TÜRKİYE EKONOMİSİ İÇİN ÜLKE-İÇİ FİYATLARIN YAKINSAMASI: PPP VARSAYIMI İÇİN ALT-BÖLGESEL TOPLULAŞTIRILMAMIŞ VERİ KULLANAN BİR PANEL VERİ ARAŞTIRMASI

Year 2014, Volume: 15 Issue: 2, 201 - 210, 01.07.2014

Mustafa Mete Pelin Karatay Gögül Levent Korap

https://izlik.org/JA29JP96YD

Abstract

Bu çalışma Türkiye ekonomisinden ülke-içi fiyatların iktisat kuramındaki uzun-dönem satın alma gücü paritesine destek veren durağan bir ilişki olarak belirtilebilmesi durumunu incelemeye çalışmaktadır. Bu amaçla ekonominin altbölgesel bir sınıflandırması 2005-2012 araştırma dönemi için dikkate alınmakta, ve Esaka 2003 izlenerek, çalışma 12 toplulaştırılmamış tüketici fiyat endeksinden oluşan bir panel tahmin yapısını Türkiye ekonomisinin alt-bölgeleri arasında malların göreceli fiyatlarının durağan zaman serisi özellikleri ile temsil edilip edilemeyeceğini araştırmak için kullanmaktadır

Keywords

Satınalma Gücü Paritesi , Panel Veri Ekonometrisi , Toplulaştırılmamış Fiyat Verisi , Türkiye Ekonomisi

CONVERGENCE OF IN-COUNTRY PRICES FOR THE TURKISH ECONOMY: A PANEL DATA SEARCH FOR THE PPP HYPOTHESIS USING SUB-REGIONAL DISAGGREGATED DATA

https://izlik.org/JA29JP96YD

Abstract

This paper tries to examine that in-country prices from the Turkish economy can be specified as a stationary relationship giving support to the long-run purchasing power parity in economics theory. For this purpose, a sub-regional categorization of the economy is considered over the investigation period of 2005-2012, and, following Esaka 2003 , the study uses a panel estimation framework consisting of 12 disaggregated consumer price indices to search for whether the relative prices of goods between sub-regions of the Turkish economy can be represented by stationary time series properties.

Keywords

Purchasing Power Parity , Panel Data Econometrics , Disaggregated Price Data , Turkish Economy

References

• ALBA, J.D., PAPELL, D.H. (2007). Purchasing power parity and country characteristics: evidence fron panel data tests. Journal of Development Economics, 83, 240-51. ss.
• ALBA, J.D., PARK, D. (2003). Purchasing power parity in developing countries: multi- period evidence under the current float. World Development, 31, 2049-60. ss.
• AZALI, M., HABIBULLAH, M.S., BAHARUMSHAH, A.Z. (2001). Does PPP hold between
• Asian and Japanese economies? evidence using panel unit root and panel cointegration. Japan and the World Economy, 13, 36-50. ss. BASHER, S.A., MOHSIN, M. (2004). PPP tests in cointegrated panels: evidence from Asian developing countries. Applied Economics Letters, 11, 163-6. ss.
• CERRATO, M., SARANTIS, N. (2008). Symmetry, proportionality and the purchasing power parity: evidence from panel cointegration tests. International Review of Economics and Finance, 17 (1), 56-65. ss.
• CHIU, R.L. (2002). Testing the purchasing power parity in panel data. International Review of Economics and Finance, 11, 349-62. ss.
• CHOI, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, , 249-72. ss.
• ENGEL, C., ROGERS, J.H. (1996). How wide is the border?. American Economic Review, , 1112-25. ss.
• ERLAT, H. (2003). The nature of persistence in Turkish real exchange rates. Emerging
• Markets Finance and Trade, 39 (2), 70-97. ss. ESAKA, T. (2003). Panel unit root tests of purchasing power parity between Japanese cities, 1998: disaggregated price data. Japan and the World Economy, 15, 233-44. ss.
• FISHER, R.A. (1932). Statistical methods for research workers, 4th edt., Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
• FLORES, R., JORION, P. and PREUMONT, P.Y. (1999). Multivariate unit root tests of the PPP hypothesis. Journal of Empirical Finance, 6, 335-53. ss.
• FROOT, K., ROGOFF, K. (1995). Perspectives on PPP and long-Run exchange rates. G.M. Grossman, K. Rogoff, K. (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 3, North- Holland, Amsterdam, 1647-88. ss.
• HEIMONEN, K. (1999). Stationarity of the European real exchange rates – evidence from panel data. Applied Economics, 31, 673-7. ss.
• JENKINS, M.A., SNAITH, S.M. (2005). Tests of purchasing power parity via cointegration analysis of heterogeneous panels with consumer price indices. Journal of Macroeconomics, 27, 345-62. ss.
• IM, K.S., PESARAN, M.H., SHIN, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels.
• Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53-74. ss. JENKINS, M.A. (1997). Cities, borders, distances, non-traded goods and purchasing power parity. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 59, 203-13. ss.
• KIM Y. (1990). Purchasing power parity in the long-run: a cointegration approach. Journal of
• Money, Credit and Banking, 22, 491-503. ss. LEVIN, A., LIN, C.F., CHU, C. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite- sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1-24. ss.
• LOTHIAN, J.R. (1997). Multi-country evidence on the behavior of purchasing power parity under the current float. Journal of International Money and Finance, 16, 19-35. ss.
• MACDONALD, G., ALLN, D., CRUICKSHANK, S. (2002). Purchasing power parity – evidence from a new panel test. Applied Economics, 34, 1319-24. ss.
• MADDALA, G.S., WU, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 631-52. ss.
• METIN K. (1994). A test of long-run purchasing poer parity and uncovered interest parity:
• Turkish case. Bilkent University Discussion Papers, No. 94 (2).
• OH, K.Y. (1996). Purhasing power parity and unit root tests using panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 15, 405-18. ss. ÖZDEMİR, Z.A. (2004). Mean reversion in real exchange rate: empirical evidence from Turkey, 1980-1999. METU Studies in Development, 31, 243-65. ss.
• PAPELL, D.H. (1997). Searching for stationarity: purchasing power parity under the current float. Journal of International Economics, 43, 313-32. ss.
• PARSLEY, D.C., WEI, S.J. (1996). Convergence to the law of one price without trade barriers orcCurrency fluctuations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 1211-36. ss.
• ROGOFF, K. (1996). The purchasing power parity puzzle. Journal of Economic Literature, , 647-68. ss.
• SARNO, L., TAYLOR, M.P. (1998). Real exchange rates under the current float: unequivocal evidence of mean reversion, Economics Letters, 60, 131-7. ss.
• SARNO, L., TAYLOR, M.P. (2002). The economics of exchange rates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. TAKAGI, S., YOSHIDA, Y. (1999). A cointegration test of long-run purchasing power parity between major Japanese cities, 1951-1991. Osaka Economic Papers, 48, 5-19. ss.
• TAYLOR, M.P. (1988). An empirical examination of long-run purchasing power parity using cointegration techniques. Applied Economics, 20, 1369-81. ss.
• TAYLOR, M.P. (2006). Real exchange rates and purchasing power parity: mean reversion in economic thought. Applied Financial Economics, 16, 1-17. ss.
• TAYLOR, M.P., SARNO, L. (1998). The behavior of real exchange rates during the post Bretton Woods period. Journal of International Economics, 46, 281-312. ss.
• TELATAR, E., KAZDAĞLI, H. (1998). Re-examining the long-run purchasing power parity hypothesis for a high inflation country. Applied Economics Letters, 5, 51-3. ss.
• WU, Y. (1996). Are real exchange rates nonstationary? evidence from panel-data Tests. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 28, 54-63. ss.
• WU, J.L., WU, S. (2001). Is purchasing power parity overvalued?. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 33, 804-12. ss.
• YAZGAN, M.E. (2003). The purchasing power parity hypothesis for a high inflation country: a re-examination of the case of Turkey. Applied Economics Letters, 10 (3), 143-7. ss.
• YILDIRIM, O. (2003). Döviz kurları çerçevesinde satın alma gücü paritesinin zaman serisi analizi ve Türkiye ekonomisi uygulaması. Bankacılar Dergisi, 44, 3-14. ss.