BibTex RIS Cite

DETERMINATION STRATEGY IN BUSINESS WITH ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS

Year 2006, Volume: 7 Issue: 2, 254 - 268, 01.07.2006

Abstract

The SWOT analysis is an analysis where external and internal environments of an enterprise are analyzed to find out strategic factors that affect the enterprises’ outcomes. These factors are also used to determine the strategies that would be followed. However, the SWOT analysis bears some insufficiencies with regard to measure and evaluation. It has been put forward in the relevant literature that these insufficiencies could be put aside by analytical approaches. But, only SWOT groups and strategic factors have analytically been dealt with in the previous literature. Deciding on alternative strategies that are based on SWOT factors has not been subject to any study. It is hoped that this study will fill a gap in the relevant literature. In order to fill the gap, the SWOT matrix is converted into a hierarchic structure and the model is analyzed with the Analytic Hierarchy Process

References

  • DİNÇER, Ö. (2004). Stratejik Yönetim ve İşletme Politikası. 7. Baskı, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • DYSON, R.G. (2004). Strategic development and SWOT analysis at the University of Warwick. European Journal Of Operational Research, 152, 631-640.
  • EXPERT CHOICE. (2000). Expert Choice, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
  • Software. Version 9.5, Expert Choice, Pittsburg, USA. HOUBEN, G., LENIE, K., VANHOOF, K. (1999). A Knowledge-based SWOT- anlysis system as an instrument for strategic planning in small and medium sized enterprises. Decision Support Systems, 26, 125-135.
  • KANGAS, J., KURTTILA, M., KAJANUS, M., KANGAS, A. (2003). Evaluating the management strategies of a forestland estate-the S-O-S approach. Journal of
  • Environmental Management, 69, 349-358. KAJANUS, M., KANGAS, J., KURTTILA, M. (2004). The use of value focused thinking and the A’WOT hybrid method in tourism management. Tourism Management, 25, 499-506.
  • KURTTILA, M., PEASONEN, M., KANGAS, J., KAJANUS, M. (2000). Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis-a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. Forest Policy and Economics, 41-52.
  • LEE, S.F., LO, K.K. (2003). e-Enterprise and management course development using strategy formulations framework for vocational education. Journal of
  • Materials Processing Technology, 139, 604-612. LESKINEN, L.A., LESKINEN, P., KURTTILA, M., KANGAS, J., KAJANUS, M. (2006). Adapting modern strategic decision support tools in the participatory strategy process-a case study of a forest research station. Forest Policy and Economics, 8(3), 267-278.
  • MASOZERA, M.K., ALAVALAPATI, J.R.R., JACOBSON, S.K., SHRESTA, R.K. (2004). Assessing the suitability of community-based management for the Nyungwe Forest Reserve, Rwanda. Forest Policy and Economics, Article In Pres.
  • SAATY, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill International Book Company, U.S.A.
  • SAATY, T. L. (1991). Some Mathematical Concepts of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Behaviormetrika, 29, 1-9.
  • SHRESTHA, R.K., ALAVALAPATI, J.R.R., KALMBACHER, R.S. (2004). Exploring the potential for silvopasture adoption in South-central Florida: an application of SWOT-AHP method. Agricultural Systems, 81, 185-199.
  • STEWART, R., MOARMED, S., DAET, R. (2002). Strategic implementation of IT/IS projects in construction: a case study. Automation in Construction, 11, 681-694.
  • ÜLGEN, H., MİRZE, S.K. (2004). İşletmelerde Stratejik Yönetim, Literatür Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • WEIHRICH, H. (1982). The TOWS matrix-a tool for situational analysis. J. Long Range Plan, 15 (2).

ANALİTİK HİYERARŞİ PROSES YÖNTEMİYLE İŞLETMELERDE STRATEJİ BELİRLEME

Year 2006, Volume: 7 Issue: 2, 254 - 268, 01.07.2006

Abstract

FÜTZ analizi, iç ve dış çevrenin analizi neticesinde, işletmenin başarısı üzerinde etkili bulunan stratejik faktörleri ve bu faktörler temelinde izlenecek stratejileri belirlemektedir. Ancak, FÜTZ analizi ölçme ve değerlendirme bakımından bir dizi eksiklik taşımaktadır. Yazında, bu eksikliklerin analitik yaklaşımlarla giderilebileceğine ilişkin çalışmalar yapılmıştır. Yapılan çalışmalarda, yalnız FÜTZ grupları ve stratejik faktörler analitik yaklaşımla incelenmiştir. FÜTZ faktörleri temelinde belirlenen alternatif stratejilerin seçimi çalışma konusu edilmemiştir. Yazında görülen bu eksiklik, bu çalışmayla giderilmeye çalışılmıştır. Bu amaçla, FÜTZ matrisi hiyerarşik bir yapıya dönüştürülmüş ve oluşturulan model Analitik Hiyerarşi Proses AHP yöntemiyle çözülmüştür.

References

  • DİNÇER, Ö. (2004). Stratejik Yönetim ve İşletme Politikası. 7. Baskı, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • DYSON, R.G. (2004). Strategic development and SWOT analysis at the University of Warwick. European Journal Of Operational Research, 152, 631-640.
  • EXPERT CHOICE. (2000). Expert Choice, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
  • Software. Version 9.5, Expert Choice, Pittsburg, USA. HOUBEN, G., LENIE, K., VANHOOF, K. (1999). A Knowledge-based SWOT- anlysis system as an instrument for strategic planning in small and medium sized enterprises. Decision Support Systems, 26, 125-135.
  • KANGAS, J., KURTTILA, M., KAJANUS, M., KANGAS, A. (2003). Evaluating the management strategies of a forestland estate-the S-O-S approach. Journal of
  • Environmental Management, 69, 349-358. KAJANUS, M., KANGAS, J., KURTTILA, M. (2004). The use of value focused thinking and the A’WOT hybrid method in tourism management. Tourism Management, 25, 499-506.
  • KURTTILA, M., PEASONEN, M., KANGAS, J., KAJANUS, M. (2000). Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis-a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. Forest Policy and Economics, 41-52.
  • LEE, S.F., LO, K.K. (2003). e-Enterprise and management course development using strategy formulations framework for vocational education. Journal of
  • Materials Processing Technology, 139, 604-612. LESKINEN, L.A., LESKINEN, P., KURTTILA, M., KANGAS, J., KAJANUS, M. (2006). Adapting modern strategic decision support tools in the participatory strategy process-a case study of a forest research station. Forest Policy and Economics, 8(3), 267-278.
  • MASOZERA, M.K., ALAVALAPATI, J.R.R., JACOBSON, S.K., SHRESTA, R.K. (2004). Assessing the suitability of community-based management for the Nyungwe Forest Reserve, Rwanda. Forest Policy and Economics, Article In Pres.
  • SAATY, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill International Book Company, U.S.A.
  • SAATY, T. L. (1991). Some Mathematical Concepts of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Behaviormetrika, 29, 1-9.
  • SHRESTHA, R.K., ALAVALAPATI, J.R.R., KALMBACHER, R.S. (2004). Exploring the potential for silvopasture adoption in South-central Florida: an application of SWOT-AHP method. Agricultural Systems, 81, 185-199.
  • STEWART, R., MOARMED, S., DAET, R. (2002). Strategic implementation of IT/IS projects in construction: a case study. Automation in Construction, 11, 681-694.
  • ÜLGEN, H., MİRZE, S.K. (2004). İşletmelerde Stratejik Yönetim, Literatür Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • WEIHRICH, H. (1982). The TOWS matrix-a tool for situational analysis. J. Long Range Plan, 15 (2).
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

İhsan Yüksel This is me

Adnan Akın This is me

Publication Date July 1, 2006
Published in Issue Year 2006 Volume: 7 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Yüksel, İ., & Akın, A. (2006). ANALİTİK HİYERARŞİ PROSES YÖNTEMİYLE İŞLETMELERDE STRATEJİ BELİRLEME. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 7(2), 254-268.