GELİR DÜZLEŞTİRME HİPOTEZİ BAĞLAMINDA TÜRKİYE’DE VERGİ, ENFLASYON VE NOMİNAL FAİZ İLİŞKİSİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Abstract

Mankiw tarafından geliştirilen literatürde gelir düzleştirme hipotezi veya optimal senyoraj teorisi adlarıyla anılan teori, kamu finansmanı için enflasyonun kullanılması konusunda olumlu bir önerme olarak literatürde yerini almıştır. Teori, kamuya gelir yaratmak maksadıyla optimal maliye ve para politikası karması kullanıldığında enflasyon ve vergi oranlarının marjinal maliyetlerinin eşit olması gerektiğini, böylece gelir elde etmek amacıyla vergi oranlarının kullanılmasından veya enflasyondan kaynaklanan sosyal maliyetlerin en aza indirgeneceğini iddia etmektedir. Teoriye göre yüksek vergi oranları uzun dönemde yüksek enflasyon ve yüksek nominal faiz oranları ile ilişkilidir

Keywords

• Gelir Düzleştirme Hipotezi,Vergi,Enflasyon,Nominal Faiz,Optimal Maliye ve Para Politikası

EVALUATION TAX, INFLATION AND NOMINAL INTEREST RATES RELATION IN THE CONTEXT OF REVENUE SMOOTHING HYPOTHESIS IN TURKEY

Abstract

Revenue smoothing hypothesis or optimal seigniorage theory, which was developed by Mankiw, has taken its place in the literature as a positive proposition to use inflation for public finance. The theory argues that when the optimal fiscal and monetary policy mix is used to generate revenue for the public, the marginal costs of inflation and tax rates should be equal, thereby minimizing social costs from using tax rates or inflation to generate revenue. According to the theory, high tax rates are associated with high inflation and high nominal interest rates in the long run period. The purpose of this study, in particular Turkey, to investigate the validity of the theory referred to as revenue smoothing hypothesis or optimal seigniorage theory in the literature. The validity of the revenue smoothing hypothesis for Turkey's economy, for the period 1985-2019, were tested using the tax rate, inflation rate and the nominal interest rate variables. Mankiw as claimed in revenue smoothing hypothesis, nominal interest rates, tax rates and inflation variables move in the long run period cointegrated and concluded that the hypothesis is valid for Turkey in particular the relevant period

Keywords

• Revenue Smoothing Hypothesis,Tax,Inflation,Nominal İnterest Rate,Optimal Fiscal and Monetary Policy

References

1. Aboagye, Herman Sintim ve Tufte, R. David (2006), “Central Bank Independence, Inflation Variability and the Revenue Smoothing Hypothesis”. International Advances in Economic Research, 12, 147-160.
2. Akkaya, Şahin. (1997), “Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerdeki Vergi Sisteminin Değerlendirilmesi ve Bu Ülkelerdeki Vergi Yapısının Kantitatif Analizi”, İ.Ü. İktisat Fakültesi Maliye Araştırma Merkezi Konferansları, 37. Seri, 213- 267.
3. Amano, A. Robert, (1998), “On The Optimal Seigniorage Hypothesis”, Journal of Macroeconomics, 20 (2), 295–308.
4. Ashworth, John ve Evans, Lynne (1998), “Seigniorage and Tax Smoothing in Developing Countries”, Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 25 No. 6, pp. 486-495.
5. Aslan, M., Hanefi. (2003), “Türkiye’de Optimal Senyoraj Teorisi ve Kamu Finansmanı Üzerine Ampirik Bulgular”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, C.V, S.l, 123-144.
6. Begg, David- Fischer, Stanley- Dornbusch, Rudiger (1994), Economics (4th ed.). McGraw- Hill Book Company.
7. Bolatoğlu, Nasip (2003), “Vergi Düzleştirme Hipotezinin Türkiye için Geçerliliği Üzerine Bir Uygulama”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt:21, Sayı:2, 97-108.
8. Click, W. Reid (1998), “Seigniorage in a Cross-Section of Countries”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 154-171.

9. De Haan, Jakob- Zelhorst Dick- Roukens, Onno (1993), “Seigniorage in Developing Countries”, Applied Financial Economics, 3, 307-314.
10. Doğru, Bülent (2013), “Seigniorage Revenue and Inflation Tax: Testing Optimal Seigniorage Theory for Turkish Economy”, International Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 5, No. 6,122-133.
11. Eğilmez, Mahfi (2020) “Türkiye’de Para ve Maliye Politikasının Başarısının Ölçülmesi”, Kendime politikasnn.html, Erişim Tarihi: 31.05.2020.
12. http://www.mahfiegilmez.com/2020/01/turkiyede-para-ve-maliye
13. Fischer, Stanley ve Modigliani, Franco (1978), “Toward an Understanding of the Real Effects and Costs of Inflation”, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No.303,1-39.
14. Friedman, Milton (1969), The Optimum Quantity of Money, Adline Publishing Company, Chicago.
15. Friedman, Milton (1971), “Government Revenue from Inflation,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 79, No. 4, 846-856.
16. Grilli, Vittorio (1989), Seigniorage in Europe, In A European Central Bank?, edited by Marcello de Cecco and Alberto Giovannini, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 53-88.
17. Guender, V. Alfred ve Lees, Kirdan (1996), “Optimal Revenue Smoothing: The Case of New Zeland”, Department of Economics, University of Canterbury Christchurch, New Zealand, Discussion Paper No. 9604,1-28.
18. Mankiw, N., Gregory. (1973), “The Optimal Collection of Seignorage: Theory and Evidence”, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No.2270,1-27.
19. Phelps, S. Edmund (1973), “Inflation in the Theory of Public Finance”, The Swedish Journal of Economics, Vol. 75, No. 1, Stabilization Policy (Mar., 1973), 67-82.
20. Poterba, M., James ve Rotemborg J., Julio (1988), “Inflation and Taxation with Optimizing Governments”, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No.2567,1-38.
21. Saadi-Sedik, Tahsin. (2003), “Optimal Seignorage in Developing Countries: An Empirical Investigation”, Document de travail de la série Etudes et Documents, E. 2003.7, 1-27.
22. Saatçioğlu, Cem ve Korap, Levent (2006), “Seigniorage Revenue and Turkish Economy”, MPRA Paper, No. 20106, 1-22.
23. Serletis, Apostolos and Schorn, G., Richard (1999), “International Evidence on the Tax- and Revenue-Smoothing Hypotheses”, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 51, No. 2 (April), pp. 387-396.
24. Trehan, Bharat. and Walsh, E. Carl. (1990), “Seigniorage and Tax Smoothing in The United States”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 25, 97-112.
25. Tanzi, Vito (1991), Public Finance in Developing Countries. Edward Elgar Publishing Company, Brookfield, Vermont, Number: 420.1-249.