A STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF THE SOCIAL-STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICSDETERMINING THE MEANINGFULNESS OF WORK ONEMPOWERMENTAND THE RESULTS OF THESE EFFECTS

Abstract

This study aims to determine the social-structural characteristics that organizations must have in order that employees could feel themselves empowered. For thispurpose, the possible effects of social-structural characteristics on the meaningfulness level of the work performed were studied. in addition, an analysis was conducted to determine whether the level ofwork meaningfulness might lead to affective commitment as well. The subjects of the study were 222 administrative personnel of 13 state universities. in conclusion, it was determined that the structural characteristics providing the work with meaningfulness were role ambiguity, access to resourses, and access to information. in addition, it was determined that the employees who fınd their work meaningful have affective commitment to their organizations.

Keywords

• Social-Structural Characteristics, Meaningfulness, Empowerment, Commitment

İŞİN ANLAMLILIĞINI BELİRLEYEN SOSYAL-YAPISAL ÖZELLİKLERİN GÜÇLENDİRMEYE OLAN ETKİLERİ VE SONUÇLARI ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Abstract

Bu araştırma çalışanların kendilerini güçlü hissedebilmeleri için örgütlerin sahip olması gereken sosyal-yapısal özellikleri belirlemeyi hedeflemektedir. Bu maksatla sosyal-yapısal özelliklerin, yapılan işin anlamlılık düzeyi üzerine muhtemel etkileri incelenmiştir. Ayrıca işin anlamlılık düzeyinin duygusal bağlılığa yol açıp açmayacağı analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma 13 kamu üniversitesindeki 222 idari çalışan üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sonuç olarak rol belirsizliği, kaynaklara erişim ve bilgiye erişimin, yapılan işe anlam kazandıran yapısal özellikler olduğu belirlenmiştir. Buna ilaveten işini anlamlı bulan işgörenlerin kurumlarına duygusal olarak bağlandıkları sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Keywords

• Sosyal - Yapısal Özellikler, Anlamlılık, Güçlendirme, Bağlılık

References

1. ALLEN, N. J. ve MEYER, J. P. (1990a). Organizational socialization tactics : a longitudinal analysis of links to newcomers' commitment nad role orientation.
2. Academy of Management Journal, Vol:33, No:4, 847-858. ss.
3. ALLEN, N. J. ve MEYER, J. P. (1990b). The Measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization, Journal ofOccupationalPsychology, Vol:63, No:l, l-18.ss.
4. BOWEN, D. E. ve LAWLER, E. E. (1992), The Empowerment of service workers : what, why, how, and when, Sloan Management Review, Spring, 31-39. ss.
5. CHEN, Z. X. ve FRANCESCO, A. M. (2003). The Relationship between the three components of commitment and employee performance in China, Journal of VocationalBehavior, Vol:62, No:3, June, 490-516.ss.
6. CONGER, J. A. ve KANUNGO, R. N. (1998). The Empowerment rrocess : integrating theory and practice, Academy of Management Review, Vol: 13, No:3, 471-482.ss.
7. DOĞAN, S., (2003). Personel güçlendirme (Empowerment). İstanbul, Sistem Yayıncılık.
8. EREN, E., (1993), Yönetim ve organizasyon, 2. bs., İstanbul, Beta Yayıncılık.

9. HU, S.L. Y. ve LEUNG, L. (2003). Effects of expectancy-value, attitudes, and use of the internet on psychological empowerment experienced by Chinese women at the Workplace, Telematics andInformatics, 365-382.ss.
10. KIRKMAN, B.L. ve ROSEN, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: antecedents and consequences of team empowerment, Academy of Management Journal, Vol:42,No:l,58-74.ss.
11. MCGEE, G.W. ve FORD, R.C. (1987). Two (or more?) dimensions of organizational commitment: reexamination of the affective and continuance commitment scales, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol:87, No:72, 638-642.ss.
12. MEYER, J.P. ve ALLEN, N.J. (1991). A Three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment, Human Resources Management Review, Vol:91, No:l,61-89.ss.
13. MEYER, J.P., STANLEY, D.J., HERSCOVITCH, L. ve TOPOLNYTSKY, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: a meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of VocationalBehavior, Vol:02, No:61, 20-52.ss.
14. MURAT, G. (2001). Çağdaş bir yönetim yaklaşımı : personel güçlendirme. Öneri, Vol:4,No:16, 113-126. ss.
15. NIJHOF, W. J., DE JONG, M.J. ve BEUKHOF, G. (1998). Employee commitment in changing organizations : an exploration. Journal of European Industrial 7r™g,Vol:22,No:6,243-248.ss.
16. NYHAN, R.C. (2000), Changing the paradigm trust and its role in public sector organizations. American Review of Public Administration, Vol:30, No:l, 87- 109.SS.
17. OLIVER, N. (1990). Rewards, investments, alternatives and organizational commitment : empirical evidence and theoretical development. Journal of OccupationalPsychology, Vol:63, No:l, 19-31.ss.
18. ÖZDAMAR, K. (1999). Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi, 2.bs., Eskişehir, Kaan Kitabevi.
19. ROBBINS, T.L., CRINO, M.D. ve FREDENDALL, L.D. (2002). An Integrative model of the empowerment process. Human Resource Management Review, Vol:12,419-443.ss.
20. SPREITZER, G.M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace : dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, Vol:38,No:5,1442-1465.ss.
21. . (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, Vol:39, No:2, 483-504.ss.
22. SPREITZER, G.M., KIZILOS, M.A. ve NASON, S.W. (1997), A Dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment and effectiveness, satisfaction, and strain. Journal of Management, Vol:23, No:5, 679-704.ss.
23. THOMAS, K.W. ve VELTHOUSE, B.A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment : an "interpretive" model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, Vol:15, No:4, 666-681.ss.
24. WASTI, S.A. (2002). Affective and continuance commitment to the organization : test of an integrated model in the Turkish context. Internetional Journal of InterculturalRelations, Vol:02, No:26, 525-550.ss.
25. WETZELS, M., RUYTER, K.D. ve BLOEMER, J. (2000). Antecedents and consequences of role stress of retail sales persons. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol:7, 65-75.SS.
26. ZANZI, A. (1987). How organic is your organization? Determinants of organic/mechanistic tendencies in a public accounting fîrm, Journal of Management Studies, Vol:24, 125-142.ss.