Abstract
Present essay compares and contrasts Hegel’s and Adorno’s thought in a critically dialectical manner and develops the approach of Adorno’s conceiving of the art work as a form of “becoming” within the context of “truth-content (Unwahrheit)”. In this way, by first refering back to basic texts in the history of thinking concerning the creative act such as Timaeus, tries to decipher its modern expressions in the works of art by grounding identity and non-identity on the concept of ‘limit’ -which dialectically excludes them in * Doç. Dr., İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Mimarlık Fakültesi, Mimarlık Bölümü, e-posta: ohush@yahoo.com.their inherence within- by means of interpreting its counterpart in the Ancient Greek under the name hupokrites which is given to actor
References
- Adorno, Th eodor W. (2002). Aesthetic Th eory, trans. & ed. by Robert Hullot-Kentor, Continuum.
- Adorno, Th eodor W. (1973). Negative Dialectics, trans. by E. B. Ashton, Routledge: London and New York.
- Beckett, Samuel (2003). Trilogy: Molloy, Malone Dies, Th e Unnamable, Calder Publications, London: Montreuil New York.
- Cahn, Michael (1984). “Subversive Mimesis: Th eodore W. Adorno and the Modern Impasse of Critique,” Mimesis in Contemporary Th eory: An Interdisciplinary Approach, Vol. I., ed. Mihai Spariosu, Philadelphia: John Benjamin’s Publishing Company.
- Chaplin, Charles (1964). “My Autobiography”, Simon & Schuster.
- Hegel, G. F. W. (1969). Hegel’s Science of Logic, trans. A. V. Miller, Atlantic Highlands.
- Plato (1900-1907). Platonis Opera, 5 vols., ed. John Burnet, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Plato (1969). Th e Collected Dialogues of Plato, eds. E. Hamilton & H Cairns, Princeton University Press.
Abstract
Makale, Hegel ve Adorno düşüncesini diyalektik yönden eleştirel olarak karşılaştırarak, özellikle Adorno’nun sanat yapıtını “hakikat esası (Unwahrheit)” bağlamında bir “oluşum” olarak gören yaklaşımını geliştirir. Böylece çalışma, Timaios gibi temel metinler üzerinden yaratıcılık fiilini ele almaya çalışarak bunun modern sanatsal ifadelerini, özdeşlik ve değil-özdeşilik kavramlarını diyalektik bağlamda içerecek şekilde dışta bırakan ‘sınır’ kavramında temellendirecek biçimde Eski Yunan’da oyuncuya verilen hupokrites ismi üzerinden yorumlar
Keywords
References
- Adorno, Th eodor W. (2002). Aesthetic Th eory, trans. & ed. by Robert Hullot-Kentor, Continuum.
- Adorno, Th eodor W. (1973). Negative Dialectics, trans. by E. B. Ashton, Routledge: London and New York.
- Beckett, Samuel (2003). Trilogy: Molloy, Malone Dies, Th e Unnamable, Calder Publications, London: Montreuil New York.
- Cahn, Michael (1984). “Subversive Mimesis: Th eodore W. Adorno and the Modern Impasse of Critique,” Mimesis in Contemporary Th eory: An Interdisciplinary Approach, Vol. I., ed. Mihai Spariosu, Philadelphia: John Benjamin’s Publishing Company.
- Chaplin, Charles (1964). “My Autobiography”, Simon & Schuster.
- Hegel, G. F. W. (1969). Hegel’s Science of Logic, trans. A. V. Miller, Atlantic Highlands.
- Plato (1900-1907). Platonis Opera, 5 vols., ed. John Burnet, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Plato (1969). Th e Collected Dialogues of Plato, eds. E. Hamilton & H Cairns, Princeton University Press.
Details
| Other ID | JA97RG65UY |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 1, 2014 |
| Submission Date | December 1, 2014 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2014 Issue: 6 |