FİNANSAL SİSTEMİN İTHALAT TALEBİ ÜZERİNDEKİ UZUN DÖNEM ETKİSİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Abstract

Çalışmada finansal sistemin uzun dönemde ithalat talebi üzerindeki etkisini görmek amacıyla, finansal sistem bileşenleri ithalat talebi fonksiyonu içerisine yerleştirilmiştir. Bununla birlikte eleştiriler doğrultusunda ithalat talep fonksiyonu içerisinde gayri safi yurt içi hasıla yerine ulusal nakit akışı değişkeni kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada finansal sisteme ait bir değişkenin uzun dönemde ithalat talebi üzerindeki etkilerini görmek amacıyla uzun dönem yapısal VAR metodolojisi kullanılmıştır. Kullanılan veriler "Güçlü Ekonomiye Geçiş Programı"nın uygulanmaya başladığı tarihten itibaren günümüze sekiz yıllık dönemi kapsamaktadır. Çalışma sonucunda ulusal nakit akışının ithalat talebi üzerinde pozitif bir etkisinin bulunduğu, göreceli fiyatların ise ithalat talebini beklendiği gibi uzun dönemde pozitif etkilediği görülmüştür. Finansal sisteme ait değişkenlerden bazılarının ise ithalat talebi üzerinde anlamlı etkilerinin olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Sonuçlar politika yapıcılarının politika kararlarında bu etkileşimi dikkate almaları gerektiğini göstermektedir.

Keywords

• İthalat Talebi, Uzun Dönem Yapısal VAR, Finansal Sistem

LONG TERM IMPACT OF FINANCIAL SYSTEM ON IMPORT DEMAND FOR TURKEY

Abstract

In this study, we aim to analyze whether a shock in a component of the financial system affect import demand on the long run. In this regard, we include components of financial system into the import demand function and employ long run SVAR method. We analyze the eight period from the beginning of “Transition Program for Strengthening the Turkish Economy”. We conclude that import demand responses affect positively a national cash flow shock. Relative prices shock affects import demand positively, as expected. There is a number of variables belonging to a financial system which induces import demand. According to results, the financial system influences the import demand and policymakers have to take into account the interaction between import demand and financial system in the policy-making process.

Keywords

• Import Demand, Long-Rrun Structural VAR, Financial System

References

1. ASTERIOU, D. (2005). Applied econometrics a modern approach using eviews and microfit. Revised Edition., Hempshire: Palgrave.
2. AYDIN, M.F., ÇIPLAK, U., YÜCEL, M.E. (2004). Export supply and import demand models for the Turkish economy. CBRT Research Department Working Paper, no. 04/09.
3. BARIŞIK, S., DEMÎRCİOĞLU, E. (2006). Türkiye'de döviz kuru rejimi, konvertibilite, ihracat- ithalat ilişkisi (1980-2001). Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(3), 71 - 84. ss.
4. BAYRAKTUTAN, Y., BIDIRDI, H. (2010). Basic determinants of Turkish import (1989- 2004). Ege Academic Review, 10(1), 51 - 369. ss.
5. BERNANKE, B.S. (1986). Alternative explanations of the money- income correlation. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 25, 49- 100. ss.
6. BLANCARH, O.J., QUAH, D. (1989). The dynamic effects of aggregate demand and supply disturbances. American Economic Review, 79, 655 - 73. ss.
7. BLANCHARD, O. J., WATSON, M.W. (1986). Are business cycles all alike? R. Gordon (ed) The American Business Cycle: Continuity and Change içinde. NBER and University of Chicago Press, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 123 - 156. ss.
8. CARONE, G. (1996). Modeling the US demand for imports through cointegration and error correction. Journal of Policy Modeling, 18(1), 1 - 48. ss.

9. CHANG, T., HO, Y.H., HUANG, C.J. (2005). A reexamination of South Korea's aggregate import demand function: The bounds test analysis. Journal of Economic Development, 30(1), 119 - 128. ss.
10. CHU, K., HWA, E.C., KRISHNAMURTY, K. (1983). Export instability and adjustments of imports, capital flows and external reserves: A short-run dynamic model. D. Bigman and T. Taya (ed.), Exchange Rate and Trade Instability: Causes, Consequences, and Remedies içinde. Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Co.
11. DASH, A.K. (2005). An Econometric Estimation of The Aggregate Import Demand Function for India. International Business Research Conference, Athens.
12. DECK, T. (2002). Financial develpoment and international trade is there a link?. Journal of International Economics, 57, 107 - 131. ss.
13. DIEWERT, E.W., MORRISON C.J. (1986). Export supply and import demand functions: a production theory approach. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers, no.2011.
14. DUTTA, D., NASIRUDDIN, A. (1999). An aggregate import demand function for Bangladesh: a cointegration approach. Applied Economics, 31(4), 465- 472. ss.
15. ELLIOT, G., ROTHENBERG, T.J., STOCK, J.H. (1996). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica, 64(4), 813 - 836. ss.
16. FAINI, R., PRITCHETT, L., CLAVIJO, F. (1988). Import demand in developing countries. The World Bank Working Papers, no. WPS 122.
17. GOLDSTEIN, M., KHAN, M.S., OFFICER, L.H. (1980). Prices of tradable and nontradable goods in the demand for total imports. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 62(2), pp. 190-199.
18. GREGORY, A.W., HANSEN, B.E. (1996). Residual-Based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts. Journal of Econometrics, 70(1), 99 - 126. ss.
19. GUJARATI, D. (2004). Basic econometrics. Fourth Edition,, Chicago: McGraw-Hill Publications.
20. GUMEDE, V. (2000). Import performance and import demand functions for South Africa. TIPS Working Papers, no. 9.
21. GÜL, E., EKİNCİ, A. (2006). Türkiye'de reel döviz kuru ile ihracat ve ithalat arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi: 1990- 2006. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16, 165- 190. ss.
22. HAMORI, S., MATSUBAYASHI, Y. (2001). An empirical analysis on the stability of Japan's aggregate import demand function. Japan and The World Economy, 13(2), 135- 144. ss.
23. IOANNIDIS, C., LAWS, J., MATTHEWS, K., MORGAN, B. (1995). Business cycle analysis and forecasting with a structural vector autoregression model for Wales. Journal of Forecasting, 14(3), 251 - 265. ss.
24. KALYONCU, H. (2006). An aggregate import demand function for Turkey: a cointegration analysis. The Indian Journal of Economics, 343, 1 - 11. ss.
25. KARAGÖZ, M., DOĞAN, Ç. (2005). Döviz kuru dış ticaret ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği. Firat University Journal of Social Science, 15(2), 219 - 228. ss.
26. KHAN, M.S. (1975). The structure and behaviour of imports of Venezuela. Review of Economics and Statistics, 57, 221- 224. ss.
27. KHAN, M.S. (1974). Import and export demand in developing countries. IMF Staff Papers, no. 21, 678 - 692. ss.
28. KUTLAR, A., ŞİMŞEK, M. (2003). Türkiye'de ithalat talebinin koentegrasyon analizi: 1987(I)- 2000(IV). Dokuz Eylül Universitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 18(2), 65 - 82. ss.
29. KWIATKOWSKI, D., PHILLIPS, P.C.B., SCHMIDT, P., SHIN, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics, 54(1-3), 159 - 178. ss.
30. LEAMER, E.E., STERN, R.M. (1970). Quantitative international economics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc.
31. LEE, J., STRAZICICH, M. (2004). Minimum LM unit root test with one structural breaks. Apalachian State University Working Papers, No 04-17.
32. LEE, J., STRAZICICH, M. (2003). Minimum LM unit root test with two structural breaks. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1082 - 1089. ss.
33. LIU, C., LUO, Z.Q., MA, L., PICKEN, D. (2008). Identifying house price diffusion patterns among australian state capital cities. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 12, 237 - 250. ss.
34. LUMSDAINE, R., PAPELL, D. (1999). Two structural breaks and the unit root hypothesis: New evidence about unemployment in Australia. Working Paper Series Victoria University Applied Economy Working Paper, no. 3/00.
35. MCCOY, D. (1997). How useful is structural VAR analysis for Irish economics. Eleventh Annual Conference of the Irish Economic Association, Athlone.
36. MEHTA, R., PARIKH, A. (2005). Impact of trade liberalization on import demands in India: A Panel Data Analysis for Commodity Groups. Applied Economics, 37, 1851- 1863. ss.
37. MUBIRU, E. (2003). The effects of globalisation on trade - a speical focus on rural farmers in Uganda. [Erişim Adresi]: http://www.global-poverty.org/policyAdvocacy/pahome2.5.nsf/ gereportsFAA90E89364586A388256E460083628B/$file/Edward. pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 14.06.2010).
38. MURRAY, T., GINMAN, P.J. (1976). An empirical examination of the traditional aggregate import demand model. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 58(1),75- 80.
39. NARAYAN, S., NARAYAN, P.K. (2005). An empirical analysis of Fiji's import demand function. Journal of Economic Studies, 32(2), 158 - 168. ss.
40. NARAYAN, P., SMYTH, R. (2005). Electricity consumption, employment and real income in Australia evidence from multivariate Granger causality tests. Energy Policy, 33, 1109-1116. ss.
41. NILSSON, K. (1999). Alternative measures of the Swedish real effective exchange rate. National Institute of Economic Research Working Paper, No.68.
42. ÖZGEN, F.B., GÜLOĞLU, B. (2004). Türkiye'de iç borçların iktisadi etkilerinin VAR tekniğiyle analizi. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 31, 93 - 114. ss.
43. PERRON, P. (1989). Test consistency with varying sampling frequency. Princeton University Econometric Research Program Research Memorandum, no.345.
44. SALAS, J. (1982). Estimation of the structure and elasticities of mexican imports in the period 1961- 1979. Journal of Development Economics, 10, 297 - 311. ss.
45. SHABBIR, T., MAHMOOD, R. (1991). Structural change in the import demand function for Pakistan. Pakistan Development Review, 30(4), 1159 - 1166. ss.
46. SIMS, A.C. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1 - 48. ss.
47. TANG, T.C. (2002). Aggregate import demand behaviour for Indonesia: evidence from bounds testing approach. Journal of Economics and Management, 10(2),1-21.ss.
48. TANG, T.C. (2004). Does financial variable(s) explain the Japanese aggregate import demand? A cointegration analysis. Applied Economics Letters, 11(12), 775 - 780. ss.
49. TANG, T.C., NAIR, M. (2002). A Cointegration analysis of Malaysian import demand function: reassessment from the bound test. Applied Economics Letters, 9(5), 293- 296. ss.
50. TEMURLENK, S., OLTULULAR, S. (2007). Türkiye'nin temel makro ekonomik değişkenlerinin bütünleşme dereceleri üzerine bir araştırma. İnönü Üniversitesi Ekonometri ve İstatistik Kongresi, Malatya.
51. XU, X. (2002). The dynamic- optimizing approach to import demand: a structural model. Economics Letters, 74, 265 - 270. ss.