength of resin composite with different reinforcement techniques. Yeditepe Dent J. 2021;17(2):91-96.
  • Candan Ü, Eronat N, Türkün M. Fiberle güçlendirmenin nanofil kompozitin eğme direncine etkisinin incelenmesi. Atatürk Üni Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2015;25(1):13-20.
  • van Heumen CCM, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Lesaffre E, Creugers NHJ. Fiber-reinforced dental composites in beam testing. Dent Mater. 2008;24(11):1435-1443.
  • Ganesh M, Tandon S. Versatility of ribbond in contemporary dental practice. Trends Biomater Artif Organs. 2006;20(1):53-58.
  • Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LVJ. Short glass fiber reinforced restorative composite resin with semi-interpenetrating polymer network matrix. Dent Mater. 2007;23(11):1356-1362.
  • Garoushi S, Säilynoja E, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. Physical properties and depth of cure of a new short fiber reinforced composite. Dent Mater. 2013;29(8):835-841.
  • Belli S, Eraslan O, Eskitaşcıoğlu G. Effect of different treatment options on biomechanics of immature teeth: a finite element stress analysis study. J Endod. 2018;44(3):475-479.
  • Türkeş E, Gürtekin B, Gökçe YB. Fiber ağların farklı pozisyonlarda kompozit materyaline uygulanmasının restorasyonun kırılma direncine etkisi. Türk Klin Diş Hek Bil Derg. 2018;24(1):1-8.
  • Khan AA, Fareed MA, Alshehri AH, et al. Mechanical properties of the modified denture base materials and polymerization methods: a systematic review. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(10):5737.
  • Ellakwa AE, Morsy MA, El-Sheikh AM. Effect of aluminium oxide addition on the flexural strength and thermal diffusivity of heat‐polymerized acrylic resin. J Prosthodont. 2008;17(6):439-444.
  • Chung SM, Yap AUJ, Chandra SP, Lim CT. Flexural strength of dental composite restoratives: Comparison of biaxial and three-point bending test. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004; 71B(2):278-283.
  • Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dental Materials. 2000;16(1):33-40.
  • Selvaraj H, Krithikadatta J. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with short fiber reinforced composite and a low viscosity Bulk Fill composite in class II mesial-oclusal-distal access cavities: an ex-vivo study. Cureus. 2023;15(8):427-498.
  • Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Watts DC, Lassila LVJ. Polymerization shrinkage of experimental short glass fiber reinforced composite with semi-inter penetrating polymer network matrix. Dental Mater. 2008;24:211-215.
  • Kamble VD, Parkhedkar RD, Mowade TK. The effect of different fiber reinforcements on flexural strength of provisional restorative resins: anin-vitrostudy. J Adv Prosthodont. 2012;4(1):1-6.
  • Freilich MA, Meiers JC. Fiber-reinforced composite prostheses. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48(2):545-562.
  • Freilich MA, Karmaker AC, Burstone CJ, Goldberg AJ. Development and clinical applications of a light-polymerized fiber-reinforced composite. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80(3):311-318.
  • Özüdoğru S, Tosun G. Evaluation of microleakage and fatigue behaviour of several fiber application techniques in composite restorations. Annals Dent Spec. 2022;10(2):60-66.
  • Eapen AM, Amirtharaj LV, Sanjeev K, Mahalaxmi S. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with 2 different fiber-reinforced composite and 2 conventional composite resin core buildup materials: an in vitro study. J Endod. 2017;43(9): 1499-1504.
  • Garoushi S, Säilynoja E, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. Physical properties and depth of cure of a new short fiber reinforced composite. Dent Mater. 2013;29(8):835-841.
  • Garlapati TG, Krithikadatta J, Natanasabapathy V. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with short fiber composite used as a core material-an in vitro study. J Prosthodont Res. 2017;61(4):464-470.
  • Rajaraman G, Senthil Eagappan AR, Bhavani S, Vijayaraghavan R, Harishma S, Jeyapreetha P. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of fiber-reinforced composite and alkasite restoration in Class I cavity. Contemp Clin Dent. 2022;13(1):56-60.
  • Tanner J, Tolvanen M, Garoushi S, Säilynoja E. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced composite restorations in posterior teeth- results of 2.5 year follow-up. Open Dent J. 2018;12:476-485.
  • Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of acrylic resin polymers reinforced with unidirectional and woven glass fibers. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81(3):318-326.
  • Chung K, Lin T, Wang F. Flexural strength of a provisional resin material with fibre addition. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25(3):214-217.
  • Kanie T, Arikawa H, Fujii K, Ban S. Mechanical properties of reinforced denture base resin: the effect of position and the number of woven glass fibers. Dent Mater J. 2002;21(3):261-269.
  • Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. The effect of fiber position and polymerization condition on the flexural properties of fiber-reinforced composite. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2004;5(2):14-26.
  • Pereira CL, Demarco FF, Cenci MS, Osinaga PW, Piovesan EM. Flexural strength of composites: influences of polyethylene fiber reinforcement and type of composite. Clin Oral Investig. 2003; 7(2):116-119.
  • Bae JM, Kim KN, Hattori M, et al. The flexural properties of fiber-reinforced composite with light-polymerized polymer matrix. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14(1):33-39.
  • Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Strength of adhesive-bonded fiber-reinforced composites to enamel and dentin substrates. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5(4):301-311.
  • Belli S, Orucoglu H, Yildirim C, Eskitascioglu G. The effect of fiber placement or flowable resin lining on microleakage in class II adhesive restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9(2):175-81.
  • Lassila L, Keulemans F, Säilynoja E, Vallittu PK, Garoushi S. Mechanical properties and fracture behavior of flowable fiber reinforced composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2018;34(4):598-606.
There are 39 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Paedodontics
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ruşen Demir 0009-0001-3551-8315

Buket Ayna 0000-0003-1963-8568

Project Number DİŞ.23.006
Publication Date September 19, 2024
Submission Date July 22, 2024
Acceptance Date August 2, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 25 Issue: 3

Cite

AMA Demir R, Ayna B. Evaluation of the effect of different fiber reinforced composite resins on the flexural strength of Bulk Fill composite resin. Dicle Dent J. September 2024;25(3):79-85. doi:10.70509/dicledentj.1520345