Research Article

Relation of the incidence of congenital variations and anomalies with intracranial aneurysms in intracranial arteries

Volume: 43 Number: 4 December 24, 2016
  • Yeliz Aktürk
  • Mehmet Murat Fırat
  • Mehmet Emrah Güven
  • Murat Beyhan
EN TR

Relation of the incidence of congenital variations and anomalies with intracranial aneurysms in intracranial arteries

Abstract

Objectives: There exists many embryological steps during the development of intracranial vascular structures. Therefore, the congenital variations and anomalies of these structures are often encountered. For a proper evaluation of cerebrovascular imaging studies it is essential to know the frequencies of these anomalies and variations, their locations and the possible accompanying patologies should be distinguished. We aimed to analyse the frequency of congenital variations and anomalies and their association with intracranial aneurysms by evaluating the cerebral angiographic images.
Methods: The cerebral angiograms taken for various reasons in the Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziosmanpasa University, between January 2007 and April 2009, were evaluated in a retrospective fashion. We investigated the association of intracranial aneurysms and congenital variations in addition to the influence of variations on aneurysm formation. A total of 254
cases with intracranial artery variation-anomaly and coexisting intracranial artery aneurysm were included in the study.
Results: The most common variation in intracranial arteries was the agenesis or hypoplasia of the A1 segment of anterior cerebral artery. This was followed infundibular dilatation of posterior communicating artery and fetal type posterior cerebral artery. The incidence of aneurysm was 22.5% in patients who had A1 hypoplasia-agenesia and 18.2% in patients who had trifurcation of middle cerebral artery.
Conclusion: Flow haemodynamics take an important part in the formation of intracranial saccular aneurysms. The incidence of aneurysm formation increases in congenital anomalies of intracranial vascular structures. It is necessary to explore the relationship between variations and aneurysms in order to understand the haemodynamic factors which take place in the pathogenesis of aneurysms. These ratios lead us to think that the incidence of aneurysms increases in cases which have variations when compared to those which have not. 

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Gailloud P, Carpenter J, Heck D.V. et al. Pseudofenestration of the cervical internal carotid artery: A pathologic process that simulates an anatomic variant. Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:421–4.
  2. 2. Padget DH. The development of the cranial arteries in the human embryo. Contrib Embryol 1948;32:205-262.
  3. 3. Alpers BJ, Berry RG. Circle of Willis in cerebral vascular disorders. The anatomical structure. Arch Neurol 1963;8:398-402.
  4. 4. Hassler O. Morphological studies on the large cerebral arteries, with reference to the aetiology of subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1961;154:1-45.
  5. 5. Rhoton AL Jr. Anatomy of saccular aneurysms. Surg Neurol 1980;14:59-66.
  6. 6. Karazincir S, Ada E, Sarılmaz A, et al. İntrakranial anevrizmalara eşlik eden vasküler varyasyon ve anomalilerin sıklığı.
  7. Diagn Interv Radiol 2004;10:103-09.
  8. 7. Leyon J, Kaliaperumal C, Choudhari K A. Aneurysm at the fenestrated anterior cerebral artery: Surgical anatomy and management. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2008;110:511–3.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Mehmet Murat Fırat This is me

Mehmet Emrah Güven This is me

Murat Beyhan This is me

Publication Date

December 24, 2016

Submission Date

January 11, 2017

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2016 Volume: 43 Number: 4

APA
Aktürk, Y., Fırat, M. M., Güven, M. E., & Beyhan, M. (2016). Relation of the incidence of congenital variations and anomalies with intracranial aneurysms in intracranial arteries. Dicle Medical Journal, 43(4), 515-520. https://doi.org/10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2015.01.0521
AMA
1.Aktürk Y, Fırat MM, Güven ME, Beyhan M. Relation of the incidence of congenital variations and anomalies with intracranial aneurysms in intracranial arteries. Dicle Medical Journal. 2016;43(4):515-520. doi:10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2015.01.0521
Chicago
Aktürk, Yeliz, Mehmet Murat Fırat, Mehmet Emrah Güven, and Murat Beyhan. 2016. “Relation of the Incidence of Congenital Variations and Anomalies With Intracranial Aneurysms in Intracranial Arteries”. Dicle Medical Journal 43 (4): 515-20. https://doi.org/10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2015.01.0521.
EndNote
Aktürk Y, Fırat MM, Güven ME, Beyhan M (December 1, 2016) Relation of the incidence of congenital variations and anomalies with intracranial aneurysms in intracranial arteries. Dicle Medical Journal 43 4 515–520.
IEEE
[1]Y. Aktürk, M. M. Fırat, M. E. Güven, and M. Beyhan, “Relation of the incidence of congenital variations and anomalies with intracranial aneurysms in intracranial arteries”, Dicle Medical Journal, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 515–520, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2015.01.0521.
ISNAD
Aktürk, Yeliz - Fırat, Mehmet Murat - Güven, Mehmet Emrah - Beyhan, Murat. “Relation of the Incidence of Congenital Variations and Anomalies With Intracranial Aneurysms in Intracranial Arteries”. Dicle Medical Journal 43/4 (December 1, 2016): 515-520. https://doi.org/10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2015.01.0521.
JAMA
1.Aktürk Y, Fırat MM, Güven ME, Beyhan M. Relation of the incidence of congenital variations and anomalies with intracranial aneurysms in intracranial arteries. Dicle Medical Journal. 2016;43:515–520.
MLA
Aktürk, Yeliz, et al. “Relation of the Incidence of Congenital Variations and Anomalies With Intracranial Aneurysms in Intracranial Arteries”. Dicle Medical Journal, vol. 43, no. 4, Dec. 2016, pp. 515-20, doi:10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2015.01.0521.
Vancouver
1.Yeliz Aktürk, Mehmet Murat Fırat, Mehmet Emrah Güven, Murat Beyhan. Relation of the incidence of congenital variations and anomalies with intracranial aneurysms in intracranial arteries. Dicle Medical Journal. 2016 Dec. 1;43(4):515-20. doi:10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2015.01.0521