Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Comparison of Mitoxantrone versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Year 2022, Volume: 49 Issue: 1, 29 - 35, 11.03.2022
https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1086113

Abstract

References

  • 1. Thompson AJ, Baranzini SE, Geurts J, et al. Multiplesclerosis. The Lancet. 2018;391:1622-36.
  • 2.Filippi M, Preziosa P, Langdon D, et al. IdentifyingProgression in Multiple Sclerosis: New Perspectives.Ann Neurol. 2020;88:438-52.
  • 3.Kavaliunas A, Manouchehrinia A, Stawiarz L, et al.Importance of early treatment initiation in theclinical course of multiple sclerosis. MultipleSclerosis. 2017;23:1233-40.

Comparison of Mitoxantrone versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Year 2022, Volume: 49 Issue: 1, 29 - 35, 11.03.2022
https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1086113

Abstract

Objective: Mitoxantrone (Mtx) and cyclophosphamide (Cyc) have successfully been used in highly aggressive multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. This study aims to compare the efficacy of these drugs in patients with secondary progressive MS (pwSPMS).
Method: Clinical data of pwSPMS treated with either Mtx or Cyc were collected retrospectively. The EDSS scores before, during, and after the drug was determined. The efficacy of the drug was evaluated according to the EDSS change after the completion of therapy. The variations in clinical benefit between the two groups were investigated, as well as the factors that influenced them.
Results: Fifty-nine SPMS patients (29 Mtx, 30 Cyc) were included in our study. Mean treatment periods were 19.5±9.9 months for Mtx and 9.1±4.1 months for the Cyc group. Mean EDSS in Mtx and Cyc groups at the first dose were 6.2±0.7 and 6.3±0.8, respectively (p=0.42). The percentage of patients who benefited from treatment was 41.6% in the Mtx group and 43.0% in the Cyc group (p=0.54). However, Mtx was more effective in patients with younger age of disease onset (p=0.01).
Conclusion: Immunosuppression with intravenous Mtx and Cyc may equally prevent progression in patients with SPMS. Additionally, Mtx may be more beneficial in MS patients with earlier disease onset.

References

  • 1. Thompson AJ, Baranzini SE, Geurts J, et al. Multiplesclerosis. The Lancet. 2018;391:1622-36.
  • 2.Filippi M, Preziosa P, Langdon D, et al. IdentifyingProgression in Multiple Sclerosis: New Perspectives.Ann Neurol. 2020;88:438-52.
  • 3.Kavaliunas A, Manouchehrinia A, Stawiarz L, et al.Importance of early treatment initiation in theclinical course of multiple sclerosis. MultipleSclerosis. 2017;23:1233-40.
There are 3 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Original Articles
Authors

Tuncay Gündüz This is me

Gonca Özcan This is me

Arman Çakar This is me

Halil İbrahim Akçay This is me

Ayşe Nur Özdağ Acarlı This is me

Mefküre Eraksoy This is me

Murat Kürtüncü This is me

Publication Date March 11, 2022
Submission Date October 9, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 49 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Gündüz, T., Özcan, G., Çakar, A., Akçay, H. İ., et al. (2022). Comparison of Mitoxantrone versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, 49(1), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1086113
AMA Gündüz T, Özcan G, Çakar A, Akçay Hİ, Özdağ Acarlı AN, Eraksoy M, Kürtüncü M. Comparison of Mitoxantrone versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. diclemedj. March 2022;49(1):29-35. doi:10.5798/dicletip.1086113
Chicago Gündüz, Tuncay, Gonca Özcan, Arman Çakar, Halil İbrahim Akçay, Ayşe Nur Özdağ Acarlı, Mefküre Eraksoy, and Murat Kürtüncü. “Comparison of Mitoxantrone Versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients With Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis”. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 49, no. 1 (March 2022): 29-35. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1086113.
EndNote Gündüz T, Özcan G, Çakar A, Akçay Hİ, Özdağ Acarlı AN, Eraksoy M, Kürtüncü M (March 1, 2022) Comparison of Mitoxantrone versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 49 1 29–35.
IEEE T. Gündüz, G. Özcan, A. Çakar, H. İ. Akçay, A. N. Özdağ Acarlı, M. Eraksoy, and M. Kürtüncü, “Comparison of Mitoxantrone versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis”, diclemedj, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 29–35, 2022, doi: 10.5798/dicletip.1086113.
ISNAD Gündüz, Tuncay et al. “Comparison of Mitoxantrone Versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients With Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis”. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 49/1 (March 2022), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1086113.
JAMA Gündüz T, Özcan G, Çakar A, Akçay Hİ, Özdağ Acarlı AN, Eraksoy M, Kürtüncü M. Comparison of Mitoxantrone versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. diclemedj. 2022;49:29–35.
MLA Gündüz, Tuncay et al. “Comparison of Mitoxantrone Versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients With Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis”. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, vol. 49, no. 1, 2022, pp. 29-35, doi:10.5798/dicletip.1086113.
Vancouver Gündüz T, Özcan G, Çakar A, Akçay Hİ, Özdağ Acarlı AN, Eraksoy M, Kürtüncü M. Comparison of Mitoxantrone versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. diclemedj. 2022;49(1):29-35.