Görsel Diş Rengi Seçimini Etkileyen Faktörler: Derleme

Abstract

Hastaların estetik taleplerindeki artış, diş hekimliğinde kullanılan materyallerde ve tedavi seçeneklerinde çeşitli gelişmelere yol açmaktadır. Bu gelişmelerin hayata geçirilmesi ve ideal estetik algıyı yaratabilmekteki en önemli basamaklardan biri, doğru renk seçimidir. Dişler ve restorasyonlar arasındaki renk uyumu hastalar tarafından da oldukça önem verilen bir konudur.
Diş rengi seçiminde farklı yöntemler kullanılabilmektedir: renk skalaları ile görsel renk seçimi ve dijital cihazlar yardımı ile renk seçimi. İnsan gözü, renkler arasındaki en küçük farklılığına bile çok hassasdır. Ancak; renk skalaları kullanılarak yapılan renk seçiminde renk algısı subjektifdir. Hekimin yaşı, cinsiyeti, tecrübesi, ruh hali, hastanın başının pozisyonu, ortam koşulları, kullanılan ışık kaynağı gibi çok çeşitli faktörler görsel renk seçimi sonuçlarını etkileyebilmektedir. Bu derlemede, diş hekimliğinde renk skalaları kullanılarak yapılan görsel renk seçimini etkileyen faktörler anlatılmaktadır. Renk algısının subjektifliği, renk seçim prosedürünün karmaşıklığı ve dijital renk ölçüm cihazlarında oluşabilecek problemlerden ötürü; diş hekimliği renk seçim prosedüründe dijital ve görsel renk seçim yöntemlerinin birlikte kullanılması önerilmektedir.

Keywords

• Diş rengi
• görsel renk seçimi
• estetik diş hekimliği

Factors Affecting The Visual Tooth Shade Selection: A Review

Abstract

The increase in the esthetic demands of the patients, leads to various developments in the materials used in dentistry and treatment options. One of the most important steps in realizing these developments and creating the ideal esthetic perception is the right shade selection. Color harmony between teeth and restorations is an issue that is highly important for patients.
Different methods can be used in tooth shade selection: visual shade selection with tooth shade guides and shade selection with digital devices. Human eyes are very sensitive to even the smallest difference between colors; but color perception is subjective in shade selection using tooth shade guides. Various factors, such as the physician's age, gender, experience, physical mood, position of the patient's head, ambient conditions, and the light source, can affect the visual shade selection results. In this review, the factors affecting the visual tooth shade selection with tooth shade guides are explained. Due to the subjectivity of color perception, the complexity of the shade selection procedure and the problems that may occur with digital color measuring devices; it is recommended to use digital and visual shade selection methods together in dentistry.

Keywords

• Tooth color
• Visual shade selection
• Esthetic dentistry

References

1. 1. Ozat PB, Tuncel I, Eroglu E. Repeatability and reliability of human eye in visual shade selection. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40(12):958-64.
2. 2. Igiel C, Lehmann KM, Ghinea R, Weyhrauch M, Hangx Y, Scheller H, et al. Reliability of visual and instrumental color matching. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29(5):303-8.
3. 3. Joshi R, Acharya J. Shade matching ability of dental students using two visual light sources. Nepal Med Coll J. 2017;19(1):24-6.
4. 4. Haralur SB, Al-Shehri KS, Assiri HM, Al-Qahtani MA. Influence of personality on tooth shade selection. Int J Esthet Dent. 2016;11(1):126-37.
5. 5. Pecho OE, Ghinea R, Perez MM, Della Bona A. Influence of gender on visual shade matching in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29(2):15-23.
6. 6. Pecho OE, Ghinea R, Alessandretti R, Pérez MM, Della Bona A. Visual and instrumental shade matching using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas. Dent Mater J. 2016;32(1):82-92.
7. 7. Blum SL, Horn M, Olms C. A comparison of intraoral spectrophotometers—Are there user‐specific differences? J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(5):442-8.
8. 8. Dagg H, O'connell B, Claffey N, Byrne D, Gorman C. The influence of some different factors on the accuracy of shade selection. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31(9):900-4.

9. 9. Chen H, Huang J, Dong X, Qian J, He J, Qu X, et al. A systematic review of visual and instrumental measurements for tooth shade matching. Quintessence Int. 2012;43(8):649-59.
10. 10. Kahramanoğlu E, Özkan YK. Diş hekimliğinde estetik ve renk. Cumhur Dent J. 2013;16(4):339-47.
11. 11. Brandt J, Nelson S, Lauer HC, von Hehn U, Brandt S. In vivo study for tooth colour determination-visual versus digital. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(9):2863-71.
12. 12. Curd FM, Jasinevicius TR, Graves A, Cox V, Sadan A. Comparison of the shade matching ability of dental students using two light sources. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;96(6):391-6.
13. 13. Kalantari MH, Ghoraishian SA, Mohaghegh M. Evaluation of accuracy of shade selection using two spectrophotometer systems: Vita Easyshade and Degudent Shadepilot. Eur J Dent. 2017;11(2):196-200.
14. 14. Ristic I, Paravina RD. Does gender influence color matching quality? Balk J Dent Med. 2016;20(2):89-93.
15. 15. Alfouzan AF, Alqahtani HM, Tashkandi EA. The effect of color training of dental students' on dental shades matching quality. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29(5):346-51.
16. 16. Haddad HJ, Jakstat HA, Arnetzl G, Borbely J, Vichi A, Dumfahrt H, et al. Does gender and experience influence shade matching quality? J Dent. 2009;37:e40-e44.
17. 17. Capa N, Malkondu O, Kazazoglu E, Calikkocaoglu S. Effects of individual factors and the training process of the shade-matching ability of dental students. J Dent Sci. 2011;6(3):147-52.
18. 18. Alomari M, Chadwick R. Factors influencing the shade matching performance of dentists and dental technicians when using two different shade guides. Br Dent J. 2011;211(11):E23.
19. 19. Miranda M. Effect of gender, experience, and value on color perception. Oper Dent. 2012;37(3):228-33.
20. 20. Poljak-Guberina R, Celebic A, Powers JM, Paravina RD. Colour discrimination of dental professionals and colour deficient laypersons. J Dent. 2011;39:17-22.
21. 21. Bahannan SA. Shade matching quality among dental students using visual and instrumental methods. J Dent. 2014;42(1):48-52.
22. 22. Recen D, Önal B, Türkün LŞ. Deneyimin kompozit rezinlerin renk seçimi üzerine etkisinin bir spektrofotometre kullanılarak değerlendirilmesi. Acta Odontol Turc. 2016;33(1):12-7.
23. 23. Çapa N, Kazazoğlu E, Çalikkocaoğlu S. Evaluating factors that affect the shade-matching ability of dentists, dental staff members and laypeople. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141(1):71-6.
24. 24. Gasparik C, Tofan A, Culic B, Badea M, Dudea D. Influence of light source and clinical experience on shade matching. Clujul Med. 2014;87(1):30-3.
25. 25. Lagouvardos PE, Diamanti H, Polyzois G. Effect of individual shades on reliability and validity of observers in colour matching. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2004;12(2):51-6.
26. 26. Jasinevicius TR, Curd FM, Schilling L, Sadan A. Shade‐matching abilities of dental laboratory technicians using a commercial light source. J Prosthodont. 2009;18(1):60-3.
27. 27. Yilmaz B, Irmak O, Yaman BC. Outcomes of visual tooth shade selection performed by operators with different experience. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(5):500-7.
28. 28. Horn DJ, Bulan-Brady J, Hicks ML. Sphere spectrophotometer versus human evaluation of tooth shade. J Endod. 1998;24(12):786-90.
29. 29. Shammas M, Alla RK. Color and shade matching in dentistry. Trends Biomater Artif Organs. 2011;25(4):172-5.
30. 30. Fondriest J. Shade matching in restorative dentistry: the science and strategies. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003;23(5):467-79.
31. 31. Corcodel N, Helling S, Rammelsberg P, Hassel AJ. Metameric effect between natural teeth and the shade tabs of a shade guide. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010;118(3):311-6.
32. 32. Lee Y-K, Powers JM. Metameric effect between resin composite and dentin. Dent Mater. 2005;21(10):971-6.
33. 33. Brewer JD, Wee A, Seghi R. Advances in color matching. Dent Clin N Am. 2004;48(2):341-58.
34. 34. Sikri VK. Color: Implications in dentistry. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13(4):249-55.
35. 35. Wee AG, Meyer A, Wu WD, Wichman CS. Lighting conditions used during visual shade matching in private dental offices. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(4):469-74.
36. 36. Barrett AA, Grimaudo NJ, Anusavice KJ, Yang MC. Influence of tab and disk design on shade matching of dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88(6):591-7.
37. 37. İnan H, Yapıcı D, Şentürk Y, Toprak S, Çınar D, Yüzügüllü B. Başkent Üniversitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi öğrencileri ile restoratif diş hekimleri arasında renk eşleştirme yetilerinin karşılaştırılması. Hacettepe Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2008;32(3):56-63.
38. 38. Önal B, Recen D, Türkün LŞ. Restoratif Diş Hekimliğinde Renk Seçimi. Türkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci. 2015;1(3):21-7.
39. 39. Nakhaei M, Ghanbarzadeh J, Keyvanloo S, Alavi S, Jafarzadeh H. Shade matching performance of dental students with three various lighting conditions. J Contemp Dent Prac. 2013;14(1):100-3.
40. 40. Boksman L. Shade selection: accuracy and reproducibility. Ont Dent. 2007;84(4):24-7.
41. 41. Keyf F, Uzun G, Altunsoy S. Diş hekimliğinde renk seçimi. Hacettepe Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2009;33(4):52-8.