İHRACATTA YURTİÇİ KATMA DEĞERİN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ: BRICS-T ÜLKELERİ ÖRNEĞİ

Year 2022, Issue: 31, 270 - 286, 26.10.2022

Demet Yaman

Abstract

Üretimin sınırlarının değişmesi, uluslararası rekabetin sınırlarını değiştirmiştir. Bu kapsamda, ülkelerin küresel değer zincirine katılmaları önem arz etmektedir. Bu nedenle, ihracatta yurtiçi katma değerin belirleyicilerinin belirlenmesi önemlidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, BRICS-T ülkelerinde ihracatta yurtiçi katma değerin belirleyicileri araştırılmıştır. Amaç doğrultusunda, 1995-2018 dönemine ait yıllık veriler kullanılmıştır. Bu kapsamda çalışmada panel veri analiz tekniklerinden yararlanılmıştır. Değişkenler arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi, Dumitrescu ve Hurlin (2012) tarafından geliştirilen nedensellik testi kullanılarak araştırılmıştır. Bulgular, brüt ihracatın yurtdışı katma değerli içeriğinin, işgücü verimliliğinin, sermaye stokunun, beşeri sermaye stokunun, internet penetrasyonunun ve AR-GE harcamalarının ihracatta yurtiçi katma değerli içeriğin nedeni olduğunu göstermektedir.

Keywords

İhracatta Yurtiçi Katma Değer, Panel Nedensellik Analizi, İhracatta Yurtdışı Katma Değer

DETERMINANTS OF DOMESTIC ADDED VALUE IN EXPORTS: THE CASE OF THE BRICS-T COUNTRIES

Abstract

The change in the boundaries of production has changed the boundaries of international competition. In this context, it is important for countries to participate in the global value chain. Therefore, it is important to determine the determinants of domestic value added in exports. The aim of this study is to investigate the determinants of domestic added value in exports in BRICS-T countries. For the purpose, annual data for the period 1995-2018 were used. In this context, panel data analysis techniques were used in the study. The causality relationship between the variables was investigated using the causality test developed by Dumitrescu and Hurlin (2012). The findings show that the overseas value-added content of gross exports, labor productivity, capital stock, human capital stock, internet penetration and R&D expenditures are the causes of domestic value-added content in exports.

Keywords

Domestic Value-Added Content in Exports, Panel Causality Analysis

References

• Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly journal of economics, 118(4), 1279‐1333.
• Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The review of economic studies, 47(1), 239-253.
• Cappariello, R. (2012). Domestic value added content of exports: a cross-country comparison for the major European economies. In Proceedings of the 20th International Input-Output Conference.
• Chen, X., Cheng, L. K., Fung, K. C., Lau, L. J., Sung, Y. W., Zhu, K., Yang, C., Pei, J. & Duan, Y. (2012). Domestic value added and employment generated by Chinese exports: A quantitative estimation. China economic review, 23(4), 850-864.
• Dumitrescu, E. I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460.
• Erkök, B. (2018). Türkiye sanayisinin küresel değer zincirine entegrasyonu. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 75(2), 637‐666.
• Gereffi, G. (1994). The organization of buyer‐driven global commodity chains: How US retailers shape overseas production networks. In Gereffi, G. and Korzeniewicz, M. (Eds.). Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism (pp. 95‐122). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
• Gereffi, G. (2015). Global value chains, development and emerging economies. UNUMERIT Working Paper Series No: 2015‐047.
• Goldar, B., Das, D. K., Sengupta, S., & Das, P. C. (2017). Domestic value addition and foreign content: An analysis of India's exports from 1995 to 2011. Working paper (No. 332).
• Granger, C. W. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 424-438.
• Kasaplar, H. A. (2020). Avrupa Birliği ülkelerinin ihracatındaki yurtiçi katma değerin belirleyicileri. Optimum: Journal of Economics & Management Sciences/Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(1), 41-62.
• Alkın, H., & Türkcan, K. (2021). Yabancı Katma Değerin İhracat İçerisindeki Yerli Katma Değere Etkisi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 16(3), 798-820.
• Kee, H. L., & Tang, H. (2016). Domestic value added in exports: Theory and firm evidence from China. American Economic Review, 106(6), 1402-36.
• Kummritz, V. (2015). Global value chains: Benefiting the domestic economy?. Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Working Paper No. 02/2015.
• Lopez-Gonzalez, J. (2016), Using foreign factors to enhance domestic export performance: A focus on Southeast Asia (No. 191), OECD Publishing.
• OECD (2021). The changing nature of international production: Insights from Trade in Value Added and related indicators, OECD Publishing.
• Solaz, M. (2018). Value added and participation in global value chains: The case of Spain. The World Economy, 41(10), 2804-2827.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of applied econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
• Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A., & Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias‐adjusted LM test of error cross‐section independence. The econometrics journal, 11(1), 105-127.
• Songur, M. (2021). Küreselleşme, küresel değer zincirleri ve COVID‐19 salgını: bir değerlendirme. İçinde Konukman, A. ve
• Şimşek, O. (Ed.). Dünya Ekonomisini Anlamak (ss. 303-321). Siyasal Kitapevi.
• Timmer, M. P., Los, B., Stehrer, R., & De Vries, G. J. (2013). Fragmentation, incomes and jobs: an analysis of European competitiveness. Economic policy, 28(76), 613-661.
• Veeramani, C., & Dhir, G. (2017). Domestic value added content of India's exports: Estimates for 112 sectors, 1999-2000 to 2012-13. Mumbai: Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research.