Comparison of the Clinical Outcome of Nonoperative Management and Surgical Treatment of Blunt Splenic Trauma

Year 2016, Volume: 43 Issue: 1, 117 - 121, 01.03.2016

Zülfü Bayhan , Sezgin Zeren Mehmet Ekici Cüneyt Kahraman Turgay Şimşek

Abstract

Objective: Nonoperative management is the preferred treatment option of blunt splenic injury in appropriate conditions. İncreasing success is achieved with the help of advanced imaging techniques and angioembolization procedure. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes of Nonoperative Management and Surgical Intervention in patients with blunt splenic injury.
Methods: Records of 56 patients who were treated by nonoperative management or surgical intervention in our clinic were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were evaluated in terms of age, gender, grade of injury, mortality, length of hospital stay, complications, presence of additional injuries and concomitant disease in both groups.
Results: There were 29 patients (51.78%) in the surgery group and 27 patients (48.2%) in the nonoperative management group. Grade of injury was determined significantly higher in surgical treatment group (p<0.001). Additional injury was observed more in the group treated with surgery (p: 0.033). Infectious complication rate was found higher in surgically treated group (<0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age, gender, mortality, length of hospital stay, presence of concomitant disease.
Conclusion: Nonoperative management is the appropriate method in treatment of blunt splenic injury in patients who were hemodinamically stable and have no signs of peritoneal irritation. Nonoperative management is increasingly being implemented in conjunction with improvements in imaging methods. Angioembolization is a treatment that increases the success rate of nonoperative management and implementation of this method in trauma centers is an important target. Surgical intervention is inevitable in cases when the nonoperative management is inappropriate.
Key words: Blunt splenic injury, Nonoperative Management, Splenectomy, Splenoraphy.

Keywords

Künt dalak yaralanması, Konservatif tedavi, Splenektomi, Splenorafi

References

• Schroeppel TJ, Croce MA. Diagnosis and management of blunt abdominal solid organ injury. Curr Opin Crit Care 2007;13:399–404.
• Millikan JS, Moore EE, Moore GE, Stevens RE. Alternatives to splenectomy in adults after trauma. Repair, partial resection, and reimplantation of splenic tissue. Am J Surg 1982;144:711-716.
• Krause KR, Howells GA, Bair HA, et al. Nonoperative management
• of blunt splenic injury in adults 55 years and older: a twenty-year experience. Am Surg 2000;66:636-640.
• Bain IM, Kirby RM. 10 year experience of splenic injury. An
• increasing place for conservative management after blunt trauma. Injury 1998;29:177-182.
• Watanabe S, Ishi T, Kamachi M, Takahashi T. Computed tomography and nonoperative treatment for blunt abdominal
• trauma. Jpn J Surg 1990;20:56-63.
• Olthof DC, Joosse P, van der Vlies CH, et al. Prognostic factors
• for failure of nonoperative management in adults with blunt splenic injury: a systematic review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013;74:546-557.
• Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Jurkovich GJ, et al. Organ injury scaling: spleen and liver (1994 revision). J Trauma 1995;38:323-324.
• Tan KK, Chiu MT, Vijayan A. Management of isolated splenic
• injuries after blunt trauma: an institution’s experience over 6 years. Med J Malaysia 2010;65:304-306.
• Miller PR, Chang MC, Hoth JJ, et al. Prospective trial of angiography and embolization for all grade III toV blunt splenic injuries: nonoperative management success rate is significantly improved. Am Coll Surg 2014;218:644–648.
• Velmahos GC, Zacharias N, Emhoff TA, et al. Management of the most severely injured spleen: a multicenter study of the Research Consortium of New England Centers for Trauma (ReCONECT). Arch Surg 2010;145:456–460.
• Peitzman AB, Heil B, Rivera L, et al. Blunt splenic injury in adults: Multiinstitutional Study of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma 2000;49:177-187.
• Dehli T, Bagenholm A, Trasti NC, et al. The treatment of spleen injuries: a retrospective study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2015;23:85.
• Okuş A, Sevinç B, Ay S, et al. Conservative management of abdominal injuries. Ulus Cerrahi Derg 2013;29:153-157.
• Soo KM, Lin TY, Chen CW, et al. More becomes less: management strategy has definitely changed over the past
• decade of splenic injury- a nationwide population-based study. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:124969.
• Pachter HL, Guth AA, Hofstetter SR, Spencer FC. Changing patterns in the management of splenic trauma: the impact of nonoperative management. Ann Surg 1998;227:708-719.
• Feliciano DV, Bitondo CG, Mattox KL, et al. A four-year experience with splenectomy versus splenorrhaphy. Ann Surg 1985;201:568-575.