Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The Measurement of Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin in Umbilical Cord Blood and the Assessment of Its Relationship with Neonatal Results

Year 2022, Volume: 49 Issue: 2, 308 - 314, 13.06.2022
https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1128915

Abstract

References

  • 1.American Society of Nephrology American Societyof Nephrology Renal Research Report. J Am SocNephrol 2005; 16: 1886–93.
  • 2.Bellos, I., Fitrou, G., Daskalakis, G. et al. Neutrophilgelatinase-associated lipocalin as predictor of acutekidney injury in neonates with perinatal asphyxia: asystematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pediatr.2018; 177: 1425-34.
  • 3.De Mul A, Parvex P, Wilhelm-Bals A. Neutrophilgelatinase-associated lipocalin distribution inpreterm newborns without acute kidney injury asdefined by a reference method. J Matern FetalNeonatal Med. 2021; 17; 1-5.
  • 4.Parravicini E, Nemerofsky SL, Michelson KA, et al.Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin is a promising biomarker for late onset culture-positive sepsis in very low birth weight infants.Pediatr Res. 2010; 67: 636-40.

The Measurement of Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin in Umbilical Cord Blood and the Assessment of Its Relationship with Neonatal Results

Year 2022, Volume: 49 Issue: 2, 308 - 314, 13.06.2022
https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1128915

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, the relationship of cord blood Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL) with neonatal diseases was investigated.
Methods: NGAL levels were measured in the cord blood of 180 babies born between 2015 and 2016. Patients were classified according to maternal diseases, neonatal diseases and demographic characteristics. Obtained data were compared with cord blood NGAL levels.
Results: In our study, the mean NGAL levels were 1283.99 ng/mL in boys and 1306.52 ng/mL in girls. Umbilical cord blood NGAL levels of infants diagnosed with intrauterine growth retardation (1913.4±2833.5 ng/mL) and prolonged premature rupture of membranes (2594.2±2037.1 ng/mL) were found to be statistically high (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between NGAL levels in infants of mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus, acyanotic congenital heart diseases, meconium aspiration syndrome, infants of mothers with preeclampsia, Apgar scores and infants of mothers with oligohydramnios (p>0.05).
Conclusions: Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin, may be useful as a diagnostic biomarker in the evaluation of maternal and neonatal diseases. However, studies on larger patient populations are needed.

References

  • 1.American Society of Nephrology American Societyof Nephrology Renal Research Report. J Am SocNephrol 2005; 16: 1886–93.
  • 2.Bellos, I., Fitrou, G., Daskalakis, G. et al. Neutrophilgelatinase-associated lipocalin as predictor of acutekidney injury in neonates with perinatal asphyxia: asystematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pediatr.2018; 177: 1425-34.
  • 3.De Mul A, Parvex P, Wilhelm-Bals A. Neutrophilgelatinase-associated lipocalin distribution inpreterm newborns without acute kidney injury asdefined by a reference method. J Matern FetalNeonatal Med. 2021; 17; 1-5.
  • 4.Parravicini E, Nemerofsky SL, Michelson KA, et al.Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin is a promising biomarker for late onset culture-positive sepsis in very low birth weight infants.Pediatr Res. 2010; 67: 636-40.
There are 4 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Original Articles
Authors

Seckin İlter This is me

Sabahattin Ertugrul This is me

İbrahim Deger This is me

İbrahim Kaplan This is me

Publication Date June 13, 2022
Submission Date November 22, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 49 Issue: 2

Cite

APA İlter, S., Ertugrul, S., Deger, İ., Kaplan, İ. (2022). The Measurement of Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin in Umbilical Cord Blood and the Assessment of Its Relationship with Neonatal Results. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, 49(2), 308-314. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1128915
AMA İlter S, Ertugrul S, Deger İ, Kaplan İ. The Measurement of Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin in Umbilical Cord Blood and the Assessment of Its Relationship with Neonatal Results. diclemedj. June 2022;49(2):308-314. doi:10.5798/dicletip.1128915
Chicago İlter, Seckin, Sabahattin Ertugrul, İbrahim Deger, and İbrahim Kaplan. “The Measurement of Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin in Umbilical Cord Blood and the Assessment of Its Relationship With Neonatal Results”. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 49, no. 2 (June 2022): 308-14. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1128915.
EndNote İlter S, Ertugrul S, Deger İ, Kaplan İ (June 1, 2022) The Measurement of Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin in Umbilical Cord Blood and the Assessment of Its Relationship with Neonatal Results. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 49 2 308–314.
IEEE S. İlter, S. Ertugrul, İ. Deger, and İ. Kaplan, “The Measurement of Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin in Umbilical Cord Blood and the Assessment of Its Relationship with Neonatal Results”, diclemedj, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 308–314, 2022, doi: 10.5798/dicletip.1128915.
ISNAD İlter, Seckin et al. “The Measurement of Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin in Umbilical Cord Blood and the Assessment of Its Relationship With Neonatal Results”. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 49/2 (June 2022), 308-314. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1128915.
JAMA İlter S, Ertugrul S, Deger İ, Kaplan İ. The Measurement of Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin in Umbilical Cord Blood and the Assessment of Its Relationship with Neonatal Results. diclemedj. 2022;49:308–314.
MLA İlter, Seckin et al. “The Measurement of Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin in Umbilical Cord Blood and the Assessment of Its Relationship With Neonatal Results”. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, vol. 49, no. 2, 2022, pp. 308-14, doi:10.5798/dicletip.1128915.
Vancouver İlter S, Ertugrul S, Deger İ, Kaplan İ. The Measurement of Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin in Umbilical Cord Blood and the Assessment of Its Relationship with Neonatal Results. diclemedj. 2022;49(2):308-14.