Evaluation of Hearing in Patients Undergoing Type 1 Tympanoplasty

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This study evaluated the clinical results of type 1 tympanoplasty performed in our clinic. Methods: This retrospective analysis included eighty patients who underwent type I tympanoplasty for tympanic membrane perforation in the otorhinolaryngology department of between January 2019 and December 2022. We determined the mean hearing levels by averaging the hearing thresholds at 500, 1,000, 2,000, and 4,000 Hz. Researchers examined the differences in air-bone gaps before and after tympanoplasty between the groups. Researchers evaluated pre- and postoperative air conduction (AC), bone conduction (BC), and air-bone gap (ABG) between groups using paired t-tests. Results: This study involved 80 patients, comprising 45 males and 35 females. The mean age was 33.8 ± 15.3 years. Out of 80 patients, 38 (47.5%) exhibited disease in the right ear, 33 (41.25%) had disease solely in the left ear, and nine patients (11.25%) were affected in both ears. The existence of central perforation was the most ordinary observation (43.75%). In the present investigation, we noticed that 100% of patients had hearing thresholds of more than 30 dB. The preoperative air-bone tract gap ratio was 38.3. The postoperative air-bone tract gap ratio was 22.8. 74 of 80 patients (92.5%) showed remarkable surgical success with graft harvesting, with just four patients having residual tympanic membrane perforation and two with graft medialisation. Out of 80 patients, 71 (88.75%) have restored to normal hearing, while only 9 (11.25%) remain in the category of mild deafness. The mean of the preoperative air-bone gap is 38.3 Db; however, postoperatively, the air-bone gap is 23.98 Db. Improvement in the air-bone gap is 14.32 Db. Conclusions: Type 1 tympanoplasty employing temporalis fascia is a reliable method for mending tympanic membrane perforations and boosting hearing results. The procedure achieves great air bone gap closure and enhances patients' auditory function. However, individual variables such as age, perforation size, and surgical procedure must be acknowledged when quantifying postoperative hearing improvement. Keywords:

Keywords

• Type 1 tympanoplasty
• hearing loss
• chronic otitis media; air bone gap; temporalis fascia

Tip 1 Timpanoplasti Uygulanan Hastalarda İşitmenin Değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmada kliniğimizde uygulanan tip 1 timpanoplastinin klinik sonuçları değerlendirildi. Yöntem: Bu retrospektif analiz, Ocak 2019 ile Aralık 2022 tarihleri arasında Kulak Burun Boğaz kliniğinde tip I timpanoplasti uygulanan hastaları kapsamaktadır. Ortalama işitme seviyelerini elde etmek için 500, 1.000, 2.000 ve 4.000 Hz eşiklerinin ortalaması alındı. Gruplar arasında timpanoplasti öncesi ve sonrasında hava-kemik aralığındaki değişimleri incelendi. Eşleştirilmiş t-testleri kullanarak gruplar arasında ameliyat öncesi ve sonrası hava iletimi, kemik iletimi ve hava-kemik aralığı incelendi. Bulgular: Bu çalışmaya 45 erkek ve 35 kadından oluşan 80 hasta katıldı. Ortalama yaş 33.8 ± 15.3 yıldı. Seksen hastanın otuz üçünde (%41,25) sadece sol kulakta, dokuzunda (%11,25) her iki kulakta ve 38'inde (%47,5) sağ kulakta hastalık vardı. En yaygın bulgu (%43,75) santral perforasyon varlığı idi. Bu çalışmadaki tüm hastaların işitme eşiklerinin 30 dB'den yüksek olduğunu tespit ettik. Ameliyat öncesi hava-kemik yolu boşluk oranı 38,3 idi. Ameliyat sonrası hava-kemik yolu boşluk oranı 22,8 idi. 80 hastanın 74'ünde (%92,5) greft alımında kayda değer bir cerrahi başarı elde edilmiş, sadece dört hastada rezidüel timpanik membran perforasyonu ve iki hastada greft medializasyonu görülmüştür. 80 hastanın 71'i (%88,75) normal işitmeye geri dönerken, sadece 9'u (%11,25) hafif sağırlık kategorisinde kalmıştır. Hava-kemik aralığındaki iyileşme 14.32 Db'dir. Sonuçlar: Bu prosedür, hava kemik aralığını etkili şekilde kapatmakta ve hastaların işitme fonksiyonu postoperatif düzeltmenin yanısıra yaş, perforasyon boyutu ve cerrahi prosedür gibi bireysel değişkenler göz önünde bulundurulmalıdır.

Keywords

• Tip 1 timpanoplasti
• işitme kaybı
• kronik otitis media
• hava kemik aralığı
• temporal fasya.

References

1. 1.Wullstein H. LXXXVIII The Restoration of theFunction of the Middle Ear, in Chronic Otitis Media.Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology.1956;65(4):1020-41.
2. 2.Bajaj A, Sheikh S, Joshi S, et al. Benefit ofTympanoplasty With or Without CorticalMastoidectomy in Active Mucosal Otitis Media – AComparative Study. Bengal Journal ofOtolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery. 2019;27(1).
3. 3.Vidiyanti C, Ahadiah TH, Moon IS. HearingEvaluation Post Canal Wall-Up (CWU)Tympanoplasty on Patients With Safe Type ChronicSuppurative Otitis Media. Journal of Health Scienceand Medical Research. 2022.
4. 4.Erkorkmaz Ü, Yılmaz MS, Güven M, et al.Determination of Factors That Impact PatientSatisfaction Following Tympanoplasty. The Journalof International Advanced Otology. 2015;10(3):264-9.
5. 5.Kumaraswamy PT, Shambulingegowda A,Neelanmegarajan D. Effect of Canal Widening (TypeI Tympanoplasty) on Hearing Sensitivity.International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology andHead and Neck Surgery. 2020;6(11):2086.
6. 6.Huq M, Qaiyoum SMM, Mannan SI, et al. Outcomeof Interlay Type 1 Tympanoplasty for Large CentralPerforation. Bangladesh Journal ofOtorhinolaryngology. 2021;27(1):86-91.
7. 7. Eom T-H, Lim H-R, Jeong S-H, et al. Hearing Results Following Type 1 Tympanoplasty in ElderlyPatients. In Vivo. 2020;34(3):1395-8.
8. 8.Batni G, Goyal R. Hearing Outcome After Type ITympanoplasty: A Retrospective Study. IndianJournal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery.2014;67(1):39-42.

9. 9.Sidabalok SF. Hearing Threshold Before and AfterTympanoplasty at Hasan Sadikin General Hospital in2018–2020. 2023:172-7.
10. 10.Karanjai S, Pal D. Comparisons of Results of Type1 Tympanoplasty Using Temporalis Fascia andTragal Perichondrium: A Prospective Study.International Journal of Contemporary MedicalResearch [Ijcmr]. 2019;6(6).
11. 11.Kusumanjali A, Chaitanya VK. Clinical Study onType 1 Tympanoplasty: Anatomical and FunctionalOutcomes. International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery.2019;5(5):1197.
12. 12.Boronat-Echeverría NE, Reyes-García E, Sevilla-Delgado Y, et al. Prognostic Factors of SuccessfulTympanoplasty in Pediatric Patients: A CohortStudy. BMC Pediatrics. 2012;12(1).
13. 13.Hasegawa M, Shinnabe A, Kanazawa H, et al.Clinical Characteristics of Chronic Perforated OtitisMedia in Different Age Groups. The Journal ofInternational Advanced Otology. 2017;13(2):176-80.
14. 14.Sevil E, Doblan A. Significance of the Middle EarRisk Index in Predicting Tympanoplasty Success inthe Elderly. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2020;278(10):3689-95.
15. 15.Bayır Ö. Evaluation of the Contralateral Ear inPatients With Chronic Otitis Media. The Annals ofClinical and Analytical Medicine. 2017;08(01).
16. 16.Olusesi AD, Opaluwah E, Hassan SB. Subjectiveand Objective Outcomes of Tympanoplasty Surgeryat National Hospital Abuja, Nigeria 2005–2009.European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.2010;268(3):367-72.
17. 17.Ramalingam V, Subramaniam S, Rajeevan A, et al.Evaluating the Outcome of Type I TympanoplastyWith Cortical Mastoidectomy Using TemporalisFascia Graft With and Without Tragal CartilageSupport. Ip Journal of Otorhinolaryngology andAllied Science. 2022;4(4):134-8.
18. 18.Gamra OB, Nacef I, Romdhane NB, et al.Tympanoplasty Outcomes in Dry and Wet Ears.Otolaryngology - Open Journal. 2016;2(2):51-7.
19. 19. Shrestha BL, Shrestha I, Amatya R. Comparison ofClinical Presentation Between Chronic Otitis MediaMucosal With Squamous. Kathmandu UniversityMedical Journal. 2012;8(4):387-91.
20. 20.Monsanto RdC, Kasemodel ALP, Tomaz A, et al.Current Evidence of Peripheral VestibularSymptoms Secondary to Otitis Media. Annals of Medicine. 2018;50(5):391-401.
21. 21.Tailor BV, Phillips JS, Nunney I, et al. Analysis ofTinnitus Severity and Associated Risk Factors inPatients With Chronic Otitis Media: Data From theMultinational Collaborative Chronic Otitis MediaQuestionnaire-12 Study. The Journal of Laryngology& Otology. 2022;136(12):1203-10.
22. 22.Karakuş MF, Karakurt SE, Çolak M, et al. TheEffect of Perforation Size and Site on Graft Successand Hearing in Cartilage Tympanoplasty WithMastoidectomy. Middle Black Sea Journal of HealthScience. 2020;6(3):364-8.
23. 23.Kolo ES, Ramalingam R. Hearing Results PostTympanoplasty: Our Experience With Adults at theKKR ENT Hospital, India. Indian Journal ofOtolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery.2012;66(4):365-8.
24. 24.Yurttaş V, Yakut F, Kutluhan A, et al. Preparationand Placement of Cartilage Island Graft inTympanoplasty. Brazilian Journal ofOtorhinolaryngology. 2014;80(6):522-6.
25. 25.Şahan M, Derin S, Deveer M, et al. FactorsAffecting Success and Results of Cartilage-Perichondrium Island Graft in RevisionTympanoplasty. The Journal of InternationalAdvanced Otology. 2014;10(1):64-7.
26. 26.Kütük SG, Özdaş T. Impact of Platelet-Rich FibrinTherapy in Tympanoplasty Type 1 Surgery on GraftSurvival and Frequency-Specific Hearing Outcomes:A Retrospective Analysis in Patients With TympanicMembrane Perforation Due to Chronic Otitis Media.The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.2019;133(12):1068-73.
27. 27.Ahmed J, Panchami. Comparitive Study BetweenButton-Hole Tympanoplasty and TympanoplastyWith Placement of Graft Lateral to Handle of MalleusWith or Without Cortical Mastoidectomy in MucosalType of Chronic Otitis Media. International Journalof Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery.2020;6(5):929.